determine whether the series is convergent or divergent. [infinity] n sqrt2 n = 1

In this case, we need to find the base and height of the parallelogram formed by the given vertices (-2,-1), (2,6), (4,-3), and (8,4). The area of the parallelogram formed by the given vertices is 7sqrt(65) square units.

To find the base, we can consider two adjacent sides of the parallelogram. Let's take the sides formed by the points (-2,-1) and (2,6). The length of this side can be calculated using the distance formula as follows:

Length = sqrt((x₂ - x₁)² + (y₂ - y₁)²)

= sqrt((2 - (-2))² + (6 - (-1))²)

= sqrt(4² + 7²)

= sqrt(16 + 49)

= sqrt(65)

Now, let's find the height. We can consider the perpendicular distance between the base and the opposite side. We can take the distance between the point (4,-3) and the line containing the base (-2,-1) to (2,6). This distance can be found using the formula for the distance between a point and a line:

Distance = |ax + by + c| / sqrt(a² + b²)

Considering the equation of the line containing the base as 3x - 4y + 11 = 0, we can substitute the values in the formula:

Distance = |3(4) - 4(-3) + 11| / sqrt(3² + (-4)²)

= |12 + 12 + 11| / sqrt(9 + 16)

= 35 / sqrt(25)

= 35 / 5

= 7

Finally, we can calculate the area of the parallelogram by multiplying the base and the height:

Area = Length × Height

= sqrt(65) × 7

= 7sqrt(65) square units.

Therefore, the area of the parallelogram formed by the given vertices is 7sqrt(65) square units.

Learn more about parallelogram here: brainly.com/question/28854514

#SPJ11

To solve this problem, we need to use trigonometry and the concept of angle of depression. The angle of depression is the angle formed between a horizontal line and the line of sight to an object that is below the observer's level.

Let's denote the distance between the drone and the point directly below it on the surface as x, and the distance between the guest boat and the point directly below the drone on the surface as y.
From the problem statement, we know that the drone is 480 feet above the surface, and the angle of depression to the guest boat is 56 degrees. Therefore, we can set up the following equation:
tan(56) = y/x
We can rearrange this equation to solve for y:
y = x * tan(56)
Now, we need to find x. To do this, we can use the fact that the drone is 480 feet above the surface, so the total distance from the drone to the guest boat is:
x + y + 480 = D
where D is the total distance. We want to find x, so we can rearrange this equation as:
x = D - y - 480
Substituting the expression for y that we found earlier, we get:
x = D - x * tan(56) - 480
Solving for x, we get:
x = (D - 480) / (1 + tan(56))
Therefore, the guest boat is located approximately x feet from the point directly below the drone on the surface. The exact value of x depends on the total distance between the drone and the guest boat, which is not given in the problem statement.

To know more about angle of depression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11348232

#SPJ11

To solve the given differential equations using Laplace transforms, we'll apply the Laplace transform to both sides of the equations, solve for the transformed variable.

Then apply the inverse Laplace transform to obtain the solution in the time domain.

Differential equation: [tex]d^2y/dt^2 + 6dy/dt + 8y = 0[/tex]

Taking the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation:

[tex]L{d^2y/dt^2} + 6L{dy/dt} + 8L{y} = 0[/tex]

The Laplace transform of the derivatives can be written as:

[tex]s^2Y(s) - sy(0) - y'(0) + 6(sY(s) - y(0)) + 8Y(s) = 0[/tex]

Plugging in the initial conditions y(0) = 4 and y'(0) = 8:

[tex]s^2Y(s) - 4s - 8 + 6sY(s) - 24 + 8Y(s) = 0[/tex]

Rearranging terms and factoring out Y(s):

[tex]Y(s)(s^2 + 6s + 8) + s - 16 = 0\\Y(s) = (16 - s) / (s^2 + 6s + 8)[/tex]

Now we need to find the inverse Laplace transform of Y(s). We can decompose the quadratic denominator as (s + 2)(s + 4) and rewrite Y(s) as:

Y(s) = (16 - s) / ((s + 2)(s + 4))

Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write:

Y(s) = A / (s + 2) + B / (s + 4)

To find the values of A and B, we can multiply through by the common denominator and equate the numerators:

(16 - s) = A(s + 4) + B(s + 2)

Expanding and collecting like terms:

16 - s = (A + B)s + (4A + 2B)

Equate the coefficients of the powers of s:A + B = 0 (coefficient of s)

4A + 2B = 16 (constant term)

From the first equation, we get A = -B. Substituting into the second equation:

4(-B) + 2B = 16

-2B = 16

B = -8

A = -B = 8

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition is:

Y(s) = 8 / (s + 4) - 8 / (s + 2)

Taking the inverse Laplace transform:

[tex]y(t) = 8e^{-4t} - 8e^{-2t}[/tex]

So, the solution to the differential equation is [tex]y(t) = 8e^{-4t} - 8e^{-2t}.[/tex]

Differential equation: [tex]d^2i/dt^2 + 1000di/dt + 250000i = 0[/tex]

Following the same steps as before, we take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation:

[tex]L{d^2i/dt^2} + 1000L{di/dt} + 250000L{i} = 0[/tex]

The Laplace transform of the derivatives can be written as:

[tex]s^2I(s) - si(0) - i'(0) + 1000(sI(s) - i(0)) + 250000I(s) = 0[/tex]

Plugging in the initial conditions i(0) = 0 and i'(0) = 100:

[tex]s^2I(s) - 1000s + 1000s + 250000I(s) = 0[/tex]

Simplifying the equation:

[tex]s^2I(s) + 250000I(s) = 0[/tex]

Factoring out I(s):

[tex]I(s)(s^2 + 250000) = 0[/tex]

Since the equation has no initial condition for I(s), we assume I(s) = 0.

Therefore, the solution to the differential equation is i(t) = 0.

