evaluate the integral by reversing the order of integration. 27 0 3 2ex4 dx dy 3 y

To compute the second-order partial derivative of the function ℎ(,)=/ 25, we first need to find the first-order partial derivatives with respect to each variable. The second-order partial derivatives of the function ℎ(,)=/ 25 are both 0.

Let's start with the first partial derivative with respect to :

∂ℎ/∂ = (1/25) * ∂/∂

Since the function is only dependent on , the partial derivative with respect to is simply 1.

So:

∂ℎ/∂ = (1/25) * 1 = 1/25

Now let's find the first partial derivative with respect to :

∂ℎ/∂ = (1/25) * ∂/∂

Again, since the function is only dependent on , the partial derivative with respect to is simply 1.

So:

∂ℎ/∂ = (1/25) * 1 = 1/25

Now that we have found the first-order partial derivatives, we can find the second-order partial derivatives by taking the partial derivatives of these first-order partial derivatives.

The second-order partial derivative with respect to is:

∂²ℎ/∂² = ∂/∂ [(1/25) * ∂/∂ ]

Since the first-order partial derivative with respect to is a constant (1/25), its partial derivative with respect to is 0.

So:

∂²ℎ/∂² = ∂/∂ [(1/25) * ∂/∂ ] = (1/25) * ∂²/∂² = (1/25) * 0 = 0

Similarly, the second-order partial derivative with respect to is:

∂²ℎ/∂² = ∂/∂ [(1/25) * ∂/∂ ]

Since the first-order partial derivative with respect to is a constant (1/25), its partial derivative with respect to is 0.

So:

∂²ℎ/∂² = ∂/∂ [(1/25) * ∂/∂ ] = (1/25) * ∂²/∂² = (1/25) * 0 = 0

Therefore, the second-order partial derivatives of the function ℎ(,)=/ 25 are both 0.

To compute the second-order partial derivatives of the function h(x, y) = x/y^25, you need to find the four possible combinations:

1. ∂²h/∂x²
2. ∂²h/∂y²
3. ∂²h/(∂x∂y)
4. ∂²h/(∂y∂x)

Note: Since the mixed partial derivatives (∂²h/(∂x∂y) and ∂²h/(∂y∂x)) are usually equal, we will compute only three of them.

Your answer: The second-order partial derivatives of the function h(x, y) = x/y^25 are ∂²h/∂x², ∂²h/∂y², and ∂²h/(∂x∂y).

Learn more about derivatives at: brainly.com/question/30365299

#SPJ11

The sum for the telescoping series is given by the limit of Sn as n approaches infinity:

S = lim(n→∞) Sn = lim(n→∞) 2 + 5/2 - 1/(n+1) = 9/2.

First, let's find Sn:

Sn = 3C0/(n+1)(n+2) + 3C1/(n)(n+1) + ... + 3Cn/(1)(2)

Notice that each term has a denominator in the form (k)(k+1), which suggests we can use partial fractions to simplify:

3Ck/(k)(k+1) = A/(k) + B/(k+1)

Multiplying both sides by (k)(k+1), we get:

3Ck = A(k+1) + B(k)

Setting k=0, we get:

3C0 = A(1) + B(0)

A = 3

Setting k=1, we get:

3C1 = A(2) + B(1)

B = -1

Therefore,

3Ck/(k)(k+1) = 3/k - 1/(k+1)

So, we can write the sum as:

Sn = 3/1 - 1/2 + 3/2 - 1/3 + ... + 3/n - 1/(n+1)

Simplifying,

Sn = 2 + 5/2 - 1/(n+1)

Now, we can find the different partial sums:

S1 = 2 + 5/2 - 1/2 = 4

S2 = 2 + 5/2 - 1/2 + 3/6 = 17/6

S3 = 2 + 5/2 - 1/2 + 3/6 - 1/12 = 7/4

S4 = 2 + 5/2 - 1/2 + 3/6 - 1/12 + 3/20 = 47/20

Finally, the sum for the telescoping series is given by the limit of Sn as n approaches infinity:

S = lim(n→∞) Sn = lim(n→∞) 2 + 5/2 - 1/(n+1) = 9/2.

