find g[h(-2)] from f(x)=x^(2),g(x)=5x , h(x)=x+4

Answer:

tourist: 28%

non-tourist: 72%

Step-by-step explanation:

total: 50

tourists: 14

non-tourists:50 - 14 = 36

tourist percentage: 14/50 × 100% = 28%

non-tourist percentage: 36/50 × 100 = 72%

The value of the quadratic function y = x² - 4x + 3 is determined by substituting the given value of x into the equation and performing the necessary calculations.

1. Start with the quadratic function: y = x² - 4x + 3.

2. Determine the value of x for which you want to find the value of y.

3. Substitute the given value of x into the equation.

4. Perform the necessary calculations to simplify the expression.

5. Evaluate the expression to find the value of y.

For example, let's find the value of y when x = 2:

1. Start with the quadratic function: y = x² - 4x + 3.

2. We want to find the value of y when x = 2.

3. Substitute x = 2 into the equation: y = (2)² - 4(2) + 3.

4. Simplify the expression: y = 4 - 8 + 3.

5. Perform the necessary calculations: y = -1.

6. Therefore, when x = 2, the value of the quadratic function y = x² - 4x + 3 is -1.

For more such questions on quadratic, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ11

Answer:

y = (-1/6)x represents a proportional relationship.

The output value is feasible. The input value is not feasible, the possible solution of (6.5, $17.50) does not make sense for this function. The correct answer is No. The input is not feasible.

Jade decided to rent movies for a movie marathon over the weekend.

The function g(x) represents the amount of money spent in dollars, where x is the number of movies.

The given function is g(x) which represents the amount of money spent in dollars, where x is the number of movies.

The solution given is (6.5, $17.50).

We need to find whether the solution makes sense for the given function or not.

The input is given as 6.5 and the output is given as $17.50.

This means that Jade rented 6.5 movies and spent $17.50 on renting those movies.

To check whether the solution makes sense or not, we need to see if the input and output values are feasible or not.

The input value 6.5 is not a feasible value because it is not possible to rent half a movie.

Jade can rent 6 movies or 7 movies but not 6.5 movies.

Therefore, the input value is not feasible.

On the other hand, the output value $17.50 is a feasible value because it is possible for Jade to spend $17.50 on renting 6 movies.

The output value is feasible.

Since the input value is not feasible, the possible solution of (6.5, $17.50) does not make sense for this function. The correct answer is No. The input is not feasible.

For more related questions on feasible:

https://brainly.com/question/32957392

#SPJ8

162

Step-by-step explanation:

(12 square - 15 + 17) + 16

=(144 - 15 + 17) + 16

=146 + 16

=162

Answer:

1. 9 2/7 = (63+2)/7 = 65/7

2. 2 4/5 = (10+4)/5 = 14/5

3. 65/7 * 14/5 = 910/35 = 26

The total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

To determine the cost of the pita bread and hummus dips, Toula can use the following expressions:

Cost of pita bread:

Number of crates needed = (150 bags) / (50 bags/crate) = 3 crates

Cost of each crate = $15.00

Total cost of pita bread = (Number of crates needed) × (Cost of each crate) = 3 crates × $15.00/crate = $45.00

Cost of hummus dips:

Number of boxes needed = (65 containers) / (5 containers/box) = 13 boxes

Cost of each box = $20.00

Total cost of hummus dips = (Number of boxes needed) × (Cost of each box) = 13 boxes × $20.00/box = $260.00

Therefore, the expressions Toula can use to determine the costs are:

Cost of pita bread = 3 crates × $15.00/crate

Cost of hummus dips = 13 boxes × $20.00/box

The total cost will be the sum of the costs of pita bread and hummus dips:

Total cost = Cost of pita bread + Cost of hummus dips

Total cost = $45.00 + $260.00

Total cost = $305.00

Therefore, the total cost of the pita bread and hummus dips will be $305.00.

for such more question on cost

https://brainly.com/question/8993267

#SPJ8

If Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag, she will be able to sell a total of 12 bags of pears at the Saturday market.

To represent the number of bags of pears, b, that Natalie sells at the Saturday market, we can use the following equation:

b = total_number_of_pears / pears_per_bag

In this equation, "total_number_of_pears" represents the total quantity of pears Natalie has, and "pears_per_bag" represents the number of pears she puts in each bag.

Given that Natalie has a total of 48 pears, we can substitute the value into the equation:

b = 48 / pears_per_bag

Now, we need to determine the number of pears she puts in each bag. The information provided states that Natalie sells bags of pears, and each bag is sold for $5. However, the specific number of pears per bag is not given. To proceed, we need this information.