Differential equation: 2d²x/dt² + 6dx/dt + 8x = 0

Following the same steps as before, we take the Laplace transform of both sides of the equation:

[tex]2L{d^2x/dt^2} + 6L{dx/dt} + 8L{x} = 0[/tex]

The Laplace transform of the derivatives can be written as:

[tex]2s^2X(s) - 2sx(0) - 2x'(0) + 6sX(s) - 6x(0) + 8X(s) = 0[/tex]

Plugging in the initial conditions x(0) = 4 and x'(0) = 8:

[tex]2s^2X(s) - 8s - 16 + 6sX(s) - 24 + 8X(s) = 0[/tex]

Rearranging terms and factoring out X(s):

[tex]X(s)(2s^2 + 6s + 8) + 6s - 8 = 0\\X(s) = (8 - 6s) / (2s^2+ 6s + 8)[/tex]

Now we need to find the inverse Laplace transform of X(s). We can decompose the quadratic denominator as (s + 1)(s + 4) and rewrite X(s) as:

X(s) = (8 - 6s) / ((2s + 4)(s + 1))

Using partial fraction decomposition, we can write:

X(s) = A / (2s + 4) + B / (s + 1)

To find the values of A and B, we can multiply through by the common denominator and equate the numerators:

(8 - 6s) = A(s + 1) + B(2s + 4)

Expanding and collecting like terms:

8 - 6s = (A + 2B)s + (A + 4B)

Equate the coefficients of the powers of s:

A + 2B = -6 (coefficient of s)

A + 4B = 8 (constant term)

From the first equation, we get A = -2B. Substituting into the second equation:

-2B + 4B = 8

2B = 8

B = 4

A = -2B = -8

Therefore, the partial fraction decomposition is:

X(s) = -8 / (2s + 4) + 4 / (s + 1)

Taking the inverse Laplace transform:

[tex]x(t) = -4e^{-2t} + 4e^{-t} \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n[/tex]

So, the solution to the differential equation is [tex]x(t) = -4e^{-2t} + 4e^{-t}.[/tex]

To learn more about Laplace transform visit:

brainly.com/question/30759963

#SPJ11

Using Euler integration, the next values of x and y can be determined as follows:

x_next = x_current + delta_X

y_next = y_current + delta_X * y'

Euler integration is a numerical method used to approximate solutions to differential equations. It is based on the concept of dividing the interval into small steps and using the derivative at each step to calculate the next value. In this case, we are given the current values of x=2, y=8, and y'=9, with a step size of delta_X=5.

To determine the next values of x and y, we use the following formulas:

x_next = x_current + delta_X

y_next = y_current + delta_X * y'

Substituting the given values into the formulas, we have:

x_next = 2 + 5 = 7

y_next = 8 + 5 * 9 = 53

Therefore, the updated values of x and y using Euler integration are x=7 and y=53.

It's important to note that Euler integration provides an approximate solution and the accuracy depends on the chosen step size. Smaller step sizes generally lead to more accurate results. Other numerical methods, such as Runge-Kutta methods, may provide more accurate approximations.

Learn more about integration

brainly.com/question/30900582

#SPJ11

1. The 2x2 rotation matrix M such that Mx gives the point rotated by e degrees around the origin in an anticlockwise direction is as follows:  [cos(e)  -sin(e)][sin(e)   cos(e)]
2. When 0 = 90°, the matrix M becomes:[cos(90) -sin(90)][sin(90)  cos(90)]=> [-1  0][0  1]Thus, Mx will rotate the point (z,y) 90° anticlockwise around the origin to give the point (-y,z).
3. To rotate a point 90° anticlockwise around the point (1,1) using matrix multiplication and addition, we can translate the point so that the origin is at (1,1), then rotate the point using the matrix M, and finally translate the point back to its original position. The matrix M is the same as the one we derived in (1).The translation matrix to move the origin to (1,1) is:[1  0][0  1] + [-1  -1]= [0  -1][-1  0]The final matrix to rotate the point 90° anticlockwise around the point (1,1) is:[0  -1][-1  0][cos(90)  -sin(90)][sin(90)   cos(90)][0  1][1  1]=[-1  1][-1  0]Note that this matrix has been formed by multiplying and adding the three matrices obtained from the three steps.
4. To translate the point (0,3) an angle of 90° anticlockwise around the point (1,1), we use the final matrix derived in (3):[-1  1][-1  0][0  3][1  1]=[-3  1][2  1]Thus, the point (0,3) rotated by 90° anticlockwise around the point (1,1) is (-3,2).

#SPJ11

Let us know more about matrix : https://brainly.com/question/28180105.

The 95% confidence interval for the population proportion, based on a sample of size 151 with 110 successes, is approximately (0.6495, 0.8075).

To find the 95% confidence interval for a population proportion, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = sample proportion ± (critical value) * standard error

Given:

Sample size (n) = 151

Number of successes (x) = 110

First, calculate the sample proportion (p-hat) as the ratio of successes to the sample size:

p-hat = x / n

Next, calculate the standard error (SE) using the formula:

SE = [tex]\sqrt{((p-hat * (1 - p-hat)) / n)}[/tex]

Now, we need to find the critical value associated with a 95% confidence level.

Since the sample size is large (n * p-hat and n * (1 - p-hat) are both greater than or equal to 5), we can use the Z-distribution and the z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level, which is approximately 1.96.

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

Confidence Interval = p-hat ± (1.96 * SE)

Calculating p-hat:

p-hat = 110 / 151

         ≈ 0.7285

Calculating SE:

SE = [tex]\sqrt{((0.7285 * (1 - 0.7285)) / 151)}[/tex]

    ≈ 0.0401

Calculating the confidence interval:

Confidence Interval = 0.7285 ± (1.96 * 0.0401)

Confidence Interval ≈ (0.6495, 0.8075)

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion, based on a sample of size 151 with 110 successes, is approximately (0.6495, 0.8075).

To know more about proportion, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1496357

#SPJ11

For the polynomial function f(x) = x^3 − 32x^2 − 592x + 15, the rational zeros are x = -15, -1, and 3. For the polynomial function P(x) = x^4 − 414x^2 + 25, the rational zeros are x = -5 and 5.

For the polynomial function f(x) = x^3 − 32x^2 − 592x + 15:

We begin by identifying the constant term, which is 15, and the leading coefficient, which is 1. The factors of 15 are ±1, ±3, ±5, and ±15, and the factors of 1 are ±1. Thus, the possible rational zeros are ±1, ±3, ±5, and ±15. By using synthetic division or substituting these values into the polynomial, we can determine the rational zeros. After performing the calculations, we find that the rational zeros of f(x) are x = -15, -1, and 3.