Learn more about telescoping series here:

https://brainly.com/question/14523424

#SPJ11

The statement is true.

If the columns of a square (n x n) matrix A are linearly independent, then the determinant of A is nonzero.

Now consider the matrix A^T, which is the transpose of A. The rows of A^T are the columns of A, and since the columns of A are linearly independent, so are the rows of A^T.

Multiplying A^T by A gives the matrix A^T*A, which is a symmetric matrix. The determinant of A^T*A is the square of the determinant of A, which is nonzero.

Therefore, the columns of A^T*A (which are the rows of A) are linearly independent.

Repeating this process two more times, we have A^T*A*A^T*A*A^T*A = (A^T*A)^3, and the rows of this matrix are also linearly independent.

Therefore, if the columns of a square (n x n) matrix A are linearly independent, so are the rows of A^T, A^T*A, and (A^T*A)^3, which are the transpose of A.

To know more about transpose, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30589911

#SPJ11

a. The PDF (probability density function) of an exponential random variable X with expected value λ is given by:

f(x) = λ * e^(-λ*x), for x > 0

Therefore, for an exponential random variable with an expected value of 0.5, the PDF would be:

f(x) = 0.5 * e^(-0.5*x), for x > 0

b. The graph of the PDF of an exponential random variable with an expected value of 0.5 is a decreasing curve that starts at 0 and approaches the x-axis, as x increases.

c. The CDF (cumulative distribution function) of an exponential random variable X with expected value λ is given by:

F(x) = 1 - e^(-λ*x), for x > 0

Therefore, for an exponential random variable with an expected value of 0.5, the CDF would be:

F(x) = 1 - e^(-0.5*x), for x > 0

d. The graph of the CDF of an exponential random variable with an expected value of 0.5 is an increasing curve that starts at 0 and approaches 1, as x increases.

To know more about graph, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ11

The answer is , the largest frequency is in the interval 0-5, with 3 students watched between 20 and 25 games.

Given data shows the number of volleyball games 20 students of a class watched in a month:

15 1 4 2 22 10 7 4 3 16 16 21 22 19 19 20 22 16 19 22

To construct a histogram, we need to determine the range and class interval.

Range = Maximum value - Minimum value

Range = 22 - 1 = 21

We will use 5 as a class interval.

Therefore, we will have five classes:

0-5, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20, 20-25.

For example, for the first class (0-5), we count the frequency of the number of students who watched between 0 and 5 games, for the second class (5-10), we count the frequency of the number of students who watched between 5 and 10 games, and so on.

The histogram accurately represents the given data is shown below:

As we can see from the histogram, the largest frequency is in the interval 0-5, with 3 students watched between 20 and 25 games.

To know more about Frequency visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30053506

#SPJ11

Binary search works by dividing the sorted list in half repeatedly until the target value is found or it is determined that the value is not present in the list. In the worst case, the value is not present in the list and the search must continue until the remaining sub-list is empty.

The binary search checked a total of 3 elements to find the value 77.

In this case, the list has 10 elements and we are searching for the value 77.

Start by dividing the list in half:

{ 4 11 17 18 25 } | { 45 63 77 89 114 }

The target value 77 is in the right sub-list, so we repeat the process on that sub-list:

{ 45 63 } | { 77 89 114 }

The target value 77 is in the left sub-list, so we repeat the process on that sub-list:

{ 77 } | { 89 114 }

We have found the target value 77 in the list.

Therefore, the binary search checked a total of 3 elements to find the value 77.

To know more about binary search refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12946457

#SPJ11

Sigma notation is a shorthand way of writing the sum of a series of terms.

The given expression can be written using sigma notation as:

∞

Σ (2/n)

n=1

This is an infinite series that starts with the term 2/1, then adds the term 2/2, then adds the term 2/3, and so on. The nth term in the series is 2/n.

what is series?

