Express the limit as a definite integral. [Hint: Consider
f(x) = x8.]
lim n→[infinity]
n 3i8
n9
sum.gif
i = 1

To show that powertm is undecidable, we will reduce the acceptance problem of an arbitrary Turing machine to powertm.

Let M be an arbitrary Turing machine and let w be a string. We construct a new Turing machine N as follows:

N starts by computing the binary representation of |w|.

N then simulates M on w.

If M accepts w, N generates a sequence of |w| 1's and halts. Otherwise, N generates a sequence of |w| 0's and halts.

Now, we claim that N is in powertm if and only if M accepts w.

If M accepts w, then the length of the binary representation of |w| is a power of 2. Moreover, since M halts on input w, the sequence generated by N will consist of |w| 1's. Therefore, N is in powertm.

If M does not accept w, then the length of the binary representation of |w| is not a power of 2. Moreover, since M does not halt on input w, the sequence generated by N will consist of |w| 0's. Therefore, N is not in powertm.

Therefore, we have reduced the acceptance problem of an arbitrary Turing machine to powertm. Since the acceptance problem is undecidable, powertm must also be undecidable.

To know more about rice’s theorem refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/17176332

#SPJ11

The answer of the given question based on the Triangle is the length of AC is approximately 12.81 centimeters (rounded to the nearest tenth of a centimeter).

We have,

The Pythagorean theorem is  mathematical principle that relates to three sides of right triangle. It states that in  right triangle, square of length of hypotenuse (side opposite the right angle) is equal to sum of the squares of the lengths of other two sides.

Since ABCD is a kite, we know that AC and BD are diagonals of the kite, and they intersect at right angles. Let E be the point where AC and BD intersect. Also, since DE = EB, we know that triangle EDB is Equilateral.

We can use Pythagorean theorem to find length of AC. Let's call length of AC "x". Then we have:

(AD)² + (CD)² = (AC)² (by Pythagorean theorem in triangle ACD)

Substituting the given values, we get:

(8)² + (10)² = (x)²

64 + 100 = x²

164 = x²

Taking square root of both sides, we will get:

x ≈ 12.81

Therefore, the length of AC is approximately 12.81 centimeters (rounded to the nearest tenth of a centimeter).

To know more about Right triangle visit:

brainly.com/question/24050780

#SPJ1

The numerator and denominator cancel out, leaving us with: 1. Therefore, the simplified form of (1/1)-(1/cos2x) is simply 1.

To simplify the expression (1/1)-(1/cos2x), we need to find a common denominator for the two fractions. The LCD is cos^2x, so we can rewrite the expression as:

(cos^2x/cos^2x) - (1/cos^2x)

Combining the numerators, we get:

(cos^2x - 1)/cos^2x

Recall the identity cos^2x + sin^2x = 1, which we can rewrite as:

cos^2x = 1 - sin^2x

Substituting this expression for cos^2x in our original expression, we get:

(1 - sin^2x)/(1 - sin^2x)

Learn more about fractions at: brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ11

1.20 moles of Li3N can be theoretically produced from the given amounts of Li and N2.

The balanced chemical equation for the reaction is:

6 Li + 2 N2 → 2 Li3N

The molar mass of Li is 6.94 g/mol and the molar mass of N2 is 28.02 g/mol. Using these molar masses, we can convert the given masses of Li and N2 into moles:

moles of Li = 12.3 g / 6.94 g/mol = 1.77 mol

moles of N2 = 33.6 g / 28.02 g/mol = 1.20 mol

According to the balanced chemical equation, 6 moles of Li react with 2 moles of N2 to produce 2 moles of Li3N. So the limiting reactant is N2, and the maximum number of moles of Li3N that can be formed is given by the stoichiometry of the reaction:

moles of Li3N = 2/2 * 1.20 mol = 1.20 mol

Therefore, 1.20 moles of Li3N can be theoretically produced from the given amounts of Li and N2.

To know more about moles refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/20486415?#

#SPJ11

A diagonal matrix can only be orthogonal if all of its diagonal entries are either 1 or -1.

