During the isothermal heat rejection process of a Carnot cycle, the working fluid experiences an entropy change of -0.7 Btu/R.
To determine the amount of heat transfer, we can use the formula Q = TS, where Q is the heat transfer, T is the temperature, and S is the entropy change. Plugging in the values given, we get Q = (-0.7 Btu/R)(95 degree F) = -66.5 Btu.
To determine the entropy change of the sink, we can use the formula S = Q/T, where Q is the heat transfer and T is the temperature of the sink. Plugging in the values given, we get S = (-66.5 Btu)/(95 degree F) = -0.7 Btu/R.
To determine the total entropy change for this process, we can add up the entropy changes of the working fluid and the sink. The entropy change of the working fluid was given as -0.7 Btu/R, and the entropy change of the sink was calculated as -0.7 Btu/R, so the total entropy change is (-0.7 Btu/R) + (-0.7 Btu/R) = -1.4 Btu/R.
Learn more about entropy change: https://brainly.com/question/4526346
#SPJ11
if the message number is 64bits long. how many messages could be numbered. b) choose an authentication function for secure channel, the security factor required is 256bits.
If the message number is 64 bits long, then there could be a total of 2^64 possible message numbers. This is because each bit has two possible states (0 or 1) and there are 64 bits in total, so 2 to the power of 64 gives us the total number of possible message numbers.
For the authentication function, a common choice for a secure channel with a security factor of 256 bits would be HMAC-SHA256. This is a type of message authentication code (MAC) that uses a secret key and a cryptographic hash function to provide message integrity and authenticity. HMAC-SHA256 is widely used in secure communication protocols such as TLS and VPNs.
If you need to learn more about bits click here:
https://brainly.com/question/19667078
#SPJ11
what is the difference between an argument that is valid and one that is invalid? construct an example each.
An argument is said to be valid when its conclusion follows logically from its premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true.
On the other hand, an argument is said to be invalid when its conclusion does not follow logically from its premises. This means that even if the premises are true, the conclusion may not necessarily be true.
For example, consider the following argument:
Premise 1: All cats have tails.
Premise 2: Tom is a cat.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tom has a tail.
This argument is valid because if we accept the premises as true, then the conclusion logically follows. However, consider the following argument:
Premise 1: All dogs have tails.
Premise 2: Tom is a cat.
Conclusion: Therefore, Tom has a tail.
This argument is invalid because even though the premises may be true, the conclusion does not logically follow from them. In this case, the fact that all dogs have tails does not necessarily mean that all cats have tails, so we cannot use this premise to support the conclusion.
To know more about argument visit:
https://brainly.com/question/27100677
#SPJ11