In mathematics, a series is the sum of the terms of a sequence. More formally, a series is an expression obtained by adding up the terms of a sequence. Series are used in many areas of mathematics, including calculus, analysis, and number theory.

To learn more about series visit:

brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

The value of ED is 9.2 cm.

Given data : AB = 5.2 cm BC = 3.8 cmCG = 7.5 cm

We have to find the ED of the cuboid.

Now, we know that the diagonals of the cuboid are expressed as the square root of the sum of the squares of three dimensions.

⇒ DE² = AB² + AE² .....(1)

⇒ DE² = CG² + CF² .....(2)

Since we know that AE = CF and BE = DG

⇒ AB² + AE² = CG² + CF²⇒ AB² = CG²

Since, A, B, C, D, E, F, G & H form a cuboid, BC is parallel to ED, and we can say that

BC = ED - BE .....(3)

We are given AB = 5.2 cm, BC = 3.8 cm & CG = 7.5 cm.

Substituting the values in equation (2)

⇒ DE² = 7.5² + 3.8²⇒ DE² = 84.49

Taking the square root on both sides, we get

⇒ DE = 9.19 cm

Putting the value of DE in equation (3)

⇒ 3.8 = 9.19 - BE⇒ BE = 5.39

ED = BE + BC= 5.39 + 3.8 = 9.19 cm (rounded to 1 DP)

Therefore, the answer is 9.2 cm (rounded to 1 DP).

To learn about the cuboid here:

https://brainly.com/question/20919556

#SPJ11

The general solution of [tex]y''' y'' -y' -y= 1 cosx cos2x e^x[/tex] is

[tex]y = C1 e^x + C2 x e^x + C3 e^(^-^x^) + (-5/64 cos x + 8/89 sin x) (8/89 cos 2x + 5/89 sin 2x) e^x[/tex]

where C1, C2, and C3 are constants.

Find complementary solution by solving homogeneous equation:

y''' - y'' - y' + y = 0

The characteristic equation is:

[tex]r^3 - r^2 - r + 1 = 0[/tex]

Factoring equation as:

[tex](r - 1)^2 (r + 1) = 0[/tex]

So roots are: r = 1, r = -1.

The complementary solution is :

[tex]y_c = C1 e^x + C2 x e^x + C3 e^(^-^x^)[/tex]

where C1, C2, and C3 are constants.

Find a solution of non-homogeneous equation using undetermined coefficients method.

[tex]y_p = (A cos x + B sin x) (C cos 2x + D sin 2x) e^x[/tex]

where A, B, C, and D are constants.

Taking first, second, and third derivatives of [tex]y_p[/tex] and substituting into differential equation:

[tex]A [(8C - 5D) cos x + (5C + 8D) sin x] e^x + B [(8D - 5C) cos x - (5D + 8C) sin x] e^x = cos x cos 2x e^x[/tex]

Equating the coefficients of like terms:

8C - 5D = 0

5C + 8D = 0

8D - 5C = 1

5D + 8C = 0

Solving system of equations: C = 8/89, D = 5/89, A = -5/64, and B = 8/89.

Therefore:

[tex]y_p = (-5/64 cos x + 8/89 sin x) (8/89 cos 2x + 5/89 sin 2x) e^x[/tex]

The general solution of the non-homogeneous equation is:

[tex]y = y_c + y_p[/tex]

[tex]y = C1 e^x + C2 x e^x + C3 e^(^-^x^) + (-5/64 cos x + 8/89 sin x) (8/89 cos 2x + 5/89 sin 2x) e^x[/tex]

where C1, C2, and C3 are constants.

Know more about general solution here:

https://brainly.com/question/30285644

#SPJ11

The percentage increase of R11.50 to R12.00 is 4.35%.

The percentage increase of R11.50 to R12.00 is 4.35%.