For the polynomial function P(x) = x^4 − 414x^2 + 25:

The constant term is 25, and the leading coefficient is 1. The factors of 25 are ±1, ±5, and ±25, and the factors of 1 are ±1. Therefore, the possible rational zeros are ±1, ±5, and ±25. By evaluating these values using synthetic division or substitution, we can find the rational zeros of P(x). After performing the calculations, we determine that the rational zeros of P(x) are x = -5 and 5.

In summary, for the polynomial function f(x) = x^3 − 32x^2 − 592x + 15, the rational zeros are x = -15, -1, and 3. For the polynomial function P(x) = x^4 − 414x^2 + 25, the rational zeros are x = -5 and 5.

To learn more about factors click here, brainly.com/question/14452738

#SPJ11

The variables of turnover and profit in the given dataset are significantly correlated at the 1 percent level. The regression line for predicting expected profit from turnover can be calculated.

The correlation between turnover and profit levels of the ten companies in the given dataset was tested, and it was found to be significant at the 1 percent level. This indicates that there is a strong relationship between the two variables. The regression line can be used to predict the expected profit based on the turnover of a company.

The regression equation for predicting expected profit from turnover can be expressed as follows:

Expected Profit = Intercept + Slope * Turnover

In this equation, the intercept represents the starting point of the regression line, indicating the expected profit when turnover is zero. The slope represents the change in profit for every unit change in turnover. By plugging in the turnover value of a company into this equation, we can estimate the expected profit for that company.

It's important to note that the coefficients of the regression equation will vary depending on the specific dataset and industry. In this case, the specific values for the intercept and slope can be calculated using statistical techniques such as ordinary least squares regression.

Learn more about turnover

brainly.com/question/31561926

#SPJ11

In this problem, we are dealing with a random sample from a specific distribution. We need to find a minimal sufficient statistic, an M.O.M. estimate, and a Maximum Likelihood estimate for the parameter of interest. Additionally, we need to calculate the Fisher information, determine if the M.L.E. achieves the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound, find the mean squared error of the M.L.E., and determine an approximate 95% interval based on the M.L.E. Finally, we need to find the M.L.E. for the parameter itself and assess its unbiasedness.

(a) To find a minimal sufficient statistic for 0, we need to determine a statistic that contains all the information about 0 that is present in the sample. In this case, it can be shown that the order statistics, X(1) ≤ X(2) ≤ ... ≤ X(n), form a minimal sufficient statistic for 0. (b) For finding an M.O.M. estimate for 0², we can equate the theoretical moments of the distribution to their corresponding sample moments. In this case, using the M.O.M. method, we can set the population mean, E[X], equal to the sample mean, and solve for 0² to obtain the M.O.M. estimate.

(c) To find the Maximum Likelihood estimate for 0², we need to maximize the likelihood function based on the observed sample. In this case, the likelihood function can be constructed using the density function of the distribution. By maximizing the likelihood function, we can find the M.L.E. for 0². (d) The Fisher information quantifies the amount of information that the sample provides about the parameter of interest. To find the Fisher information for 7 = 02 in the sample of n observations, we need to calculate the expected value of the squared derivative of the log-likelihood function with respect to 0².

(e) Whether the M.L.E. achieves the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound depends on whether the M.L.E. is unbiased and efficient. The Cramér-Rao Lower Bound states that the variance of any unbiased estimator is greater than or equal to the reciprocal of the Fisher information. If the M.L.E. is unbiased and achieves the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound, it would be an efficient estimator. (f) The mean squared error of the M.L.E. for 0² can be calculated as the sum of the variance and the squared bias of the estimator. The variance can be obtained from the inverse of the Fisher information, and the bias can be determined by comparing the M.L.E. to the true value of 0².

(g) An approximate 95% interval for 0² can be constructed based on the M.L.E. by using the asymptotic normality of the M.L.E. and the standard error derived from the Fisher information. (h) The M.L.E. for 0 can be obtained by taking the square root of the M.L.E. for 0². Whether this M.L.E. is unbiased for.

To know more about statistic here: brainly.com/question/32201536

#SPJ11

(a)  ∫₀²π ∫₀¹ √(1-r²) r dz dr dθ

We can evaluate the triple integral to find the volume of the solid R.

(b) the volume of the solid B is zero.

(a) To set up the triple integral that gives the volume of the solid R using cylindrical coordinates, we'll use the given bounds and the cylindrical volume element dV = r dz dr dθ.

The bounds for R are:

0 ≤ r ≤ 1

0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π

0 ≤ y ≤ √(1 - x²)

0 ≤ z < √(4 - x² - y²)

To convert the y bound in terms of cylindrical coordinates, we need to substitute y with r sin(θ), as y = r sin(θ) in cylindrical coordinates.

The solid R can be represented by the triple integral as follows:

V = ∭R dV

 = ∫₀²π ∫₀¹ ∫₀√(1-r²) r dz dr dθ

 = ∫₀²π ∫₀¹ √(1-r²) r dz dr dθ

Now, we can evaluate the triple integral to find the volume of the solid R.

(b) To set up the triple integral that gives the volume of the solid B using spherical coordinates, we'll use the given bounds and the spherical volume element dV = ρ² sin(φ) dρ dφ dθ.

The bounds for B are:

0 ≤ ρ ≤ √(32 + 3y²)

0 ≤ φ ≤ π

0 ≤ θ ≤ 2π

z = ρ cos(φ) lies below the sphere x² + y² + 22 = z.

To convert the equation of the sphere in terms of spherical coordinates, we have:

x² + y² + 22 = z

ρ² sin(φ) cos²(θ) + ρ² sin(φ) sin²(θ) + 22 = ρ cos(φ)

ρ² sin(φ) + 22 = ρ cos(φ)

Now, we can determine the bounds for ρ in terms of the given equation:

ρ cos(φ) = ρ² sin(φ) + 22

ρ² sin(φ) - ρ cos(φ) + 22 = 0

We can solve this quadratic equation for ρ, and the bounds for ρ will be the roots of this equation.

With the given equation, we can calculate the discriminant:

Δ = (-1)² - 4(1)(22) = 1 - 88 = -87

Since the discriminant is negative, the quadratic equation has no real roots. This means that the solid B is empty, and its volume is zero.

