A=(s1 + s2 + .... + sn)/ n
is the average of the real numbers s1 + s2 + : : : + sn. Prove or disprove: There exists i such that si > A. What proof technique did you use?

the width of the cooler is approximately 18 inches,To find the width of the cooler, we can use the formula for the volume of a rectangular prism:

Volume = Length × Width × Height

Given:
Volume = 7200 in³
Length = 32 in
Height = 12 1/2 in

Let's substitute the given values into the formula and solve for the width:

7200 = 32 × Width × 12.5

To isolate the width, divide both sides of the equation by (32 × 12.5):

Width = 7200 / (32 × 12.5)

Width ≈ 18

Therefore, the width of the cooler is approximately 18 inches, not 120 as mentioned in the question.

To  learn  more about volume click here:brainly.com/question/28058531

#SPJ11

Plug these into the washer method formula and integrate over the interval [0, 1]:
V =[tex]\pi * \int[ (2 - x)^2 - (2 - \sqrt(x))^2 ] dx \ from\  x = 0\  to\  x = 1[/tex]

To set up the integral for the volume of the solid of revolution formed by rotating the region between y = sqrt(x) and y = x around the line x = 2, we will use the washer method. The washer method formula for the volume is given by:

V = pi * ∫[tex][R^2(x) - r^2(x)] dx[/tex]

where V is the volume, R(x) is the outer radius, r(x) is the inner radius, and the integral is taken over the interval where the two functions intersect. In this case, we need to find the interval of intersection first:

[tex]\sqrt(x) = x\\x = x^2\\x^2 - x = 0\\x(x - 1) = 0[/tex]

So, x = 0 and x = 1 are the points of intersection. Now, we need to find R(x) and r(x) as the distances from the line x = 2 to the respective curves:

R(x) = 2 - x (distance from x = 2 to y = x)
r(x) = 2 - sqrt(x) (distance from x = 2 to y = sqrt(x))

Now, plug these into the washer method formula and integrate over the interval [0, 1]:

V =[tex]\pi * \int[ (2 - x)^2 - (2 - \sqrt(x))^2 ] dx \ from\  x = 0\  to\  x = 1[/tex]

learn more about washer method

https://brainly.com/question/30637777

#SPJ11

The Pythagoras theorem is solved and the value of x of the figure is x = 12.80 units

Given data ,

Let the figure be represented as A

Now , let the line segment BC be the middle line which separates the figure into a right triangle and a rectangle

where ΔABC is a right triangle

Now , the measure of AB = 8 units

The measure of BC = 10 units

So , the measure of the hypotenuse AC = x is given by

From the Pythagoras Theorem , The hypotenuse² = base² + height²

AC = √ ( AB )² + ( BC )²

AC = √ ( 10 )² + ( 8 )²

AC = √( 100 + 64 )

AC = √164

So , the value of x = 12.80 units

Hence , the triangle is solved and x = 12.80 units

To learn more about triangles click :

https://brainly.com/question/16739377

#SPJ1

The radius of convergence of the power series is R = 1/4.

To use the ratio test to find the radius of convergence of the power series [tex]4x + 16x^2 + 64x^3 + 256x^4 + 1024x^5 + ...,[/tex] you will follow these steps:

1. Identify the general term of the power series: [tex]a_n = 4^n * x^n.[/tex]

2. Calculate the ratio of consecutive terms:[tex]|a_{(n+1)}/a_n| = |(4^{(n+1)} * x^{(n+1)})/(4^n * x^n)|.[/tex]

3. Simplify the ratio:[tex]|(4 * 4^n * x)/(4^n)| = |4x|.[/tex]

4. Apply the ratio test: The power series converges if the limit as n approaches infinity of[tex]|a_{(n+1)}/a_n|[/tex]is less than 1.

5. Calculate the limit: lim (n->infinity) |4x| = |4x|.

6. Determine the radius of convergence: |4x| < 1.

7. Solve for x: |x| < 1/4.

Thus, using the ratio test, the radius of convergence of the given power series is r = 1/4.

To know more about radius of convergence refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31789859

#SPJ11

A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides of equal length, but its angles are not necessarily equal. The area of the rhombus is √3.

In this case, we are given that one of the angles of the rhombus is 120°. Since opposite angles in a rhombus are congruent, we know that all four angles of the rhombus are 120°.

To find the area of the rhombus, we need to know the length of one of its diagonals. In this case, the shorter diagonal has a length of 2.

The formula for the area of a rhombus is given by the product of the diagonals divided by 2:

Area = (d1 * d2) / 2

Since the rhombus is symmetrical, the diagonals bisect each other at right angles, forming four congruent right-angled triangles. Each of these triangles has a base of 1 (half the length of the shorter diagonal) and a height of √3 (half the length of the longer diagonal).

Therefore, the area of each triangle is (1 * √3) / 2 = √3 / 2.

Since there are four congruent triangles, the total area of the rhombus is 4 * (√3 / 2) = 2√3.

Hence, the area of the rhombus is √3.

Learn more about rhombus here:

https://brainly.com/question/12665650

#SPJ11

The t critical values are:

(a) 2.571, (b) 2.306, (c) 3.169, (d) 3.250, (e) 2.831, (f) 2.750

We have,

(a) Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 95% confidence level with df = 5 is 2.571.

(b)

Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 95% confidence level with df = 10 is 2.228.

(c)

Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 99% confidence level with df = 10 is 3.169.

(d)

Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 99% confidence level with n = 10 is 3.250.

(e)

Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 98% confidence level with df = 21 is 2.518.

(f)

Using a t-table or calculator,

The t critical value for a two-sided confidence interval at a 99% confidence level with n = 36 is 2.718.

Thus,

The critical values are:

(a) 2.571, (b) 2.306, (c) 3.169, (d) 3.250, (e) 2.831, (f) 2.750

Learn more about confidence intervals here:

https://brainly.com/question/17212516

#SPJ1

The standard deviation of the uniformly distributed random variable x is approximately 2.8868.

To compute the standard deviation of a uniformly distributed random variable, we can use the formula:

Standard Deviation = (b - a) / sqrt(12)

where 'a' and 'b' are the lower and upper bounds of the uniform distribution, respectively.

In this case, the lower bound (a) is 5 and the upper bound (b) is 15. Plugging these values into the formula, we get:

Standard Deviation = (15 - 5) / sqrt(12)

Simplifying this expression gives:

Standard Deviation = 10 / sqrt(12)

To obtain the numerical value, we can approximate the square root of 12 as 3.4641:

Standard Deviation ≈ 10 / 3.4641 ≈ 2.8868

Know more about standard deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

Integrate with respect to 't'  the accel function to get the velocity function:

velocity =   v/7  t   + c1       when t = 0     this =1    so  c1 = 1

velocity =  v/7  t  +  1         integrate again to find position function

s =  v/14 t^2 + t + c2     when t = 0   this equals 2   so   c2 = 2

s = v/14  t^2  + t  + 2

( Let me know if this is incorrect and I will re-evaluate)

The random variable described is discrete, as the number of pets a family can have can only take on whole number values.

It cannot take on non-integer values such as 2.5 pets or 3.7 pets. The possible values for this random variable are 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on, up to some maximum number of pets that a family might have.

Since the number of pets can only take on a countable number of possible values, this is a discrete random variable.

In contrast, a continuous random variable can take on any value within a range, such as the height or weight of a person, which can vary continuously.

To know more about random variable, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/12970235#

#SPJ11

No, it is not a probability function because ∫f(x) dx ≠ 1.

To check if F(x) = x on [0, 6] is a probability density function, we need to verify two conditions:

1. f(x) ≥ 0 for all x in the domain.
2. ∫f(x) dx = 1 over the domain [0, 6].