To determine the percentage increase, you can use the following formula:

Percentage increase = (new value - old value) / old value × 100

To find the percentage increase from R11.50 to R12.00,

we can plug in the values:(12.00 - 11.50) / 11.50 × 100 = 0.50 / 11.50 × 100 = 4.35%

To know more about percentage  visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/32197511

#SPJ11

2 is the constant in the expression 4y+2+x

The given expression is 4y+2+x

four times of y plus two plus x

x and y are the variables in the expression

We have to find the constant in the expression

The constant in the expression is the term which doesnot have any variable.

2 is the constant.

To learn more on Expressions click:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

An IQ score greater than 128 would be considered unusually high.

C. Any IQ score more than 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater than, is unusually high. One would expect to see an IQ score 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater than, only rarely.

To calculate the IQ score that would be considered unusually high, follow these steps:
Identify the mean and standard deviation of the normal model. In this case, the mean (μ) is 100 and the standard deviation (σ) is 14.
Determine the number of standard deviations above the mean that would be considered unusually high.

In this case, it's 2 standard deviations.
Multiply the standard deviation by the number of standard deviations above the mean (2 × 14 = 28).
Add the result to the mean (100 + 28 = 128).

For similar question on standard deviations.

https://brainly.com/question/29800829

#SPJ11

Choice B is correct: Any IQ score more than 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater than 128, is unusually high. One would expect to see an IQ score 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater, only rarely.

To determine what IQ would be considered unusually high in a standardized Normal model N(100,14) IQ test, we need to look at the number of standard deviations above the mean. The mean IQ is 100 and the standard deviation is 14.

This is because 95% of IQ scores fall within two standard deviations of the mean, so an IQ score greater than 128 is in the top 5% of IQ scores. This would be considered an unusually high IQ.

Some IQ tests are standardized to a Normal model N(100,14). What IQ would be considered to be unusually high?

C. Any IQ score more than 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater than 128, is unusually high. One would expect to see an IQ score 2 standard deviations above the mean, or greater than 128, only rarely.

Explanation: In a normal distribution, a score more than 2 standard deviations above the mean is considered rare and unusually high. To find the IQ score 2 standard deviations above the mean, you can calculate as follows:

1. Find the mean (100) and standard deviation (14).
2. Multiply the standard deviation by 2 (14*2 = 28).
3. Add the result to the mean (100 + 28 = 128).

So, an IQ score greater than 128 would be considered unusually high.

Learn more about standard deviations at: brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Answer:B

Step-by-step explanation:I got it right

Answer: ABD is equal to angle AEC.

Step-by-step explanation:

If A, B, C, and D are four points on the circumference of a circle and AEC and BED are straight lines, then we can conclude that angle ABD is equal to angle AEC.

This is because of the Inscribed Angle Theorem, which states that an angle formed by two chords in a circle is half the sum of the arc lengths intercepted by the angle and its vertical angle. In this case, angle ABD is formed by the chords AB and BD, and angle AEC is formed by the chords AC and CE. The arc lengths intercepted by these angles are arc AD and arc AC, respectively. Since arc AD and arc AC are congruent arcs (they both intercept the same central angle), angles ABD and AEC must be congruent by the Inscribed Angle Theorem.

If we conclude that the mean is greater than 58 when its true value is really 60, we have made a correct decision. This is because our alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the true population mean is greater than 58, and the sample mean that we observed is greater than 58.

Therefore, we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis (H0) and conclude that the population mean is likely greater than 58.

A Type I error occurs when we reject the null hypothesis when it is actually true. In this case, we are not rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true, so it is not a Type I error.

A Type II error occurs when we fail to reject the null hypothesis when it is actually false. In this case, we are rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually false, so it is not a Type II error.

Therefore, the correct answer is (c) a correct decision.

To know more about decision, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31475041

#SPJ11

Mathematical models are important to the scientific study of biological systems because they can help us understand and analyze complex biological phenomena.

Biological systems are often too complex to be understood by intuition alone, and mathematical models provide a quantitative framework that can help us make predictions and test hypotheses.

Mathematical models can be used to describe the behavior of individual components of a biological system, as well as the interactions between these components. For example, models can be used to describe the dynamics of biochemical reactions, the growth and division of cells, or the spread of diseases through a population.

