Let f(x)=2 x+5 and g(x)=x²-3 x+2 . Perform each function operation, and then find the domain.

-2 g(x)+f(x)

To complete the sentence, 5.1 liters is approximately equal to 5.4 quarts.

5.1 liters is approximately equal to 5.39 quarts.

To convert liters to quarts, we need to consider the conversion factor that 1 liter is approximately equal to 1.05668821 quarts. By multiplying 5.1 liters by the conversion factor, we get:

5.1 liters * 1.05668821 quarts/liter = 5.391298221 quarts.

Rounded to the nearest hundredth, 5.1 liters is approximately equal to 5.39 quarts.

Know more about conversion factor  here:

https://brainly.com/question/30567263

#SPJ11

The greatest common factor (GCF) of the expression 21h³ + 35h² - 28h is 7h.

To find the GCF, we need to determine the highest power of h that divides each term of the expression.

The given expression is: 21h³ + 35h² - 28h

Let's factor out the common factor from each term:

21h³ = 7h * 3h²

35h² = 7h * 5h

-28h = 7h * -4

We can observe that each term has a common factor of 7h. Therefore, the GCF is 7h.

The greatest common factor (GCF) of the expression 21h³ + 35h² - 28h is 7h.

To know more about greatest common factor, visit

https://brainly.com/question/29584814

#SPJ11

To find the man's speed in km/h, calculate the total time it takes to walk 11 km in 30 minutes. Subtract the distance covered in 30 minutes from the total distance, and solve for x. The total time is 30 minutes, which divides by 60 to get 0.5 hours. The speed is 22 km/h.

To find the man's speed in km/h, we need to calculate the total time it takes for him to walk the entire 11 km.

We know that in 30 minutes, he has traveled two-ninths of the remaining distance. This means that he has covered (2/9) * (11 - x) km, where x is the distance he has already covered.

To find x, we can subtract the distance covered in 30 minutes from the total distance of 11 km. So, x = 11 - (2/9) * (11 - x).

Now, let's solve this equation to find x.

Multiply both sides of the equation by 9 to get rid of the fraction: 9x = 99 - 2(11 - x).

Expand the equation: 9x = 99 - 22 + 2x.

Combine like terms: 7x = 77.

Divide both sides by 7: x = 11.

Therefore, the man has already covered 11 km.

Now, we can calculate the total time it takes for him to walk the entire distance. Since he covered the remaining 11 - 11 = 0 km in 30 minutes, the total time is 30 minutes.

To convert this to hours, we divide by 60: 30 minutes / 60 = 0.5 hours.

Finally, we can calculate his speed by dividing the total distance of 11 km by the total time of 0.5 hours: speed = 11 km / 0.5 hours = 22 km/h.

So, his speed is 22 km/h.

To know more about speed Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17661499

#SPJ11

The distance between the points (-5, -5) and (1, 3) is 10 units.

To find the distance between the points (-5, -5) and (1, 3), we can use the distance formula.

The distance formula is:
[tex]d = \sqrt{((x_2 - x_1)^2+ (y_2 - y_1)^2)}[/tex]
Let's substitute the values into the formula:

[tex]d = \sqrt{((1 - (-5))^2 + (3 - (-5))^2)}\\d = \sqrt{((1 + 5)^2 + (3 + 5)^2}\\d = \sqrt{(6^2 + 8^2)}\\d = \sqrt{(36 + 64)}\\d = \sqrt{100}\\d = 10[/tex]

Therefore, the distance between the points (-5, -5) and (1, 3) is 10 units.

Explanation:
The distance formula is derived from the Pythagorean theorem.

It calculates the length of the hypotenuse of a right triangle formed by the coordinates of two points.

In this case, we have a right triangle with legs of length 6 and 8.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we find that the hypotenuse (the distance between the two points) is 10 units.

Remember to round your answer to the nearest tenth, so the final answer is 10 units.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11

To sketch a few vectors of f, we can plot arrows at different points (x, y) that represent the direction and magnitude of the gradient field f.

To find the gradient field f for a potential function, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable.

Let's say the potential function is given by f(x, y).

The gradient field f can be represented as the vector (f_x, f_y), where f_x is the partial derivative of f with respect to x, and f_y is the partial derivative of f with respect to y.