For a matrix to be orthogonal, it must satisfy the condition that its transpose is equal to its inverse. For a diagonal matrix, the transpose is simply the matrix itself, since all off-diagonal entries are zero. Therefore, for a diagonal matrix to be orthogonal, its inverse must also be equal to itself. This means that the diagonal entries must be either 1 or -1, since those are the only values that are their own inverses. Any other diagonal entry would result in a different value when its inverse is taken, and thus the matrix would not be orthogonal. It's worth noting that not all diagonal matrices are orthogonal. For example, a diagonal matrix with all positive diagonal entries would not be orthogonal, since its inverse would have different diagonal entries. The only way for a diagonal matrix to be orthogonal is if all of its diagonal entries are either 1 or -1.

Learn more about orthogonal here

https://brainly.com/question/30772550

#SPJ11

The correct constraint for demand at Seattle is given as c) [tex]x_1_1 + x_2_1 + x_3_1 + x_4_1 + x_5_1[/tex]>= 30,000.

This constraint indicates that the total demand for Seattle (represented by the sum of variables ) [tex]x_1_1 + x_2_1 + x_3_1 + x_4_1 + x_5_1[/tex]must be at least 30,000 units, ensuring that the demand is met or exceeded.

The constraint c) [tex]x_1_1 + x_2_1 + x_3_1 + x_4_1 + x_5_1[/tex] >= 30,000 represents the minimum demand for Seattle.

The variables ([tex]x_1_1 + x_2_1 + x_3_1 + x_4_1 + x_5_1[/tex]) signify supplies from various sources to Seattle.

The inequality ensures that the total supply sent to Seattle meets or surpasses the 30,000-unit demand.

Read more about demand constraints here:

https://brainly.com/question/1420762
#SPJ1

The torque about the origin is 1470 N·m in the positive z-direction.

To determine the torque about the origin, we need to first find the position vector of the force with respect to the origin, and then take the cross product of the position vector and the force.

The position vector of the force is given by:

r = (-2.7, -2.3, 0) - (-4.8, 4.4, 0) = (2.1, -6.7, 0) m

The force is given by:

F = y = (0, 100, 0) N

Taking the cross product of r and F, we get:

τ = r × F = (2.1, -6.7, 0) × (0, 100, 0) = (0, 0, 1470) N·m

Therefore, the torque about the origin is 1470 N·m in the positive z-direction.

Learn more about torque here:

https://brainly.com/question/25708791

#SPJ11

The image will be virtual, upright, and reduced in size.

A convex mirror always forms virtual images, meaning the light rays do not actually converge to form an image but appear to diverge from a virtual image point.

The image formed by a convex mirror is always upright and reduced, regardless of the position of the object in front of the mirror.

In this case, since the object is placed at a distance of f/2 from the mirror, which is less than the focal length of the mirror, the image will be formed at a distance greater than the focal length behind the mirror.

This implies that the image will be virtual, upright, and reduced in size.

Therefore, the correct answer is: upright and reduced.

Learn more about virtual images

brainly.com/question/12538517

#SPJ11

The mean of 3X is 6 and the variance of 3X is 36

Let X and Y be independent random variables with μX = 2, σX = 2, μY = 2, and σY = 3. To find the mean and variance of 3X, we can use the properties of linear transformations for means and variances.

The mean of 3X is found by multiplying the original mean of X (μX) by the scalar value (3):
Mean of 3X = 3 * μX = 3 * 2 = 6

The variance of 3X is found by squaring the scalar value (3) and then multiplying it by the original variance of X (σX²):
Variance of 3X = (3^2) * σX² = 9 * (2^2) = 9 * 4 = 36

To learn more about : mean

https://brainly.com/question/1136789

#SPJ11

1. Mean of 3X = 3 * μX = 3 * 2 = 6
2. Variance of 3X = (3^2) * σX^2 = 9 * (2^2) = 9 * 4 = 36

To find the mean and variance of 3X, we use the following properties:
Since X and Y are independent random variables with given means (μX and μY) and standard deviations (σX and σY), we can find the mean and variance of 3X.
Mean: E(aX) = aE(X)
Variance: Var(aX) = a^2Var(X)

Using these properties, we can find the mean and variance of 3X as follows:

Mean:
E(3X) = 3E(X) = 3(2) = 6
Therefore, the mean of 3X is 6.