Let's assume that Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag. We can substitute this value into the equation:

b = 48 / 4

Simplifying the equation gives:

b = 12

So, if Natalie puts 4 pears in each bag, she will be able to sell a total of 12 bags of pears at the Saturday market.

It's important to note that the specific value of "pears_per_bag" will affect the final result. If Natalie puts a different number of pears in each bag, the equation will yield a different number of bags sold.

For more such questions on sell visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24951536

#SPJ8

Answer:

Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve the inequality x - 5 + 2 < 20, we can simplify it step by step:

x - 5 + 2 < 20

Combine like terms:

x - 3 < 20

Add 3 to both sides of the inequality:

x - 3 + 3 < 20 + 3

Simplify:

x < 23

The solution to the inequality is x < 23.

Therefore, the correct answer is: x < 23.

Answer and Step-by-step explanation:

Please see the photo for the solution :)

Answer:

x = 4

m<AXC = 150

Step-by-step explanation:

m<1 + m<2 = m<AXC

102 + 10x + 8 = 6(6x + 1)

10x + 110 = 36x + 6

26x = 104

x = 4

m<AXC = 6(6x + 1)

m<AXC = 6(24 + 1)

m<AXC = 150

Answer:

In summary, the faster cyclist cycles at a speed of 18 mi/h since they travel 36 of the 54 miles in 2 hours while cycling twice as fast as the slower cyclist.

Explanationn:

The two cyclists are 54 miles apart and heading toward each other.

One cyclist cycles 2 times as fast as the other. We will call the faster cyclist A and the slower cyclist B.

They meet 2 hours after starting. This means they travel a total distance of 54 miles in 2 hours.

Since cyclist, A cycles 2 times as fast as cyclist B, cyclist A travels 2/3 of the total distance, and cyclist B travels 1/3 of the total distance.

In two hours, cyclist A travels (2/3) * 54 miles = 36 miles.

We need to find the speed of cyclist A in miles per hour.

Speed = Distance / Time

So the speed of cyclist A is:

36 miles / 2 hours = 18 miles per hour

Therefore, the speed of the faster cyclist is 18 mi/h.

The radius of the circle is 25 inches. The length of arc with a central angle of 138° is 115π/6 in

An equation is an expression that shows how numbers and variables are related to each other using mathematical operators.

The length of an arc with a central angle Ф with circle radius (r) is given by:

Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr

Given the length of arc as 115π/6 in and angle of 138°, hence:

Length of arc = (Ф/360) * 2πr

Substituting:

115π/6 = (138/360) * 2πr

r = 25 inches

The radius of the circle is 25 inches.

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ1

The appropriate shape to model each section of the tower are the cone and the cylinder.

The approximate surface area of each shape would be =

For cone = 1,041.27m²

For cylinder = 3,543.72m².

The first shape is a cone and the formula for the surface area = A = πr(r+√h²+r²)

where;

Radius = 24/2 = 12

height = 10m

Area = 1,041.27m²

For cylinder:

A = 2πrh+2πr²

where:

r = 12m

h = 35m

A = 3,543.72m²

Learn more about area here:

https://brainly.com/question/28470545

#SPJ1

Answer:

A scale is just another way of saying what we want to count by on our graph.

Step-by-step explanation:

A "scale" is just another way of saying what we want to count by on our graph. The scale is the range of values that are shown on the axis of a graph. It helps to determine the size and spacing of the intervals or ticks on the axis. The scale can be in different units, such as time, distance, weight, or any other measurable quantity depending on the type of data being represented in the graph.

The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).

To determine the vertices of the image N'M'O' after reflecting triangle NMO over the line x = -1, we need to apply the reflection transformation to each vertex.

For a reflection over the line x = -1, we can find the image of a point (x, y) by finding its reflection as (2(-1) - x, y).

Applying this transformation to each vertex of triangle NMO, we get:

N' = (2(-1) - (-5), 2) = (5, 2)

M' = (2(-1) - (-2), 1) = (2, 1)

O' = (2(-1) - (-3), 3) = (3, 3)

The vertices of the image triangle N'M'O' are N'(5, 2), M'(2, 1), and O'(3, 3).