Mathematical models also provide a way to analyze and interpret experimental data. By fitting models to experimental data, we can estimate the values of important parameters and test hypotheses about the underlying biological mechanisms. Models can also be used to make predictions about the behavior of a system under different conditions or to design experiments that can test specific hypotheses.

Finally, mathematical models can help us identify gaps in our knowledge and guide future research efforts. By comparing model predictions to experimental data, we can identify areas where our understanding is incomplete or where our models need to be refined. This can help us focus our research efforts and develop more accurate and comprehensive models of biological systems.

Overall, mathematical models are an essential tool for the scientific study of biological systems, providing a quantitative framework that can help us understand, analyze, and predict the behavior of these complex systems.

Learn more about Mathematical models here

https://brainly.com/question/29069620

#SPJ11

The parameter estimate of X1 is 0.147. It means that, holding all other variables constant, a unit increase in X1 is associated with a 0.147 increase in Y.

X4 is a dummy variable, which takes the value of 1 if a certain condition is met and 0 otherwise. The parameter estimate of X4 is -0.105, which means that, on average, the value of Y decreases by 0.105 units when X4 equals 1 (compared to when X4 equals 0).

The parameter estimates that are statistically significant at 5% level of significance are X1 and X2. This can be determined by looking at the p-values in the table. The p-value for X1 is less than 0.05, which means that the parameter estimate for X1 is statistically significant.

Similarly, the p-value for X2 is less than 0.05, which means that the parameter estimate for X2 is statistically significant.

The 95% confidence interval for X2 can be calculated using the formula:

B ± t-value * SE(B)

where B is the parameter estimate for X2, t-value is 1.96 (for a 95% confidence interval), and SE(B) is the standard error of the parameter estimate for X2. From the table, the parameter estimate for X2 is 0.001 and the standard error is 0.001. Thus, the 95% confidence interval is:

0.001 ± 1.96 * 0.001 = (-0.001, 0.003)

This means that we can be 95% confident that the true value of the parameter estimate for X2 falls between -0.001 and 0.003.

To test whether the overall model is statistically significant, we use the F-test. The null hypothesis is that all the regression coefficients are zero (i.e., there is no linear relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable).

The alternative hypothesis is that at least one of the regression coefficients is non-zero (i.e., there is a linear relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable).

From the ANOVA table in the output, the F-statistic is 1.976 and the p-value is 0.104. Since the p-value is greater than 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to suggest that the overall model is statistically significant.

The t-statistic for X3 can be calculated using the formula:

t = (B - 0) / SE(B)

where B is the parameter estimate for X3, and SE(B) is the standard error of the parameter estimate for X3. From the table, the parameter estimate for X3 is 0.095 and the standard error is 0.311. Thus, the t-statistic is:

t = (0.095 - 0) / 0.311 = 0.306

The R-squared of the model is 0.038, which means that only 3.8% of the variation in the dependent variable (Y) can be explained by the independent variables (X1, X2, X3, X4). This suggests that the fit is not very good, and there may be other factors that are influencing Y that are not captured by the model.

However, it is important to note that a low R-squared does not necessarily mean that the model is not useful or informative. It just means that there is a lot of unexplained variation in Y.

To know more about null hypothesis  refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

a)  The correct answer is: p-value 0.10.

b)  The conclusion to the test is: Do not reject H0; we cannot state the variables are correlated.

a-1. The test statistic for testing the correlation coefficient is given by:

t = r * sqrt(n-2) / sqrt(1-r^2)

where r is the sample correlation coefficient and n is the sample size.

Substituting the given values, we get:

t = 0.15 * sqrt(18-2) / sqrt(1-0.15^2) ≈ 1.562

Rounding to 3 decimal places, the test statistic is 1.562.

a-2. The p-value is the probability of observing a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the one calculated, assuming that the null hypothesis is true. Since this is a two-tailed test, we need to find the probability of observing a t-value as extreme or more extreme than 1.562 or -1.562. Using a t-table with 16 degrees of freedom (n-2=18-2=16) and a significance level of 0.05, we find the critical values to be ±2.120.

The p-value is the area under the t-distribution curve to the right of 1.562 (or to the left of -1.562), multiplied by 2 to account for the two tails. From the t-table, we find that the area to the right of 1.562 (or to the left of -1.562) is between 0.10 and 0.20. Multiplying by 2, we get the p-value to be between 0.20 and 0.40.

Therefore, the correct answer is: p-value 0.10.

b. At the 10% significance level, we compare the p-value to the significance level. Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.10, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, the conclusion to the test is: Do not reject H0; we cannot state the variables are correlated.

Learn more about p-value here:

https://brainly.com/question/30461126

#SPJ11

The angles whose equals to 60 ° are ∠1 , ∠2 , ∠3 , ∠4 . This is due to opposite angles and angle pairs due to a transversal with a parallel.

Note that

l and m are the parallel lines .

m ∠ 1 = 60 °

Thus

∠1 = ∠2 = 60 °

(As l and m are the parallel lines and ∠ 1 and ∠2 are the vertically opposite angles .)

As

∠2 = ∠3

(As l and m are the parallel lines and ∠2 and ∠3 are the alternate interior angles. )

As

∠3 = ∠4 = 60°

( As l and m are the parallel lines and ∠ 3 and ∠4 are the vertically opposite angles )

Therefore the angles whose equals to 60 ° are ∠1 , ∠2 , ∠3 , ∠4 .

Learn more about angles:
https://brainly.com/question/28451077
#SPJ1

(a) The independent and dependent variables in this problem are: Independent variable: number of people in the portrait and Dependent variable: total cost of taking the portrait

(b)The number of people in the portrait is 6.

Given that the Milligan family spent $215 to have their family portrait taken. The portrait package they would like to purchase costs $125. In addition, the photographer charges a $15 sitting fee per person in the portrait.Let x be the number of people in the portrait and y be the total cost of taking the portrait.The function that represents the total cost of any number of people in the portrait is given byy = 15x + 125Therefore, if we need to find the total cost for any number of people in the portrait, we just need to substitute the number of people in the above equation to get the corresponding total cost.b) The given equation is:y = 15x + 125The total cost of the portrait is $215.So, we can substitute y = 215 in the above equation to find the number of people in the portrait.215 = 15x + 125215 - 125 = 15x90 = 15xx = 6.

Know more about variables here:

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ11

Given that, the Total number of students = 18

Number of students who can play guitar and piano (Common)

= 1/3 × 18

= 6

Number of students who can play only guitar = 6

The number of students who cannot play any of the instruments = 4

Now, let us calculate the number of students who can play only the piano.

Let this be x.

Number of students who can play only the piano = Total number of students - (Number of students who can play both guitar and piano + Number of students who can play only guitar + Number of students who cannot play any of the instruments)

Therefore,

x = 18 - (6 + 6 + 4)

x = 18 - 16x

= 2

Therefore, 2 students can play only the piano.

To know more about instruments visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28572307

#SPJ11

We have the following table:

x -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

f(x) 2 3 6 3 -2 -0.5 1.25

f(2) - f(0) = 6 - 3 = 3

f(-3) + f(1) - f(0) = 2 + (-2) - 3 = -3

(f(3) + f(2)) / 2 = (1.25 + (-0.5)) / 2 = 0.375

To know more about solving equations refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/30066982

#SPJ11

The statement P(1) is that 1³ = ((1(1+1))/2)² is true.

To show P(1) is true, calculate the right side: ((1(1+1))/2)² = ((1(2))/2)² = (1)² = 1. Since 1³ = 1, P(1) is true, completing the base of the induction.

The inductive hypothesis is assuming P(k) is true for some positive integer k, meaning 1³ + 2³ + 3³ + ... + k³ = ((k(k+1))/2)².

