Answer:
The several banks in Ghana had collapsed. The banks were given license few years ago. The banks were heavily deficient in liquidity and they had instability in financial systems.
Explanation:
There have been mergers of some banks in Ghana which lead to financial system inconsistencies. There was continuous mobilization of fund which resulted in unstable deposits. The challenges have been addressed by Implementing Institution Act of 2016.
Capacity and authority are two important concepts with regards to the normal day to day functioning of a company. With the aid of authoritative text, critically discuss the form and substance of these concepts.
Capacity occurs in the form of abilities whereas authority occurs in the form of power.
Capacity refers to the ability of a person to use the given information for making a decision. A person that lacks capacity it means that its mind is impaired and he is unable to make a decision at that time while on the other hand, authority is the legitimate power that a person or a group of persons possess and use it over other people. In capacity, the person has something in the form of abilities whereas in authority, the person has something in the form of power which they used to implement its decision over other people.
https://brainly.com/question/24353112
Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
Answer:
In simple words, Restorative justice refers to the legal strategy where one of the approaches to a case is to arrange a meeting between both the perpetrator including the complainant, often with members of the broader community.
Academic evaluation of restorative justice seems to be optimistic. Most findings indicate that it makes criminals less inclined to commit an offence. The 2007 research also indicates that it would have the greatest level of similar values and responsibility for any sort of justice.
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
Looking at the misty rain and fog, explain at least two defensive driving techniques you would utilize to adjust your driving and lower your risk
Answer: Some of the defensive driving techniques while driving in misty rain and fog are-
Utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively.
Staying put and not jumping lanes.
Not using high beam
Explanation:
Driving during misty rain and fog can be tricky at times. It is advisable to engage in defensive driving during such events. Some of the action which can be taken during such event are-
Utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively- Frankly speaking, wipers and defrosters are driver’s best friend during such critical times. Effective use of these enhances the visibility from the windshield and driver can get insights into the condition existing on the road (regarding slippery condition, traffic movement ahead etc.)
Staying put and not jumping lanes- Normally such conditions are accompanied by slow traffic. A wise driver would never jump lanes on account of two reasons. Firstly, the road is wet and slippery and secondly low visibility.
Not using a high beam of headlights- High beam reflects the mist and fog particles thus forming a white wall and further reducing visibility. Instead, special sodium lamps can be used.
Answer:
utilizing wipers and defrosters effectively and staying put and not jumping lanes
Explanation:
Which of the following illustrates an agent's fiduciary duty?
A. An agent believes that her principal is making a poor business
decision, but she enters the agreement on behalf of her
principal as instructed.
B. An agent makes a deal with a client that will result in greater
profit for her principal, even though her own bonus is likely to
be less
C. An agent believes that her principal is making a poor business
decision, so she refuses to enter the agreement on behalf of
her principal as instructed.
D. An accountant agent lacks knowledge about a unique
situation in her principal's finances, so she consults with other
accountants
Answer:
B
Explanation:
I think this is B just because it seems to be the one answer where the agent really commits to helping the client - C is also a viable answer but I think its B - Good Luck!
: Công ty Cổ Phần Bình Minh nộp thuế GTGT theo phương pháp khấu trừ thuế, tháng 01/20xx đã gửi các đại lý bán lẻ 5.000 sản phẩm Z với giá chưa thuế GTGT là 44.000 đồng/sản phẩm, thuế suất thuế GTGT sản phẩm Z là 10%, cuối tháng các đại lý còn tồn kho 1.000 sản phẩm. Xác định thuế GTGT đầu ra tháng 01/20xx của Công ty Cổ Phần Bình Minh là:
a. 16 triệu đồng.
b. 17,6 triệu đồng.
c. 20 triệu đồng.
d. 22 triệu đồng.
Answer:
A 15. vgeghhhjdt to the yyyyyyuihfgj
Scarlett and Mark want to lease an apartment from Connor for a year. Connor first agrees, but upon finding that they have two small children, refuses to lease them his apartment. Is Connor's refusal legal?
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Cuz Connor is the land owner he has the right to say rather or not he wants children in his apartment.
which article is related to Equality before law
Answer:
Article 14 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.
Answer:
article 14
Explanation:
bình luận tại sao kinh doanh dịch vụ đòi nợ được coi là một loại hình thức kinh doanh dịch vụ hợp pháp trong luật đầu tư 2014
Which foods are not allowed on clear liquid diet
Answer:
the things on the left are the answer
It would be inappropriate to refer to "criminal law," as if it were a singular entity. Why is this? Discuss all that "criminal law" really includes in the U.S.
Answer:
In simple words, Crime legislation is an offence-related area of law. It forbids behaviour that is viewed as dangerous, hazardous and sometimes jeopardising the land, health , safety and spiritual well-being of others, including one's own self.