To sketch a few level curves, we can plot curves where the value of

f(x, y) is constant.

These curves will be perpendicular to the gradient vectors of f.

To sketch a few vectors of f, we can plot arrows at different points (x, y) that represent the direction and magnitude of the gradient field f.

To know more about magnitude visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31022175

#SPJ11

To find the gradient field f for a potential function, we calculate the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable. Then, we can sketch the level curves and vectors of f to visualize the function.

The gradient field f for a potential function can be found by taking the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable. Let's assume the potential function is given by f(x, y).

To find the gradient field, we need to calculate the partial derivatives of f with respect to x and y. This can be written as ∇f = (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y).

Once we have the gradient field, we can sketch the level curves and vectors of f. Level curves are curves on which f is constant, meaning the value of f does not change along these curves. Vectors of f represent the direction and magnitude of the gradient field at each point.

To sketch the level curves, we can choose different values for f and plot the corresponding curves. For example, if f = 0, we can plot the curve where f is constantly equal to 0. Similarly, we can choose other values for f and sketch the corresponding curves.

To sketch the vectors of f, we can select a few points on the level curves and draw arrows indicating the direction and magnitude of the gradient field at those points. The length of the arrows represents the magnitude, and the direction represents the direction of the gradient field.

In conclusion, to find the gradient field f for a potential function, we calculate the partial derivatives of the function with respect to each variable. Then, we can sketch the level curves and vectors of f to visualize the function.

Learn more about gradient field from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/31583861

#SPJ11

Another point on the parabola is (2, 2).

To find another point on the parabola, we can use the fact that the parabola is described by a quadratic equation of the form y = ax^2 + bx + c. We can substitute the given points (-1,8), (0,4), and (1,2) into this equation to find the values of a, b, and c.

Let's start by substituting (-1,8) into the equation:
8 = a(-1)^2 + b(-1) + c

This simplifies to:
8 = a - b + c          (Equation 1)

Next, let's substitute (0,4) into the equation:
4 = a(0)^2 + b(0) + c

This simplifies to:
4 = c                 (Equation 2)

Finally, let's substitute (1,2) into the equation:
2 = a(1)^2 + b(1) + c

This simplifies to:
2 = a + b + c          (Equation 3)

Now, we have a system of three equations (Equations 1, 2, and 3) with three variables (a, b, and c). We can solve this system to find the values of a, b, and c.

From Equation 2, we know that c = 4. Substituting this value into Equations 1 and 3, we get:

8 = a - b + 4          (Equation 1')
2 = a + b + 4          (Equation 3')

Let's subtract Equation 1' from Equation 3':
2 - 8 = a + b + 4 - (a - b + 4)

This simplifies to:
-6 = 2b

Dividing both sides by 2, we get:
-3 = b

Substituting this value of b into Equation 3', we can solve for a:
2 = a + (-3) + 4
2 = a + 1

Subtracting 1 from both sides, we find:
a = 1

Therefore, the quadratic equation that represents the parabola is:
y = x^2 - 3x + 4

Now, to find another point on the parabola, we can choose any value of x and substitute it into the equation to solve for y. For example, if we choose x = 2, we can find y:
y = (2)^2 - 3(2) + 4
y = 4 - 6 + 4
y = 2

Therefore, another point on the parabola is (2, 2).

To know more about parabola refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/11911877

#SPJ11

To find the measure of angle ADC (m∠ADC), we can use the fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is 180 degrees.

Given:
m∠BAD = 38 degrees
m∠BCD = 50 degrees

We know that angle BCD and angle BAD are adjacent angles (they share a common side, CD). Therefore, the sum of their measures is 180 degrees:

m∠BCD + m∠BAD = 180 degrees

Substituting the given values:

50 + 38 = 180

88 = 180

To find m∠ADC, we subtract the sum of angles BCD and BAD from 180 degrees:

m∠ADC = 180 - 88
m∠ADC = 92 degrees

The measure of angle ADC (m∠ADC) is 92 degrees.

Given that m∠BAD is 38 degrees and m∠BCD is 50 degrees, we can find the measure of angle ADC (m∠ADC). To do this, we use the fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is always 180 degrees. In this case, angles BCD and BAD are adjacent angles, meaning they share a common side, CD.

So, we can write the equation m∠BCD + m∠BAD = 180 degrees. Substituting the given values, we get 50 + 38 = 180. Simplifying this equation, we find that 88 = 180. To find m∠ADC, we subtract the sum of angles BCD and BAD from 180 degrees. Thus, m∠ADC = 180 - 88 = 92 degrees. In conclusion, the measure of angle ADC (m∠ADC) is 92 degrees.

The measure of angle ADC (m∠ADC) is 92 degrees.

To know more about adjacent angles :

brainly.com/question/12838185

#SPJ11

When constructing a confidence interval for a population mean from a sample of size 28, the number of degrees of freedom (df) for the critical t-value is 27.

To construct a confidence interval for a population mean using a sample size of 28, we need to determine the number of degrees of freedom (df) for the critical t-value.

The number of degrees of freedom is equal to the sample size minus 1. In this case, the sample size is 28, so the number of degrees of freedom would be 28 - 1 = 27.

To find the critical t-value, we need to specify the confidence level. Let's assume a 95% confidence level, which corresponds to a significance level of 0.05.

Using a t-table or statistical software, we can find the critical t-value associated with a sample size of 28 and a significance level of 0.05, with 27 degrees of freedom.

Once we have the critical t-value, we can then construct the confidence interval for the population mean.

In conclusion, when constructing a confidence interval for a population mean from a sample of size 28, the number of degrees of freedom (df) for the critical t-value is 27.

To know more about confidence interval  visit:

brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

The values of x that solve the proportion are -4.7 and 2.2.

To solve the proportion (2x + 3)/3 = 6/(x - 1), we can cross multiply.
First, we multiply the numerator of the first fraction with the denominator of the second fraction, and vice versa. This gives us (2x + 3)(x - 1) = 3 * 6.

Next, we simplify and expand the equation: 2x² - 2x + 3x - 3 = 18.

Combining like terms, we get 2x² + x - 3 = 18.

Rearranging the equation, we have 2x² + x - 21 = 0.

To solve for x, we can use the quadratic formula or factor the equation.
The solutions are approximately x = -4.7 and x = 2.2.
In conclusion, the values of x that solve the proportion are -4.7 and 2.2.

To know more about proportion visit:

brainly.com/question/33460130

#SPJ11

The diameter of the cylinder is 16 millimeters.

To find the diameter of the cylinder, we need to use the formula for the surface area of a cylinder. The formula is given by 2πr(r + h), where r is the radius and h is the height. Since the surface area is given as 256π square millimeters and the height is given as 8 millimeters, we can substitute these values into the formula.

256π = 2πr(r + 8)

Simplifying the equation, we have:

128 = r(r + 8)

Expanding the equation:

r² + 8r - 128 = 0

By factoring or using the quadratic formula, we find the solutions:

r = 8 or r = -16

Since the radius cannot be negative, the radius is 8 millimeters. The diameter is twice the radius, so the diameter is 16 millimeters.

In conclusion, the diameter of the cylinder is 16 millimeters.

To know more about diameter visit:

brainly.com/question/33294089

#SPJ11

The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately 77.50.

The upper limit of a 95% confidence interval for the population mean can be calculated using the formula:

Upper Limit = Sample Mean + (Z * (Standard Deviation / √Sample Size))

In this case, the sample mean is 75, the standard deviation is 5, and the sample size is 15.

To find the Z value for a 95% confidence interval, we need to look it up in the Z-table. A 95% confidence interval corresponds to a Z value of approximately 1.96.

Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Upper Limit = 75 + (1.96 * (5 / √15))

Calculating this expression, we find that the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval for the population mean is approximately 77.50.

Therefore, the correct answer is approximately 77.50.

Learn more about confidence interval

brainly.com/question/32546207

#SPJ11

A sphere of radius r is cut horizontally by two parallel planes, which are at a distance h apart. We have to show that the surface area of the sphere between the planes is given by 2πrh. The surface area of the sphere is given by S = 4πr².

See the image below: Here, A and B are the centers of the two circular caps on the sphere. AB = h. The radius of the sphere is r. Let the height of the triangle be y. The base of the triangle is h. So we have:

y² + r² = (r + h)²

y² + r² = r² + h² + 2rh

y² = h² + 2rh

y² = h(h + 2r)

y = √(h(h + 2r))

The area of the circular cap of the sphere is given by πy².

The area of the two caps is 2πy² = 2πh(h + 2r).

The surface area of the sphere between the planes is given by

S' = S - 2πh(h + 2r)  

= 4πr² - 2πh(h + 2r)

= 2πr(2r - h).

We know that the height of the triangle is y = √(h(h + 2r)).

The surface area of the sphere between the planes is given by S' = 2πrh.

We have proved that the surface area of the sphere between the planes is given by 2πrh. The surface area of the sphere between two parallel planes, which are at a distance h apart, is given by 2πrh.

To know more about sphere visit:

https://brainly.com/question/22849345

#SPJ11

To find the difference in price between Luke's original brand of cereal and the super-saving brand, we need to subtract the price of the super-saving brand from the price of Luke's original brand.

The price of Luke's original brand is $11 per box, and the price of the super-saving brand is given by the equation

y = 9x.

To find the price of the super-saving brand, substitute

x = 1 into the equation:

y = 9(1) = $9.  

So, the price of Luke's original brand is $11 and the price of the super-saving brand is $9. To find the difference, subtract $9 from $11: $11 - $9 = $2.  Therefore, the price of a box of Luke's original brand of cereal is $2 more than the price of a box of the super-saving brand.

To calculate how much money Luke saves each month with the change in cereal brand, we need to find the difference in cost between buying 6 boxes of Luke's original brand and 6 boxes of the super-saving brand. The cost of 6 boxes of Luke's original brand is $11 x 6 = $66.  The cost of 6 boxes of the super-saving brand is $9 x 6 = $54. To find the savings, subtract $54 from $66: $66 - $54 = $12. Therefore, Luke saves $12 each month with the change in cereal brand if he buys 6 cereal boxes each month.

To know more about Luke's original brand visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28447852

#SPJ11

Answer:

11\2 gal =5.5 gal

Step-by-step explanation:

11\2=5.5

the probability mass function (PMF) of y indicates that each digit from 0 to 9 has an equal probability of occurring as the first digit after the decimal point, which is 1/10 for each possible value.

In the given experiment of drawing a point uniformly from the unit interval [0, 1], the variable y represents the first digit after the decimal point of the chosen number.

To explain why y is discrete, we need to understand that a discrete random variable takes on a countable number of distinct values. In this case, the first digit after the decimal point can only take on the values 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, or 9. These values are distinct and countable, making y a discrete random variable.

To find the probability mass function (PMF) of y, we need to determine the probability of y taking on each possible value.

Since the point is drawn uniformly from the interval [0, 1], each digit from 0 to 9 has an equal probability of being the first digit after the decimal point. Therefore, the probability of y being any specific digit is 1/10.

Thus, the probability mass function (PMF) of y is as follows:

P(y = 0) = 1/10

P(y = 1) = 1/10

P(y = 2) = 1/10

P(y = 3) = 1/10

P(y = 4) = 1/10

P(y = 5) = 1/10

P(y = 6) = 1/10

P(y = 7) = 1/10

P(y = 8) = 1/10

P(y = 9) = 1/10

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The letter "C" represents the approximate location of the mean pulse rate. In the dotplot, the mean pulse rate is the average of all the pulse rates recorded. To determine the approximate location of the mean pulse rate, we need to find the pulse rate value that is closest to the average.

Here's a step-by-step mathematical explanation:

Step 1: Calculate the mean pulse rate:

Add up all the pulse rates and divide the sum by the total number of patients. This will give you the mean pulse rate.

Step 2: Find the pulse rate value closest to the mean:

Compare the mean pulse rate with each pulse rate value on the dotplot. Look for the value that is closest to the mean. This value represents the approximate location of the mean pulse rate.

Step 3: Identify the corresponding letter:

Once you have identified the pulse rate value closest to the mean, locate the corresponding letter on the dotplot. This letter represents the approximate location of the mean pulse rate.

By following these steps, you will be able to determine that letter "C" represents the approximate location of the mean pulse rate.

To know more about Dotplot here

https://brainly.com/question/17029945

#SPJ4

Complete Question

The dotplot shows the pulse rate of patients in beats per. Which letter represents the approximate location minute. mean pulse rate? Use the drop-down menu to complete the statement Pulse Rate The mean pulse rate is located at Beats per Minute

In the given context, there is a triangle ΔJKL. The sides of the triangle are represented by line segments JK, KL, and LJ. The lengths of these line segments are as follows: JK = 15 units, KL = 13 units, and LJ = unknown.

Additionally, there are two other line segments mentioned: JM = 5 units and LK = 13 units.

The question asks whether JL is parallel to MP. In terms of parallel lines, two lines are parallel if they never intersect and are always equidistant from each other.

To determine if JL is parallel to MP, we need to identify the line segment MP and assess if it meets the conditions for being parallel to JL.

However, the content does not provide any information about line segment MP. Therefore, with the given information, it is not possible to determine whether JL is parallel to MP or not.

To know more about segments visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12622418

#SPJ11

let's write the equation of the line using function notation:

g(x) = 120x + 600

The table of values represents a linear function g(x), where x is the number of days that have passed and g(x) is the balance in the bank account:

x g(x)

0 $600

3 $720

6 $840

To find the equation of the line using function notation, we first need to calculate the slope of the line:

slope = (change in y)/(change in x) = (g(x2) - g(x1))/(x2 - x1)

For points (0, 600) and (3, 720):

slope = (g(x2) - g(x1))/(x2 - x1)

= (720 - 600)/(3 - 0)

= 120

So, the slope of the line is 120.

Next, we can use the point-slope form of the equation of the line:

y - y1 = m(x - x1), where (x1, y1) is a point on the line and m is the slope.

Substituting x1 = 0, y1 = 600, m = 120, we get:

y - 600 = 120(x - 0)

y - 600 = 120x

Now, let's write the equation of the line using function notation:

g(x) = 120x + 600

To know more about linear function

https://brainly.com/question/29205018

#SPJ11

In summary, Ada's statement is incorrect because the lengths of the diagonals in a rectangle and a square are not proportional to each other.

To determine if Ada is correct in stating that the length of diagonal SQ is twice the length of diagonal OM, we need to analyze the properties of rectangles and squares. In a rectangle, the diagonals are not necessarily equal in length. The length of the diagonal can be determined using the Pythagorean theorem, which states that the square of the length of the diagonal is equal to the sum of the squares of the lengths of the sides. Let's assume the length of side OA is "a" and the length of side AD is "b" for both the rectangle and the square. The diagonal OM in the rectangle can be calculated as √[tex](a^2 + b^2)[/tex]. In a square, all sides are equal, so the length of the side is "a." The diagonal SQ in the square can be calculated as √[tex](2a^2)[/tex] or √2 * a. Now, comparing the lengths of the diagonals:

Diagonal OM in the rectangle: √[tex](a^2 + b^2)[/tex]

Diagonal SQ in the square: √2 * a

Since the expressions for the lengths of the diagonals are different, we can conclude that Ada is not correct in stating that the length of diagonal SQ is two times the length of diagonal OM.

To know more about rectangle,

https://brainly.com/question/19683475

#SPJ11

The simplified power of the product (5w⁷)² is 25w¹⁴ and  (7w⁻⁹)⁻³ is 1/343 w²⁷

To simplify the expression (7w⁻⁹)⁻³ using Kelly's steps, we can follow the exponentiation rules:

Apply the power to each factor individually:

(7⁻³)(w⁻⁹)⁻³

Simplify each factor:

7⁻³ = 1/7³ = 1/343

(w⁻⁹)⁻³ = w⁻³⁻⁹ = w²⁷

Now, let's simplify the expression (5w⁷)²:

Apply the power to each factor individually:

(5²)(w⁷)²

Simplify each factor:

5² = 25

(w⁷)² = w¹⁴

Therefore, the simplified power of the product (5w⁷)² is 25w¹⁴

To know more about power click here :

https://brainly.com/question/28457639

#SPJ4

The question is incomplete the complete question is :

Kelly simplified this power of a product

(7w⁻⁹)⁻³

1. 7⁻³ (w⁻⁹)⁻³

2 1/343 w²⁷

use Kelly's steps to simplify this expression

(5w⁷)²

what is the simplified power of the product?

