find the length of the third side. if necessary, round to the nearest tenth. 12 5

Solution:

The difference of cubes identity is

if a and b are any two real numbers, then difference of their cubes, when taken individually:

a³-b³= (a-b)(a² + ab + b²)→→→Option (D) is

true option.

I will show you, how this identity is valid.

Taking RHS

(a-b)(a² +b²+ab)

= a (a² +b²+ab)-b(a² +b²+ab)

= a³ + a b² +a²b -b a² -b³-ab² Cancelling like terms, we get

= a³-b³

= LHS

if c is a irrational number that means a or b is also an irrational number or both of them are irrational numbers but they are different then each other

i hope that will help

There are two possible answers:

You can only pick one of those two cases. In short, exactly one of the 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational. Both 'a' and b cannot be rational together, and they both cannot be irrational together.

================================================

Explanation:

For a moment, let's say that 'a' and b are both rational numbers. This means they would be ratios of integers. So,

a = p/q

b = r/s

where p,q,r,s are integers. The denominators q & s cannot be zero.

Multiplying those rational numbers 'a' and b leads to

a*b = (p/q)*(r/s) = (p*r)/(q*s)

We get a result in the form of integer/integer. Recall that multiplying any two integers leads to some other integer. Since (p*r)/(q*s) is a ratio of integers, it is rational and that makes a*b = c to be rational. However, your teacher said that c is irrational which is the opposite of rational.

In short, if both 'a' and b are rational, then a*b = c is rational. This means we know for certain that both 'a' and b cannot be both rational for c to be irrational.

------------------------

Next, we'll consider 'a' and b to both be irrational. Is it possible to have a*b = c to be irrational as well? It depends.

If we have the following

a = sqrt(3)

b = sqrt(12)

then,

a*b = sqrt(3)*sqrt(12) = sqrt(3*12) = sqrt(36) = 6

Showing that a*b is rational because 6 = 6/1 is a ratio of integers. This is a bit strange considering how 'a' and b themselves were irrational, but they led to a rational product.

This doesn't always happen since something like

sqrt(3)*sqrt(5) = sqrt(3*5) = sqrt(15)

is irrational. So if both 'a' and b are irrational together, then a*b could be rational or it could be irrational. We would need more information about the values of 'a' and b.

Therefore, we know that we can rule out the case that 'a' and b are irrational together.

------------------------

Lastly, we'll consider the case when one of 'a' or b is rational while the other is irrational. The order doesn't matter. So we'll make 'a' to be irrational and b to be rational.

Since b is rational, this means b = p/q for some integers p,q where q is nonzero. The value of 'a' cannot be written as a ratio like this because it is irrational.

Multiplying any nonzero rational number with an irrational one always leads to an irrational result. If a*b was rational, then we could say

a*b = r/s

a*(p/q) = r/s

a = (r/s)*(q/p)

a = (r*q)/(s*p)

Showing that 'a' is rational, but this contradicts the fact we made 'a' to be irrational at the top of this section. Therefore, a*b is always irrational if exactly one of 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational.

In other words, if,

then a*b = c is irrational

Answer:

3.259259259259 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3 7/27

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok so first you do

2×1 = 2, then

2×2/9 = 4/9, then

1×2/3 = 2/3, then

2/3×2/9 = 4/27, then add all of those...

2+4/9+2/3+4/27= 3 7/27    

Hope this helps!! :D

The Answer is (6x^2+7x+2)

Use the FOIL method

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

3x/6=36

3x=36(6)

3x=216

x=216/3

x=72

Answer:

22+34i

Step-by-step explanation:

Brainliest?

Answer:

22+34i

Step-by-step explanation:

(12+9i)+(10+25i)

12+9i+10+25i

12+10+9i+25i

22+34i

Answer:

r= -sec(θ) x ∛2

θ=0

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

11 1/4 divided by 3= 3.75 (3 3/4)

Answer:

d) [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex] pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi there!

What we know:

- Sarah has [tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex] pounds of dog food

- Sarah is dividing this into 3 containers

1) Convert [tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex] into an improper fraction

[tex]11 \frac{1}{4}[/tex]

Multiply the whole number by the denominator

11 × 4 = 44

Add 44 to the numerator

44 + 1 = 45

[tex]\frac{45}{4}[/tex]

2) Divide [tex]\frac{45}{4}[/tex] by 3

[tex]\frac{45}{4} / 3[/tex]

Dividing by a number is the same as multiplying its reciprocal

[tex]= \frac{45}{4} *\frac{1}{3}[/tex]

Multiply the numerators and the denominators

[tex]45*1 = 45\\4*3 = 12[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{45}{12}[/tex]

3) Convert [tex]\frac{45}{12}[/tex] into a mixed number fraction

[tex]\frac{45}{12}[/tex] ⇒ [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex]

Therefore, there will be [tex]3\frac{3}{4}[/tex] pounds of food in each container.

I hope this helps!

Answer:

3/4 h

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

First we can write the equation to find the surface area of a rectangular prism[tex]A = 2(w*l+h*l+h*w)[/tex]

Now rewrite filling in variables

[tex]A = 2(3*5+8*5+8*3)[/tex]

Solve. Keep in mind the order of operations

After solving, you should get 158.

Since these measurements were done in inches, we need to add inches/in to the end.