Variance:
Var(3X) = (3^2)Var(X) = 9(2^2) = 36
Therefore, the variance of 3X is 36.

Learn more about Variance:

brainly.com/question/13708253

#SPJ11

A toxicologist aiming to determine the lethal dosages for an industrial feedstock chemical based on exposure data would most likely utilize logistic regression.

So, the correct answer is D.

This modeling technique is appropriate because it helps predict the probability of an event, such as lethality, occurring given a set of independent variables like exposure levels.

Unlike linear regression, which assumes a linear relationship between variables, logistic regression is suitable for binary outcomes.

Polynomial regression and ANOVA may not be ideal in this case, as they focus on modeling different relationships between variables.

Scatterplots, on the other hand, are a graphical tool for data visualization and not a modeling technique.

Hence the answer of the question is D.

Learn more about exposure data at

https://brainly.com/question/30167575

#SPJ11

The triple integral to be evaluated is ∫∫∫[tex]E y dV,[/tex] where E is bounded by the planes x=0, y=0, z=0, and 2x+2y+z=4.

To evaluate the given triple integral, we need to first determine the limits of integration for x, y, and z. The plane equations x=0, y=0, and z=0 represent the coordinate axes, and the plane equation 2x+2y+z=4 can be rewritten as z=4-2x-2y. Thus, the limits of integration for x, y, and z are 0 ≤ x ≤ 2-y, 0 ≤ y ≤ 2-x, and 0 ≤ z ≤ 4-2x-2y, respectively.

Therefore, the triple integral can be written as:

∫∫∫E y[tex]dV[/tex] = ∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-x-∫[tex]0^4[/tex]-2x-2y y [tex]dz dy dx[/tex]

Evaluating the innermost integral with respect to z, we get:

∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-x-∫[tex]0^4[/tex]-2x-2y y [tex]dz dy dx[/tex] = ∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-x (-y(4-2x-2y)) [tex]dy dx[/tex]

Simplifying the above expression, we get:

∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-∫[tex]0^2[/tex]-x (-4y+2xy+2y^2)[tex]dy dx[/tex] = ∫[tex]0^2-2x(x-2) dx[/tex]

Evaluating the above integral, we get the final answer as:

∫∫∫[tex]E y dV[/tex]= -16/3

Learn more about coordinates here:

https://brainly.com/question/29479478

#SPJ11

Factoring a polynomial involves expressing it as the product of two or more factors. In this case, the polynomial is 4x^2 + 12x - 6.

Here's how Joe and Hope went about factoring the polynomial:

Joe: Joe wrote down the polynomial and tried to factor it using a common factoring technique. He tried to factor out the greatest common factor (GCF), which is 4. He then tried to factor the remaining term, which is 12x - 6, using the difference of squares method. He obtained the factors (2x + 3)(2x - 3).

Hope: Hope also wrote down the polynomial and tried to factor it using a common factoring technique. She tried to factor out the GCF, which is 4. She then tried to factor the remaining term, which is 12x - 6, using the difference of squares method. She obtained the factors (2x + 6)(2x - 3).

Therefore, both Joe and Hope made some errors in their factoring attempts. Joe obtained the incorrect factors (2x + 3)(2x - 3), while Hope obtained the incorrect factors (2x + 6)(2x - 3).

To factor the polynomial completely, we need to find the correct factors. The correct factors are (x + 3)(x - 3), which can be verified by multiplying out the factors and simplifying.

Therefore, neither Joe nor Hope correctly factored the polynomial 4x^2 + 12x - 6.

Learn more about polynomial Visit : brainly.com/question/1496352

#SPJ11

The inverse Laplace transform of f(s) is f(t) = 10t + 7t^2/2 + 7t^3/3 + 80.125 t^4.