For more such questions on Triangle

https://brainly.com/question/1058720

#SPJ8

Answer$535.50

Step-by-step explanation:

15% is equal to .15

So, multiply 600.00x .15=90

                   600.00 - 90.0=510.
                   510. 00x .05=25.50

                   510.00+25.50=535.50

                   Your answer is $535.5

The hourly wage, the number of hours and the number of days Jaxon works indicates that the amount Jaxon gets paid is $192

The formula for hourly wage can be presented as follows;

Hourly wage  = Total earnings/Total hours worked

The question in the link is presented as follows;

Jaxon gets paid $6 an hour. He works for 8 hours each day for four days. How much will Jaxon get paid

The amount Jaxon gets paid per hour (his hourly wage) = $6

The number of hours he works each day = 8 hours

The number of days Jaxon works = Four days

The amount Jaxin gets paid = Hourly wage × Hours per day × Number of days

Therefore we get;

Amount he gets paid = $6 per hour × 8 hours/day × 4 days = $192

Learn more on hourly wage here: https://brainly.com/question/11641574

#SPJ1

The equation of the line parallel to the line passing through (1, -2) and (-4, 3) and passing through the point (-4, -5) is y = -x - 9 in slope-intercept form.

To find the equation of a line parallel to a given line, we need to determine the slope of the given line and then use it to construct the equation of the parallel line.

First, let's calculate the slope of the given line passing through points (1, -2) and (-4, 3). The slope, denoted as m, can be found using the slope formula:

m = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

Substituting the coordinates, we have:

m = (3 - (-2)) / (-4 - 1) = 5 / (-5) = -1

Now that we have the slope, we can use it to construct the equation of the parallel line.

We'll use the point-slope form of a linear equation, which is:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

where (x1, y1) represents the coordinates of a point on the line.

We'll use the point (-4, -5) on the parallel line:

y - (-5) = -1(x - (-4))

y + 5 = -1(x + 4)

Simplifying further:

y + 5 = -x - 4

y = -x - 9

For similar question on line parallel.

https://brainly.com/question/30097515  

#SPJ8

a) Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their accounts.

b) Heather's investment is approximately $273,714.17, while Lesley's investment is approximately $191,048.18 when they are 65 years old.

c) Heather has more money by approximately $82,665.99 at age 65.

a) To find out how much money Heather and Lesley contributed to their accounts, we need to calculate the total contributions made by each of them.

Heather:

Heather started investing at age 20 and stopped at age 65, contributing $3000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 20) = 45 years.

Total contributions by Heather = $3000 × 45 = $135,000.

Lesley:

Lesley started investing at age 40 and stopped at age 65, contributing $6000 annually. The number of years she contributed is (65 - 40) = 25 years.

Total contributions by Lesley = $6000 × 25 = $150,000.

Therefore, Heather contributed $135,000 and Lesley contributed $150,000 to their respective accounts.

b) To calculate the value of their investments at age 65, we can use the formula for compound interest:

Future Value = Principal × (1 + interest rate)^number of years

Heather:

Principal (initial investment) = $3000

Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)

Number of years = 65 - 20 = 45

Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1 + 0.075)^45

Lesley:

Principal (initial investment) = $6000

Interest rate = 7.5% = 0.075 (converted to decimal)

Number of years = 65 - 40 = 25

Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1 + 0.075)^25

Calculating these values:

Future Value of Heather's investment = $3000 × (1.075)^45 ≈ $273,714.17

Future Value of Lesley's investment = $6000 × (1.075)^25 ≈ $191,048.18

c) To determine who has more money at age 65 and by how much, we compare the future values of their investments.

Heather's investment value at age 65 = $273,714.17

Lesley's investment value at age 65 = $191,048.18

Therefore, Heather has more money at age 65, and the difference in their investments is approximately $273,714.17 - $191,048.18 = $82,665.99.

for such more question on Heather's investment

https://brainly.com/question/1400500

#SPJ8

Answer:

A.

3.25x + 13.50 ≤ 40

Step-by-step explanation:

a)  the value of the tractor after two years is $10,400.

b)  the value of the tractor after six years is $5,200.

To find the value of the tractor after a certain number of years, we can substitute the value of t into the equation v = -1,300t + 13,000.

a) After two years:

Substituting t = 2 into the equation, we get:

v = -1,300(2) + 13,000

v = -2,600 + 13,000

v = 10,400

Therefore, the value of the tractor after two years is $10,400.

b) After six years:

Substituting t = 6 into the equation, we get:

v = -1,300(6) + 13,000

v = -7,800 + 13,000

v = 5,200

Therefore, the value of the tractor after six years is $5,200.

To find when the tractor will have no value, we need to find the value of t when v = 0. We can set the equation v = -1,300t + 13,000 equal to 0 and solve for t:

-1,300t + 13,000 = 0

-1,300t = -13,000

t = -13,000 / -1,300

t = 10

Therefore, the tractor will have no value after 10 years.

