Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Assumption of risk does not protect the defendant from all possible injuries. If the plaintiff uses a product despite being aware of a dangerous defect but is injured by another, unknown defect, there is no bar on recovery for that other injury.
True, the assumption is not a defense available to defendant.
Basically, a product liability is policy that provide compensation for user who suffers damage or injury because of use of a particular product.
Assumption of risk is use to describe when a Plaintiff uses the product despite being aware that the product has a dangerous defect.
In law, the assumption of the risk is not a defense available to defendants because he is entitled to ensure product produced are safe for use.
Therefore, it is true that assumption of the risk is not a defense available to defendants in products liability cases.
Read more on this here
brainly.com/question/21487428
James is a lawyer who is representing a victim of domestic abuse in a case
presided over by Judge Danner. During an unofficial conversation in the hallway,
James talks to Judge Danner about the woman's restraining order stating she moved into her parents home out of fear, but her parents' home is not on the list of addresses banned on the restraining order. Judge Danner decides to write the parents' address on a photocopy of the restraining order and authenticated the document without adding the new document to the court records.
A. Ethical
B. Unethical
C. Illegal
Your reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Answer:
unethical as it would be considered "ex parte"
Explanation:
ex parte- with respect to or in the interests of one side only or of an interested outside party.
he had an unnoficial conversation