Also, since it is area, we need to add ²

158 in²

Answer:7

Step-by-step explanation: 3 1/4 is equal to 13/4. When dividing fractions, you switch the numerator and denominator in the second fraction and change the symbol to a multiplication symbol. You then multiply straight across and then divide the top number by the bottom number. The whole number is how many times you can divide it equally

Answer:

231

Step-by-step explanation:

TB equals 90 bc it's a 90 degree angle. To get BD you need to subtract 180 and 90 bc half of a circle equals 180. Do the same to find DC but it's 180-129. Then to find TBC you add all of those together.

Answer:

5 * 4 * 2 = 40 cubic centimeters

Step-by-step explanation:

Step-by-step explanation:

5k×8×20

_______ =800

100

Answer:

≈ 23305

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount A is calculated as

A = P [tex](1+r)^{t}[/tex]

P is the principal

r is the interest rate

t is the time in years

A = 5000 [tex](1+0.08)^{20}[/tex]

   = 5000 [tex](1.08)^{20}[/tex]

   ≈ 23305 ( to the nearest whole number )

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

336 square units

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for a triangle is 1/2 * height *base

Step-by-step explanation:

Therefore, 180/280 simplified to lowest terms is 9/14.

I hope it's helpful for you.....

Answer:

Impossible

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

At 10 percent significance level, there is not enough statistical evidence to suggest that there is a difference between mean

a. The decision rule for 5% level of confidence is;

For test statistic is less than 2.306 we fail to reject the null hypothesis

For a test statistic larger than 2.306 we reject the null hypothesis

b. The test statistic is approximately -1.2008

Step-by-step explanation:

The given data are;

No; 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

East Side Shop; 548, 493, 609, 567, 432

West Side Shop; 523, 721, 695, 510, 532

Therefore, we have;

The mean for the East Side Shop, [tex]\overline x_1[/tex] = 529.8

The standard deviation for the East Side Shop, s₁ = 68.751

The mean for the West Side Shop, [tex]\overline x_2[/tex] = 596.2

The standard deviation for the West Side Shop, s₂ = 102.7701

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2})}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^{2} }{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

Therefore, we have;

The null hypothesis is H₀; μ₂ - μ₁ = 0

The alternative hypothesis is Hₐ; μ₂ - μ₁ ≠ 0

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(529.8-596.2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{68.751^{2} }{5}+\dfrac{102.7701^{2}}{5}}} \approx -1.2008[/tex]

At degrees of freedom, df = n₁ + n₂ - 2 = 8, we have the critical-t = 1.895

Given that the critical-t is more than test statistic, we do not reject the null hypothesis, therefore, there is not enough statistical evidence to suggest that there is a difference between mean

Required;

a. At 5% level, we have critical-t = 2.306

Therefore, the decision rule for 5% level of confidence is that we fail to reject the null hypothesis when the magnitude of the test statistic is less than 2.306 and we reject the null hypothesis for a test statistic larger than 2.306

b. The test statistic is given as follows;

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(\bar{x}_{1}-\bar{x}_{2})}{\sqrt{\dfrac{s_1^{2} }{n_{1}}+\dfrac{s{2}^{2}}{n_{2}}}}[/tex]

[tex]t_0=\dfrac{(529.8-596.2)}{\sqrt{\dfrac{68.751^{2} }{5}+\dfrac{102.7701^{2}}{5}}} \approx -1.2008[/tex]

Answer:

6.11 or 6.12

Step-by-step explanation:

You will have to divide 116.25 by 19

to find the length Mr.Rice will need to purchase

which is 6.11842105

Answer:

Present value (PV) is the current value of a future sum of money or stream of cash flows given a specified rate of return. Future cash flows are discounted at the discount rate, and the higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of the future cash flows.

How to find PV:Calculating present value is called discounting. Discounting cash flows, like our $25,000, simply means that we take inflation and the fact that money can earn interest into account.

...

Calculating Present Value Using the Formula

FV = the future value.

i = interest rate.

t = number of time periods.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Present value, also known as discounted value, is a financial calculation that measures the worth of a future amount of money or stream of payments in today’s dollars adjusted for interest and inflation. In other words, it compares the buying power of one future dollar to purchasing power of one today

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

height = 26.96 feet

Step-by-step explanation:

sin 64° = height/30

0.8988 = height/30

height = 26.96 feet

Answer:

18.9

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Last option, $58.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's look at the graph, and let's do a simple analysis of the information that it shows.

We can see that in 2009, the price was between $30 and $40.

We can see that as the years pass by, the price increases, such that in the year 2013 the selling price spikes and ranges between a bit less than $50 to a little more than $50.

Then we can only expect that a few years later (in 2016) the price to be larger than $50.

The only option that has a price larger than $50 is the last one, $58.50, then that one is the only option that can be the correct one.

We also could do an exact calculation of this if we had the raw data, but as you can see in the graph, we can not know the exact price of each graphed point (we can only estimate it) so we will not get a nice interpolation by only using the given graph.

Answer:

I think Cube

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Hi! The answer to your question is B. {[tex]{-3, -13}[/tex]}

Step-by-step explanation:

☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆☆*: .｡..｡.:*☆

☆Brainliest is greatly appreciated!☆

Hope this helps!!

- Brooklynn Deka

Answer:

210 is answer when bases are same. powers should be added

Step-by-step explanation:

it's basically indicesis basically in this is so it was multiplication addition rule that you use