Answer:
Federalists wanted a strong central government. They believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were going to band together to form a nation. A strong central government could represent the nation to other countries.
Explanation:
Answer:
The Federalists wanted a strong central government, they believed that a strong central government was necessary if the states were to join together to form a country.
Explanation:
PLZ HELP ME IM STUCK ON THIS QUESTION, AND IM TRYING TO COMPLETE MY MIDTERM
In 1880Frederick Douglass said "to the freedman was given the machinery of liberty , but there was denied to them the steam to put it into motion...The old master class... retained power to starve them to death, and wherever this power is held there is the power of slavery"
Which of the following best explains this statement?
A, The ex -masters continued to treat newly- freed men like slaves.
B, The industrialization of the South prevented ex-slaves from prospering as much as whites
C, Freedmen who were given new farm equipment did much better financially than white landowners
D, Although freedmen had been given the right to votethey still had little economic independence
in the game of economics which of the following players use goods and services
Question 11.
Which of the following best illustrates the concept of limited
government?
A. The federal government replacing state curricula in
public schools
B. The federal government restricting commerce within a
state
C. The president appointing state and federal judges
D. The president vetoing a bill from Congress
Answer:
D. The president vetoing a bill from Congress
who is candra Gupta tne second
Answer:
Explanation:
Chandragupta II (c. 375 CE - 413/14 CE) was the next great Gupta emperor after his father Samudragupta (335/350 - 370/380 CE). He proved to be an able ruler and conqueror with many achievements to his credit. He came to be known by his title Vikramaditya (Sanskrit: "Sun of Power").
What did Horace advice poets to do before they publish their poetry?
Please heeeeelppp me
What was the impact of the US Supreme Court's decision in Miranda v Arizona (1966)?
O Police were required to have a search warrant to search a suspect's dwelling.
O Minors were given the same "due process" rights as adults
O Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.
O Defendants accused of serious crimes had to be provided with a state-sponsored public defender
mmm
Answer:
C/the third one
Explanation:
Suspects had to be told of their right to have an attorney present or to remain silent during police interrogations.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
i answerd it and got it correct
many Mexicans fled to texas to escape the
Answer:
The war or poverty? This is just a guess, is there a wordbank?
what was the cultural important of the annual flooding of the Nile River
Answer:
Ancient Egyptians believed that the Nile flooded every year because of Isis's tears of sorrow for her dead husband
Why.did Greek citit-states like Athens depend. on sea trade?
Answer:
The Greeks even built cities in other parts of the world so they could trade goods. They also built ships that could travel far across the sea. The Greeks spread their culture to other peoples by selling wine, olives, and pottery.
Explanation:
hope this helps :-)
• Are revolutions futile? Are the odds stacked against revolutionaries? Do they cause more harm than good? Should oppressed people revolt? Should they just endure oppression? Are there alternatives NO OTHER SITES OR FILES
Answer:
This dissertation examines popular fictions that employed the history and
iconography of the American Revolution to promote radical reform movements in the
antebellum United States. The project challenges common critical assumptions that
historical fictions—and particularly those drawing upon Revolutionary history—are
inherently nostalgic and capable of conveying only a limited range of political meanings.
Rather than conservative efforts to preserve Revolutionary history, many works of this type
were extensions of their authors’ progressive reform efforts. These historical fictions sought
to recruit readers to the cause of completing the democratizing work of the Revolution in
order to ensure that the people maintained control over their own institutions.
The project considers works by authors who circulated among groups and parties that
contributed to the democratic tumult of the antebellum period, including Catharine Maria
Sedgwick, George Lippard, Herman Melville, Frederick Douglass, and Harriet Beecher
Stowe. As members—either centrally or peripherally—of opposition political parties,
unions, and reform groups, these authors spoke on behalf of, or were received as engaging
with, campaigns for labor reform, socialism, and abolitionism. Situating these texts within
contemporary radical reform movements reveals that they explicitly endorsed policies such
Explanation:
Why do many claim the Civil War was a war over states' rights, and not over slavery?
Answer:
Because many people insisted that "It's about Southern pride and that it was about their heritage, forgetting about slavery altogether
Explanation:
The Civil War, was in fact, over states' rights, rather than slavery. It was essentially the only reason, with only a small sector on both sides (abolitionists and people who heavily depended on slaves) who viewed it as such.
The first part is the wish to be able to see where the rights of the slaves was drawn from that of the federal, and to test the limits. This was found in the 10th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, in quote, "powers not delegated to the United States, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States". In this case, the right for a state to cede, as well as their right over whether or not they have slavery or not, simply is their choice, rather than being bound with the federal government and the United States.
However, the U.S. Federal Government and the North did not believe so, and even raised an army to force the south to rejoin. This was their first objective. In fact, slavery was not essentially a main objective until the Emancipation Proclamation was published, which effectively ended slavery only in the South. Any states that were still part of the union that allowed slaves technically still had state's rights over them. Simply going over war over slavery as a subject would have been frowned upon in that day and age, and would not have garnered large amounts of support in any way, shape, or form.
Notice how while slavery is the selling point of the war, it is not exactly the main reason. States individually believe whether or not they are able to first benefit from slavery, and secondly to set whether or not it's own citizens can have slaves.
The next part is to suggest that there was actually not going to be a war if the states did not cede. There would not have been a good reason, as slavery has already been prevalent for years, and to suddenly go to war about it would have put the world, who was watching this interaction, firmly on the side of the South, which the North was looking to avoid.
Slavery was a main part of the Civil War following the Emancipation Proclamation, where finally the Northern objective was shown. In the early years, as well as following the E.P., it has always been about whether the state has the right to cede just because they do not agree with federal beliefs.
~
How many states had applied for
statehood under the Land Ordinance of
1785?
Answer:
at least three but not more than five
Explanation:
The “Atlanta Compromise” is the name given to the
A
proposal that African Americans emphasize making economic progress over the quest for political and social equality
B
political concessions southern White politicians made to African Americans in order to win their support against northerners
C
southern agreement to supply raw materials to the North and West in exchange for manufactured products
D
political deal made by northern Republicans and southern Democrats to pass legislation favoring the gold standard
E
agreement expected to forge a new Republican Party of northern moderates and southern conservatives
Answer:a
Explanation:
What movement started the Protestant Reformation? How/Why?
Answer:
In England, the Reformation began with Henry VIII's quest for a male heir. When Pope Clement VII refused to annul Henry's marriage to Catherine of Aragon so he could remarry, the English king declared in 1534 that he alone should be the final authority in matters relating to the English church.
Explanation:
What is one thing the Wari people were known for?
A. Having no major religious rituals
O B. Building large clay and stone structures
C. Sailing ships to northern Asia
O D. Destroying the Inca civilization
SUBMIT
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A P 3 X
Briefly describe ONE development that contributed to the passage of New Deal legislation in the 1930s. Briefly explain ONE effect of New Deal legislation on the role of the federal government in the United States economy. Briefly explain ONE difference between the role of the federal government in the United States economy during the Gilded Age and the role of the federal government in the United States economy in the 1930s.
The New Deal was a series of programs, public work projects, financial reforms, and regulations enacted by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in the United States between 1933 and 1939.
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer:
1. The New Deal Legislation was put in place by President Roosevelt regarding relief, recovery, and reform of the American economy from the Great Depression. The Depression caused unemployment rates to skyrocket and the economy to crash, and the New Deal aimed to rectify this.
2. The role of the federal government became one of more power. As the Depression affected the entire United States, the state government would not have been equipped to handle the issue. The optimal thing was to follow the federal government and have the same policies implemented in each state. The laissez-faire style of governing ended.
3. During the Gilded Age there was so much corruption that the Robber Barons of America were able to create monopolies that destroyed small and medium-sized businesses. The government stepped back and was pro-business and allowed the economy to run as it was. During the 1930s, the government took a much more active role. It implemented many policies to help the people and was largely free from corruption.
In March 1983, in response to the Baby Doe case, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued a (an) ______________, which directed that all health care facilities dealing with infants less than one year of age and who received federal funding prominently display an antidiscrimination notice protecting these infants. a. advance directive b. Interim Final Rule c. best interest standard d. DNR order
Answer:
a. advance directive
Explanation:
From the question given above, the correct answer is "ADVANCE DIRECTIVE." This is because what the United States Department of Health and Human Services issued is known as BABY DOE RULES which directed that all health care facilities dealing with infants less than one year of age and who received federal funding prominently display an anti-discrimination notice protecting these infants.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "Advance Directive."
• Are revolutions futile? Are the odds stacked against revolutionaries? Do they cause more harm than good? Should oppressed people revolt? Should they just endure oppression? Are there alternatives?
Answer:
Are the odds stacked against revolutionaries? ... Should oppressed people revolt? ... The oppressed should not endure oppression but instead should take steps ... (Williams 2001) There are alternatives of revolution as the oppressed should ... that revolutions cause more harm than good as most people don't prefer them.
Explanation:
Revolution is said as a sudden and radical change in political power and society.
What are revolutions futility?Yes, revolution brings a necessary change in the social structure of the future that has become corrupted by governing authority.
Are the odds stacked against revolutionaries?Yes, it is because revolutionaries are attacked and suppressed by tyranny and powerful groups where they may even lose their life.
Do they cause more harm than good?Yes, revolution brings full turmoil in the economy in the form of movement where rebellion may become violent and loss to military and economy occurs.
Should oppressed people revolt?Yes, whenever any group or community is being suppressed for the long term it often results in revolt in order to gain their rights and freedom to live with respect in society.
Should they just endure oppression? Are there alternatives?No, suppression should not endure as it would harm the well-being of people that would lead to higher suffering. Therefore, an alternative for this would be a peaceful and non-violent protest by establishing clear communication.
Learn more about a revolution here:
https://brainly.com/question/8303230
What does it mean to follow 8 fold path
Answer:don’t know
Explanation:
House of representatives and the Senate make up which branch of the US government
Answer:
Legislative Branch makes up both
Punakha Dzong was build by ___
1. Zhabdrung Ngawang Namgyel
2. Guru Rinpochoe
3. Sangay
4. Lam Ngawang Chogyal
Answer:
1
Explanation:
i did the same thing a day ago and it was right
Which practice of primitive man indicates life after death?
With one sentence
• Why do popular revolutions (revolutions of the people) often lead to military dictatorships?
Answer:
economy change, technology change, political change and social change
The ancient Chinese invented a wooden computer made of bamboo
A. True
B. False
_____________-are naturally occurring, nonliving, solids with a definite chemical composition.
Group of answer choices
Rocks
Erosion
Minerals
weather
Answer:
Mineral
Explanation:
Hope it helps!!!
Answer:
Minerals
Explanation:
Minerals cannot be minerals if they are not composed of a specific chemical composition. So if it had a diffrent composition it would not be a mineral hence why its the correct answer
One significant consequence of the 1994 Rwandan genocide was that __________.
A.
Rwanda’s economy did not suffer
B.
over 1 million children were orphaned
C.
Rwanda returned to a colonial government
D.
the international community refused to help Rwanda rebuild
Answer: B. over 1 million children were orphaned
Explanation:
Answer:
B - over 1 million children were orphaned
Explanation:
How did policing began in the United States
The modern police force started in the early 1900s, but its origins date back to the American colonies. In the South in the 1700s, patrol groups were created to stop runaway slaves. In the north, a formal police force was created to control immigrants who were moving into cities in the 1800s.
2 points
Which country helped the colonists try to siege Savannah during the
Revolutionary War? *
Spain
Mexico
Britain
France
2*
Answer:
Britain
Explanation:
Answer:Who helped the colonists at the Siege of Savannah?
Charles Hector
In 1779, more than 500 recruits from Saint-Domingue (the French colony which later became Haiti), under the overall command of French nobleman Charles Hector, Comte d'Estaing, fought alongside American colonial troops against the British Army during the siege of Savannah.
maybe this will give you what you need
Can you guys give me some compare and contrasts in ancient rome and ancient greece for culture, environment , and religion
Answer:
I'm not good at Ancient rome and ancient greece but I can try.
Explanation:
The Greeks wanted perfection in their depiction of people. The Romans want real life people. The Greek civilization was a collection of city-states, and were not united under one central government until they were conquered by Alexander the Great.
Hope this helps!
How did the Land Act of 1851 affect Mexican Americans living in territories
the United States won in the Mexican-American War?
O A. The law required Mexican Americans in Texas to prove they
owned their land.
B. The law prevented Mexican Americans from buying new land in
Texas.
C. The law forced Mexican Americans to move to Mexico.
D. The law seized Mexican American land in Texas and gave it to
American settlers.
SUBMIT
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The law required land owners to validate their grants before a land claim commission.