5w

10w¹⁴

25w

25w¹⁴

To determine the number of grams of calcium carbonate needed to react completely with 15.0 grams of hydrochloric acid, we need to use stoichiometry.

From the balanced equation, we can see that 1 mole of CaCO3 reacts with 2 moles of HCl. We need to convert the given mass of HCl to moles, and then use the mole ratio to find the moles of CaCO3. First, let's calculate the moles of HCl. The molar mass of HCl is 36.5 g/mol, so:
moles of HCl = mass of HCl / molar mass of HCl
= 15.0 g / 36.5 g/mol
≈ 0.41 mol
Since the mole ratio between CaCO3 and HCl is 1:2, the moles of CaCO3 needed would be:
moles of CaCO3 = 0.41 mol HCl × (1 mol CaCO3 / 2 mol HCl)
= 0.20 mol
Finally, we can convert the moles of CaCO3 to grams using its molar mass. The molar mass of CaCO3 is 100.09 g/mol, so:
grams of CaCO3 = moles of CaCO3 × molar mass of CaCO3
= 0.20 mol × 100.09 g/mol
= 20.02 g
Approximately 20.02 grams of calcium carbonate would be needed to react completely with 15.0 grams of hydrochloric acid.

To know more about carbonate visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13046593

#SPJ11

Approximately 41.1 grams of calcium carbonate would be needed to react completely with 15.0 grams of hydrochloric acid.

To determine the amount of calcium carbonate needed to react completely with 15.0 grams of hydrochloric acid, we need to use stoichiometry.

First, let's write the balanced chemical equation for the reaction:

[tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex] + 2HCl -> [tex]CaCl_{2}[/tex] + [tex]CO_{2}[/tex] + [tex]H_{2}O[/tex]

From the equation, we can see that one mole of calcium carbonate reacts with two moles of hydrochloric acid. We need to convert the mass of hydrochloric acid to moles, then use the stoichiometric ratio to find the moles of calcium carbonate needed.

To convert grams of hydrochloric acid to moles, we need to divide the given mass by the molar mass of HCl. The molar mass of HCl is 36.5 g/mol.

15.0 g HCl / 36.5 g/mol HCl = 0.411 moles HCl

Since the stoichiometric ratio is 1:1 for calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid, we can conclude that 0.411 moles of calcium carbonate would be needed to react completely with 15.0 grams of hydrochloric acid.

Now, to convert moles of calcium carbonate to grams, we need to multiply the moles by the molar mass of [tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex]. The molar mass of [tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex] is 100.1 g/mol.

0.411 moles [tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex]* 100.1 g/mol [tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex]= 41.1 grams [tex]CaCO_{3}[/tex]

Learn more about react completely from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/32100777

#SPJ11

No, the resulting correlation coefficient cannot be interpreted as a reliability coefficient.

Reason: In the given question, different students are in each of the classes, so the reliability of the test is not constant. The two groups of students that are being compared have different sets of scores, and the correlation coefficient is only measuring how well the scores matchup between the two groups of students. Hence, it cannot be considered as a measure of reliability.

Reliability is the extent to which a measure is consistent and free from errors of measurement. It is not affected by differences in students between the two groups. Reliability is often estimated using a test-retest approach in which the same test is given to the same individuals twice. The correlation coefficient between the two sets of scores obtained from this approach would indicate the degree of reliability of the measure.

Learn more about correlation coefficient visit:

brainly.com/question/29978658

#SPJ11

The error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon lies in using the formula 360°/n, where n is the number of sides of the polygon.

The formula 360°/n is used to find the measure of each exterior angle of a regular polygon. It is based on the idea that the sum of all exterior angles of any polygon is always 360 degrees. However, this formula assumes that the polygon has internal angles of 180°, which is true only for regular polygons.

The error occurs when this formula is applied to a non-regular polygon, as non-regular polygons have varying internal angles. Using the formula 360°/n for a non-regular polygon will give incorrect results because the internal angles are not all equal.

For regular polygons, each exterior angle is indeed 360°/n, and the sum of all exterior angles will be 360 degrees. However, for non-regular polygons, this formula cannot be used, and the measures of exterior angles must be calculated differently based on their internal angles and sides.

To know more about regular polygon, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29722724#

#SPJ11

The error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon is they divided 360 by 10 instead of 5.

Given that,

There are a total of 10 exterior angles, two at each vertex, so the measure of one exterior angle is 360°/10 = 36°.

Here, at each vertex there are two angles.

So, there must be 5 vertices and 5 sides.

Then, the measure of one exterior angle = 360°/5

= 72°

Therefore, the error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon is they divided 360 by 10 instead of 5.

Learn more about the sum of exterior angles of polygon here:

https://brainly.com/question/1983075.

#SPJ4

"Your question is incomplete, probably the complete question/missing part is:"

Describe and correct the error in finding the measure of one exterior angle of a regular polygon. There are a total of 10 exterior angles, two at each vertex, so the measure of one exterior angle is 360°/10 = 36°.

The probability question you asked is incomplete, so I will make an assumption based on the information provided. If you are asking about the probability of selecting a clarinet or a French horn player from the school band,

we can calculate it as follows:

1. Calculate the total number of members in the band: 36.
2. Calculate the total number of clarinets: 5.
3. Calculate the total number of French horns: 2.
4. Add the number of clarinets and French horns together: 5 + 2 = 7.
5. Divide the total number of clarinets and French horns by the total number of band members: 7 / 36.
6. Simplify the fraction if needed.
  - In decimal form, the probability would be 0.1944 (rounded to four decimal places) or 19.44% (rounded to two decimal places).

The probability of selecting a clarinet or a French horn player from the school band is approximately 0.1944 or 19.44%.

To know more about probability  :

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The polynomial function of the lowest degree that has -5, -2, and 0 as roots is f(x) = (x - 2)(x - 5).

To find the polynomial function of the lowest degree with -5, -2, and 0 as roots, we can use the factored form of a polynomial. If a number is a root of a polynomial, it means that when we substitute that number into the polynomial, the result is equal to zero.

In this case, we have the roots -5, -2, and 0. To construct the polynomial, we can write it in factored form as follows: f(x) = (x - r1)(x - r2)(x - r3), where r1, r2, and r3 are the roots.

Substituting the given roots, we have: f(x) = (x - (-5))(x - (-2))(x - 0) = (x + 5)(x + 2)(x - 0) = (x + 5)(x + 2)(x).

Simplifying further, we get: f(x) = (x^2 + 7x + 10)(x) = x^3 + 7x^2 + 10x.

Therefore, the polynomial function of the lowest degree with -5, -2, and 0 as roots is f(x) = x^3 + 7x^2 + 10x.

To learn more about polynomial function visit : https://brainly.com/question/7693326

#SPJ11

The polynomial function of lowest degree that has –5, –2, and 0 as roots is f(x) = x(x + 2)(x + 5). Each root is written in the form of (x - root) and then multiplied together to form the polynomial.

The question asks for the polynomial function of the lowest degree that has –5, –2, and 0 as roots. To find the polynomial, each root needs to be written in the form of (x - root). Therefore, the roots would be written as (x+5), (x+2), and x. When these are multiplied together, they form a polynomial function of the lowest degree.

Thus, the polynomial function of the lowest degree that has –5, –2, and 0 as roots is f(x) = x(x + 2)(x + 5).

https://brainly.com/question/31657291

#SPJ12

The equation 7²ˣ = 75 and obtain the value of "x" rounded to the nearest hundredth.

To solve the equation 7²ˣ = 75 using a calculator and rounding the answer to the nearest hundredth, you can follow these steps:

1. Enter "7" on the calculator.
2. Press the exponent button (usually "^" or "x^y").
3. Enter the value of "x" on the calculator.
4. Press the equals "=" button.
5. If your calculator has a square root function, you can use it to find the square root of 75. If not, continue to the next step.
6. Divide the result by 7 to isolate the variable "x".
7. Take the logarithm (base 10 or natural logarithm, depending on the calculator) of both sides to solve for "x".
8. Divide the logarithm result by the logarithm of 7 to get the value of "x".
9. Round the value of "x" to the nearest hundredth.

Using these steps, you can solve the equation 7²ˣ = 75 and obtain the value of "x" rounded to the nearest hundredth.

Learn more about equation

brainly.com/question/29538993

#SPJ11

The baker can get approximately 6.28 "perfect" slices out of one pie. By using the central angle of 1 radian as a basis, we can calculate the number of "perfect" slices that can be obtained from a pie.

Dividing the total angle around the center of the pie (360 degrees or 2π radians) by the central angle of 1 radian gives us the number of slices.

In this case, the baker can get approximately 6.28 "perfect" slices out of one pie. It is important to note that this calculation assumes the pie is a perfect circle and that the slices are of equal size and shape.

The central angle of 1 radian represents the angle formed at the center of a circle by an arc whose length is equal to the radius of the circle. In the case of the baker's pie, assuming the pie is a perfect circle, we can use the central angle of 1 radian to calculate the number of "perfect" slices.

To find the number of slices, we need to divide the total angle around the center of the pie (360 degrees or 2π radians) by the central angle of 1 radian.

Number of Slices = Total Angle / Central Angle

Number of Slices = 2π radians / 1 radian

Number of Slices ≈ 6.28

To know more about central angle, visit

https://brainly.com/question/10945528

#SPJ11

Gagné (1941) discovered that when rats were trained to achieve a perfect run through a maze and then subjected to various delays before completing the maze again, their performance deteriorated over time.

Decay of memory: Gagné might have observed that as the delay between the initial training and the subsequent maze completion increased, the rats' performance deteriorated. This decay could suggest that the rats' memory of the maze task gradually faded over time.

Retention of memory: Conversely, Gagné might have found that even after a delay, the rats were still able to complete the maze with a high level of accuracy. This outcome would indicate that the rats retained their memory of the task despite the intervening time period.

Relearning or reacquisition: Gagné might have discovered that although the rats initially required a certain number of trials to achieve a perfect run, after a delay, they were able to relearn the maze more quickly. This finding could suggest that the rats retained some knowledge or skills from the initial training, enabling them to reacquire the task more efficiently.

To know more about maze,

https://brainly.com/question/29219013

#SPJ11

The statement "false. the sets have the same number of elements" is false. The sets {5, 6, 7} and {8, 20, 31} do not have the same number of elements.

Let's analyze each statement one by one:

1. {5, 6, 7} ~ {8, 20, 31} - False. The elements of both sets are not all even or all odd. The first set contains both odd and even numbers, while the second set contains only odd numbers.

2. The elements of the first set are all less than the elements of the second set. - False. This statement is not necessarily true. While it is true that 5, 6, and 7 are all less than 8, it does not hold true for the other elements. For example, 5 from the first set is less than 20 from the second set, but 7 from the first set is greater than 31 from the second set.

3. The sets do not contain the same elements. - True. The elements in both sets are different. The first set {5, 6, 7} contains 5, 6, and 7, while the second set {8, 20, 31} contains 8, 20, and 31.

4. The sets have the same number of elements. - False. The first set has three elements (5, 6, 7), whereas the second set also has three elements (8, 20, 31). Therefore, the sets have an equal number of elements.

In conclusion:

- Statement 1 is false because the elements are not all even or all odd.

- Statement 2 is false because not all elements of the first set are less than the elements of the second set.

- Statement 3 is true because the sets contain different elements.

- Statement 4 is false because the sets have different numbers of elements.

To know more about sets visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30705181

#SPJ11

The real square roots of 0.16 are ±0.4. This means that when we square ±0.4, we obtain the original number 0.16. It is important to consider both the positive and negative values as both satisfy the square root property. The square root operation is the inverse of squaring a number, and finding the square root allows us to determine the original value when the squared value is known.

To find the square roots of 0.16, we can use the square root property. The square root of a number is a value that, when multiplied by itself, equals the original number.

Let's solve for x in the equation x² = 0.16.

Taking the square root of both sides, we have:

√(x²) = √(0.16)

Simplifying, we get:

|x| = 0.4

Since we are looking for the real square roots, we consider both the positive and negative values for x. Therefore, the real square roots of 0.16 are ±0.4.

To know more about square roots, visit

https://brainly.com/question/428672

#SPJ11