The inverse Laplace transform of f(s) = (3s - 7s^2 - 4s)/s^5 can be found by partial fraction decomposition. First, we factor the denominator as s^5 = s^2 * s^3 and write:

f(s) = (3s - 7s^2 - 4s) / s^5

= (As + B) / s^2 + (Cs + D) / s^3 + E / s^4 + F / s^5

where A, B, C, D, E, and F are constants to be determined. We multiply both sides by s^5 and simplify the numerator to get:

3s - 7s^2 - 4s = (As + B) * s^3 + (Cs + D) * s^2 + E * s + F

Expanding the right-hand side and equating coefficients of like terms on both sides, we obtain the following system of equations:

-7 = B

3 = A + C

0 = D - 7B

0 = E - 4B

0 = F - BD

Solving for the constants, we find:

B = -7

A = 10

C = -7

D = 49

E = 28

F = 343

Therefore, we have:

f(s) = 10/s^2 - 7/s^3 + 28/s^4 - 7/s^5 + 343/s^5

Using the inverse Laplace transform formulas, we can find the inverse transform of each term. The inverse Laplace transform of 10/s^2 is 10t, the inverse Laplace transform of -7/s^3 is 7t^2/2, the inverse Laplace transform of 28/s^4 is 7t^3/3, and the inverse Laplace transform of -7/s^5 + 343/s^5 is (343/6 - 7/24) t^4. Therefore, the inverse Laplace transform of f(s) is:

f(t) = l^-1 {f(s)}

= 10t + 7t^2/2 + 7t^3/3 + (343/6 - 7/24) t^4

= 10t + 7t^2/2 + 7t^3/3 + 80.125 t^4

Hence, the inverse Laplace transform of f(s) is f(t) = 10t + 7t^2/2 + 7t^3/3 + 80.125 t^4.

To know more about inverse laplace, visit;

https://brainly.com/question/27753787

#SPJ11

For the first question: The Watsons' adjusted gross income is $100,805.00 (option c).For the second question: Sadira's taxable income is $50,333.00 (option a).

For the first question:

The Watsons' adjusted gross income is $100,805.00 (option c).

To calculate the adjusted gross income, we start with the total gross wages of $105,430.00 and subtract the contributions to the health care plan ($2,500.00) and the student loan interest paid ($2,300.00). We also add the interest received ($175.00).

Therefore, adjusted gross income = total gross wages - health care plan contributions + interest received - student loan interest paid = $105,430.00 - $2,500.00 + $175.00 - $2,300.00 = $100,805.00.

For the second question:

Sadira's taxable income is $50,333.00 (option a).

To calculate the taxable income, we start with the gross wages of $71,983.00 and subtract the contributions to retirement plans ($6,000.00) and the standard deduction ($18,650.00). We also add the rental income ($9,000.00).

Therefore, taxable income = gross wages - retirement plan contributions - standard deduction + rental income = $71,983.00 - $6,000.00 - $18,650.00 + $9,000.00 = $50,333.00.

Therefore, Sadira's taxable income is $50,333.00.

Learn more about income here:

https://brainly.com/question/13593395

#SPJ11

the predicted subway fare when the CPI is 80 would be $1.214.

To determine the line of regression that predicts subway fare based on CPI, we need to use linear regression analysis. We can use software like Excel or a calculator to perform the calculations, but since we don't have that information here, we will use the formulas for the slope and intercept of the regression line.

Let x be the CPI and y be the subway fare. Using the given data, we can find the mean of x, the mean of y, and the values for the sums of squares:

$\bar{x} = \frac{30.2 + 48.3 + 112.3 + 162.2 + 191.9 + 197.8}{6} = 110.933$

$\bar{y} = \frac{0.15 + 0.35 + 1.00 + 1.35 + 1.50 + 2.00}{6} = 1.225$

$SS_{xx} = \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})^2 = 52615.44$

$SS_{yy} = \sum_{i=1}^n (y_i - \bar{y})^2 = 0.655$

$SS_{xy} = \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i - \bar{x})(y_i - \bar{y}) = 22.69$

The slope of the regression line is given by:

$b = \frac{SS_{xy}}{SS_{xx}} = \frac{22.69}{52615.44} \approx 0.000431$

The intercept of the regression line is given by:

$a = \bar{y} - b\bar{x} \approx 1.225 - 0.000431 \times 110.933 \approx 1.180$

Therefore, the equation of the regression line is:

$y = a + bx \approx 1.180 + 0.000431x$

To predict the subway fare when the CPI is given, we can substitute the CPI value into the equation of the regression line. For example, if the CPI is 80, then the predicted subway fare would be:

$y = 1.180 + 0.000431 \times 80 \approx 1.214$

To learn more about equation visit:

brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The sum of 10 will occur approximately 50 times if the two number cubes are rolled 600 times.

