Elliot had his license revoked three years ago for unethical actions. Elliot is guilty of a misdemeanor.
What is unethical?Not all unethical conduct at work involves overt actions. It includes employees acting out and provoking managers, delegation of responsibilities, and coworkers, as well as more covert actions that endanger people, output, and companies.
By functioning in the role of a property investment salesman without having a California carry permit, Elliott has misled himself. A misdemeanor is a category of crime that is penalized by law. A misdemeanors is often a crime that carries a sentence from less than one year in prison. Misdemeanors are typically punished by volunteer work, supervision, taxes, and jail with less than a year.
Learn more about unethical, Here:
https://brainly.com/question/10174825
#SPJ2
Is the government doing enough to ensure that human rights are protected? Explain your viewpoint.
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
i would believe so because they ae constantly making laws that support human right protection. also, the court system is always active, which means if for some reason human rights arent protects you have the ability to take it to court and stand for what you believe in.
What is a Good Samaritan policy in relation to alcohol abuse
Answer:
Amherst College
Explanation:
Question 2
What should you leave with a friend or relative before a long outing on the
water?
A
float plan
B
boat registration certificate
С
operator's license
D
insurance policy
As
pport
Submit Answer
Answer:
A. Float plan
Explanation:
A float plan can be defined as a written statement containing the details about an intended boat trip which is filed with a friend, siblings, or relatives.
Generally, float plan is a collection of details about your boat, number of people on board (crew and passengers), a safety equipment being used, expected or intended destination, and when you expect to get there.
Hence, before a long outing on the water, you should leave a float plan with your friend or relative.
The purpose of having a float plan is to assist the search and rescue personnel in locating victims in the event of a boat accident, mishap or emergency.
In a nutshell, a float plan is a life saving document which is used to locate victims in the shortest possible time during a boat emergency.
MI LAW PROHIBITS OPEN ALCOHOL/INTOXICANTS IN A MOTOR VEHICLE. VIOLATORS OF THIS LAW WILL FACE A FINE UP TO $____, ALTHOUGH NO ACTION IS TAKEN AGAINST A DRIVER'S LICENSE ON A FIRST OFFENSE.
Answer:
is this a question?
The House majority leader is Select one: a. chosen soon after their first election to Congress. b. selected by the president. c. chosen by the national party chairperson. d. chosen by seniority. e. elected by the caucus of the majority party.
d and e are the answers
Do you think that a trial judge should inform a jury that it has the power to issue a jury pardon despite the evidence of the defendant's guilt when the jury feels that in "good conscience" the defendant should not be convicted of the crime charged or any lesser crime supported by the evidence at trial? Explain your answer.
Answer : No.
Explanation:
Once you inform that you have the power, they will use the power for the bad. and abuse the power.
How do opinions and facts contribute to whether or not an issue needs civic attention or not?
Answer:
Generally, in every democratic state, governments promote their public policies based on the needs of their inhabitants. Therefore, public opinion and the facts that affect the population turn out to be decisive factors when the government determines which issues deserve to be addressed and resolved.
Thus, for example, demonstrations, protests or social problems are those that highlight the government regarding an unfavorable situation, so that it passes through Congress the necessary laws destined to improve said situation.
In short, the government is nothing other than the representation of the will of the people. Therefore, its main objective is to solve people's problems and guarantee a better quality of life, with which the daily events that affect them have an enormous weight in determining the public policies to be carried out.
Every judge has the power to decide the cases before him/her without having to follow the decisions of any other judge or court.
Answer:
Judicial power is the power “of a court to decide and pronounce a judgment and carry it into effect between persons and parties who bring a case before it for decision.”
Which of the following advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights?
a. individual-rights advocates
b. public-order advocates
c. states'-rights advocates
d. crime-control advocates
The individual-rights advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is advocates ?
Defend, debate, and support someone's unique idea is what the word "advocate" refers to. Typically, lawyers use the term "advocate." A person with the right to represent a party in court is known as an advocate.
Advocates for individual rights mean defending the human and legal rights of people. Advocates for individual rights include those for civil rights, economic rights, social rights, political rights, cultural rights, etc.
Therefore, option (a) individual-rights advocates is correct.
Learn more about on advocates, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8994455
#SPJ2
The Texas legislature has given special jurisdiction to certain courts in proceedings involving the estates of decedents. The type of law dealing with these matters is known as
Answer:
Probate
Explanation:
Probate is a term that explains the legal process which involves the determination of the authenticity of a Will, in a court of law, and accepted as a valid public document, but the true last testament of the deceased, and manages the assets and liabilities left behind by that particular deceased.
Hence, the type of law with special jurisdiction, that the Texas legislature has given to certain courts in proceedings involving the estates of decedents is known as PROBATE.
Which jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law?
Answer:
Harvard law school
Explanation:
As the Historical jurisprudential school of thought relies the most upon precedent in establishing law.
What is a law?In order to control conduct, social or political institutions make laws that are then enforced. However, the exact concept of law is still up for question. It has been called both science and the practice of justice in diverse contexts.
It is possible to think of this school as the school of the evolutionary process. Its emphasis is still on the development and history of the legal system. it holds that prior laws and rulings will continue to be valid in the present and the future.
Therefore, As a result, By the historic school of thought relies the most on precedent in establishing law
Learn more about the law here:
https://brainly.com/question/6590381
#SPJ6
Seats in the House of Representatives are up for election every __________, while Senate seats are up for election every __________.. a.two years; four years b. six years; four years c. two years, three years d. two years; six years e. six years; two years
a?
(i would like brainliest if i'm correct)
Lois considers herself an act utilitarian. Accordingly, which of the following statements is Lois most likely to make?
A. "It may be O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the good you produce outweighs the harm caused by the violation."
B. "It is O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the law says it’s okay."
C. "Good consequences are not as important as human rights."
D. "The notion of rights is just a way for lesser members of society to maintain control over those capable of greatness."
Answer:
Correct Answer:
A. "It may be O.K. to violate someone’s rights if the good you produce outweighs the harm caused by the violation."
Explanation:
Utilitarian theory is a moral theory whereby an individual views the morality of an action being done as either good or bad based on the effect it would have. For example, is the dropping of bomb in an area in the cause of war.
This could be viewed by some people as morally right since it will kill people but at same time stop the ongoing war rather than a situation where the war continues on the long run.
What is a constitution in government?
o any official agreement between two or more nations
O a written document stating how people agree to be governed
O a statement outlining basic rights and freedoms
O a written agreement between equal branches of government
Answer:
a written document stating how people agree to be governed
Agent Suma has recently had several clients request his assistance in completing their paper enrollment form. What advice would you give him?
Answer:
He should get an assistant to ease him of some work .
The advice would be the only fields that Agent Suma is allowed to complete are the applicant's name and contact information. To preserve their privacy, the client must fill out the remaining fields.
What is clients?
The individual or customer who utilizes the services of a company, client, or organization is referred to as a “client.” The customer both uses the company's services and pays for them. The customer mostly purchases the company's services in accordance with her preferences and choices.
Suma, the agent, is responsible for completing the enrollment form on paper. Agent Suma is a client who needs help completing the form. However, there are numerous inquiries about personal and private information on the form.
As a result, the agent Suma only authorizes the entry of the name and a few other details but not all of them. The clients are adding details based on their personal perceptions rather than to assist others because anyone could abuse the information.
Hence, the significance of the clients is aforementioned.
Learn more about on clients, here:
https://brainly.com/question/17355548
#SPJ5
If a person upon whom the assurance is demanded does not have a good reputation or economic position, a guarantee of performance or a pledge of security may be required.
A. True
B. False
Answer:
The correct answer is A. It is true that, if a person upon whom the assurance is demanded does not have a good reputation or economic position, a guarantee of performance or a pledge of security may be required.
Explanation:
Indeed, to access good insurance coverage, the insured person is required to have a certain financial solvency, which guarantees the insurance company that the person has no need to cause the evil for which he is insuring, since he has no financial need to obtain said benefit immediately.
Therefore, in case of not being completely solvent, the person must demonstrate certain requirements that fulfill the guarantee function for the company. Thus, many times these people are required to sign security guarantees, and are even forced to pay a higher fee for an amount that is worth less than the good they are insuring. In this way, insurance companies seek to reduce the risk of insurance fraud.
Which laws protect citizens from human rights violations?
Answer:
the human right to live
Explanation:
what is the legal bac of drinking and driving
Answer:
when you are driving and drinking you may get an accident
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
In which of the following circumstances, under the doctrine of stare decisis, does the common law rule stated in an earlier judgment not apply to a present case?
A. Only when the case concerns a government agency.
B. Only when the court distinguishes the earlier decision.
C. Only when the parties involved jointly appeal to the courts to do so.
D. The doctrine of stare decisis does not allow this kind of a situation.
An eight-year-old girl went to the grocery store with her mother. The girl pushed the grocery cart while her mother put items into it. The girl's mother remained near her at all times. The plaintiff, another customer in the store, noticed the girl pushing the cart in a manner that caused the plaintiff no concern. A short time later, the cart the girl was pushing struck the plaintiff in the knee, inflicting serious injury. If the plaintiff brings an action, based on negligence, against the girl, which of the following will be her best argument in defense?
A. Yes, if the girl was negligent.
B. Yes, because the girl's mother is responsible for any harm caused by the girl.
C. Yes, because the girl's mother assumed the risk of her child's actions.
D. Yes, if the girl's mother did not adequately supervise the girl's actions.
Answer:
the answer is C. because the mother did not push the cart but was near her daughter all times, the mother DID supervise her but the girl was pushing the cart and she DID crash but she wasn't planning to crash so the girl wasn't fully negligent but the mother was kinda responsible so that leaves the only option that still stands is C.
Yes, since the girl's mother accepted responsibility for her child's behavior. A further explanation is below.
The mother didn't pressure this same vehicle but remained close to her daughter throughout all circumstances; the mother DID watch her, but the child must have been moving the cart as well as she DID crash, even though she had no intention of doing so.Therefore the daughter was not completely careless, however, the mother was partly to blame, therefore the only alternative which thus remains is choice C.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/24662070
The state of Connecticut offered a $20,000 reward to anyone giving information leading to the arrest and conviction of the individual responsible for the murder of a man who was killed during the course of a robbery. Robert DePretis, a private investigator hired by an attorney Joseph Gallicchio representing a codefendant in the case, obtained a written and signed confession from James Avis, in which Avis admitted responsibility for the murder, and delivered the confession to the state police. This information eventually led to Avis s arrest, and Avis was later convicted for the crime. When DePretis tried to obtain the reward money, the state claimed, among other things, that DePretis was not eligible to collect the reward because, as Gallicchio s private investigator, he had a preexisting duty to investigate and report information relating to the crime. DePretis argued that although he commenced his activity in this matter as a result of his relationship with the attorney, he had no duty as a police officer would to continue his investigations. What will the court decide
Answer:
that he has to much involvement in the case
Which 1948 Supreme Court decision supported the hands-off doctrine?
Answer:
Price v. Johnston
Explanation:
1948-supported hands-off doctrine, saying prison inmates must expect that part of their punishment for their crime is the loss of freedoms that free citizens take for granted
Perhaps the aspect of internal investigation that has instigated the greatest amount
of litigation is
drug testing
genetic testing
health history inquiry
mental health review
Of the proposed methods for responding to an unruly defendant in Illinois v. Allen, which did the Supreme Court state should be used as a last resort for fear of prejudicing the jury against the defendant?
Answer:
Gag and bind defendants
Explanation:
In the Illinois v. Allen case of 1970, the Supreme court upheld the gag or bind order which allows for the removal of an unruly defendant who interrupts court proceedings. In that particular case, Allen was tried for ordering a drink in a bar, refusing to pay, and collecting $200 at gunpoint from a bartender. When he was charged to court, Allen refused the public defender whom the court assigned to him, rather insisting that he would defend himself. He proved verbally abusive to the judge even issuing him a death threat when he tried convincing him of the need for a public defender who understands the language of the court. When the situation proved uncontrollable, the judge ordered that Allen be taken out of the court and only brought in when there was a need for him to be identified.
The Supreme court upheld this decision agreeing that any defendant whose actions proved disruptive to the court should be removed from the courtroom. Gag and shackles were one of the three methods proposed for controlling an unruly defendant and it was to be the last resort. The reason for this is that when the judges see the defendant in that condition it could play on their emotions, thus making them prejudiced.
2. Jane Jackson purchased a sealed can of Katydids, chocolate-covered pecan caramel candies manufactured by Nestle. Shortly after, Jackson bit into one of the candies and allegedly broke a tooth on a pecan shell embedded in the candy. She filed a complaint, asserting breach of implied warranty. How would you argue on behalf of the company?
Answer:
The argument for the company would be based on the fact that, she could have had a defective tooth which only broke while eating the Katydids candies. Most times, the warranty offered in food is with regards to the food being expired, unwholesome for eating due to foreign materials inside etc.
Her filing for breach of warranty over her defective tooth is uncalled for.
Explanation:
summarize articles 4-6 of the constitution
Answer:
4) The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.
5) Article Five of the United States Constitution describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of government, may be altered
6) Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution first says that any debts or engagements that the country was involved in before the Constitution was put into action are still valid.
Explanation:
Read above ^
What does "establishment of religion" mean? (The Establishment Clause) (Choose all answers that apply) The government can use praying at its events The government cannot discriminate against non-believers. The government cannot establish an official religion. The government can order children to pray at school The government cannot favor one religion over another.
Answer:the government cannot discriminate non believers, the government cannot establish an official religion, the government cannot favor one religion over another
Theorists from the ___________________ school sought to determine basic causes of crime, had strong faith in scientific experts, and believed in rehabilitating offenders rather than punishing them. A. Classical B. Neoclassical C. Chicago D. Positivist
Answer:
theorists from the positivist school
What does NOT give law enforcers probable cause? (choose all answers that apply) Group of answer choices Reasonable suspicion that a crime has been committed. An anonymous tip is considered reliable evidence. When a person is in flight. A person's appearance.
Answer:
An anonymous tip is considered reliable evidence. When a person is in flight. A person's appearance.
Explanation:
Hope it helps