Compare the preterite tense conjugations to the present tense conjugations for an AR verb (hablar) as well as an ER/IR verb (comer) in this chart. Pay particular attention to the endings in the tú, nosotros, vosotros, and ellos/ellas/ustedas forms. What do the present and preterite endings for those subjects have in common? Do these patterns hold true for irregular verbs as well?

Compare The Preterite Tense Conjugations To The Present Tense Conjugations For An AR Verb (hablar) As

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Pay particular attention to the endings in the tú, nosotros, vosotros, and ellos/ellas/ustedas forms

Explanation:


Related Questions

Other Questions
Although King John signed the Magna Carta, he is not usually considered a hero or a pioneer for his role in thislandmark document. PLZZ Explain why this is so using facts NO LINKS OR I REPORTThe following question has two parts. First, answer part A. Then, answer part B.Part AHow are the doctors from the 1700s and modern doctors similar? A. They use the best medical information available at the time. B. They believe that a person can have too much bad blood. C. They understand that it is important to clean their tools. D. They do not always do what the patient wants.Part BWhich detail from the text best supports your answer in part A? A. "carefully cleaning hands" B. "had to be balanced for a person to be healthy" C. "did the best they could with what they knew" D. "asked to be bled when he became very sick" Which of these devices does NOT contain a magnet or electromagnet?A. an electric motorB. a doorbellC. a telephoneD. a light bulb How long has slavery existed?A. Since the 1600'sB. For thousands of yearsC. For hundreds of yearsD. Since the 1800's Pretend you are a part of the audience for the formal debate shown in the video below. Summarize the key points of both the affirmative and the opposing side. Then conduct some additional research to better inform yourself about the pros and cons of technology and smart devices, including the impact they have on the developing human brain. Finally, explain which side you agree with and why.here is the transcript"There's n othing smart about personalized intimate technology. It simply confirms our misplac ed ideal that the world revolv es around us.Smart technology has made us smart in some unexpected ways. It's made us more responsive. It's made us more engaged.What we've created, in other words, is an environment that is constantly frustrating our mind's ability to create deep knowledge into think deeply.This is the greatest time in human history to be wanting to know. There is no better time. The access to information has never been this free.We're losing that contemplative deep focused attentive state of mind that is crucial to the creation of knowledge, the creation of intelligence, and deep thinking in general.In this age of constant distraction-- we can't focus-- we're watching seven years of Game of Th rones, the most complex narrative that we've ever seen in our world. Our universities are turning out experts and scholars who are deep into their topics-- deeper than ever, because they can go that deep because of the internet. We are knowing more and better than ever.What we're losing is the sub tlety, the depth, the sophistication of thought. In an odd way, perhaps we're becoming like machi nes. But that, in an odd way, as well makes us du mber than we once were.There are lots of things that people do with technology in this current moment that may not rise to the bar of tenured faculty and book writers. That doesn't necessarily mean it's dum b. What is d umb, and what is lying underneath that judgment? Buried in that is notions about what is appropriate disco urse, what is sufficiently merit-worthy.We're not all broadcasting these deep thoughts. Were sending out links to sill y videos. We're going-- spending huge amounts of time on Fac ebook. We're spending lots of time on T witter, sending Snapc hats.We've never had an opportunity like this, the ability to participate in the creation of knowledge. This is the smartest age we've ever had." Fill in the blank with the correct form of SER or ESTARLa mujer ______________ vieja, rubia y muy inteligente. 4. 2x2 + 4x + 10 = 0 Need help I only have 5 minutes Which of the following African Kingdom made Christianity their official religion? *1 pointGhanaAxumEgyptMali What was the purpose of the Interstate Commerce Commission, and how successful was it? About how much cardboard is needed to make the inner tube for a roll of paper if thetube has a diameter of 4.5 cm and is 24 cm long? Find the Greatest Common Factor of 25c2 and 10w2 i need help with this Find the length of AC using Pythagorean Theorem. i know this is easy but can someone answer the following questionsComplete the following. Show all work for calculations. 25 points if answered correctlyList the dimensions of your box. Be sure to include the units (in, cm, ft, etc.).Describe the shape of the cross section when the box is cut parallel to the base.What is the surface area of the box?What is the surface area of the box if it is scaled up by a factor of 10?What is the volume of the box?What is the volume of the box if it is scaled down by a factor of 110? I need this please help me What was the name of the treaty that the allies agreed to? What is the complete factorization of the trinomial x^2-8x+16?A.(x 4)(x 4)B.(x 2)(x + 8)C.(x 1)(x 16)D.(x + 4)(x 4) help me plz which one of the four WORTH A LOT OF POINTS. WILL GIVE BRAINLEIST THINGY TO WHOEVER SOLVES IT! When Svante Arrhenius first proposed his acid base theory, he was a doctoral candidate. His professors thought his ideas were unfounded. Within a decade, the Arrhenius theory of acid base was widely accepted and praised within the scientific world. Arrhenius defined acids as compounds having an ionizable hydrogen and bases as compounds with ionizable hydroxides. Eventually scientists adopted a broader theory which includes more compounds to define acids and bases. The Bronsted-Lowry acid base theory defines an acid as a _______ and a base as a ______________.