Criminal law differs significantly by territory and varies from common law, within which there is more focus on resolving disputes and market financing than on retribution or reintegration.
Criminal process is a formalised legal action that verifies the conduct of a felony and requires the perpetrator to be convicted or rehabilitated.
Which legal school of thought is illustrated in this dialogue? DONUT DAY AT THE OFFICE Part 7 Alison: (She stands during David's speech as if inspired but sits down once Bob starts talking.) Bob: Right. Power to the people David. Anyone else hungry? (He tries to slowly move to the donuts and Joyce continues to defend them like a point guard.) Lee: I have an idea that might address all of these issues. What if none of us have any of these donuts but instead we break up into teams and sell them to our coworkers for a profit? Instead of getting one or two donuts, we can stop on our way home and pick up a dozen of them each with our profits. In this case, we ignore the company stick-in-the-mud book regulations because, as you can see, we are obviously presented with some opportunities for a little economic development. Corporate rules here must bow to economic opportunity. If we let our rules block our prosperity, what kind of company will we become? End Part 7 Command school of thought. Law and economics school of thought. Sociological school of thought. Legal realism school of thought.
Answer:
The legal school of thought illustrated in this dialogue is:
Law and economics school of thought.
Explanation:
The law and economics school of thought postulates that economic analyses, theories, and methods should be brought to the practice and interpretation of laws. This means that the tools of economic reasoning are the best tools for justified and consistent legal practices. This school of thought is significantly one of the dominant theories of jurisprudence.
vẽ sơ đồ mối liên hệ giữa các cơ quan thanh tra nhà nước. chỉ rõ mối liên hệ giữa các cơ quan thanh tra nhà nước
ed to the President of the
No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.
Sixty-nine-year-old Edgar wants to use the values in his variable annuity to provide a series of quarterly payments for a certain period of time, but he does not want to commit the contract's principal to liquidation. He also wants the income payments to be tied to the growth of his contract values. As his agent, which of the following should you recommend?
Answer:
I recommend that he should eat the income payment tied to the growth of his contract
Which of the following statements is true about CERTs? A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood. B. CERTS often support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects in the community. C. Being a CERT volunteer requires little time because disasters do not occur frequently. D. CERTS never support emergency response agencies with nonemergency projects.
Answer:
A. CERTs are restricted to disaster response activities in their neighborhood.
Explanation:
CERT is an educational program that seeks to instruct volunteers who can help their communities in emergencies or disasters, in addition to teaching concepts for preventing these disasters, low-complexity rescues and even simpler medical procedures that can make all the difference in safety of the victims .. As stated before, the goal is for the volunteer to be able to help their community in the face of a need.
vận dụng cặp phạm trù nguyên nhân và kết quả trong giả quyết tai nạn giao thông
Answer:
srryy i have know Idea im here for points
1. The case caption says that Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff are the plaintiffs in the case and that the City of Milwaukie is the Defendant. Why is the City of Milwaukie a party in the case? Why did the City of Milwaukie fail to appear (file any documents with) the Court of Appeals?
Answer:
I'm very low at mathematics
The City of Milwaukie is a party in the case because it is being sued by the plaintiffs, Helen Sollars (aka Helen Kelly) and the Estate of Helene Valoff.
It is named as the defendant because it is the party being accused of some wrongdoing.The City of Milwaukie failed to appear or file any documents with the Court of Appeals because it might have decided not to contest the lawsuit or decided not to pursue any further legal action regarding the case. This may be due to various reasons, such as a settlement agreement with the plaintiffs or an acknowledgment of the plaintiffs' claims. As a result, the Court of Appeals may have made a default judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
Learn more about plaintiffs here:
https://brainly.com/question/30714126
#SPJ2
3. Tòa án hoãn phiên họp sơ thẩm khi:
A. Người yêu cầu vắng mặt lần thứ nhất không có đơn xin xét xử vắng mặt
B. Người yêu cầu đã được triệu tập hợp lệ lần thứ hai mà vẫn vắng mặt
C. Kiểm sát viên vắng mặt
D. Người yêu cầu vắng mặt lần thứ nhất có đơn xin xét xử vắng mặt
Answer:
D. Người yêu cầu vắng mặt lần thứ nhất có đơn xin xét xử vắng mặt
Explanation:
escribe la terminación de los siguientes verbos:
indagariamos:
satisfacer:
invertiremos:
ayuda por favor
lo le Agan caso que es la materia ley es de caligrafía
Answer:
can u plz type in english ?..............
The type of government in which eligible members of society make decisions by voting is known as what?
which of the following is something that both Bentham abd Mill would endorse
Answer:
The good is best understood in terms of pleasure.
Explanation:
Answer:The good is best understood in terms of pleasure.