To estimate the number of times that the sum will be 10 if the two number cubes are rolled 600 times, we need to consider the probability of getting a sum of 10 on a single roll.

The possible combinations that result in a sum of 10 are (4,6), (5,5), and (6,4). Each of these combinations has a probability of 1/36 (since there are 36 possible outcomes in total when rolling two number cubes).

Therefore, the probability of getting a sum of 10 on a single roll is (1/36) + (1/36) + (1/36) = 3/36 = 1/12.

To estimate the number of times this will happen in 600 rolls, we can multiply the probability by the number of rolls:

(1/12) x 600 = 50

So we can estimate that the sum of 10 will occur approximately 50 times if the two number cubes are rolled 600 times.

To know more about probability refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/22597778#

#SPJ11

The expected value of the number of heads observed is 1, and the variance is 1/2.

When flipping two balanced coins, there are four possible outcomes: HH, HT, TH, and TT. Each of these outcomes has a probability of 1/4. Let X be the number of heads observed. Then X takes on the values 0, 1, or 2, depending on the outcome. We can use the formula for expected value and variance to find:

Expected value:

E[X] = 0(1/4) + 1(1/2) + 2(1/4) = 1

Variance:

Var(X) = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2

To find E[X^2], we need to compute the expected value of X^2. We have:

E[X^2] = 0^2(1/4) + 1^2(1/2) + 2^2(1/4) = 3/2

So, Var(X) = E[X^2] - (E[X])^2 = 3/2 - 1^2 = 1/2.

Therefore, the expected value of the number of heads observed is 1, and the variance is 1/2.

To know more about variance refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

The inequality s greater than equal to 90 represents the s score that Byron must earn. This implies that Byron has to earn a score greater than or equal to 90 to be considered a successful candidate.

The s score is essential in determining whether a candidate is qualified for a particular job or course.The score is used to evaluate a candidate's aptitude, intelligence, and capability to perform tasks effectively. It's worth noting that a score of 90 or higher indicates a high level of competence and an above-average performance level. A candidate with this score is likely to perform well in their job or course of study. However, if the score is lower than 90, it means that the candidate may have to work harder to improve their performance to meet the required standards. Therefore, the s score is an important aspect of the evaluation process, and candidates are encouraged to work hard to achieve high scores.

To know more about   Byron must  visit:

brainly.com/question/25140985

#SPJ11

Since each step of the algorithm is decidable, the overall algorithm is decidable. Therefore, the set a is decidable.

To show that the set a is decidable, we need to show that there exists an algorithm that can decide whether a given pair of regular expressions r and s satisfy the condition l(r) ⊆ l(s).

We can construct such an algorithm as follows:

Convert the regular expressions r and s to their corresponding finite automata using a standard algorithm such as the Thompson's construction or the subset construction.

Construct the complement of the automaton for s, i.e., swap the accepting and non-accepting states of the automaton.

Intersect the automaton for r with the complement of the automaton for s, using an algorithm such as the product construction.

If the resulting automaton accepts no strings, output "Yes" to indicate that l(r) ⊆ l(s). Otherwise, output "No".

Know more about algorithm here:

https://brainly.com/question/28724722

#SPJ11

A. The total kinetic energy of the car traveling at 92 km/h is

                   22.37 × 10⁶ J.

B. The fraction of the kinetic energy in the tires and wheels is        approximately 29.8%.

C. The acceleration of the car when pulled by a tow truck with a force of     1400 N is 1 m/s².

D. The percent error in part C due to ignoring the rotational inertia of the tires and wheels is likely to be small.

A. The total kinetic energy of the car traveling at 92 km/h can be calculated as the sum of its translational and rotational kinetic energies, which are:

                  5.70 × 10⁶ J and 16.67 × 10⁶J,

respectively.

Therefore, the total kinetic energy of the car is:

                         22.37 × 10⁶J.

