How can you decide whether you can multiply two matrices?

Without additional information such as the significance level or p-value, it is not possible to make a definitive decision regarding the null hypothesis based solely on the t-score of -0.20.

Based on the given information, the counselor obtained a t-score of -0.20. To make a decision regarding the null hypothesis, we need to compare this t-score to a critical value or determine the p-value associated with it.

If the counselor has a predetermined significance level (α), she can compare the t-score to the critical value from the t-distribution table. If the t-score falls within the critical region (beyond the critical value), she would reject the null hypothesis. However, without knowing the significance level or degrees of freedom, we cannot make a definitive decision based solely on the t-score.

Alternatively, if the counselor has access to the p-value associated with the t-score, she can compare it to the significance level. If the p-value is less than the significance level (typically α = 0.05), she would reject the null hypothesis.

Without more information about the significance level or p-value, it is not possible to determine the decision regarding the null hypothesis based solely on the t-score of -0.20.

To learn more about null hypothesis visit : https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Given quadratic function:

[tex]y=3x^2 - 9, \qquad x \leq 0[/tex]

The domain of the given function is restricted to values of x less than or equal to zero. Therefore:

As 3x² ≥ 0, then range of the given function is restricted to values of y greater than or equal to -9.

[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]

To find the inverse of the given function, first interchange the x and y variables:

[tex]x = 3y^2 - 9[/tex]

Now, solve the equation for y:

[tex]\begin{aligned}x& = 3y^2 - 9\\\\x+9&=3y^2\\\\\dfrac{x+9}{3}&=y^2\\y&=\pm \sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}\end{aligned}[/tex]

The range of the inverse function is the domain of the original function.

As the domain of the original function is restricted to x ≤ 0, then the range of the inverse function is restricted to y ≤ 0.

Therefore, the inverse function is the negative square root:

[tex]f^{-1}(x)=-\sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}[/tex]

The  domain of the inverse function is the range of the original function.

As the range of the original function is restricted to y ≥ -9, then the domain of the inverse function is restricted to x ≥ -9.

[tex]\boxed{f^{-1}(x)=-\sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}\qquad x \geq -9}[/tex]

So the correct statement is:

When a 45-foot long cable with a weight-density of 7 pounds per foot is wound up 34 feet, the work done when winding up the cable is 10,710 foot-pounds.

The work done is equal to the force applied multiplied by the distance over which the force is exerted. In this case, the force applied is the weight of the cable, which is determined by multiplying the weight-density by the length of the cable.

The distance over which the force is exerted is the distance the cable is wound up, which is 34 feet. By multiplying these values together, we can determine the work done in foot-pounds.

The weight of the cable is given by the weight-density (7 pounds per foot) multiplied by the length of the cable (45 feet), resulting in a weight of 7 pounds/foot × 45 feet = 315 pounds. This weight represents the force applied to wind up the cable. The distance over which the force is exerted is 34 feet, as mentioned in the problem.

Therefore, the work done is calculated by multiplying the force (315 pounds) by the distance (34 feet), resulting in a total work of 315 pounds × 34 feet = 10,710 foot-pounds. Thus, the work done when winding up the cable is 10,710 foot-pounds.

To learn more about density click here:

brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ11

In summary, the redesigned equation of the path from entrance a affects the coordinates of the fountain by changing the coefficients of x and y in the equation. This change in coefficients results in a different slope for the path.

The redesigned equation of the path from entrance a affects the coordinates of the fountain by changing the values of x and y in the equation of the path.


The original equation of the path from entrance a is 3x + y = 5. To redesign the equation, we need to analyze the changes mentioned in the question: "path a ---- = path b - 2x + 5y8 wao entrance bc".

From this information, we can deduce that the new equation of the path from entrance a is given by: 3x + y = -2x + 5y + 8.

To understand how this redesigned equation affects the coordinates of the fountain, we can compare it to the original equation.

By rearranging the terms in both equations, we can see that the coefficients of x and y have changed. In the original equation, the coefficient of x is 3 and the coefficient of y is 1. However, in the redesigned equation, the coefficient of x is now -2 and the coefficient of y is 5.

These changes in the coefficients affect the slope of the path. The slope of the original equation is -3 (the coefficient of x divided by the coefficient of y), while the slope of the redesigned equation is -2/5.

Learn more about the coordinates: https://brainly.com/question/32836021

#SPJ11

The expression is [tex]∑(i=1 to n) (a * x_i + b * y_i + c) = a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n[/tex]

To show that the given expression is true, we will use the properties of summation notation. Let's break it down step-by-step:

1. Start by expanding the left side of the equation using the properties of summation:
[tex]a * x_1 + b * y_1 + c + a * x_2 + b * y_2 + c + ... + a * x_n + b * y_n + c[/tex]

2. Now, group the terms together based on their constants (a, b, and c):
[tex](a * x_1 + a * x_2 + ... + a * x_n) + (b * y_1 + b * y_2 + ... + b * y_n) + (c + c + ... + c)[/tex]

3. Observe that each sum within the parentheses represents the summation of the sequences x_i, y_i, and a sequence of c's respectively:
[tex]a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n[/tex]

4. This matches the right side of the equation, which proves that the given expression is true.

Therefore, we have shown that:
[tex]∑(i=1 to n) (a * x_i + b * y_i + c) = a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n.[/tex]

To know more about the expression, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32967003

#SPJ11

The required answer is the volume of the sphere is approximately 65 cubic inches.

To find the volume of the sphere inscribed in a cube with a volume of 125 cubic inches,  the formula for the volume of a sphere.

The volume of a sphere is given by the formula V = (4/3) * π * r^3, where r is the radius of the sphere.

In this case, since the sphere is inscribed in the cube, the diameter of the sphere is equal to the side length of the cube. the side length of the cube as s.

Since the volume of the cube is 125 cubic inches, we have s^3 = 125.

Taking the cube root of both sides gives us s = 5.

Therefore, the diameter of the sphere is 5 inches, and the radius is half of the diameter, which is 2.5 inches.

Plugging the value of the radius into the volume formula, we get V = (4/3) * π * (2.5)^3.

Evaluating this expression gives us V ≈ 65.4 cubic inches.

Rounding this answer to the nearest whole number, the volume of the sphere is approximately 65 cubic inches.

To know about sphere . To click the link .

https://brainly.com/question/14703025.

#SPJ11

John wanted to bring attention to the fact that litter was getting out of hand at his neighborhood park. He created a poster where giant pieces of trash came to life and stomped on the park. The type of humor that he used in the poster is exaggeration.

What is exaggeration?

Exaggeration is the action of describing or representing something as being larger, better, or worse than it genuinely is. It is a representation of something that is far greater than reality or what the person is used to.

In this case, John used an exaggerated approach to convey the message that litter was getting out of hand in the park.

Incongruity: This is a type of humor that involves something that doesn't match the situation.

Parody: This is a type of humor that involves making fun of something by imitating it in a humorous way.

Reversal: This is a type of humor that involves changing the expected outcome or situation.

For more questions on: exaggeration

https://brainly.com/question/31881329

#SPJ8                  

Answer:

The type of satire that John used in his poster is exaggeration.Exaggeration is a technique used in satirical writing, art, or speech that highlights the importance of a certain issue by making it seem bigger than it actually is. It is used to make people aware of a problem or issue by amplifying it to the point of absurdity.In the case of John's poster, he exaggerated the issue of litter by making it appear as if giant pieces of trash were coming to life and stomping on the park, which highlights the importance of keeping the park clean.

The dimension of the fountain will be 20ft x 20ft x 2.5ft. Let the width of the fountain be x ft. The length of the fountain will be x ft as well. The height of the fountain will be 2.5 ft.

Therefore, the volume of the fountain will be:V = (length) × (width) × (height)

V = (x) × (x) × (2.5)

V = 2.5x²

Now, let us calculate the area of the sidewalk. The area of the sidewalk is a rectangular region with the dimensions (length + 2) × (width + 2). This is because there are two additional feet on both sides of the length and width of the fountain. Therefore, we can represent the area of the sidewalk as follows: A = (length + 2) × (width + 2)

A = (x + 2) × (x + 2)

A = (x + 2)²

Now, since the total area of the fountain and sidewalk is 700ft², we can write an equation as follows: 2.5x² + (x + 2)² = 700 Expanding and solving the quadratic equation

we get,x² + 4x - 348 = 0

(x + 19)(x - 15) = 0

Since the width of the fountain cannot be negative, we will only consider the positive root, x = 15 feet.

Therefore, the dimensions of the fountain will be 20ft x 20ft x 2.5ft.

To know more about dimension visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31460047

#SPJ11

The correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

Based on the given information, the reasoning used is an example of deductive reasoning.

Deductive reasoning is when a conclusion is drawn based on a set of premises or known facts. In this case, the formula p = 4s is a well-known and accepted formula to calculate the perimeter of a square.

By substituting the side length of 7 inches into the formula, the conclusion is reached that the perimeter is 28 inches. However, the stated perimeter of 4728 inches is incorrect.

To find the correct perimeter, we would use the formula p = 4s, where s represents the side length of the square.

Plugging in 7 inches for s, we get p = 4 * 7, which simplifies to p = 28 inches.

Therefore, the correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

To know more about perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13957726

#SPJ11

The reasoning used in this example is deductive because it starts with a general formula and applies it to a specific example to draw a conclusion. The conclusion, however, is incorrect, and the correct perimeter is 28 inches, not 4728 inches.

The reasoning provided is an example of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises.

In this case, the reasoning starts with the general principle or formula for finding the perimeter of a square, which is p = 4s, where p represents the perimeter and s represents the length of one side of the square. The formula is based on the geometric properties of a square.

Next, the specific example of a square with a side length of 7 inches is given. By substituting the value of s into the formula, we can calculate the perimeter: p = 4 * 7 = 28 inches.

The conclusion that the perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 4728 inches is incorrect. It seems like there might have been a typo or calculation error in the provided answer.

To find the correct perimeter, we need to use the formula p = 4s again, substituting the correct value of s (7 inches). This gives us: p = 4 * 7 = 28 inches. Therefore, the correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

In summary, the reasoning used in this example is deductive because it starts with a general formula and applies it to a specific example to draw a conclusion. The conclusion, however, is incorrect, and the correct perimeter is 28 inches, not 4728 inches.

Learn more about Deductive reasoning  from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/7284582

#SPJ11

a) The square root of 196 is 14.

b) The square root of 441 is 21.

To find the square root of a number using the prime factorization method, we need to express the number as a product of its prime factors and then take the square root of each prime factor.

a) Let's find the square root of 196:

First, we find the prime factorization of 196:

196 = 2 * 2 * 7 * 7

Now, we group the prime factors into pairs:

196 = (2 * 2) * (7 * 7)

Taking the square root of each pair:

√(2 * 2) * √(7 * 7) = 2 * 7

Therefore, the square root of 196 is 14.

b) Let's find the square root of 441:

First, we find the prime factorization of 441:

441 = 3 * 3 * 7 * 7

Now, we group the prime factors into pairs:

441 = (3 * 3) * (7 * 7)

Taking the square root of each pair:

√(3 * 3) * √(7 * 7) = 3 * 7

Therefore, the square root of 441 is 21.

Learn more about prime factorization on:

https://brainly.com/question/17108205

#SPJ11

The expression for Cam's amount would be: bbbb dollars - 7777 dollars.

To find the number of dollars Cam has, we need to subtract 7777 from Ben's amount.

Let's represent Ben's amount as "bbbb dollars."
The expression for Cam's amount would be: bbbb dollars - 7777 dollars.

Know more about expression  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

No, it is not necessarily true that Player A has a higher batting average than Player B for the entire season, even if A outperforms B in both the first and second halves.


The batting average is calculated by dividing the number of hits by the number of at-bats. Player A could have a higher batting average in the first and second halves while accumulating more hits than Player B in those respective periods.

However, if Player B had significantly more at-bats in the overall season or had a higher number of hits relative to their at-bats in the remaining games, it is possible for Player B to surpass Player A’s cumulative batting average for the entire season. The final season batting average depends on the performance in all games played, not just individual halves.

Learn more about Average here: brainly.com/question/33085858
#SPJ11

To find the probability of picking one red candle followed by another red candle without replacement, we need to consider the total number of possible outcomes and the number of favorable outcomes. So the probability of picking one red candle followed by another red candle without replacement is 1/6.

First, let's determine the total number of possible outcomes. Alfred draws one candle from the pack, leaving 3 candles. Then, he draws another candle from the remaining 3 candles. The total number of possible outcomes is the product of the number of choices at each step, which is 4 choices for the first draw and 3 choices for the second draw, resulting in a total of 4 * 3 = 12 possible outcomes. Next, let's determine the number of favorable outcomes. To have a favorable outcome, Alfred needs to draw a red candle on both draws. Since there are 2 red candles in the pack, the number of favorable outcomes is 2 * 1 = 2.Finally, we can calculate the probability by dividing the number of favorable outcomes by the total number of possible outcomes. Therefore, the probability of picking one red candle followed by another red candle is 2/12 = 1/6.Equation used: Probability = Number of favorable outcomes / Total number of possible outcomes.

In conclusion, the probability of picking one red candle followed by another red candle without replacement is 1/6.

learn more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

You can substitute the value of x into the formula to calculate the probability for any specific number of no-change audits.

To determine the probability that the sample has a specific number of no-change audits, we can use the binomial probability formula.

The binomial probability formula is given by:

[tex]P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^{(n - k)}[/tex]

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of having exactly k successes (in this case, no-change audits),

n is the sample size,

k is the number of successes,

p is the probability of success in a single trial (in this case, the probability of a no-change audit), and

C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient, also known as "n choose k," which represents the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials.

In this scenario, n = 200 (sample size) and p = 0.9 (probability of no-change audit). We want to calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits. Let's say we want to find the probability of having x no-change audits.

[tex]P(X = x) = C(200, x) * 0.9^x * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - x)}[/tex]

Now, let's calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits for different values of x. For example, if we want to find the probability of having exactly 180 no-change audits:

[tex]P(X = 180) = C(200, 180) * 0.9^{180} * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - 180)}[/tex]

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The increase in tax filers in the 65+ age group and the 45-54 age group can be attributed to factors such as the aging population, changes in retirement patterns, economic factors, and increased income levels.

The percentage of tax filers has most dramatically increased for the 65+ age group and the 45-54 age group due to several reasons.

Firstly, the aging population is one of the main factors contributing to the increase in tax filers in the 65+ age group. As people in this age group retire, they may rely on various sources of income such as pensions, social security benefits, and investments. These income sources are taxable, which requires them to file tax returns.

Secondly, changes in retirement patterns and economic factors play a role. With longer life expectancies and improved healthcare, many individuals in the 65+ age group continue to work beyond traditional retirement age. This leads to additional income and tax obligations, resulting in an increase in tax filers.

In the 45-54 age group, the increase in tax filers can be attributed to several factors as well. This age range represents individuals in their peak earning years, with higher incomes compared to other age groups. As their incomes increase, they may reach certain tax thresholds that require them to file tax returns.

Additionally, changes in employment patterns and economic factors can impact the number of tax filers in this age group. For instance, economic downturns or job loss may lead individuals to seek self-employment or other sources of income, increasing the likelihood of filing tax returns.

In conclusion, the increase in tax filers in the 65+ age group and the 45-54 age group can be attributed to factors such as the aging population, changes in retirement patterns, economic factors, and increased income levels.

To know more about tax visit-

https://brainly.com/question/12611692

#SPJ11

Approximately 50% of the data falls below 50 in a normal distribution with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 8.

To find the percentage of data that falls below 50 in a normal distribution with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 8, we can use the Z-score formula.

The Z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations an observation is away from the mean. For our case, we want to calculate the Z-score for the value of 50.

Z = (X - μ) / σ

where X is the given value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Substituting the values into the formula, we have:

Z = (50 - 50) / 8

Z = 0 / 8

Z = 0

A Z-score of 0 indicates that the value of 50 is exactly at the mean.

Now, to find the percentage of data less than 50, we need to determine the area under the normal distribution curve up to the Z-score of 0.

By referring to a standard normal distribution table or using statistical software, we find that the area to the left of the Z-score of 0 is 0.5000 or 50%.

Therefore, approximately 50% of the data falls below 50 in a normal distribution with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 8.

learn more about normal distribution here

https://brainly.com/question/15103234

#SPJ11

The equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent to the curve y=x^4+x-1 at the point (1,1) is y = -1x + 2.

To find the equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent, we first need to find the slope of the tangent line. The slope of the tangent line is equal to the derivative of the curve at the given point. Taking the derivative of y=x^4+x-1, we get y'=4x^3+1. Substituting x=1 into the derivative, we get y'=4(1)^3+1=5.

The slope of the tangent line is 5. To find the slope of the perpendicular line, we use the fact that the product of the slopes of perpendicular lines is -1. Therefore, the slope of the perpendicular line is -1/5.

Next, we use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation. Using the point (1,1) and the slope -1/5, we have y-1=(-1/5)(x-1). Simplifying this equation gives us y = -1x + 2. Thus, the equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent to the curve y=x^4+x-1 at the point (1,1) is y = -1x + 2.

Know more about tangent here:

https://brainly.com/question/10053881

#SPJ11

Juan and Ben have been negotiating the purchase of Juan's car. Juan receives a new and higher offer from someone else. The negotiations between Juan and Ben can be renegotiated based on the new offer.

In this scenario, Juan and Ben have been negotiating the purchase of Juan's car. However, Juan receives a new and higher offer from someone else. This new offer changes the dynamics of the negotiation between Juan and Ben. Since Juan now has a better offer, he can choose to renegotiate the terms of the deal with Ben. Juan may use the new offer as leverage to potentially get a higher price or better terms from Ben. The negotiation process can be restarted based on the new information. The dynamics of the negotiation change as a result of the new offer.

When Juan receives a new and higher offer for his car while negotiating with Ben, he can use it as leverage to reopen the negotiation and potentially obtain a better deal.

To know more about negotiations visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33445141

#SPJ11

The dataset representing total points scored during recent football games is as follows: 12, 14, 15, 17, 17, 21, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33 so  the quartiles of the given dataset are Q1 = 15, Q2 = 21, and Q3 = 27.

To determine the quartiles of this dataset, we need to find the values that divide the dataset into four equal parts. The first quartile (Q1) represents the 25th percentile, the second quartile (Q2) represents the 50th percentile (also known as the median), and the third quartile (Q3) represents the 75th percentile.

To find the quartiles, we first need to arrange the dataset in ascending order: 12, 14, 15, 17, 17, 21, 24, 25, 27, 31, 33.

There are a total of 11 data points in the dataset. To find the median (Q2), we take the middle value. Since there are 11 data points, the middle value is the 6th value, which is 21. Therefore, Q2 (the median) is 21.

To find Q1, we need to locate the 25th percentile. This means that 25% of the data points in the dataset should be below Q1. Since 25% of 11 is 2.75, we round it up to 3. The third value in the dataset is 15, so Q1 is 15.

To find Q3, we locate the 75th percentile, which means that 75% of the data points should be below Q3. 75% of 11 is 8.25, which we round up to 9. The ninth value in the dataset is 27, so Q3 is 27.

Therefore, the quartiles of the given dataset are Q1 = 15, Q2 = 21, and Q3 = 27.

Learn more about median here

brainly.com/question/11237736

#SPJ11

To construct an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle, Zahid would need to draw three specific segments.

First, Zahid would need to draw the radius of the circle, which is a line segment connecting the center of the circle to any point on its circumference. This segment serves as the base of the equilateral triangle.

Next, Zahid would draw two more line segments from the endpoints of the base (radius) to another point on the circumference of the circle. These segments should be of equal length and form angles of 60 degrees with the base. These segments complete the equilateral triangle by connecting the remaining two vertices. Zahid needs to draw the radius of the circle (base of the equilateral triangle) and two additional line segments connecting the endpoints of the radius to other points on the circle's circumference. These line segments should be equal in length and form angles of 60 degrees with the base.

It is important to note that an equilateral triangle is a special case where all sides are equal in length and all angles are 60 degrees. In the context of a circle, an equilateral triangle is inscribed when all three vertices lie on the circumference of the circle.

Learn more about triangle here: brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

Lisa's percentile rank is approximately 7.857%.

To calculate Lisa's percentile rank, you can use the formula:

Percentile Rank = (Number of scores less than Lisa's score / Total number of scores) * 100

In this case, Lisa's score is 86, and it is the 23rd score from the top in a class of 280 scores. Therefore, the number of scores less than Lisa's score is 23 - 1 = 22 (excluding Lisa's score itself).

Substituting the values into the formula:

Percentile Rank = (22 / 280) * 100 ≈ 7.857%

Lisa's percentile rank is approximately 7.857%.

To know more about number click-
http://brainly.com/question/24644930
#SPJ11

Scalar multiplication can help with a repeated matrix addition problem. Scalar multiplication involves multiplying a scalar (a single number) by each element of a matrix.

In a repeated matrix addition problem, if we have a matrix A and we want to add it to itself multiple times, we can use scalar multiplication to simplify the process. Instead of manually adding each corresponding element of the matrices, we can multiply the matrix A by a scalar representing the number of times we want to repeat the addition.

For example, if we want to add matrix A to itself 3 times, we can simply multiply A by the scalar 3, resulting in 3A. This operation scales each element of A by 3, effectively repeating the addition process. Thus, scalar multiplication can efficiently handle repeated matrix addition problems by simplifying the calculation.

To know more about Scalar multiplication visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30221358

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: The negative sign needs to be enclosed in parentheses if you want the result to be 9

If you write (-3)^2 the result is 9

and -3^2 = -9 is right

The seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To calculate the seasonal total prior to the recent storm, we need to subtract the rainfall from the recent storm (50 inches) from the updated seasonal total (26.42 inches).

Let's assume that the seasonal total prior to the recent storm is represented by "x" inches.

So, we can set up the equation:

x - 50 = 26.42

To solve for x, we can add 50 to both sides of the equation:

x - 50 + 50 = 26.42 + 50

This simplifies to:

x = 76.42

Therefore, the seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To know more about equation click-
http://brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ11

To find the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a convex polygon, we can use the formula:

Sum of Interior Angles = (n - 2) * 180 degrees

Where "n" represents the number of sides (or vertices) of the polygon.

For a 32-gon, substituting n = 32 into the formula, we have:

Sum of Interior Angles = (32 - 2) * 180 degrees

                      = 30 * 180 degrees

                      = 5400 degrees

Therefore, the sum of the measures of the interior angles of a 32-gon is 5400 degrees.

To know more about convex polygon visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32208408

#SPJ11

The correct options are A)  X-1 <1 and D) X+4 < 6.

Given, we need to find all the inequalities for which the solution set is x < 2. We know that if x < a then the solution set will lie on the left side of a in the number line. Therefore, for x < 2 the solution set will be on the left side of 2 on the number line. So, let's check each option:

A. X-1 <1 - Adding 1 to both sides of the inequality we get: X < 2

Here, the solution set is x < 2. So, option A is correct.

B. X2 <0 - There is no real value of x for which x² < 0. So, the solution set is null. Therefore, option B is incorrect.

C. X 3 < 1 - Subtracting 3 from both sides we get: X < -2. The solution set is x < -2. So, option C is incorrect.

D. X+4 < 6 - Subtracting 4 from both sides we get: X < 2. Here, the solution set is x < 2. So, option D is correct.

Therefore, the correct options are A and D.