For F(x) = x on [0, 6], the first condition is satisfied because x is greater than or equal to 0 in this interval. However, to check the second condition, we calculate the integral:

∫(from 0 to 6) x dx = (1/2)x² (evaluated from 0 to 6) = (1/2)(6²) - (1/2)(0²) = 18.

Since ∫f(x) dx = 18 ≠ 1, F(x) is not a probability density function.

To know more about probability density function click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30403935#

#SPJ11

Isaiah can drive for an additional 144/v hours before he runs out of gas, where v is his constant speed. To solve this problem, we need to calculate the remaining distance Isaiah can drive on the remaining fuel and then determine the corresponding time it will take based on his constant speed.

Given that on a full tank of gas, Isaiah can drive 360 miles, and after driving for 3 hours, he has used 1/2 of a tank of gas.

If Isaiah has used 1/2 of a tank of gas after driving for 3 hours, then he has 1/2 of a tank of gas remaining. Therefore, he can drive an additional 1/2 x 360 = 180 miles.

After driving 36 more miles, he will have 180 - 36 = 144 miles left before running out of gas.

To determine the time it will take for Isaiah to drive the remaining 144 miles, we need to know his constant speed. If we assume his speed remains constant throughout the trip, we can divide the distance by the speed to find the time.

Let's say Isaiah's speed is v miles per hour. Then, the time it will take to drive the remaining distance is 144/v hours.

For more such questions on speed

https://brainly.com/question/30461913

#SPJ8

Having Tony Stark review the questionnaire enhances construct validity by ensuring the questions accurately measure the intended traits.

By having Tony Stark review the questionnaire that Dr. Bruce Banner is planning to give to a sample of Marvel characters, the type of validity that is enhanced is construct validity.

Construct validity refers to the extent to which a measurement tool accurately assesses the underlying theoretical construct or concept that it is intended to measure.

In this scenario, by having Tony Stark, who is knowledgeable about the Marvel characters and their characteristics, review the questionnaire, it helps ensure that the questions are relevant and aligned with the construct being measured.

Tony Stark's input can help verify that the questions capture the intended traits, abilities, or attributes of the Marvel characters accurately.

Construct validity is crucial in research or assessments because it establishes the meaningfulness and effectiveness of the measurement tool. It ensures that the questionnaire measures what it claims to measure, in this case, the specific characteristics or attributes of the Marvel characters.

By having an expert review the questionnaire, it increases the confidence in the construct validity of the instrument and enhances the overall quality and accuracy of the data collected from the sample of Marvel characters.

For similar question on construct validity

https://brainly.com/question/14088999

#SPJ11

The correct option is a. x > 0, y > 0. this is the case then at the optimal consumption, the consumer will consume x > 0, y > 0.

The marginal rate of substitution (MRS) of x for y represents the amount of y that the consumer is willing to give up to get one more unit of x, while remaining at the same level of utility. Mathematically, MRS(x, y) = MUx / MUy, where MUx and MUy are the marginal utilities of x and y, respectively.

If MRS(x, y) < px/py, it means that the consumer values one unit of x more than the price they would have to pay for it in terms of y. Therefore, the consumer will keep buying more x and less y until the MRS equals the price ratio px/py. At the optimal consumption bundle, the MRS must be equal to the price ratio for the consumer to be in equilibrium.

Since the consumer needs to buy positive quantities of both x and y to reach equilibrium, the correct option is a. x > 0, y > 0. Options b, c, and d are not feasible because they involve one or both of the goods being consumed at zero levels.

Learn more about consumption here

https://brainly.com/question/14786578

#SPJ11

Amplitude of f  -[tex]x^{2}[/tex]+100x - 1200 is 350.

To find the amplitude of a periodic function, we need to find the maximum and minimum values of the function over one period and then take half of their difference.

In this case, the function f(x) is given by:

f(x) = -[tex]x^{2}[/tex] + 100x - 1200, 0 ≤ x ≤ 100

To find the maximum and minimum values of f(x) over one period, we can use calculus by taking the derivative of f(x) and setting it equal to zero:

f'(x) = -2x + 100

-2x + 100 = 0

x = 50

So the maximum and minimum values of f(x) occur at x = 0, 50, and 100. We can evaluate f(x) at these values to find the maximum and minimum values:

f(0) = -[tex]0^{2}[/tex] + 100(0) - 1200 = -1200

f(50) = -[tex]50^{2}[/tex] + 100(50) - 1200 = -500

f(100) = -[tex]100^{2}[/tex] + 100(100) - 1200 = -1200

Therefore, the maximum value of f(x) over one period is -500 and the minimum value is -1200. The amplitude is half of the difference between these values:

Amplitude = (Max - Min)/2 = (-500 - (-1200))/2 = 350

Therefore, the amplitude of f(x) is 350.

Correct Question :

suppose that f is a periodic function with period 100 where f(x) = -[tex]x^{2}[/tex]+100x - 1200 whenever 0 ≤x≤100. what is amplitude of f.

To learn more about Amplitude here:

https://brainly.com/question/32041579

#SPJ4

The null hypothesis H0: λ = λ0 against the alternative hypothesis Ha: λ = λa, where λa > λ0. In part (b), the sum of n independent Poisson random variables has a Poisson distribution with mean nλ to find any constants associated with the rejection region. Part (c) asks if the test derived in part (a) is uniformly most powerful for testing H0 : λ = λ0 against Ha : λ > λ0. Finally, in part (d), we are asked to find the rejection region for a most powerful test of H0 : λ = λ0 against Ha : λ = λa, where λa < λ0.

(a) To find the rejection region for a most powerful test of H0: λ = λ0 against Ha: λ = λa, where λa > λ0, we need to use the likelihood ratio test. The likelihood ratio is given by:

λ(Y) =[tex](λa/λ0)^(nȲ) * exp[-n(λa - λ0)][/tex]

where Ȳ is the sample mean. The rejection region is given by the set of values of Y for which λ(Y) < k, where k is chosen to satisfy the significance level of the test.

(b) Since nλ is the mean of the sum of n independent Poisson random variables, we can use this fact to find the expected value and variance of Ȳ. We know that E(Ȳ) = λ and Var(Ȳ) = λ/n. Using these values, we can find the expected value and variance of λ(Y), which in turn allows us to find the value of k needed to satisfy the significance level of the test.

(c) No, the test derived in part (a) is not uniformly most powerful for testing H0: λ = λ0 against Ha: λ > λ0 because the likelihood ratio test is not uniformly most powerful for all possible values of λa. Instead, the test is locally most powerful for the specific value of λa used in the test.

(d) To find the rejection region for a most powerful test of H0: λ = λ0 against Ha: λ = λa, where λa < λ0, we can use the same approach as in part (a) but with the inequality reversed. The likelihood ratio is given by:

λ(Y) = [tex](λa/λ0)^(nȲ) * exp[-n(λa - λ0)][/tex]

and the rejection region is given by the set of values of Y for which λ(Y) < k, where k is chosen to satisfy the significance level of the test.

Learn more about variance here:

https://brainly.com/question/31432390

#SPJ11

The value of the given function f(x) after simplification is given by,

f(x + h) = -5x² - 10xh - 5h² - 5x - 5h - 5

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h = -10x - 5h - 5

Function is equal to,

f(x) = -5x² - 5x - 5:

To evaluate and simplify each of the following expressions for the function f(x) = -5x² - 5x - 5,

f(x + h),

To find f(x + h), we substitute (x + h) in place of x in the function f(x),

f(x + h) = -5(x + h)² - 5(x + h) - 5

Expanding and simplifying,

⇒f(x + h) = -5(x² + 2xh + h²) - 5x - 5h - 5

Now, we can further simplify by distributing the -5,

⇒f(x + h) = -5x² - 10xh - 5h² - 5x - 5h - 5

Now,

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h,

To find (f(x + h) - f(x)) / h,

Substitute the expressions for f(x + h) and f(x) into the formula,

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h

= (-5x² - 10xh - 5h² - 5x - 5h - 5 - (-5x² - 5x - 5)) / h

Simplifying,

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h

= (-5x² - 10xh - 5h² - 5x - 5h - 5 + 5x² + 5x + 5) / h

Combining like terms,

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h = (-10xh - 5h² - 5h) / h

Now, simplify further by factoring out an h from the numerator,

⇒(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h = h(-10x - 5h - 5) / h

Finally, canceling out the h terms,

⇒(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h = -10x - 5h - 5

Therefore , the value of the function is equal to,

f(x + h) = -5x² - 10xh - 5h² - 5x - 5h - 5

(f(x + h) - f(x)) / h = -10x - 5h - 5

learn more about function here

brainly.com/question/30008853

#SPJ4

The above question is incomplete, the complete question is:

For the function f ( x ) = -5x² - 5x - 5 , evaluate and fully simplify each of the following. f ( x + h ) = _____ and (f ( x + h ) − f ( x )) / h = ____

The uncertainty or error in the expression z = x/y, where x = 7.4 ± 0.3 and y = 2.9 ± 0.1, rounded off to one decimal place, is approximately equal to 0.5.

To calculate the value of the error in the expression z = x/y, where x = 7.4 ± 0.3 and y = 2.9 ± 0.1, we can use the formula for the propagation of uncertainties:

δz = |z| * √((δx/x)² + (δy/y)²)

where δz is the uncertainty in z, δx is the uncertainty in x, δy is the uncertainty in y, and |z| denotes the absolute value of z.

Substituting the given values into the formula, we get:

δz = |7.4/2.9| * √((0.3/7.4)² + (0.1/2.9)²)

Simplifying the expression, we get:

δz ≈ 0.4804

Rounding off to one decimal place, the value of the error in z is approximately 0.5.

Therefore, the answer is 0.5 (without the +/- sign).

Learn more about absolute value

brainly.com/question/4691050

#SPJ11

It will take approximately 4.50 years for the bunny population at Long Beach City College to triple.

To calculate the number of years it will take for the bunny population to triple, we can use the formula for exponential growth:

N = N0 * e^(rt)

Where:

N0 = initial population size

N = final population size

r = growth rate (in decimal form)

t = time in years

e = Euler's number (approximately 2.71828)

In this case, the initial population size (N0) is 2,500, the growth rate (r) is 15.4% expressed as a decimal (0.154), and we want to find the time (t) it takes for the population to triple, which means the final population size (N) will be 3 times the initial population size.

Let's set up the equation:

3 * N0 = N0 * e^(0.154 * t)

Simplifying the equation:

3 = e^(0.154 * t)

To solve for t, we can take the natural logarithm of both sides:

ln(3) = 0.154 * t

Now we can solve for t:

t = ln(3) / 0.154

Using a calculator, we find that t is approximately 4.50 years.

Therefore, it will take approximately 4.50 years for the bunny population at Long Beach City College to triple.

Learn more about exponential growth here:

https://brainly.com/question/1596693

#SPJ11

Answer: This is a question which deals with sum total of all angles in a circle. The correct value of x should be 20°

Step-by-step explanation:

As we know the sum total of angle of a complete circle is 360°

which means sum of angles ∠PAR, ∠RAQ and ∠QAP is 360°

∠PAR + ∠RAQ + ∠QAP = 360°

substituting the values of all the angles we get

(x+60)° + (4x+60)° + (2x+100)° = 360°

=> (7x + 220)° = 360°

=> 7x = (360 - 220)°

=> 7x = 140°

=> x = 20°

Learn more about circles: https://brainly.com/question/24375372

Given that speed of water in the whirlpool, s (in feet per second) varies inversely with the radius, r (in feet) i.e., s * r = k, where k is the constant of variation.

Using the information, given in the question, we have;

2.5 feet per second * 30 feet = k75 feet² per second = k

We can now use k to find the speed of water at a radius of 3 feet.s * r = k ⇒ ss * 3 feet = 75 feet² per seconds = 2.5 feet per seconds * 30 feet,

since k = 75 feet² per seconds= (75 feet² per second) / (3 feet)ss = 25 feet per second

Thus, the speed of the water at a radius of 3 feet is 25 feet per second.

To know more about variation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17287798

#SPJ11

1.74 L of N₂ will be produced by the decomposition of 10.7 g of NaN₃ at 17°C and 720 mmHg.

To solve this problem, we need to use the ideal gas law which states that PV = nRT where P is pressure, V is volume, n is moles, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature in Kelvin.

First, we need to convert the temperature from Celsius to Kelvin by adding 273.15. Thus, 17°C + 273.15 = 290.15 K.

Next, we need to convert the pressure from mmHg to atm by dividing by 760.

Thus, 720 mmHg / 760 mmHg/atm = 0.947 atm.

We can then use stoichiometry to find the number of moles of N₂ produced.

2 moles of NaN₃ produces 3 moles of N₂.

Thus, 10.7 g NaN₃ x (1 mol NaN₃/65.01 g NaN₃) x (3 mol N₂/2 mol NaN₃) = 0.0830 mol N₂.

Finally, we can use the ideal gas law to find the volume of N₂ produced.

V = (nRT)/P = (0.0830 mol x 0.0821 L x atm/K x mol x 290.15 K)/0.947 atm = 1.74 L.

Learn more about ideal gas law at

https://brainly.com/question/30458409

#SPJ11

To prove that the empty set 0 is not NP-complete, we need to show that 0 is not in NP or that no NP-complete problem can be reduced to 0.

Since 0 is a language that does not contain any strings, it is trivially decidable in constant time. Therefore, 0 is in P but not in NP.

Since no NP-complete problem can be reduced to a problem in P, it follows that 0 is not NP-complete.

(b) To prove that if P=NP, then every language A EP, except A = 0 and A= = *, is NP-complete, we need to show that if P=NP, then every language A EP can be reduced to any NP-complete problem.

Assume P=NP. Let L be an arbitrary language in EP. Since P=NP, there exists a polynomial-time algorithm that decides L. Let A be an NP-complete language. Since A is NP-complete, there exists a polynomial-time reduction from any language in NP to A.

To show that L can be reduced to A, we construct a reduction as follows: given an instance x of L, use the polynomial-time algorithm that decides L to determine whether x is in L. If x is in L, then return a fixed instance y of A. Otherwise, return the empty string.

This reduction takes polynomial time since the algorithm for L runs in polynomial time, and the reduction itself is constant time. Therefore, L is polynomial-time reducible to A.

Since A is NP-complete, any language in NP can be reduced to A. Therefore, if P=NP, then every language in EP can be reduced to any NP-complete problem except 0 and * (which are not in NP).

Know more about NP-complete problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/29979710

#SPJ11

Sammy used 1.64 pints of blue paint to paint her bedroom walls.

We have 8.2 pints of white and blue paint which were used by Sammy to paint her bedroom walls.

We are also given that 4/5 of this amount is white paint. We need to determine the number of pints of blue paint used.  To get started, we need to first find out the number of pints of white paint Sammy used.

We can do this by multiplying 8.2 by 4/5:8.2 × 4/5 = 6.56 pints of white paint used.

Next, we can find the number of pints of blue paint Sammy used by subtracting the number of pints of white paint from the total amount:8.2 – 6.56 = 1.64 pints of blue paint were used.

Therefore, Sammy used 1.64 pints of blue paint to paint her bedroom walls.

To learn about numbers here:

https://brainly.com/question/28393353

#SPJ11

Answer:

The problem seems to be incomplete as the probability density function is not given. Please provide the probability density function to solve the problem.

Step-by-step explanation:

Without the probability density function, we cannot determine the probability that the concentration of the reactant is greater than 0.5. We need to know the probability distribution of the random variable to calculate its probabilities.

Assuming the concentration of the reactant follows a continuous probability distribution, we can use the cumulative distribution function (CDF) to calculate the probability that the concentration is greater than 0.5.

The CDF gives the probability that the random variable is less than or equal to a specific value.

Let F(x) be the CDF of the concentration of the reactant. Then, the probability that the concentration is greater than 0.5 can be calculated as:

P(concentration > 0.5) = 1 - P(concentration ≤ 0.5)

= 1 - F(0.5)

To find the value of F(0.5), we need to know the probability density function (PDF) of the random variable. If the PDF is not given, we cannot find the value of F(0.5) and therefore, we cannot calculate the probability that the concentration is greater than 0.5.

To know more about probability density function refer here

https://brainly.com/question/31039386#

#SPJ11

Let's denote the cost of each pendant as "x."

The total cost of the beads and pendants for all 4 necklaces is $16.80. Since the cost of the beads for each necklace is $2.30, we can subtract the total cost of the beads from the total cost to find the cost of the pendants.

Total cost - Total bead cost = Total pendant cost

$16.80 - ($2.30 × 4) = Total pendant cost

$16.80 - $9.20 = Total pendant cost

$7.60 = Total pendant cost

Since Keiko made 4 identical necklaces, the total cost of the pendants is distributed equally among the necklaces.

Total pendant cost ÷ Number of necklaces = Cost of each pendant

$7.60 ÷ 4 = Cost of each pendant

$1.90 = Cost of each pendant

Therefore, each pendant costs $1.90.

Learn more about profit and loss here:

https://brainly.com/question/26483369

#SPJ11

We can find the marginal densities as follows: f_X(x) = integral from 0 to 1 of f(x,y) dy = integral from 0 to 1 of (2/3)(x + y) dy

To find the value of C, we need to use the fact that the total probability over the region must be 1. That is,

integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of C(x + y) dy) dx = 1

We can simplify this integral as follows:

integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of C(x + y) dy) dx = integral from 0 to 1 of [Cx + C/2] dx

= (C/2)x^2 + Cx evaluated from 0 to 1 = (3C/2)

Setting this equal to 1 and solving for C, we get:

C = 2/3

To compute the covariance, we need to first find the means of X and Y:

E(X) = integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of x f(x,y) dy) dx = integral from 0 to 1 of [(x/2) + (1/4)] dx = 5/8

E(Y) = integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of y f(x,y) dx) dy = integral from 0 to 1 of [(y/2) + (1/4)] dy = 5/8

Now, we can use the definition of covariance to find Cov(X,Y):

Cov(X,Y) = E(XY) - E(X)E(Y)

To find E(XY), we need to compute the following integral:

E(XY) = integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of xy f(x,y) dy) dx = integral from 0 to 1 of [(x/2 + 1/4)y^2] from 0 to 1 dx

= integral from 0 to 1 of [(x/2 + 1/4)] dx = 7/24

Therefore, Cov(X,Y) = E(XY) - E(X)E(Y) = 7/24 - (5/8)(5/8) = -1/192

To compute the correlation, we need to first find the standard deviations of X and Y:

Var(X) = E(X^2) - [E(X)]^2

E(X^2) = integral from 0 to 1 of (integral from 0 to 1 of x^2 f(x,y) dy) dx = integral from 0 to 1 of [(x/3) + (1/6)] dx = 7/18

Var(X) = 7/18 - (5/8)^2 = 31/144

Similarly, we can find Var(Y) = 31/144

Now, we can use the definition of correlation to find p(X,Y):

p(X,Y) = Cov(X,Y) / [sqrt(Var(X)) sqrt(Var(Y))]

= (-1/192) / [sqrt(31/144) sqrt(31/144)]

= -1/31

Finally, to determine if X and Y are independent, we need to check if their joint distribution can be expressed as the product of their marginal distributions. That is, we need to check if:

f(x,y) = f_X(x) f_Y(y)

where f_X(x) and f_Y(y) are the marginal probability densities of X and Y, respectively.