For more such question on value visit:

https://brainly.com/question/843074

#SPJ8

The domain for the time in this context is (0, 7.4)

An equation is an expression that shows how numbers and variables are related to each other using mathematical operators.

Let h represent the height of the ball after spending t seconds. A ball is thrown straight up from the top of a building that is 168 ft high with an initial velocity of 96 ft/s.

Given the equation:

h(t) = -16t² + 96t + 168

The reasonable domain restriction for t, is when  the height of the rocket is above the ground. Hence the domain for the time in this context is (0, 7.4)

Find out more on equation at: https://brainly.com/question/29174899

#SPJ1

y" = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y) by implicit differentiation.

To find the second derivative (y") by implicit differentiation, we will differentiate the equation with respect to x twice.

Equation: cos(y) + sin(x) = 1

Differentiating once with respect to x using the chain rule:

-sin(y) * dy/dx + cos(x) = 0

Now, differentiating again with respect to x:

Differentiating the first term:

-d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(y) * d^2y/dx^2

Differentiating the second term:

-d/dx(cos(x)) = -(-sin(x)) = sin(x)

The equation becomes:

-d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(y) * d^2y/dx^2 + sin(x) = 0

Now, let's isolate the second derivative, d^2y/dx^2:

-d^2y/dx^2 = d/dx(sin(y)) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

Substituting the previously obtained expression for d/dx(sin(y)) = cos(y):

-d^2y/dx^2 = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

Thus, the second derivative (y") by the equation:

y" = cos(y) * dy/dx - sin(x) + sin(y)

For more such questions on implicit differentiation

https://brainly.com/question/25081524

#SPJ8

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Yes, because for each input there is exactly one output. You can have two of the same x values but you cannot have 2 of the same y values. if you have two of the same y values, it is not a function as it doesn't pass the vertical line test.

After 300 trials, the experimental probabilities may not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, with more trials, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities for closer alignment.

To examine whether experimental probabilities after 300 trials align closely with theoretical probabilities, let's consider an example of flipping a fair coin.

Theoretical probability: When flipping a fair coin, the theoretical probability of obtaining heads or tails is 0.5 each. This assumes that the coin is unbiased and has an equal chance of landing on either side.

Experimental probability: After conducting 300 trials of flipping the coin, we record the outcomes and calculate the experimental probabilities. Let's assume that heads occurred 160 times and tails occurred 140 times.

Experimental probability of heads: 160/300 = 0.5333

Experimental probability of tails: 140/300 = 0.4667

Comparing the experimental probabilities to the theoretical probabilities, we can observe that the experimental probability of heads is slightly higher than the theoretical probability, while the experimental probability of tails is slightly lower.

In this particular example, the experimental probabilities after 300 trials do not align perfectly with the theoretical probabilities. However, it is important to note that these differences can be attributed to sampling variability, as the experimental outcomes are subject to random fluctuations.

To draw a more definitive conclusion about the alignment between experimental and theoretical probabilities, a larger number of trials would need to be conducted. As the number of trials increases, the experimental probabilities tend to converge towards the theoretical probabilities, providing a closer alignment between the two.

For more such information on: probabilities

https://brainly.com/question/30390037

#SPJ8  

The question probable may be:

Do experimental probabilities after 300 trials tend to align closely with theoretical probabilities? Consider an example scenario and calculate both the theoretical and experimental probabilities to determine if they are close.

The statement "1 is NOT in the domain" is true because for the function f(x), the expression x - 7 results in division by zero when x equals 1, which makes 1 not a valid input for the function.

To determine if a value is in the domain of a function, we need to consider any restrictions or limitations on the input values.

For the function f(x) = √(x - 7), the square root function is defined only for non-negative values.

Therefore, the expression (x - 7) inside the square root must be greater than or equal to zero. In other words, x - 7 ≥ 0.

Solving this inequality, we find x ≥ 7.

This means that any value of x that is greater than or equal to 7 is in the domain of f(x).

However, the statement is asking specifically about the value 1.

Since 1 is less than 7, it does not satisfy the inequality x ≥ 7 and is therefore not in the domain of f(x).

Similarly, for the function g(x) = 4x - 8, there are no restrictions on the domain.

Any real number can be substituted into the function, including the value 1.

Therefore, the statement "1 isn't in the domain of f(0) g" is not accurate.

It is true that 1 is not in the domain of f(x), but it is in the domain of g(x).

In summary, the correct statement is that "1 is not in the domain."

For similar question on domain.

https://brainly.com/question/26098895  

#SPJ8

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: