Answer: The pseudoscientific ideas that the4 Nazi people believed in were ideas that were not true and had not been proven scientifically. The ideas were used to violate human rights and especially the rights of black Americans. They were treated as if they were not complete human beings because of the color difference.
Different impacts were brought about by the pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1949. This was the period when the pseudoscientific ideas of race brought about a sense of racism among the people and this can be seen by how the people would discriminate against others based on how they look and most importantly their skin color. (Coppersmith, 2021). The Nazi people would violate the rights of the black people and that was because they would view the black American people to be people who are not complete.
It was prohibited that the black Americans were not supposed to vote in general elections and at the same time, it was prohibited that they were not supposed to own dogs and also owning or moving around carrying guns. It was not allowed that the black Americans would intermarry with the white people and therefore they were supposed to have special permission that was granted by the government. And finally, the black Americans were completely moved to the reserves by force. There were those people that believed that the black Americans were not supposed to top integrate with the whites and therefore they were to be kept in a different place.
Reference
Coppersmith, D. (2021). The Evolution of the Idea of the Jewish Race from Medieval Spain to Nazi Germany (Doctoral dissertation).
Explanation:
Explain how the court case Brown versus the Board court of education of Topeka,illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of the constitution as a guarantee of human rights
Annika was leaving work and discovered that her car had been stolen. What would make this a social problem? if there are a lot of car thefts in the area if everyone agrees that stealing a car is wrong if she has insurance that will pay to replace her car if Annika remembered to lock her car before she left it
The loss of Annika's car would be a social problem if there are a lot of car thefts in the area. The first option is the answer.
What is a social problem?A social problem is a condition or issue in society that is judged undesirable or in need of care and affects a sizable number of people. It is an issue that has an effect on how people interact, function, and feel about their community or society as a whole. Economic inequalities, cultural disputes, prejudice, criminality, inequality, and institutional flaws are only a few of the many causes of social problems.
When auto thefts are commonplace in one location, there may be a social issue there. It implies that there might be underlying problems like insufficient safety precautions, economic inequalities, or a dearth of efficient law enforcement. Increased dread and insecurity among community members might have a negative impact on their general well-being and quality of life.
Learn more on social problems here https://brainly.com/question/22851515
#SPJ1
What was it to think an activist
Answer:
An activist is someone who is active in campaigning for change, normally on political or social issues. Not sure if that's what u were looking for but I hope it helps!
A person who actively campaigns for change, typically on political or social concerns, is referred to as an activist.
The goal of activism (or advocacy) is to influence social, political, economic, or environmental transformation in order to transform society for what is thought to be the greater good.
There are many different ways to be politically active, including writing letters to the editor of local newspapers, organizing community meetings, marching on city streets, participating in sit-ins or hunger strikes, running for office, or contributing to a political campaign.
Learn more about activists here:
https://brainly.com/question/28115615
#SPJ1
Which group of people spent the most time at the sahara desert
Which of the following composers wrote excellent suites for the harpsichords
Nadia Boulanger
Joan Tower
Thea Musgrave
Elizabeth Jacquet de la Guerre
Answer:
Elizabeth Jacquet de la Guerre
Explanation:
Elizabeth Jacquet de la Guerre was a harpsichordist and composer from France during the Baroque period. She was well-known for her keyboard works, which included harpsichord suites. Her harpsichord suites were published in 1687 and are considered some of the finest examples of late 17th-century French keyboard music. Lively dance movements and intricate counterpoints distinguish her suites, and they demonstrate her talent as a performer and composer.
QUESTION 9
Class is a large-scale grouping of people who share common economic resources, influencing
the types of lifestyle they lead.
Briefly elaborate on the Marxist and Functionalist points of view on class, with special
reference to the South African context. (10)
QUESTION 10
Culture defines acceptable ways of behaving for members of a particular society and to a large
degree, culture determines how members of society think and feel: It directs their actions and
defines their outlook on life.
Briefly discuss what the concept of "culture" entails.(10)
QUESTION 9:
Marxist perspective views class as a result of economic relations and exploitation, emphasizing class struggle. Functionalist perspective sees class as a functional division with each class contributing to society's stability. In the South African context, Marxist analysis highlights class divisions and economic inequality resulting from historical apartheid policies, while Functionalist perspective may focus on social integration and interdependence across different classes.
QUESTION 10:
Culture encompasses shared beliefs, values, customs, and behaviors of a society. It influences individuals' thoughts, emotions, and actions, shaping their worldview and providing guidelines for acceptable behavior. Culture includes language, religion, art, music, traditions, norms, and other aspects that define a particular society's identity. It varies across regions, ethnic groups, and historical contexts, playing a crucial role in social cohesion and shaping individual and collective identities.
QUESTION 9:
The Marxist perspective on class sees it as a product of economic relations and exploitation.
Marxists argue that society is divided into social classes based on ownership of the means of production, leading to class struggle.
In the South African context, this perspective highlights the deep-rooted economic inequality resulting from apartheid policies, with a small capitalist class exploiting the working class and perpetuating social divisions.
The Functionalist perspective views class as a functional division necessary for social stability.
According to functionalists, different classes perform specific roles and contribute to the smooth functioning of society.
In South Africa, functionalists might emphasize the interdependence and integration of different classes for societal harmony and progress.
QUESTION 10:
Culture encompasses the shared beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, symbols, and artifacts of a particular society.
It defines acceptable ways of behaving and provides a framework for individuals to understand and navigate their social environment.
Culture influences individuals' thoughts, emotions, and actions, shaping their worldview and guiding their behavior.
Culture is transmitted from one generation to another through socialization processes, including language, education, and social interactions.
It includes aspects such as language, religion, art, music, traditions, social norms, rituals, and material objects.
Culture varies across societies, reflecting their unique histories, geographical locations, and social structures.
Culture plays a vital role in maintaining social cohesion, as it provides a shared sense of identity and belonging.
It also influences individuals' perceptions, preferences, and attitudes, directing their actions and shaping their outlook on life.
For more such questions on Culture:
https://brainly.com/question/13214433
#SPJ11
Match the push and pull factors that might motivate someone to immigrate to the United States.
Tiles
Pull
Push
Pairs
a good economy, freedom of religion and speech
arrowBoth
poverty, religious and political persecution
arrowBoth
Push factors that might motivate someone to immigrate to the United States include poverty, religious persecution, and political persecution. Pull factors include a good economy, freedom of religion, and freedom of speech.
Push and pull factors are two different types of reasons that motivate people to immigrate to a new country. Pull factors refer to positive aspects of the destination country that attract immigrants, while push factors refer to negative factors in the country of origin that compel people to leave.
In the context of immigration to the United States, some examples of pull factors include a strong economy, the promise of better job opportunities, freedom of religion and speech, and access to education and healthcare. On the other hand, some push factors that might motivate someone to leave their country of origin and immigrate to the US include poverty, political persecution, war, natural disasters, lack of economic opportunities, and limited access to basic needs like food and water.
Therefore, a good economy, freedom of religion and speech are examples of pull factors that might motivate someone to immigrate to the United States, while poverty and religious and political persecution are examples of push factors that might compel someone to leave their country of origin and immigrate to the United States. It's important to note that there can be multiple push and pull factors that motivate someone to immigrate, and the decision to leave one's home country is often complex and influenced by a variety of social, economic, and political factors.
For more such questions on immigration, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/27959789
#SPJ11
A company wants to meet the following business goals over the next year.
increase profit made from each sale
create a new product
open a new store
What business decisions will the company most likely need to make to meet these goals?
increase the costs of products
invest in research and development
give loans to customers
hire more workers
stop selling older products
Reset
To meet the goals of the company, they need to make some business decisions. Firstly, they should increase the costs of products to increase their profit margin.
This can be done by making improvements to the products or by introducing new products. Secondly, they should invest in research and development to create a new product. Thirdly, they should offer loans to customers to purchase their products and services.
Fourthly, they should hire more workers to open and manage the new store. Lastly, they should discontinue selling older products to make room for the new ones. By making these decisions, the company can achieve their goals and increase their profits.
To know more about company, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30532251
#SPJ1
In Nevada, the justices of the Supreme Court are appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate
True or False
Answer:
False. In Nevada, the justices of the Supreme Court are not appointed by the governor and confirmed by the Senate. Instead, they are elected through nonpartisan elections by voters. Justices serve six-year terms, after which they may seek re-election.
Explain the meaning of Rev. Dr Allan Boesak's statement, 'The homelands policy forms the basis of the wilful exclusion of 80% of
our nation from the new political deal."
Rev. Dr Allan Boesak's statement refers to the homelands policy implemented by the apartheid government in South Africa.
The homelands policy was a system of racial segregation that aimed to divide the country's population along racial lines and concentrate black South Africans in designated areas called homelands.
Boesak's statement highlights the fact that the homelands policy was a deliberate attempt by the apartheid government to exclude the majority of black South Africans from political power and representation.
By confining black South Africans to homelands that were not recognized as part of the country's political structure, the government effectively denied them the right to participate in the new political order that was established after the end of apartheid.
Boesak's statement also points out the stark reality that 80% of the South African population was black, and therefore, the homelands policy had the effect of excluding the vast majority of the country's people from political power and representation.
Overall, Boesak's statement underscores the discriminatory nature of the homelands policy and the harm it caused to the majority of South Africans during the apartheid era.
Know more about South Africans here :
brainly.com/question/31905303
#SPJ11
Traditional Africa marriage is an advantage for men only not women
Answer:They have more control over their lives and the direction of their
Explanation:
hans frank speech historical context
Hans Frank was a prominent figure during the Nazi era in Germany, serving as the Governor-General of the occupied Polish territories from 1939 to 1945. Analyzing his speech requires understanding the historical context of the time.
Hans Frank's speech took place during World War II, a period marked by widespread aggression, territorial expansion, and the implementation of Nazi ideology. By 1940, the German army had invaded and occupied Poland, which had been divided between Germany and the Soviet Union under the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. Frank's speech was likely delivered as part of his role in overseeing the administration of the occupied Polish territories.
During this time, Nazi Germany pursued a policy of Lebensraum, which aimed to secure "living space" for the German people through the annexation and colonization of other countries. In line with Nazi racial ideology, the occupation of Poland involved the persecution, displacement, and extermination of millions of Polish Jews and other minority groups.
Considering this historical context, it can be inferred that Hans Frank's speech likely propagated Nazi propaganda, emphasizing the superiority of the German race and the need to establish German control over the occupied territories. It might have included themes of anti-Semitism, territorial claims, and the subjugation of conquered peoples.
However, to provide a precise analysis of the speech's content, it is necessary to refer to the specific speech in question. Examining the original text and its historical context would allow for a more comprehensive understanding of Hans Frank's speech and its implications within the broader context of Nazi Germany's policies and actions during World War II.
For more such question on Hans Frank
https://brainly.com/question/15114773
#SPJ11
Synthesizing: What similarities exist between the messages conveyed by the two sources? Mandela and tutus speeches
Nelson Mandela's speech and Desmond Tutu's speech share many similarities in terms of message and intent.
Both of them are fighting for the rights of their fellow South Africans, with Tutu calling for an end to apartheid and Mandela advocating for freedom and democracy. Both speeches were delivered in South Africa, with Tutu's taking place in Cape Town in 1984 and Mandela's being delivered in Pretoria in 1994.
Both speeches are about the need for freedom and democracy in South Africa, and both highlight the need for unity among South Africans.
They both believe that apartheid is a deeply immoral system that must be ended and that all South Africans should have equal rights and opportunities.
They both emphasize the importance of forgiveness and reconciliation, with Tutu saying that forgiveness is the only way to break the cycle of violence and oppression, and Mandela saying that forgiveness is the key to a brighter future. Overall, the similarities between these two speeches show that both Mandela and Tutu were fighting for the same things: freedom, equality, and justice for all South Africans.
For more answers on Nelson Mandela
https://brainly.com/question/26741033
#SPJ8
Question 10
Which of the following words relate most closely to Petrarch?
O Scientist
O Sculpting
O Humanism
Perspective
< Previous
1 pts
Next >
Answer: I believe the answer is humanism
Explanation: if you search for synonyms for Petrarch humanism will appear as a synonym for Petrarch
What are some examples of U.S. policies that have placed its interests above its allies
One example is the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris climate agreement, despite opposition from many of its allies. Another example is the imposition of tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, which has strained relationships with allies such as Canada and the European Union.