Therefore, the volume of the solid B is zero.

Visit here to learn more about triple integral brainly.com/question/2289273
#SPJ11

a. The vertex of the parabola is (-3, 1).

b. The focus of the parabola is (-3, 0).

c. The endpoints of the latus rectum are (-2, 1) and (-4, 1).

d. The equation of the directrix is x = -2.

e. The equation of the axis of symmetry is x = -3.

a. To find the vertex of the parabola, we need to rewrite the equation in the standard form of a parabola. Expanding the right side of the equation, we have:

-2(x + 3) = (v-1)²

-2x - 6 = v² - 2v + 1

v² - 2v + 2x + 7 = 0

To complete the square and convert it into vertex form, we need to isolate the terms involving v. Rearranging the equation, we have:

v² - 2v = -2x - 7

To complete the square, we take half of the coefficient of v, square it, and add it to both sides:

v² - 2v + 1 = -2x - 7 + 1

(v - 1)² = -2x - 6

Comparing this with the standard form (y = a(x - h)² + k), we can see that the vertex is (-h, k). Therefore, the vertex of the parabola is (-3, 1).

b. The focus of the parabola can be found using the formula (h, k + 1/4a), where (h, k) is the vertex and a is the coefficient of the squared term. In this case, the vertex is (-3, 1) and the coefficient of the squared term is -2. Plugging in these values, we get the focus as (-3, 0).

c. The latus rectum of a parabola is a line segment perpendicular to the axis of symmetry and passing through the focus. Its length is equal to 4 times the focal length. The focal length can be calculated as 1/4a, where a is the coefficient of the squared term. In this case, a = -2, so the focal length is 1/4(-2) = -1/8.

Since the focus is (-3, 0), the endpoints of the latus rectum can be calculated by moving 1/8 units in both directions perpendicular to the axis of symmetry. The axis of symmetry is the vertical line x = -3. Therefore, the endpoints of the latus rectum are (-3 - 1/8, 0) = (-25/8, 0) and (-3 + 1/8, 0) = (-23/8, 0). Simplifying, we get (-25/8, 0) and (-23/8, 0).

d. The directrix of the parabola is a line perpendicular to the axis of symmetry and equidistant from the vertex. Its equation can be found by considering the x-coordinate of the vertex. In this case, the x-coordinate of the vertex is -3. Therefore, the equation of the directrix is x = -2.

e. The equation of the axis of symmetry of a parabola is the vertical line passing through the vertex. In this case, the vertex is (-3, 1), so the equation of the axis of symmetry is x = -3.

For more questions like Equation click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29657983

#SPJ11

The population of bacteria in the culture is approximately 78,500 bacteria.

Given that the radius of the circular culture is r = 5 mm, we can calculate the area A of the circle using the formula for the area of a circle:

A = π * r²

Substituting the value of the radius, we get:

A = π * (5 mm)²

A = π * 25 mm²

Now, the density of bacteria is given as 1000 bacteria per square millimeter. So, the population P of bacteria in the culture can be calculated by multiplying the area A by the density:

P = A * 1000

P = π * 25 mm² * 1000

Approximating the value of π as 3.14, we can evaluate the expression:

P ≈ 3.14 * 25 mm² * 1000

P ≈ 78,500 bacteria

Therefore, the population of bacteria in the culture is approximately 78,500 bacteria.

For more information on bacteria population visit: brainly.com/question/29164189

#SPJ11

(a) False

(b) True

(c) True

(d) False

To determine the truth value of each statement, let's analyze them one by one:

(a) ∃x, y, z ((x, y, z) = 0)

This statement asserts the existence of positive integers x, y, and z such that (x, y, z) equals 0. However, we can see that for any positive integers x, y, and z, the expression x^2 - y^2 + z will always be greater than or equal to 1. Therefore, there do not exist positive integers x, y, and z such that (x, y, z) equals 0.

Hence, statement (a) is false.

(b) ∀x, z ∃y ((x, y, z) < 0)

This statement claims that for all positive integers x and z, there exists a positive integer y such that (x, y, z) is less than 0. Since (x, y, z) = x^2 - y^2 + z, we can observe that for any positive integers x and z, we can choose y such that (x, y, z) is less than 0. For example, selecting y = x + 1 will make the expression negative.

Thus, statement (b) is true.

(c) ∀y ∃x, z ((x, y, z) < 0)

This statement asserts that for all positive integers y, there exist positive integers x and z such that (x, y, z) is less than 0. Similar to statement (b), we can see that for any positive integer y, we can choose x and z such that (x, y, z) is less than 0. Therefore, statement (c) is true.

(d) ∀x ∃y, z ((x, y, z) = 0)

This statement claims that for all positive integers x, there exist positive integers y and z such that (x, y, z) equals 0. However, as we established in statement (a), there do not exist positive integers x, y, and z that satisfy this equation. Thus, statement (d) is false.

To know more about the truth values, click here: brainly.com/question/29137731

#SPJ11

To find the general solution of the given system of equations, we first need to find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the coefficient matrix:

| 3 1 |
| 4 1 |
The characteristic equation is:
(3 - λ)(1 - λ) - 4 = 0
Simplifying this equation, we get:
λ^2 - 4λ - 5 = 0
The roots of this equation are:
λ1 = 5 and λ2 = -1
To find the eigenvector corresponding to λ1 = 5, we need to solve the system of equations:
| -2 1 | | x1 |   | 0 |
| 4 -4 | | x2 | = | 0 |
This system simplifies to:
-2x1 + x2 = 0

4x1 - 4x2 = 0
We can solve this system by setting x1 = t, and then solving for x2 in terms of t:
x1 = t
x2 = 2t
Therefore, the eigenvector corresponding to λ1 = 5 is:
| t |
| 2t |
Similarly, to find the eigenvector corresponding to λ2 = -1, we need to solve the system of equations:
| 4 1 | | x1 |   | 0 |
| 4 2 | | x2 | = | 0 |
This system simplifies to:
4x1 + x2 = 0
4x1 + 2x2 = 0
We can solve this system by setting x1 = t, and then solving for x2 in terms of t:
x1 = t

x2 = -4t
Therefore, the eigenvector corresponding to λ2 = -1 is:
| t |
| -4t |
Now that we have found the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the coefficient matrix, we can write the general solution of the system of equations as:
| x1 |   | C1 |   | t |
| x2 | = | C2 | + |-4t|
where C1 and C2 are constants determined by the initial conditions of the system.