B. To determine the fraction of the kinetic energy in the tires and wheels, we need to calculate the rotational kinetic energy of the tires and wheels and divide it by the total kinetic energy of the car.

The rotational kinetic energy of each tire and wheel combination is:

                             1.67 × 10⁶ J

and the total rotational kinetic energy is:

                            6.68 × 10⁶J

Therefore, the fraction of the kinetic energy in the tires and wheels is:

                           6.68 × 10⁶  J / 22.37 × 10⁶ J,

or approximately 0.298, or 29.8%.

C. The acceleration of the car when pulled by a tow truck with a force of 1400 N can be calculated using the formula:

                          F = ma,

where F is the force applied, m is the mass of the car, and a is its acceleration.

Substituting the given values,

we get:

        a = F/m = 1400 N / 1400 kg = 1 m/s².

D. The percent error in part C if we ignore the rotational inertia of the tires and wheels can be calculated by comparing the actual acceleration of the car with the acceleration calculated assuming the tires and wheels have no rotational inertia.

The moment of inertia of the tires and wheels is small compared to that of the car, so the error introduced by ignoring it is likely to be small. However, a precise calculation of the error would require additional information.

Learn more about kinetic energy

brainly.com/question/15764612

#SPJ11

The cube root of an irrational number is rational must be incorrect. Thus, we can conclude that the cube root of an irrational number is irrational.

To prove using contradiction that the cube root of an irrational number is irrational, we will assume the opposite: the cube root of an irrational number is rational.

Let x be an irrational number, and let y be the cube root of x (i.e., y = ∛x). According to our assumption, y is a rational number. This means that y can be expressed as a fraction p/q, where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0.

Now, we will find the cube of y (y^3) and show that this leads to a contradiction:

y^3 = (p/q)^3 = p^3/q^3

Since y = ∛x, then y^3 = x, which means:

x = p^3/q^3

This implies that x can be expressed as a fraction, which means x is a rational number. However, we initially defined x as an irrational number, so we have a contradiction.

Learn more about irrational number

brainly.com/question/17450097

#SPJ11

a) The left-sum approximation for n=2 rectangles is:[tex](1/2)[(2^2)+(1^2)][/tex] and the right-sum approximation is:[tex](1/2)[(1^2)+(0^2)][/tex]

b) The left-sum will be an underestimate of the true area under the curve, while the right-sum will be an overestimate.

c) Evaluating the left-sum approximation gives 1.5, while the right-sum approximation gives 0.5.

d) The left-sum approximation for n=4 rectangles is:[tex](1/4)[(2^2)+(5/4)^2+(1^2)+(1/4)^2],[/tex] and the right-sum approximation is: [tex](1/4)[(1/4)^2+(1/2)^2+(3/4)^2+(1^2)].[/tex]

(a) The integral is:

[tex]\int (from 1 to 2) t^2 dt[/tex]

(b) Using n = 2 rectangles, the width of each rectangle is:

Δt = (2 - 1) / 2 = 0.5

The left-sum approximation is:

[tex]f(1)\Delta t + f(1.5)\Delta t = 1^2(0.5) + 1.5^2(0.5) = 1.25[/tex]

The right-sum approximation is:

[tex]f(1.5)\Delta t + f(2)\Deltat = 1.5^2(0.5) + 2^2(0.5) = 2.25[/tex]

(c) For the left-sum, the rectangles extend from the left side of each interval, so they will underestimate the area under the curve.

For the right-sum, the rectangles extend from the right side of each interval, so they will overestimate the area under the curve.

Using a calculator, we get:

∫(from 1 to 2) t^2 dt ≈ 7/3 = 2.3333

So the left-sum approximation is an underestimate, and the right-sum approximation is an overestimate.