The Paris Agreement is an international treaty that was adopted at the United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP21) in Paris in 2015.
The goal of the agreement is to limit global warming to well below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels and pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
It requires participating countries to regularly report on their progress towards reducing greenhouse gas emissions and to submit increasingly ambitious plans for reducing emissions. The Paris Agreement is widely considered a landmark achievement in the global effort to address climate change.
Learn more about Paris climate agreement here
https://brainly.com/question/1694817
#SPJ1
Which events are correlated but do not necessarily have a casual relationship
Answer:
A Teacher drops a box of Chalk, and her chalkboard cracks a few minutes later.
Explanation:
hi
In Worcester v. Georgia, Cherokee leaders argued that:
OA. the U.S. government could force Cherokee peoples to leave land
that it legally owned.
B. the Cherokee Nation's constitution did not make it a sovereign
nation with its own laws.
C. treaties signed with the United States did not make Cherokee
peoples a sovereign nation.
D. the U.S. government could not enforce the United States' laws on
Cherokee territory.
n
Answer:
option D
Explanation:
The U.S. government could not enforce the United States' laws on Cherokee territory. In this landmark Supreme Court case of 1832, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that the Cherokee Nation was a "distinct community" with self-government and sovereignty over its territory. Therefore, Georgia could not enforce state law on Cherokee land, and the federal government had exclusive authority to deal with Indian nations. This decision ultimately protected the Cherokee Nation from forced removal during the infamous Trail of Tears.
name the dispersal point of the luo
The dispersal point of the Luo refers to the origin and migration of the Luo people.
The Luo people's dispersal point is believed to be Bahr el Ghazal, a region in South Sudan. The Luo are an ethnic group native to East Africa, primarily residing in countries such as Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania. Their dispersal began in the late 15th and early 16th centuries as they migrated from Bahr el Ghazal toward their present-day locations.
This migration occurred in multiple stages, with the Luo people splitting into various subgroups and settling in different regions. The causes of their dispersal are attributed to factors such as population pressure, conflicts, and the search for better agricultural land and fishing opportunities. As the Luo moved eastward, they adopted new cultural practices, such as the cultivation of crops, and interacted with other communities, leading to a rich exchange of traditions and languages.
Today, the Luo are known for their vibrant culture, which is reflected in their music, dance, art, and oral literature. Their social organization is based on a clan system, with a strong emphasis on kinship ties and communal living. Their primary economic activities include farming, fishing, and livestock herding, which have evolved over the centuries due to their diverse geographical settlements.
In conclusion, the dispersal point of the Luo people is Bahr el Ghazal in South Sudan, and their migration to East Africa has shaped their unique cultural identity and way of life.
Know more about dispersal here:
https://brainly.com/question/16113316
#SPJ11
based on your knowledge of Bill Clinton's presidency, was he an effective leader?
Answer: yes
Explanation:
because his overal plan was to fix the economy including spending and cutting the budget to reduce the nations $60 billion dollar deficit
When was your county incorporated or created?
What is the population of your county?
Who is the mayor of your county/city?
Baltimore County was incorporated in 1659. The population of the county is 1. 2 million people. The current mayor is Brandon Scott.
What is known of Baltimore county ?The county seat is Towson. The county is located in the central part of Maryland. The county is bodered by Anne Arundel County to the north, Howard County to the west, Harford County to the northeast, and the city of Baltmore to the south.
The county is home to a variety of industres, including healthcare, education, and manufacturng. The county is also home to a number of cultural attractions, including the Baltmore Museum of Art, the Maryland Science Center, and the Baltimore Zoo.
Find out more on counties at https://brainly.com/question/13570563
#SPJ1
Question 4
4.1 Discuss the following two elements of ubuntu in relation to inclusive educational
practices and cultures:
• Ubuntu values interdependence and dependence - It takes a village to
raise a child - requiring support, cooperation, and solidarity within the
community.
(5)
• Ubuntu promotes a spirit of interconnectedness; social cohesion; respect
and dignity; collectivism and solidarity; communal enterprise and legitimate
leadership.
(5)
4.2 In the spirit of ubuntu, how would you promote social cohesion and
interdependence in your inclusive classroom?
(5)
N.B. Read about inclusive educational practices and inclusive cultures in Hall,
R. 2002. Implementing inclusive educational practices through partnerships.
Available under the e-reserves for this module.
The inclusive educational practices and cultures can be strengthened by embracing the values of ubuntu most particularly the interdependence and interconnectedness.
How can ubuntu values promote inclusive education practices?The key way to promote social cohesion and interdependence in an inclusive classroom is to create a sense of community where students feel connected and supported by their peers and teachers.
This can be achieved by encouraging cooperative learning activities such as group projects and discussions where students work together to achieve a common goal. Teachers can also foster a sense of belonging by creating a welcoming and inclusive classroom environment where students feel comfortable expressing their thoughts and ideas.
Read more about Ubuntu
brainly.com/question/30045716
#SPJ1
What are the similarities and differences between a straw poll and an exit poll
Answer:
Among political bodies, straw polls often are scheduled for events at which many people interested in the polling question can be expected to vote.
Explanation:
Sometimes polls conducted without ordinary voting controls in place (i.e., on an honor system, such as in online polls) are also called "straw polls"
Discuss Conferences the 1914 four and 1924 General Missionary their resolutions
The 1914 Four Conferences and the 1924 General Missionary Conference were significant gatherings that aimed to address various issues and formulate resolutions related to missionary work.
What were the key discussions and resolutions made?The 1914 Four Conferences were held in Edinburgh, Scotland and brought together representatives from different Protestant missionary societies. The conferences focused on topics such as the unity and cooperation among Christian missions, the evangelization of non-Christian regions and the role of the church in addressing social and economic issues.
The 1924 General Missionary Conference held in Edinburgh, built upon the discussions of the Four Conferences. It aimed to assess the progress made in missionary efforts since 1910 and address emerging challenges. The conference emphasized the need for a holistic approach to mission work, encompassing evangelism, social justice and cultural sensitivity.
Read more about resolutions
brainly.com/question/2267795
#SPJ1
How were Trump's and Biden's responses to the COVID-19 pandemic similar?
O They both took a centralized approach, where the federal government
imposed mandates and restrictions.
O Neither one prioritized the development of vaccines.
O Neither administration kept the public informed with televised
briefings.
O. They both provided cash payments to help people pay for housing and
other basic needs.
Submit
Answer:
D. They both provided cash payments... (Stimulus checks, btw).
I NEED HELP ASAP!!!!!
Which do you think had a greater impact on Southwest Asia and North Africa in the 2000s and 2010s: intervention from Western governments or the actions of people and groups within the region?
Write your response in at least three sentences.
It is difficult to compare the impact of Western government intervention versus the actions of people and groups within the region, as both have had significant and complex effects on SWANA.
The impact of Western government intervention versus the actions of people and groups within Southwest Asia and North Africa (SWANA) in the 2000s and 2010s is a complex issue with varying perspectives.
On the one hand, Western government intervention in the form of military invasions, political and economic sanctions, and drone strikes have had significant effects on the region.
The Iraq War, for example, destabilized the country and led to the rise of extremist groups such as ISIS.
The War in Afghanistan and the War on Terror have also had long-lasting impacts on the region, including increased violence and the displacement of millions of people.
On the other hand, the actions of people and groups within the region have also had a profound impact on the SWANA region.
The Arab Spring, for instance, was a series of protests and uprisings throughout the region that led to the overthrow of several long-standing dictatorships.
These protests were largely driven by the actions of ordinary people and civil society groups, rather than Western intervention.
Ultimately, It is important to acknowledge the nuances of the situation and the multiple factors that have contributed to the region's current state.
For more such questions on Western government, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/28321592
#SPJ11
13. The political changes brought about by the actions of the National Association for the
Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE),
and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) led to
The political changes brought about by the actions of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), and the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) were significant and instrumental in advancing the civil rights movement in the United States.
The NAACP, founded in 1909, played a crucial role in fighting for racial equality and challenging discriminatory laws through legal means. They pursued legal strategies, such as litigation and lobbying, to challenge segregation and discriminatory practices.
Their efforts resulted in groundbreaking victories, including the landmark Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional.
The NAACP's legal victories not only struck down discriminatory laws but also laid the foundation for broader civil rights reforms.
CORE, established in 1942, focused on nonviolent direct action and civil disobedience to challenge segregation. They organized sit-ins, freedom rides, and other forms of protest to expose and challenge racial discrimination in public facilities, transportation, and voting rights. Their efforts, often met with violent resistance, garnered national attention and contributed to shifting public opinion in favor of civil rights reforms.
The SCLC, founded in 1957 and led by Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., advocated for nonviolent protest and played a pivotal role in organizing large-scale civil rights campaigns, such as the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the March on Washington.
Through peaceful demonstrations, they aimed to bring attention to racial injustice, advocate for equal rights, and mobilize support for civil rights legislation.
Collectively, these organizations, through their tireless activism, brought attention to racial inequality, challenged discriminatory practices, and mobilized public support for civil rights reforms.
Their efforts helped shape public opinion, influenced policymakers, and ultimately led to significant political changes.
The passage of landmark legislation, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, can be attributed in part to the relentless advocacy and activism of the NAACP, CORE, SCLC, and other civil rights organizations.
These political changes dismantled legal segregation, protected voting rights, and marked significant steps towards racial equality in the United States.
For more questions on NAACP
https://brainly.com/question/1146050
#SPJ8
The largest source of Nevada state budget comes from taxes on the:
gaming industry
mining industry
service sector
entertainment
What are 3 important facts / details about John Steinbeck's life or work.
John Steinbeck was an American writer and Pulitzer Prize winner acknowledged for his realistic and socially conscious novels. 3 important facts about his life and work are:
Steinbeck was born in Salinas, California, in 1902, and spent a great deal of his life writing approximately the human beings and places of his house state. many of his novels, consisting of "Of Mice and guys" and "The Grapes of Wrath," explore the struggles of migrant employees and different marginalized agencies in California.Steinbeck was deeply committed to social justice & used his writing to expose the injustices and inequalities he noticed in American society. He changed into a vocal critic of capitalism and the yank Dream, and his novels regularly challenged readers to rethink their assumptions approximately the world.Steinbeck's work was broadly acclaimed during his lifetime and remains influential nowadays. He received the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1962 and is broadly appeared as one of the greatest American writers of the twentieth century. His novels are nonetheless broadly study and studied in faculties and universities around the world.Learn more about John Steinbeck:-
https://brainly.com/question/31015404
#SPJ1
Which of the following is true about Japan and
the United States following World War II?
A. Both nations became military superpowers.
B. Both nations agreed the use of the atomic bomb was justified.
C. They never spoke to one another again.
D. They became active trade partners with each other over time.
Explanation:
D. They became active trade partners with each other over time.
Answer:
The correct answer would be D, :D!
Explanation:
Brain maybe?
Read the excerpt from the supreme court’s decision in Baker v Carr. How has the Supreme Court answered the question posed in this excerpt? “And so the question is, may a state weight the vote of one county or one district more heavily than it weights the vote in another? The traditional test under the equal protection clause has been whether a state has made an invidious discrimination…”-Baker v. Carr, 1962. A. the Supreme Court cannot rule in these cases because states are allowed to establish their own forms of republic governments. B. the Supreme Court has ruled that states must create legislative districts that represent equal numbers of citizens. C. the Supreme Court has ruled that states have the authority to weigh the votes of one district more heavily than the votes cast in another district. D. The Supreme Court has ruled that all states must have their legislative districts approved by the federal government before each election.
The Supreme Court has ruled that states must create legislative districts that represent equal numbers of citizens. Therefore the correct option is B.
The Supreme Court has answered the question posed in this excerpt by stating that the traditional test under the equal protection clause has been whether a state has made an invidious discrimination.
This means that the Court has ruled that it is unconstitutional for a state to weight the vote of one county or one district more heavily than it weights the vote in another if such weighting results in invidious discrimination, which is a form of unfair treatment.
The Court's decision in Baker v. Carr was a landmark case in the area of voting rights & redistricting. The case arose from a challenge to Tennessee's state legislative districts, which had not been redrawn in over 60 years despite significant population shifts.
As a result, some districts had many more residents than others, which meant that some citizens had more influence over the state's legislative process than others.
To know more about Supreme Court-
brainly.com/question/29845548
#SPJ1