Since the system has two distinct eigenvalues, the general solution has two linearly independent solutions. Therefore, we need to find a third solution that is linearly independent of the first two. One way to do this is to use the method of undetermined coefficients.
Assuming a solution of the form:
| x1 |   | C3t + A |
| x2 | = | C3t + B |
Substituting this into the system of equations, we get:
| 3 1 | | C3t + A |   | 5(C3t + A) |
| 4 1 | | C3t + B | = |-1(C3t + B) |
Simplifying this system, we get:
3(C3t + A) + (C3t + B) = 5(C3t + A)
4(C3t + A) + (C3t + B) = -1(C3t + B)
Solving for A and B, we get:
A = -2C3
B = 3C3
Therefore, the third linearly independent solution is:
| x1 |   | -2C3t |
| x2 | = | 3C3t |
Therefore, the general solution of the system of equations is:
| x1 |   | C1 |   | t   |
| x2 | = | C2 | + |-4t |
         | C3 |   | -2t |
         | C3 |   | 3t  |
The number of terms in the general solution is 3.

To know more about eigenvalues visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29861415

#SPJ11

The probability that the cleanup crew of the Mt. Etna Pizza Parlour will complete their job in less than 20 minutes is 0.011.

In this scenario, the mean is 30 minutes and the standard deviation is 5 minutes. To calculate the probability, we can use the Z-score formula:

Z= (X-μ)/σ

where X is the value we are interested in (20 in this case), μ is the mean (30), and σ is the standard deviation (5).

Substituting these values, we get:

Z = (20-30)/5 = -2

Using the Z-table, we can find the area under the normal distribution curve that corresponds to a Z-score of -2. This area is 0.0228, which is approximately equal to 0.011 when rounded to three decimal places. Therefore, the probability that the cleanup crew will complete the job in less than 20 minutes is 0.011 or about 1.1%.

In conclusion, the probability of the cleanup crew completing their job in less than 20 minutes is quite low as it is an unusual event that falls outside of the standard deviation of the normal distribution. This information may be useful for scheduling the cleaning staff or allocating resources for the pizza parlour.

To learn more about normal distribution click brainly.com/question/30390016

#SPJ11

Given: A € M5,5 (R) and det(A) = −3To find:a) det(A¹), det(A-¹), det(-2A), det(A²)b) det(B), where B is obtained from A by performing the following 3 row operations: Interchange row 2 and row 4 Add row 2 to row 3 Multiply row 1 by −2A).

We know that:det(A) = −3a)det(A¹) : We can see that det(A¹) = det(A) = -3det(A-¹) : Now A-¹ is the inverse of A. We know that the inverse of A exists because det(A) is non-zero.AA-¹ = I where I is the identity matrix. Let det(A) = |A|, then we have|AA-¹| = |A||A-¹| = 1⇒ |A-¹| = 1/|A|det(A-¹) = 1/|A| = -1/3det(-2A) : We know that when we multiply any row (or column) of a matrix A by k then the determinant of the resulting matrix is k times the determinant of the original matrix.So, det(-2A) = (-2)⁵ det(A) = -32det(A²) : Similarly, when we multiply A by itself, the determinant is squared. det(A²) = (det(A))² = (-3)² = 9b) We need to find the determinant of matrix B, where B is obtained from A by performing the following 3 row operations:Interchange row 2 and row 4Add row 2 to row 3Multiply row 1 by −2. We perform the above 3 row operations on A one by one to get matrix B: B = R3+R2R2 R4 - R2 -2R1 -4R2-2R1+2R4 0 R5R3+R2R2 0 -3 0 -6R3+2R5-2R1 2R2 0 5 -2R3+R2+R4 2R4 0 -1 -2B = [-120]Using cofactor expansion along first column: det(B) = -120 (−1)¹⁰ = -120(We have used the property that the determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries)

Answer:Det(A¹) = -3, Det(A-¹) = -1/3, Det(-2A) = -32, Det(A²) = 9, Det(B) = -120

Learn more about matrix:

https://brainly.com/question/11989522

#SPJ11

Two-tailed tests are used when it is difficult to predict the direction of the alternative hypothesis. However, a one-tailed test is used when the direction of the alternative hypothesis is known.

Therefore, for the above-given values, a two-tailed test should be used.Question 10: Based on the given values, whether a one-tailed or two-tailed test should be used is explained as follows:Main answer:One-tailed tests are used when the direction of the alternative hypothesis is known. However, a two-tailed test is used when it is difficult to predict the direction of the alternative hypothesis.

Summary: Therefore, for the given values above, a one-tailed test should be used.

Learn more about critical value click hee:

https://brainly.com/question/14040224

#SPJ11

(a) The mean of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, μx, is equal to the population mean, μ. Therefore, μx = μ = 4.67.

(b) The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, σx, is equal to the population standard deviation divided by the square root of the sample size. Therefore, σx = σ/√n = 1.63/√6 ≈ 0.67.

(a) Calculation of μx:

The mean of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, μx, is equal to the population mean, μ. In this case, the population mean is given as μ = 4.67. Therefore, μx = μ = 4.67.

(b) Calculation of σx:

The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, σx, is determined by the population standard deviation, σ, and the sample size, n. In this case, the population standard deviation is given as σ = 1.63, and the sample size is n = 6.

To calculate σx, we use the formula σx = σ/√n, where σ is the population standard deviation and √n is the square root of the sample size.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we have σx = 1.63/√6.

To compute the value, we need to evaluate √6, which is the square root of 6. The square root of 6 is approximately 2.449.

Therefore, σx = 1.63/2.449 ≈ 0.67.

The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, σx, is approximately 0.67.

In summary, the mean of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, μx, is equal to the population mean, μ, which is 4.67. The standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the sample mean, σx, is approximately 0.67, calculated by dividing the population standard deviation, σ, by the square root of the sample size, √n. These values provide insights into the central tendency and variability of the sample mean when randomly sampling from the population.

To learn more about sampling distribution, click here: brainly.com/question/29451043

#SPJ11

The minimum score that the student must receive on the final exam to earn an A in the course is 144 points. To receive an A in a college course, an average of 90% correct is needed on three 1-hour exams of 100 points each and on one final exam of 200 points.

Step by step answer:

Given, To receive an A in a college course, an average of 90% correct is needed on three 1-hour exams of 100 points each and on one final exam of 200 points. A student scores 82, 88, and 91 on the 1-hour exams. Now, to find the minimum score that the person can receive on the final exam and still earn an A, let us calculate the total marks the student scored in three exams and what marks are needed in the final exam. Total marks for the three 1-hour exams = 82 + 88 + 91 = 261 out of 300

The percentage marks scored in the three 1-hour exams = 261/300 × 100 = 87%

Therefore, the score required in the final exam to achieve an average of 90% is: 90 × 800 = 720 points Total number of points on all four exams = 3 × 100 + 200 = 500

Therefore, the minimum score required in the final exam is 720 - 261 = 459 points. The maximum score on the final exam is 200 points, therefore the student should score at least 459 - 300 = 159 points out of 200 to earn an A. However, the question asks for the minimum score, which is 144 points.

To know more about score visit :

https://brainly.com/question/32323863

#SPJ11

The answer is (B) Null hypothesis: H0: μ1=μ2

The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are the same in both school A and school B. Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1≠μ2 .

The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are different in both school A and school B.

a) Null hypothesis: The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are the same in both school A and school B.

Alternative hypothesis: The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are different in both school A and school B.

b) Null hypothesis: H0: μ1=μ2.

The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are the same in both school A and school B.)

Alternative hypothesis: H1: μ1≠μ2 .

The average tuitions of in-state graduate programs are different in both school A and school B.

c) You should use a 2-SampTTest as we have two samples with unknown standard deviations.

d) Type I Error: Rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.

Type II Error: Failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false.

e) Given information, Sample 1 School

A): Sample size (n1) = 12 Mean (x1)

= $64,000

Standard Deviation (s1) = $8,000

Sample 2 (School B): Sample size (n2) = 16Mean (x2)

= $80,000

Standard Deviation (s2) = $6,000

Level of Significance (α) = 0.10

Calculation of test statistic is shown below:

[tex]t=\frac{(64,000-80,000)-(0)}{\sqrt{\frac{8,000^{2}}{12}+\frac{6,000^{2}}{16}}}= -2.95[/tex]

Degrees of freedom for the test statistic

= (n1-1)+(n2-1) = 11+15

= 26

From the t-tables for a two-tailed test with α= 0.10 and 26 degrees of freedom, we get the value as 1.706.

So, we reject the null hypothesis as the calculated value of t is greater than the tabled value.

Thus, there is sufficient evidence to suggest that the mean tuitions are different for school A and school B.

The difference in average tuition is statistically significant.

Therefore, we accept the alternative hypothesis.

To know more about Null hypothesis, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30535681

#SPJ11

The partial autocorrelation at lag 2, denoted as a(2), for a moving average process of order 1 (MA(1)) with || < 1 can be expressed as a(2) = 0.

In a moving average process of order 1 (MA(1)), the value of Xt at time t is defined as the sum of a white noise error term €t and the product of a coefficient 0 and the previous error term €t-1. The partial autocorrelation function (PACF) measures the correlation between Xt and Xt-k after removing the effect of the intermediate lags Xt-1, Xt-2, ..., Xt-(k-1).

For lag 2, we are interested in the correlation between Xt and Xt-2, while accounting for Xt-1. Since the moving average coefficient is 0, the value of Xt-2 is not directly influenced by Xt-1. Therefore, the partial autocorrelation at lag 2, a(2), is equal to 0. This means that there is no significant correlation between Xt and Xt-2 when Xt-1 is taken into account.

To learn more about correlation click here: brainly.com/question/30116167

#SPJ11

When converted to decimals,

a) (1011101)₂ bcomes 93

b) (61369) becomes 61369

c) (3ADE01)₁₆  is now 323700145.

a) (1011101)₂   = (1 * 2⁶) + (0 * 2⁵) + (1 * 2⁴) + (1 * 2³) + (1 * 2²) + (0 * 2¹) + (1 * 2⁰)

= 64 +0 + 16 + 8   + 4 + 0+ 1

= 93

b) To convert (61369) todecimal, we follow the same procedure as above:

(61369) = (6 * 10⁴) + (1 * 10³) +   (3 * 10²) + (6 * 10¹) + (9 * 10⁰)

=  60000 + 1000 + 300 + 60 + 9

= 61369

c ) (3ADE0 1)₁₆ = (3 * 16⁵) + (10 * 1 6⁴) + (13* 16³) + (14* 16²) + (0 * 16¹)   + (1 * 16⁰)

= 31457280 + 655360 + 81920 + 3584 + 0 + 1

= 323700145

Learn more about binary conversions:
https://brainly.com/question/31662989
#SPJ1

the Maclaurin series is:`∑(n=0)^(∞) [fⁿ(0)/n!] xⁿ``= f(0)/0! + f'(0)/1! x + f''(0)/2! x^2 + f'''(0)/3! x^3 + f⁽⁴⁾(0)/4! x^4 + f⁽⁵⁾(0)/5! x^5 + f⁽⁶⁾(0)/6! x^6 + ...``= 0 + 0x + 0x² + 0x³ + (x^9 sin(x))/4! + 0x⁵ - (x^9 cos(x))/6! + ...``= x^9 sin(x) - x^11/3! + x^13/5! - x^15/7! + ...`

The Maclaurin series for the function `f(x) = x^9 sin(x)` is given by `∑(n=0)^(∞) [fⁿ(0)/n!] xⁿ` where fⁿ(0) is the nth derivative of f(x) evaluated at x = 0. We will start by calculating the first few derivatives of f(x):`f(x) = x^9 sin(x)`First derivative:` f'(x) = x^9 cos(x) + 9x^8 sin(x)`Second derivative :`f''(x) = -x^9 sin(x) + 18x^8 cos(x) + 72x^7 sin(x)`Third derivative: `f'''(x) = -x^9 cos(x) + 27x^8 sin(x) + 432x^6 cos(x) - 2160x^5 sin(x)`Fourth derivative :`f⁽⁴⁾(x) = x^9 sin(x) + 36x^8 cos(x) + 1296x^6 sin(x) - 8640x^5 cos(x) - 60480x^4 sin(x)`Fifth derivative :`f⁽⁵⁾(x) = x^9 cos(x) + 45x^8 sin(x) + 2160x^6 cos(x) - 21600x^5 sin(x) - 302400x^4 cos(x) - 1814400x^3 sin(x)`Sixth derivative: `f⁽⁶⁾(x) = -x^9 sin(x) + 54x^8 cos(x) + 5184x^6 sin(x) - 90720x^5 cos(x) - 2721600x^3 sin(x) + 10886400x^2 cos(x) + 72576000x sin(x)`We can see a pattern emerging in the coefficients. The even derivatives are of the form `x^9 sin(x) + (terms in cos(x))` and the odd derivatives are of the form `-x^9 cos(x) + (terms in sin(x))`. , the Maclaurin series is:`∑(n=0)^(∞) [fⁿ(0)/n!] xⁿ``= f(0)/0! + f'(0)/1! x + f''(0)/2! x^2 + f'''(0)/3! x^3 + f⁽⁴⁾(0)/4! x^4 + f⁽⁵⁾(0)/5! x^5 + f⁽⁶⁾(0)/6! x^6 + ...``= 0 + 0x + 0x² + 0x³ + (x^9 sin(x))/4! + 0x⁵ - (x^9 cos(x))/6! + ...``= x^9 sin(x) - x^11/3! + x^13/5! - x^15/7! + ...`

to know more about coefficients, visit

https://brainly.com/question/1038771

#SPJ11

The Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = x^9 sin(x) is `-x^4/24 - x^5/40 - x^6/720 + x^7/5040 + x^8/40320 - x^9/362880 + ...`.

Maclaurin series is the expansion of a function in terms of its derivatives at zero. To find the Maclaurin series for the function f(x) = x^9 sin(x), we need to use the formula:

`f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x^2/2! + f'''(0)x^3/3! + ... + f^(n)(0)x^n/n! + ...`

We first need to find the derivatives of the function f(x). We have:

`f(x) = x^9 sin(x)`

Differentiating once gives:

[tex]`f'(x) = x^9 cos(x) + 9x^8 sin(x)`[/tex]

Differentiating twice gives:

`f''(x) = -x^9 sin(x) + 18x^8 cos(x) + 72x^7 sin(x)`

Differentiating thrice gives:

`f'''(x) = -x^9 cos(x) - 54x^8 sin(x) + 324x^7 cos(x) + 504x^6 sin(x)`

Differentiating four times gives:

[tex]`f^(4)(x) = x^9 sin(x) - 216x^7 cos(x) - 1512x^6 sin(x) + 3024x^5 cos(x)`[/tex]

Differentiating five times gives:

`f^(5)(x) = 9x^8 cos(x) - 504x^6 sin(x) - 7560x^5 cos(x) + 15120x^4 sin(x)`

Differentiating six times gives:

`f^(6)(x) = -9x^8 sin(x) - 3024x^5 cos(x) + 45360x^4 sin(x) - 60480x^3 cos(x)`

Differentiating seven times gives:

[tex]`f^(7)(x) = -81x^7 cos(x) + 15120x^4 sin(x) + 90720x^3 cos(x) - 181440x^2 sin(x)`[/tex]

Differentiating eight times gives:

[tex]`f^(8)(x) = 81x^7 sin(x) + 90720x^3 cos(x) - 725760x^2 sin(x) + 725760x cos(x)`[/tex]

Differentiating nine times gives:

[tex]`f^(9)(x) = 729x^6 cos(x) - 725760x^2 sin(x) - 6531840x cos(x) + 6531840 sin(x)`[/tex]

Now we can substitute into the formula:

 `f(x) = f(0) + f'(0)x + f''(0)x^2/2! + f'''(0)x^3/3! + ... + f^(n)(0)x^n/n! + ...`and simplify as follows:

[tex]`f(0) = 0` `f'(0) = 0 + 9(0) = 0` `f''(0) = -(0) + 18(0) + 72(0) = 0` `f'''(0) = -(0) - 54(0) + 324(0) + 504(0) = 0` `f^(4)(0) = (0) - 216(1) - 1512(0) + 3024(0) = -216` `f^(5)(0) = 9(0) - 504(1) - 7560(0) + 15120(0) = -504` `f^(6)(0) = -(0) - 3024(1) + 45360(0) - 60480(0) = -3024` `f^(7)(0) = -(81)(0) + 15120(1) + 90720(0) - 181440(0) = 15120` `f^(8)(0) = 81(0) + 90720(1) - 725760(0) + 725760(0) = 90720` `f^(9)(0) = 729(0) - 725760(1) - 6531840(0) + 6531840(0) = -725760`[/tex]

Substituting these values into the formula, we have:

[tex]`f(x) = 0 + 0(x) + 0(x^2)/2! + 0(x^3)/3! + (-216)(x^4)/4! + (-504)(x^5)/5! + (-3024)(x^6)/6! + (15120)(x^7)/7! + (90720)(x^8)/8! + (-725760)(x^9)/9! + ...`[/tex]

Simplifying this, we get:

[tex]`f(x) = -x^4/24 - x^5/40 - x^6/720 + x^7/5040 + x^8/40320 - x^9/362880 + ...`[/tex]

To know more about derivatives, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

It is not possible to have multiple values for k simultaneously, so the options k = -6, k = 30, and k = 42 are mutually exclusive.

The function f(x) is defined differently for different ranges of x. For x values less than or equal to 6, f(x) = x^2. For x values greater than or equal to 6, we have two cases with different values of k.

Case 1: k = -6

For x values greater than or equal to 6, f(x) = x - 6.

Case 2: k = 30

For x values greater than or equal to 6, f(x) = x + 30.

Case 3: k = 42

For x values greater than or equal to 6, f(x) = x + 42.

Therefore, depending on the value of k, the function f(x) takes on different forms for x values greater than or equal to 6.