In the inductive step, we need to prove that P(k+1) is true, meaning 1³ + 2³ + 3³ + ... + k³ + (k+1)³ = (((k+1)((k+1)+1))/2)².

To complete the inductive step, start with the inductive hypothesis and add (k+1)³ to both sides: 1³ + 2³ + 3³ + ... + k³ + (k+1)³ = ((k(k+1))/2)² + (k+1)³. Then, show this is equal to (((k+1)((k+1)+1))/2)², proving P(k+1) is true.

To know more about inductive hypothesis click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31703254#

#SPJ11

Susie had 12 3/10 left to spend on gift C.

Here is the solution to the given question:

Given data:

Susie had 30 to spend on three gifts.She spent 11 9/10 on gift A.She spent 5 3/5 on gift B.

In order to find to find the amount of money Susie has spent, we have to add the amount spent on gift A and the amount spent on gift B:

Amount spent on gift A and B = 11 9/10 + 5 3/5

Lets change both mixed numbers to improper fractions:

11 9/10 = (11 × 10 + 9) ÷ 10

= 119 ÷ 105 3/5

= (5 × 5 + 3) ÷ 5

= 28 ÷ 5

Amount spent on gift A and B = 11 9/10 + $5 3/5

= 119/10 + 28/5

We need to find the common denominator of 5 and 10, which is 10.

We have to convert the second fraction:

28/5 = (28 × 2) ÷ (5 × 2) = 56/10

Amount spent on gift A and B = 119/10 + 56/10

= (119 + 56)/10

= 175/10

Lets simplify the fraction: 175/10

= $17 5/10

= $17.5

Therefore, Susie spent $17.5 on gift A and gift B.

To find how much money she had left for gift C, we subtract the amount spent on gifts A and B from the total amount she had:

Amount spent on gifts A and B = 17.5

Total amount Susie had = 30

Money left for gift C = 30 − 17.5

= $12.5

We can write 12.5 as a mixed number:

12.5 = 12 5/10 = 12 1/2

Therefore, Susie had 12 1/2 left to spend on gift C.

To know more about  amount please visit :

https://brainly.com/question/25109150

#SPJ11

If the slope of "fitted-line" is given to be 8.42, then the correct interpretation is Option(c), which states that "On average, every $1 million increase in salary is linked with 8.42 point increase in "winning-percentage".

The "Slope" of the "fitted-line" denotes the change in response variable (which is winning percentage in this case) for "every-unit" increase in the predictor variable (which is salary of head coach, in millions of dollars).

In this case, the slope is 8.42, which means that on average, for every $1 million increase in salary of "head-coach", there is an increase of 8.42 points in "winning-percentage".

Therefore, Option (c) denotes the correct interpretation of slope.

Learn more about Slope here

brainly.com/question/29075872

#SPJ1

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Abigail gathered data on different schools' winning percentages and the average yearly salary of their head coaches (in millions of dollars) in the years 2000-2011. She then created the following scatterplot and regression line.

The fitted line has a slope of 8.42.

What is the best interpretation of this slope?

(a) A school whose head coach has a salary of $0, would have a winning percentage of 8.42%,

(b) A school whose head coach has a salary of $0, would have a winning percentage of 40%,

(c) On average, each 1 million dollar increase in salary was associated with an 8.42 point increase in winning percentage,

(d) On average, each 1 point increase in winning percentage was associated with an 8.42 million dollar increase in salary.

Based on the data given, the histogram is attached

A histogram is a graphical representation of data points organized into user-specified ranges.

Similar in appearance to a bar graph, the histogram condenses a data series into an easily interpreted visual by taking many data points and grouping them into logical ranges or bins.

From the information, the range of the dataset will be:

= 68 - 32

= 36

The number of classes will be:

= 36 / 10

= 3.6

= 4 approximately.

To learn more on Graph click:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

Step-by-step explanation:

to get how far from the ground the top of the ladder is,we use sine.

sin = 65°

opposite= ? (how far the ladder is from the ground.)

hypotenuse=72 (length of the ladder)

therefore,

[tex]sin65 = \frac{x}{72} [/tex]

x=7265

x=72×0.9063

x=65.25 inches (to 2 d.p)

therefore, the ladder is 65.25 inches from the ground.

to get the base of the ladder from the wall.

