Answer:
No it could not have survived. Problem was Rome wasn't a stable republic, it was a very unstable one. From the fall of Carthage one strong man after another had risen, competed with the Senate and other strong men and threatened the Republic.
Explanation:
I don't think it could have survived. Rome was a very unstable republic, which was a problem. Since the fall of Carthage, one powerful individual after another has emerged, challenged the Senate and other powerful individuals, and put the Republic in danger.
Could the Roman Republic survive?Even while the populace made an effort—or at least the senators did—it simply could not endure, leading to the Third Civil War and the reign of Octavius, later known as Augustus. Also worth mentioning is that the Roman populace believed that the Roman Republic still existed. Its final downfall in 27 BCE was a result of economic issues, political corruption, criminal activity and private armies, the advent of Julius Caesar as tyrant, and other factors.
Rome's continuing growth brought the Republic money and revenue. In order for government officials to advance in authority and acquire access to this money, corruption and bribery increased. Votes were purchased and friends were given favors by the wealthy. Corruption and widespread bribery helped the commoners.
Learn more about Roman Republic here:
https://brainly.com/question/28177874
#SPJ2