Explanation:
Joe buys some watermelon seeds from a seed manufacturer's catalog. The catalog describes the seed Joe buys as "top quality." Joe strongly relies upon this statement in making the purchase. The seed turns out to be worthless, and Joe sues the manufacturer for breach of express warranty. You are the attorney representing the manufacturer. Which of the following is your best argument for escaping liability?
A. That a catalog statement cannot create an express warranty.
B. That the basis-of-the-bargain requirement was not met.
C. That the alleged warranty was merely sales talk.
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Answer:
Correct Answer:
E. That the manufacturer did not give a sample or a model of the seeds.
Explanation:
As an attorney of the manufacturer, the best argument in the case between my client and the seed buyer, Joe would be on the fact that, the manufacturer did not give a sample or model of the seeds to Joe to verify if it meets his requirements.
Also, Joe never requested to see sample of the seeds as was standard with buying of agricultural products.
What is Legal Process of Khula in Pakistan
Answer:
To apply for Khula the wife would need to file a suit for Khula in the Family Court under the West Pakistan Family Courts Ordinance, on the grounds that she feels she can no long live with her husband “within the limits prescribed by Allah' and such a statement on oath made in her suit would be sufficient to establish ...is needed
Explanation:
if my answer helps you than mark me as brainliest
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
what are the differences between legislation and case law?
Explanation:
Step 1: Find the differences
The first thing that we need to know is that another way of saying legislation is a statute.
So according to https://www.quora.com, "Legislation is the creation of statutes (another word for laws). Statutes are statutory law. Statutes, crafted and passed by legislatures and ratified by an executive authority, become law when the executive authority signs or ratifies them. They lay out in black-letter text, what the legislature intends the law to be." This means that statutes become laws which go through a process of being ratified which is mostly for a short-term because it can be changed.
On the other hand, according to https://www.quora.com, "Case law, also known as common law, is a compendium of court decisions, which establish what the courts hold to be equitable and enforceable law, which is just and sensible - and under a constitutional system, what the meaning of the law must be, in order to align with the dictates of the constitution." Case laws are the most concrete laws out there because of it being heavily impacted by the constitution during a case.
Answer: Legislation is mostly for short term and Case law is for a longer term
2. Why do you think mandatory minimum punishment sentencing dont have the deterrent
effect that they were created to prove?
Answer:
Minimum sentencing does not have the deterrent effect it was created to have because, it is punishing individuals on a set scale and not on the circumstances of the case.
Explanation:
Who was the first Postmaster General?
A. George Washington
B. George Washington
C. Benjamin Franklin
D. Washington Carver
It is C. Benjamin Franklin
Answer:
hi, you're answer would be
C. Benjamin Franklin
Hope it's help :)
Answer:
the guy on the $100 bill
Explanation:
What physical property can help characterize fragments of glass at a crime scene?
Answer:
Here is your answer .
Explanation:
Refractive index is mostly commonly measured property in the forensic examination of glass fragments (koons etal. 2002), because:precise refractive indices can be measured rapidly on the small fragments typically found in casework.
Because exact refractive indices can be determined quickly on the microscopic fragments that are generally discovered in casework, refractive index is the most frequently measured property in the forensic investigation of glass shards (koons etal. 2002).
What is refractive?A material's refractive index serves as a gauge for how light moves through it. Light travels more slowly at higher refractive indices, which results in a proportionally greater change in the direction of the light within the substance.
Smashed glass at a crime scene can be identified by density. Numerous glasses' densities are known [1]. Ordinary window or bottle glass is the most prevalent sort of glass.
Therefore ,Because exact refractive indices can be determined quickly on the microscopic fragments
Learn more about refractive here:
https://brainly.com/question/14760207
#SPJ2
saving is important
Answer:
yes I agree
Explanation:
very smart very intelligent
Tony advertises a 2014 Honda Civic car for sale at $12,999 on a website known as ‘Koala Car Sales’. Mike reads the advertisement. He is interested and so calls Tony. Tony invites him to inspect the car, giving him the address.
After inspecting the car, Mike says ‘I will give you $7,000 for this car.’ Tony responds, ‘That’s no good. I would want at least $10,000 as those tyres and rims are worth $4,500.’ Mike replies, ‘Sorry mate but it isn’t worth that much to me.’
Three weeks later Mike sees the same advertisement on the same website but this time selling the car for $10,500. Mike phones Tony and say ‘I would be prepared to pay $5,500.’ Tony laughs and says ‘How about we go back to your original price of $7,000. We have a deal.’
Discuss the legal effect of each communication and determine if an agreement was formed.
Assuming there was an agreement reached between Tony and Mike, discuss whether it would be supported by the necessary intention and consideration to be recognised as a contract.
how would i answer this or what main points would i talk about?
Answer:
the price and how he got a great deal as the average 2014 Honda Civic price right now is around $16,999
Explanation: