Can someone help me please i need to follow all the instructions i would appreciate

here is the picture



just ignore the part that says evaluate 2 students

Answer:

A .

absolute monarchy.....

Until recently, the classification of "moderate" would have applied to a. most Americans.

The term "moderate" typically refers to a political ideology that falls somewhere between the more extreme positions of the left and the right. While the exact definition of "moderate" can vary depending on the context, it generally implies a willingness to compromise and work towards solutions that are acceptable to a broad range of people.

Historically, polls have shown that a majority of Americans identify as moderate, rather than liberal or conservative. However, in recent years, there has been a growing polarization in American politics, with more people identifying as either very liberal or very conservative.

Despite this trend, it is still likely that until recently, the classification of "moderate" would have applied to most Americans.

Therefore the correct option is A.

Learn more about moderate here:https://brainly.com/question/16797771

#SPJ1

The video The House We Live In offers an insightful look into how race was constructed in the United States during the 1950s.

This period was marked by intense racial segregation, discrimination and inequality, and the video brings to light how these injustices were perpetuated by economic, political, and cultural policies and practices. Through the use of interviews, archival footage, and newsreels, the video shows how white supremacy was entrenched in nearly all aspects of life, from education to employment to housing. The video also highlights the pervasive racism that was accepted and even encouraged, and how these attitudes lead to the systematic and institutionalized mistreatment of people of color. By exploring the ways in which race was constructed in the 1950s, The House We Live In provides an important reminder of how far the United States has come in terms of race relations, while also highlighting the systemic racism that still exists today.

To know more about United States refer :

brainly.com/question/30354956

#SPJ1

Answer: 1808

Explanation:

January 1, 1808. 

Answer: Maggie's Ultimate ability Wrecking Ball allows her to throw a disruptive ball that releases speed-boosting pads and detonates near any enemies in its path for a maximum of 20 damage. It's worth noting, the ball bounces off floors, ceilings, and walls and has a 90-second cooldown.

Although she's painted as a villain by the Syndicate, Maggie is also seen as a hero by many. She's also a New Zealand Maori, and this was an aspect of her background Respawn says was determined to get right.

Answer:

The correct answer is A. they disagreed about

who should control certain cites and region.

Sunny Muslims and Shiltes are sects of the Islamic faith. (Then the option B. they disagreed about whether Islam should be the country's official religion is wrong).

In 7th century the groups divided their opinion about who should be the successor of Islam's prophet Muhammed. Now days the governme is Islamic, democratic and is a federal parliamentary republic (The option D. They disagreed about the form of government that Iraq should have is wrong).

So early the Sunnis wanted to elect a religious leader because for them Muhammed had left none rightful heir after his death to occupy his place and his followers suggest Abu Bakr as his successor.

(which are only around 15-10%

of Muslim population) fought for All ibn Abi Talib (cousin and son-in-law) announced by Muhammed as his successor, belleving him to be the rightful heir of Muhammed.

Answer:

The Native Americans resented and resisted the colonists' attempts to change them. Their refusal to conform to European culture angered the colonists and hostilities soon broke out between the two groups. May 14, 2004

Explanation: European colonization of North America had a devastating effect on the native population. Within a short period of time, their way of life was changed forever. The changes were caused by a number of factors, including loss of land, disease, enforced laws that violated their culture, and much more.

Answer:

The federal government combined several agencies into the Department of Homeland Security primarily to prevent future acts of terrorism in the United States through coordination. The Department of Homeland Security was created in response to the September 11th attacks, which highlighted the need for improved coordination and communication among various government agencies responsible for homeland security. The Department of Homeland Security was designed to consolidate and coordinate various agencies responsible for security and emergency response, such as the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the Customs Service, the Transportation Security Administration, the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and others, to enhance the government's ability to prevent and respond to future terrorist attacks. The decision to create the Department of Homeland Security was not focused on investigating whether the September 11th attacks could have been prevented or whether to bring charges for the attacks, nor was it intended to prevent the unconstitutional implementation of the Patriot Act, which was a separate legislative action.

Explanation:

ChatGPT Answer

The author of "White Man's Burden" characterizes Filipinos as being so overrun by western "white" culture that they see themselves as being beneath the westerners. They believed white people to be strong, wise, and possessed of a colonial mindset.

The manifest destiny that drives the United States to conquer and advance abroad, as well as its goal of promoting civilized values among indigenous peoples, according to the artist, bears the brunt of white imperialism and colonialism.

1899 saw the publication of Rudyard Kipling's poem The White's Man Burden: The United States and the Philippine Islands. In spite of his concerns over the expenses and dangers involved, Kippling begs the United States to seize control of the Philippines in the poem.

Learn more about imperialism and colonialism: https://brainly.com/question/4292946

#SPJ1

Governmental divisions are not mutually exclusive. Between the three branches of the federal government, the United States Constitution establishes checks and balances.

Legislation passed by Congress may be overridden by the Congress with a two-thirds vote of both houses, but the President has the authority to sign legislation into law or veto it.

When compared to the president or the house of representatives, the Senate's authority is sometimes even greater. A President may be removed from office for wrongdoing if there is enough evidence of impeachment in the Senate.

To know more about  Congress visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14348262

#SPJ1

1-The ECRA (The United States Capitol Police Emergency Appropriations Act) was passed in May 2021 and was designed to address some of the deficiencies that were highlighted by the January 6th insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. Here are five major areas that the ECRA addressed:Funding for the Capitol Police: The ECRA provided $1.9 billion in funding for the Capitol Police, which is more than triple the agency's annual budget. This funding is intended to help the Capitol Police improve its training, equipment, and staffing levels, as well as to provide additional resources for intelligence gathering and analysis.Security improvements: The ECRA requires the Capitol Police to implement additional security measures, including the installation of new security cameras, the hiring of additional personnel, and the purchase of new equipment such as body cameras, helmets, and riot shields. The legislation also mandates the creation of a new quick reaction force to respond to emergencies.Intelligence gathering and sharing: The ECRA requires the Capitol Police to establish new partnerships with other law enforcement agencies and to improve its intelligence gathering and sharing capabilities. This is intended to help the agency better identify and respond to potential threats.Accountability measures: The ECRA includes provisions to improve the accountability of the Capitol Police, including requiring the agency to report on its use of force and requiring the Inspector General to conduct regular audits of the agency's practices.Support for mental health services: The ECRA includes funding for mental health services for Capitol Police officers who were affected by the January 6th insurrection. This funding is intended to provide support for officers who experienced trauma or other mental health issues as a result of the attack.

2-It's not clear what specifically you are asking about, but I will provide some general information on the roles and responsibilities of members of Congress and the Vice President.Members of Congress are elected representatives of their constituents, and they are responsible for drafting and passing laws that reflect the needs and interests of the people they represent. There are two chambers of Congress: the House of Representatives and the Senate. Members of the House are elected every two years, while members of the Senate serve six-year terms.The Vice President of the United States serves as the second-in-command to the President and is responsible for presiding over the Senate. In this role, the Vice President can cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate, but he or she does not have the power to introduce legislation or vote on bills. The Vice President is also a member of the President's Cabinet and may be called upon to perform various other duties as assigned by the President.Both members of Congress and the Vice President are held accountable to the Constitution and are expected to uphold the laws and values of the United States. They are also subject to oversight and scrutiny from the media, their constituents, and other government agencies.

3-The states and their electors play a crucial role in the process of electing the President of the United States. Here are some key points that apply to the states and their electors:The Electoral College: The President of the United States is elected through the Electoral College, which is made up of electors from each state. The number of electors each state has is equal to its representation in Congress (the number of representatives plus two senators).State laws and regulations: Each state is responsible for determining how its electors are chosen and how they cast their votes. This means that state laws and regulations can vary widely, and the process for selecting and voting for electors can differ from state to state.Winner-takes-all vs. proportional representation: Most states have a winner-takes-all system, in which the candidate who receives the most votes in the state (even if it's not a majority) receives all of the state's electoral votes. However, some states have a system of proportional representation, in which the electoral votes are divided based on the percentage of the popular vote each candidate receives.Faithless electors: In some cases, electors may choose to vote for a candidate other than the one they were pledged to support. These so-called "faithless electors" are rare, but they can potentially change the outcome of an election. Some states have laws that require electors to vote for the candidate who won the popular vote in the state, while others allow electors to vote for whomever they choose.Role in resolving disputes: The states and their electors can play a role in resolving disputes related to the election, such as recounts, challenges to the results, or questions about the eligibility of a candidate. In some cases, these disputes may be resolved by state courts or by Congress.

Answer: Push factors may include conflict, drought, famine, lack of jobs, and discrimination. Pull factors are those factors in the destination country that attract the individual or group to leave their home. Better economic opportunities, more jobs, and the promise of a better life often pull people into new locations.

The group of immigrants wants to come to the United States due to the presence of push factors like poverty and lack of employment opportunities.

When people from home locations relocate or transferred to foreign locations in seeking employment and seek better prospects for the future to have economic stability in life along with protection is considered Immigration.

A push factor is considered a factor that tries to explain why someone leaves the place they are currently living. The push is strong, to go wherever they could avoid which is forcing them to do so which includes poverty, conflict, or lack of employment.

Learn more about Immigration, here:

https://brainly.com/question/13688875

#SPJ2

A third party is not always likely to be the opposition.

Not necessarily. A third party is simply any political party that is not one of the two major parties in a given country or region. Whether or not a third party is likely to be an opposition party depends on a variety of factors, including the political context, the platform of the third party, and the electoral system in place.

In some cases, a third party may be aligned with one of the major parties or may form a coalition with one of them, in which case it may not necessarily be considered an opposition party. Additionally, in some countries with proportional representation electoral systems, third parties may hold significant power and may even be part of governing coalitions

Read more on third party here:https://brainly.com/question/30107041

#SPJ1

Answer:

The First Amendment

Explanation:

Answer:

Scarcity means "little of"

Explanation:

Scarcity means "little of" (Example food)

There was a scarcity of food in the town.

Since economics is dealing with money the word will most likely be used in the context of money.

Answer:

the demand for something greater than what's available scarcity limits the options available for consumers

Explanation:

gap between whats available the of limited resources and the theoretical needs of people for such resource

Do go through this Pic ..

hope this gonna be helpful for u:)

In 1825 Louisiana wrote a set of laws based on C.the Napoleonic Code.

The Napoleonic Code, also known as the French Civil Code, is a legal code developed in France during the reign of Napoleon Bonaparte in the early 19th century. The code was first introduced in 1804 and remains the basis of French civil law to this day.

The Napoleonic Code aimed to create a unified and standardized legal system for France that was consistent with the ideals of the French Revolution. It was based on the principle of equality before the law and abolished many of the feudal laws that had been in place prior to the revolution.

The code covered a wide range of legal areas, including property rights, contract law, family law, and criminal law. It introduced new concepts such as legal capacity and the right to property, which were revolutionary.

Therefore, option C is correct.

Learn more about  laws at:

https://brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ1

Answer:

The principle of the constitution where citizens elect representatives and give their consent to be governed is called republicanism. Therefore, the answer is A. republicanism.

Explanation:

Answer: They took their slogan of "Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity

Explanation: A force of 13,000 militia troops, led by Hamilton and Virginia governor Henry Lee, marched into western Pennsylvania. By the time the federal force arrived, the rebellion had collapsed and most of the rebels had fled.

The Whiskey Rebellion was the first test of federal authority in the United States. This rebellion enforced the idea that the new government had the right to levy a particular tax that would impact citizens in all states.

Answer:

Personal Christianity refers to the experience of an individual who has accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior and has a personal relationship with Him. For many Christians, this personal relationship is evidence of the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

According to the Bible, after Jesus was crucified, He rose from the dead and appeared to His disciples and many others before ascending into heaven. These appearances gave the disciples the confidence and the assurance that Jesus was indeed alive and that their faith was not in vain. They were eyewitnesses to the resurrection and their experiences are recorded in the New Testament.

For many Christians, their personal experience of the transformative power of the Gospel is also evidence of the resurrection. They have encountered the living Christ through prayer, worship, and reading the Bible, and have seen His impact on their lives. They have experienced forgiveness, love, and a sense of purpose that they believe could only come from a risen Savior.

While personal experience alone cannot prove the resurrection of Jesus Christ, it is a powerful testimony to the impact that He continues to have on people's lives. For Christians, the resurrection is not just a historical event but a present reality that they experience in their daily lives.

Answer:

The New Deal, implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in response to the Great Depression, is generally considered to have been successful in addressing many of the economic and social problems of the time. However, it is not without its criticisms. Here are some of the criticisms of the New Deal:

Did not fully end the Great Depression: Although the New Deal is credited with improving the economy and reducing unemployment, it did not fully end the Great Depression. The economy did not fully recover until the US entered World War II in 1941.

Increased the national debt: The New Deal involved massive government spending, which increased the national debt. Critics argue that this has long-term negative effects on the economy.

Did not address systemic issues: While the New Deal provided immediate relief to many Americans, it did not address systemic issues that contributed to the Great Depression, such as income inequality and the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few.

Did not address racial inequality: The New Deal did not adequately address racial inequality, and some of its policies, such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act, actually worsened the situation for many African American farmers.

Encouraged a dependency on government: Critics argue that the New Deal created a culture of dependency on government aid, which continues to this day.

Restricted individual freedom: Some critics argue that the New Deal involved too much government intervention in people's lives, and that this restricted individual freedom.

Did not address environmental issues: The New Deal did not address environmental issues, and some of its policies, such as dam-building and agricultural subsidies, had negative environmental impacts.

Overall, while the New Deal is generally viewed as a positive force in American history, it is important to recognize its limitations and critiques in order to fully understand its impact.

Explanation:

Mostly through participating in a planned carpool, but also by walking, hitchhiking, and using white housewives' servants as a mode of transportation.

As part of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, a civil rights protest against seat segregation, Black Americans in Montgomery, Alabama, refused to board city buses. It is believed that the boycott, which lasted from December 5, 1955, to December 20, 1956, was the nation's first substantial act of anti-segregation protest.

The bus boycott served as a template for other Southern movements that followed, showcasing the effectiveness of nonviolent mass protest to combat racial segregation.

Learn more about Montgomery Bus Boycott: https://brainly.com/question/9385547

#SPJ9

Answer: The Immigration Act of 1924 limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the United States through a national origins quota. The quota provided immigration visas to two percent of the total number of people of each nationality in the United States as of the 1890 national census.

Answer:

The frontier meant a lot to the nation in the first half of the nineteenth century as it represented the westward expansion of the United States. The nation saw the frontier as a symbol of the country's growth, progress, and prosperity. Americans viewed the westward movement as an opportunity to acquire new lands, wealth, and resources. It was a time when people were drawn to the frontier in search of better opportunities, such as land, jobs, and a chance to start a new life. The frontier was also seen as a place where people could escape the constraints of civilization and find freedom and independence. The westward movement contributed significantly to the development of the nation's economy, political system, and culture. The idea of manifest destiny, the belief that it was the nation's God-given right to expand and spread democracy and civilization across the continent, was a driving force behind the westward movement.

Explanation:

Answer:

Across

Down

Answer:

Descartes uses methodic doubt to question whether the knowledge gained through sensory experience is reliable. He argues that the senses can be deceiving, and therefore, knowledge gained through sensory experience can be false. One of the examples he uses is the Dream Argument, which posits that when we dream, we perceive things just as vividly as we do when we are awake, and we believe them to be real. However, upon awakening, we realize that what we thought was real was nothing more than an illusion. Therefore, Descartes argues that there is no way to distinguish between the reality we perceive while awake and the illusions we perceive while dreaming.

To further his argument, Descartes introduces the Evil Genius, a powerful and deceptive being that could potentially deceive us into believing that everything we perceive is real, when in fact, it is all an illusion. The Evil Genius argument pushes the limits of Descartes' skepticism by suggesting that even the most fundamental truths, such as the existence of the self or the physical world, could be an illusion created by the Evil Genius. This argument shows that not only our senses, but also our reasoning and intellectual faculties could be unreliable, and therefore, knowledge gained through them should be subject to doubt.

Overall, Descartes' methodic doubt is a systematic approach to doubt all knowledge that is not absolutely certain. By applying this approach to the Dream Argument and the Evil Genius argument, he shows that our perception of reality is unreliable, and thus, knowledge gained through it should be subject to doubt.

Explanation:

Answer:

is not bad but its also good

Answer:

The Royal Navy has shed people faster than ships. Britain had 39,000 sailors in 2000. It now has a little more than 29,000, at least 2,000 short of its authorized strength. Fleet planners tried to address the personnel shortage by sidelining two of its most powerful ships.

So It Would Be True

Explanation: Hope This Helps

Answer:

Descartes' "Cogito, Ergo Sum" is a philosophical statement that translates to "I think, therefore I am." Descartes argued that the only thing he could be sure of was his own existence, because even if everything he knew and experienced was an illusion or a deception, he could not doubt that he himself existed as a thinking being. In other words, the very act of thinking proves his own existence.

One objection to Descartes' argument is that it relies on the assumption that thinking is an essential characteristic of a person's existence, which may not be true for all beings. Some philosophers argue that even if someone were to stop thinking, they would still exist, and therefore the statement "I think, therefore I am" is not universally applicable.

Another objection is that the argument is circular, as it assumes the conclusion in its premise. Critics argue that Descartes has not actually proven his own existence, but rather has just restated what he already believed to be true.

Furthermore, some argue that even if Descartes' argument is valid, it does not provide a foundation for knowledge beyond the self. It does not prove the existence of an external world or other minds, which are necessary for much of our knowledge.

Overall, Descartes' "Cogito, Ergo Sum" is a highly influential philosophical statement, but it has faced several objections and criticisms over the years.

Explanation:

Answer:

cogito and ergo sum are words I don't know but when you thanks about it uou have got your answer