Learn more about inequalities visit:

brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ11

Yes, the question "According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, wearing seat belts could prevent 45% of the fatalities suffered in car accidents. Do you think that everyone should wear safety belts?" introduces a bias into the survey.

The question introduces a bias because it presents information about the effectiveness of seat belts in preventing fatalities before asking for the respondents' opinion. By providing the statistic that 45% of fatalities can be prevented by wearing seat belts, the question already influences the respondents' perception and frames the issue in a positive light.

This framing can potentially lead respondents to feel pressured or compelled to agree with the statement due to the presented statistic. It may not give an unbiased opportunity for respondents to express their own opinions or consider alternative viewpoints.

To avoid bias, it is important to ask questions in a neutral and unbiased manner, allowing respondents to form their own opinions without being influenced by pre-presented information or statistics.

learn more about bias

https://brainly.com/question/15135672

#SPJ11

For a 20-minute massage, it is $0.25 per minute, while for a 40-minute massage, it is $1.375 per minute.

Based on the given information, Angela paid a flat rate of $45 to enter the spa. This is her main cost, regardless of the length of the massage.

To find the cost of the massage, we need to determine the additional charge per minute.

For a 20-minute massage, Angela is charged $50. To find the additional charge per minute, we subtract the flat rate from the total cost: $50 - $45 = $5.

So, the additional charge per minute is $5 / 20 minutes = $0.25 per minute.

For a 40-minute massage, Angela is charged $100. Using the same method, we subtract the flat rate from the total cost: $100 - $45 = $55.

To find the additional charge per minute, we divide the additional cost by the number of minutes: $55 / 40 minutes = $1.375 per minute.

The additional charge per minute for Angela's massages varies depending on the length. For a 20-minute massage, it is $0.25 per minute, while for a 40-minute massage, it is $1.375 per minute.\

To know more about number visit:

brainly.com/question/3589540

#SPJ11

The cubic function obtained from the parent function y = x³ after the given sequence of transformations is:

y = x⁴ - 8x³ + 24x² - 32x + 13

To determine the cubic function obtained from the parent function y = x³ after the given sequence of transformations (a vertical translation 3 units down and a horizontal translation 2 units right), we can apply the transformations step by step.

Vertical Translation 3 Units Down:

To translate the function 3 units down, we subtract 3 from the original function:

y = x³ - 3

Horizontal Translation 2 Units Right:

To translate the function 2 units right, we replace x with (x - 2) in the translated function obtained from the previous step:

y = (x - 2)³ - 3

Simplifying the expression, we have:

y = (x - 2)(x - 2)(x - 2) - 3

y = (x - 2)²(x - 2) - 3

y = (x - 2)²(x² - 4x + 4) - 3

y = (x² - 4x + 4)(x² - 4x + 4) - 3

y = x⁴ - 8x³ + 24x² - 32x + 16 - 3

The cubic function obtained from the parent function y = x³ after the given sequence of transformations is:

y = x⁴ - 8x³ + 24x² - 32x + 13

Know more about Horizontal Translation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31938343

#SPJ11

There are 13,749,669,792,000 ways to select the applicants. To calculate the number of ways to select applicants who will be hired, we can use the combination formula. The formula for calculating combinations is:

C(n, r) = n! / (r!(n - r)!)

Where n is the total number of applicants (90 in this case), and r is the number of applicants to be hired (20 in this case). Plugging in the values, we get:

C(90, 20) = 90! / (20!(90 - 20)!)

Calculating the factorial terms:

90! = 90 × 89 × 88 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1

20! = 20 × 19 × 18 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1

70! = 70 × 69 × 68 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1

Substituting these values into the combination formula:

C(90, 20) = 90! / (20!(90 - 20)!)

= (90 × 89 × 88 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1) / [(20 × 19 × 18 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1) × (70 × 69 × 68 × ... × 3 × 2 × 1)]

Performing the calculations, we find: C(90, 20) = 13,749,669,792,000

Therefore, there are 13,749,669,792,000 ways to select the applicants who will be hired from a pool of 90 applications.

To know more about Combination Formula visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13877117

#SPJ11