[tex]cos \: 65 = \frac{x}{72} [/tex]

x= 0.4226 × 72

x= 30.43 inches to 2 d.p

therefore, the base of the ladder is 30.43 inches from the wall.

The least number of terms in the series that must be summed to guarantee a partial sum that is within 0.03 of S is 1111.

We can use the alternating series error bound, which states that the error in approximating an alternating series is less than or equal to the absolute value of the first neglected term.

For this series, the terms decrease in absolute value and alternate in sign, so we can apply the alternating series test.

Let Sn be the nth partial sum of the series. Then, by the alternating series error bound, we have:

|S - Sn| ≤ 1/(n+1)√

We want to find the smallest value of n such that the error is less than or equal to 0.03, so we set up the inequality:

1/(n+1)√ ≤ 0.03

Squaring both sides and solving for n, we get:

n ≥ (1/0.03)^2 - 1

n ≥ 1111

Therefore, the least number of terms in the series that must be summed to guarantee a partial sum that is within 0.03 of S is 1111.

The answer is not listed among the options, but the closest one is (c) 111. However, this value is not sufficient to guarantee an error of 0.03 or less.

Learn more about partial sum here

https://brainly.com/question/29610001

#SPJ11

The linear function that best fits the data points is: f(t) = 2 + (1/3)t.

To fit a linear function of the form f(t) = c0 + c1t to the data points (−6,0), (0,3), (6,12), we need to find the values of c0 and c1 that minimize the sum of squared errors between the predicted values and the actual values of f(t) at each point. The sum of squared errors can be written as:

[tex]SSE = Σ [f(ti) - yi]^2[/tex]

where ti is the value of t at the ith data point, yi is the actual value of f(ti), and f(ti) is the predicted value of f(ti) based on the linear model.

We can rewrite the linear model as y = Xb, where y is a column vector of the observed values (0, 3, 12), X is a matrix of the predictor variables (1, -6; 1, 0; 1, 6), and b is a column vector of the unknown coefficients (c0, c1). We can solve for b using the normal equation:

(X'X)b = X'y

where X' is the transpose of X. This gives us:

[3 0 12][c0;c1] = [3 3 12]

Simplifying this equation, we get:

3c0 - 18c1 = 3

3c0 + 18c1 = 12

Solving for c0 and c1, we get:

c0 = 2

c1 = 1/3

Therefore, the linear function that best fits the data points is:

f(t) = 2 + (1/3)t.

To know more about linear function refer to-

https://brainly.com/question/29205018

#SPJ11

The coefficient of determination tells you the fraction of the total sum of squares that can be explained by using the estimated regression equation.

Coefficient of determination is marked at R².

It is the square of the correlation coefficient.

It is always positive.

It does not tell about the the sum of square error or the sum of square due to regression.

It basically tells about the fraction of the total sum of squares that can be explained by using the estimated regression equation.

Hence the correct option is D.

Learn more about Coefficient of Determination here :

https://brainly.com/question/29581430

#SPJ1

We can be 90% confident that the true mean claim payment for the population of insurance claims is between $1522.30 and $1567.70.

First, let's find the critical value Zα/2. Since we want a 0.90 confidence interval, we need to find the Z-score that corresponds to an area of 0.05 in the right tail of the standard normal distribution. Using a Z-table or a calculator, we find that Zα/2 = 1.645.

Next, we plug in the given values:

x = $1545

σ = $248

n = 366

Zα/2 = 1.645

CI = $1545 ± 1.645 * ($248/√366)

Simplifying the expression inside the parentheses, we get:

CI = $1545 ± $22.70

The 90% confidence interval for the mean claim payment is:

CI = ($1522.30, $1567.70)

Learn more about confidence interval on

https://brainly.com/question/15712887

#SPJ4