(d) Using n = 4 rectangles, the width of each rectangle is:

Δt = (2 - 1) / 4 = 0.25

The left-sum approximation is:

[tex]f(1)\Delta t + f(1.25)\Delta t + f(1.5)\Delta t + f(1.75)\Delta t = 1^2(0.25) + 1.25^2(0.25) + 1.5^2(0.25) + 1.75^2(0.25) = 1.5625[/tex]The right-sum approximation is:

[tex]f(1.25)\Delta t + f(1.5)\Delta t + f(1.75)\Delta t + f(2)Δt = 1.25^2(0.25) + 1.5^2(0.25) + 1.75^2(0.25) + 2^2(0.25) = 2.0625.[/tex]

Using a calculator, we get:

[tex]\int (from 1 to 2) t^2 dt \approx 7/3 = 2.3333[/tex]

So the left-sum approximation is still an underestimate, but it is closer to the true value than the previous approximation.

The right-sum approximation is still an overestimate, but it is also closer to the true value than the previous approximation.

For similar question on rectangles.

https://brainly.com/question/27035529

#SPJ11

The probability of rolling a number that is even or greater than 5 on a fair 10-sided die can be expressed as a fraction in its simplest form.

A fair 10-sided die has numbers from 1 to 10. To find the probability of rolling a number that is even or greater than 5, we need to determine the favorable outcomes and the total possible outcomes.

Favorable outcomes: The numbers that satisfy the condition of being even or greater than 5 are 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10.

Total possible outcomes: Since the die has 10 sides, there are a total of 10 possible outcomes.

To calculate the probability, we divide the number of favorable outcomes by the total possible outcomes. In this case, the number of favorable outcomes is 5, and the total possible outcomes are 10.

Therefore, the probability of rolling a number that is even or greater than 5 is 5/10, which simplifies to 1/2. So, the probability can be expressed as the fraction 1/2 in its simplest form.

Learn more about  probability here :

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

If the function is; F(x) = ∫[tex]e^{-5t^{4} } }[/tex] dt, then the MacLaurin polynomial of degree 5 for F(x) is x - x⁵.

A Maclaurin polynomial, also known as a Taylor polynomial centered at zero, is a polynomial approximation of a given function. It is obtained by taking the sum of the function's values and its derivatives at zero, multiplied by powers of x, up to a specified degree.

The function is : F(x) = [tex]\int\limits^x_0 {e^{-5t^{4} } } \, dt[/tex];

We know that : eˣ = 1 + x  +x²/2! + x³/3! + x⁴/4! + ...

Substituting x = -5t⁴;

We get;

[tex]e^{-5t^{4} } }[/tex] = 1 - 5t⁴ + 25t³/2! + ...

Substituting the value of [tex]e^{-5t^{4} } }[/tex] in the F(x),

We get;

F(x) = ∫₀ˣ(1 - 5t⁴ + ...)dt;

= [t - t⁵]₀ˣ

= x - x⁵;

Therefore, the required polynomial of degree 5 for F(x) is x - x⁵.

Learn more about Maclaurin Polynomial here

https://brainly.com/question/31486065

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Let F(x) = ∫[tex]e^{-5t^{4} } }[/tex] dt. Find the MacLaurin polynomial of degree 5 for F(x).

Given: An angle of measure 115 degrees We know that: The supplement of an angle is equal to 180 degrees minus the angle, and the complement of an angle is equal to 90 degrees minus the angle

Now, we need to find the complement of the supplement of an angle measuring 115 degrees.So, let's first find the supplement of the given angle:

Supplement of 115 degrees = 180 - 115= 65 degrees

Now, we need to find the complement of the above angle which is:

Complement of 65 degrees = 90 - 65= 25 degrees Therefore, the complement of the supplement of an angle measuring 115º is 25 degrees.

To know more about supplement,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29471897

#SPJ11

Using Venn diagram, the number of people surveyed is 1930, the number of people that don't eat meat is 230 and the number of vegetarians is 800

1. To determine the number of people surveyed, we can add up the total number of individuals in the data set.

650 + 550 + 480 + 250 = 1930

2. The number of people that like fish but not meat = ?

To solve this, we can simply represent the entire data on a venn diagram.

Number of people that like fish but not meat = 480 - 250 = 230

3. The number of people that are vegetarians?

These are the number of people that don't eat fish or meat.

Number of vegetarians = 1930 - (650 + 230 + 250) = 800

Learn more on venn diagram here;

https://brainly.com/question/24713052

#SPJ1

The coin is in the air for approximately 0.968 seconds.