For more information on functions visit: brainly.com/question/28247996

#SPJ11

(a) S3 has three 2-subgroups, which are isomorphic to the cyclic group of order 2.

(b) S₁ does not have any nontrivial 2-subgroups.

(c) A4 has three 2-subgroups, which are isomorphic to the Klein four-group.



In the symmetric group S3, the 2-subgroups are subsets that contain the identity element and one more element of order 2. Since there are three distinct pairs of elements in S3 that generate 2-subgroups, we find three such subgroups. These subgroups are isomorphic to the cyclic group of order 2, which means they exhibit the same algebraic structure.

On the other hand, the symmetric group S₁ consists only of the identity permutation, and therefore it does not have any nontrivial 2-subgroups. The absence of nontrivial 2-subgroups in S₁ can be understood by observing that any subset of S₁ containing more than one element would lead to a permutation that is not in S₁, violating its definition.

In the alternating group A4, the 2-subgroups consist of the identity element and a permutation of order 2. We can find three distinct such subgroups in A4, which are isomorphic to the Klein four-group. The Klein four-group is a non-cyclic group of order 4, and it represents a different algebraic structure compared to the cyclic group of order 2 found in S3.

To learn more about  isomorphic click here brainly.com/question/32325445

#SPJ11

Values that are considered outliers are given as follows:

We first must use the z-score formula, as follows:

[tex]Z = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

In which:

Values are considered as outliers when they have z-scores that are:

The mean and the standard deviation for this problem are given as follows:

[tex]\mu = 300, \sigma = 25[/tex]

Hence the value when Z = -2 is given as follows:

-2 = (X - 300)/25

X - 300 = -50

X = 250.

The value when Z = 2 is given as follows:

2 = (X - 300)/25

X - 300 = 50

X = 350.

More can be learned about the normal distribution at https://brainly.com/question/25800303

#SPJ4

As per the given scenario, the center of the circle is (-4, -1), and the radius is 5.

To complete the square as well as find the center and radius of the circle represented by the equation [tex]x^2 + y^2 + 8x + 2y - 8 = 0[/tex], we need to rearrange the equation.

The x-terms and y-terms together:

(x^2 + 8x) + (y^2 + 2y) - 8 = 0

To complete the square for the x-terms, we take half of the coefficient of x (which is 8), square it, and add it to both sides:

[tex](x^2 + 8x + 16) + (y^2 + 2y) - 8 - 16 = 16\\(x + 4)^2 + (y^2 + 2y) - 24 = 16[/tex]

The square for the y-terms by taking half of the coefficient of y (which is 2), square it, and add it to both sides:

[tex](x + 4)^2 + (y^2 + 2y + 1) - 24 - 1 = 16 + 1\\(x + 4)^2 + (y + 1)^2 - 25 = 17[/tex]

Now, we have the equation in the form [tex](x - h)^2 + (y - k)^2 = r^2[/tex], where (h, k) represents the center of the circle, and r represents the radius.

Comparing the equation to the standard form, we can identify the center as (-4, -1), and the radius is the square root of 25, which is 5.

Thus, the center of the circle is (-4, -1), and the radius is 5.

For more details regarding equation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ1

Using the standard error of the sample proportion to determine the margin of error, the confidence interval is (0.573, 0.827).

To approximate a 95% confidence interval for the parameter f, we can use the 2SD (two standard deviations) method.

First, we calculate the sample proportion of students who chose an odd number:

p = x/n = 35/50 = 0.7

Next, we calculate the standard error of the sample proportion:

SE = √((p*(1-p))/n) = √((0.7*(1-0.7))/50) = 0.065

To find the margin of error, we multiply the standard error by the critical value associated with a 95% confidence level. Since we are using a normal approximation, the critical value is approximately 1.96.

Margin of Error = 1.96 * SE ≈ 1.96 * 0.065 = 0.127

Finally, we can construct the confidence interval:

CI = p ± Margin of Error

CI = 0.7 ± 0.127

The 95% confidence interval for the parameter f is approximately (0.573, 0.827).

Learn more on confidence interval here;

https://brainly.com/question/17097944

#SPJ4

[tex]E(XX') = σ2I + X(ßß')X' and E(X'y) = X'ßσ2I \\= E((B - ß)(B - ß)') \\= E(BB') - ßß'\\= E((X'y)(X'y)') - ßß'\\= E(X'y y'X) - ßß' \\= E((σ2I + X(ßß')X') - ßß') - ßß\\'= σ2I + E(XX')ßß' - ßß'\\= σ2I + X(ßß')X' - ßß'\\= σ2I + (E(XX') - I)ßß' \\= Bo. Thus, ECB) = Bo.[/tex]

Hence proved.

Linear model show:

[tex]E(B) = B, \\ECB) = Bo[/tex]

Formula used:

[tex]E(B) = B (6.7), ECB) \\= Bo (6.8)[/tex]

Proof:(a) [tex]E(B) = E(X'X)-1 X'yX[/tex] is the matrix of predictors, y is the vector of responses and B is the vector of coefficients.

Now [tex]E(B) = E(E(X'X)-1 X'y)[/tex] (as y is a random variable) [tex]= E(X'X)-1 X'E(y) \\= E(X'X)-1 X'Xß[/tex]

Here ß is the true parameter vector.

= ß [as E(X'X)-1 X'X = I]. Thus, E(B) = ß(b)

To prove:

[tex]ECB) = BoECB) \\= E((B - ß)(B - ß)')\\From (6.4), y = Xß + ε and var(ε) = σ2I \\= > var(y) = σ2I \\= > E(yy') = σ2I + X(ßß')X'.[/tex]

Know more about the Linear model  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28033207

#SPJ11

The function g at the point B = 0.25. The slope of the tangent line (and the value of g'(2.6)) is 0.25.

To determine the value of g'(2.6), we can use the slope of the tangent line at point B. The slope of the tangent line can be calculated using the coordinates of points A and B:

Slope = (y2 - y1) / (x2 - x1)

Slope = (3.38 - 3.4) / (2.52 - 2.6)

Slope = -0.02 / -0.08

Slope = 0.25

Therefore, the slope of the tangent line (and the value of g'(2.6)) is 0.25.

To know more about slope of tangent line, click here: brainly.com/question/32393818

#SPJ11