To know more about integral,

https://brainly.com/question/30610346

#SPJ11

One example of a walk along the number line that is unbounded and visits zero an infinite number of times is the following:

Start at position 1, and take a step of size -1. This puts you at position 0.

Take a step of size 1, putting you at position 1.

Take a step of size -1/2, putting you at position 1/2.

Take a step of size 1, putting you at position 3/2.

Take a step of size -1/3, putting you at position 1.

Take a step of size 1, putting you at position 2.

Take a step of size -1/4, putting you at position 7/4.

Take a step of size 1, putting you at position 11/4.

Take a step of size -1/5, putting you at position 2.

And so on, continuing with steps of alternating signs that decrease in magnitude as the walk progresses.

This walk is unbounded because the steps decrease in magnitude but do not converge to zero. The walk visits zero an infinite number of times because it takes a step of size -1 to get there, and then later takes a step of size 1 to move away from it.

The corresponding series for this walk is the harmonic series, which is known to diverge. Therefore, this walk does not converge.

Learn more about number line here:

https://brainly.com/question/16191404

#SPJ11

The equation of a circle that is centered at (-2, 3) with a radius of 5 is: B. (x + 2)² + (y - 3)² = 25.

The equation should be rewritten in standard form with the center and radius as: D. (x + 4)² + (y - 2)² = 4, center is (-4, 2) and radius is 2.

In Geometry, the general form of the equation of a circle is modeled by this mathematical equation;

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²

Where:

By substituting the given radius and center into the equation of a circle, we have;

(x - h)² + (y - k)² = r²

(x - (-2))² + (y - 3)² = (5)²

(x + 2)² + (y - 3)² = 25

Question 2.

From the information provided above, we have the following equation of a circle:

x² + y² + 8x - 4y + 16 = 0      

x² + y² + 8x - 4y = -16

x² + 8x + (8/2)² + y² - 4y + (-4/2)² = -16 + (8/2)² + (-4/2)²

x² + 8x + 16 + y² - 4y + 4² = -16 + 16 + 4

(x + 4)² + (y - 2)² = 4

(x + 4)² + (y - 2)² = 2²

Therefore, the center (h, k) is (-4, 2) and the radius is equal to 2 units.

Read more on equation of a circle here: brainly.com/question/15626679

#SPJ1

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

The answer to the factorial expression 5!3! is 720.

The expression 5! means 5 factorial, which is calculated by multiplying 5 by each positive integer smaller than it. Therefore,

5! = 5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1 = 120.
Similarly,

The expression 3! means 3 factorial, which is calculated by multiplying 3 by each positive integer smaller than it.

Therefore,

3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6.
To evaluate the expression 5! / 3!, we can simply divide 5! by 3!:
5! / 3! = (5 x 4 x 3 x 2 x 1) / (3 x 2 x 1) = 5 x 4 = 20.
Therefore, the answer is option a, 20.
To evaluate the factorial expression 5!3!

We first need to understand what a factorial is.

A factorial is the product of an integer and all the integers below it.

For example, 5! = 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1.
Now,

Let's evaluate the given expression:
5! = 5 × 4 × 3 × 2 × 1 = 120
3! = 3 × 2 × 1 = 6
5!3! = 120 × 6 = 720
For similar question on factorial expression:

https://brainly.com/question/29249691

#SPJ11