When the coin is dropped into the fountain, it will fall due to the force of gravity. The equation that models the height h (in feet) of the coin above the fountain as a function of time t (in seconds) can be expressed as:

h(t) = -16t^2 + vt + h0

Where:

-16t^2 represents the effect of gravity, as the coin falls with acceleration due to gravity (which is approximately 32 feet per second squared).

vt represents the initial velocity of the coin (in this case, it's zero because the coin is dropped, not thrown).

h0 represents the initial height of the coin above the fountain (in this case, it's 15 feet).

To determine how long the coin is in the air, we need to find the time it takes for the height to reach zero (when the coin hits the water or the ground). We can set h(t) = 0 and solve for t:

-16t^2 + vt + h0 = 0

Since the initial velocity (v) is zero, the equation simplifies to:

-16t^2 + h0 = 0

Solving for t, we find:

t = sqrt(h0/16)

Substituting the value of h0 = 15 feet into the equation, we can calculate the time it takes for the coin to hit the water or the ground:

t = sqrt(15/16) ≈ 0.968 seconds

Know more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ11

The Maclaurin series for f(x) is: [tex]f(x) = (1/2)*x^8 + (1/3)*x^4 + O(x^1^0)[/tex]

To find the Maclaurin series for f(x) = x*∫(1+t²)dt from 0 to x³, we can first evaluate the integral:

[tex]\int(1+t^2)dt = t + (1/3)*t^3 + C[/tex]

where C is the constant of integration. Since we are interested in the interval from 0 to x³, we can evaluate the definite integral:

[tex]\int[0,x^3] (1+t^2)dt = (1/2)*x^7 + (1/3)*x^3[/tex]

Now we can write the Maclaurin series for f(x) as:

To simplify the coefficient of x⁸, we can use the given formula:

[tex](2n)!/(2^nn!)(2n-1) = (2n)(2n-2)(2n-4)...(2)(1)/(2^nn!)(2n-1)[/tex]

For n=4 (to get the coefficient of x⁸), this becomes:

So the Maclaurin series for f(x) is:

[tex]f(x) = (1/2)*x^8 + (1/3)*x^4 + O(x^1^0)[/tex]

Learn more about Maclaurin series

brainly.com/question/31745715

#SPJ11

Two figures are said to be similar if they are both equiangular (i.e., corresponding angles are congruent) and their corresponding sides are proportional. As a result, corresponding sides in similar figures are proportional and can be set up as a ratio.

 A proportion that describes the relationship between two similar figures is as follows: Let AB be the corresponding sides of the first figure and CD be the corresponding sides of the second figure, and let the ratios of the sides be set up as AB:CD. Then, as a proportion, this becomes:AB/CD = PQ/RS = ...where PQ and RS are the other pairs of corresponding sides that form the proportional relationship.In the present case, Quadrilateral STUV is similar to quadrilateral ABCD. Let the corresponding sides be ST, UV, TU, and SV and AB, BC, CD, and DA.

Therefore, the proportion that describes the relationship between the two shapes is ST/AB = UV/BC = TU/CD = SV/DA. Hence, we have answered the question.

Learn more about Ratio here,

https://brainly.com/question/25927869

#SPJ11

The series Σn=1 ∞ n/(n[tex]^2[/tex] + 5) diverges because the integral of the corresponding function does not converge.

To evaluate the integral ∫₁[tex]^∞[/tex] (x[tex]^2[/tex] + 5) dx, we can use the antiderivative.

Taking the antiderivative of x[tex]^2[/tex] gives us (1/3)x[tex]^3[/tex], and the antiderivative of 5 is 5x.

Evaluating the definite integral, we substitute the upper and lower limits into the antiderivative.

Substituting ∞, we get ((1/3)(∞)[tex]^3[/tex] + 5(∞)), which is ∞.

Substituting 1, we get ((1/3)(1)[tex]^3[/tex] + 5(1)), which is (1/3 + 5) = 16/3.

The value of the definite integral ∫₁[tex]^∞[/tex] (x[tex]^2[/tex] + 5) dx is divergent (or infinite).

Learn more about diverges

brainly.com/question/31778047

#SPJ11