Answer: Even with limited knowledge of evidence and it's preservation, a police officer who is the first responder to a crime scene can properly protect, preserve, and, in some cases, collect evidence.
Explanation: :)
london knowingly divulges to breakingnews information about neandro's e-money payments to oracle oil corporation without the consent of neandro or oracle. london may be in violation of federal law
It is absolutely correct and factually appropriate to mention that when London intentionally divulges breaking news information about a person without his or her consent, it leads to a situation of violation of the federal law.
The violation of a federal law is a situation wherein the rules and regulation made under the law are applicable nationwide, and the amendments to the same can only be bought about by relevant authorities serving the government at a federal level. It is further to be noted that the violation of these laws may also lead to punishment or penalty, or both to the doer of the act.
Learn more about a federal law here:
https://brainly.com/question/16849808
#SPJ4
In addition to numerous congressional acts that focus more on national regulation, laws have been created that affect the practice of home mortgage lending at a community or neighborhood level. For example, laws have been enacted to prevent lenders from avoiding certain neighborhoods without regard to the merits of the individual loan applications, a practice more commonly referred to as:
A. rescinding
B. redlining
C. assuming
D. holdout
In addition to numerous congressional acts that focus more on national regulation, laws have been created that affect the practice of home mortgage lending at a community or neighborhood level. For example, laws have been enacted to prevent lenders from avoiding certain neighborhoods without regard to the merits of the individual loan applications, a practice more commonly referred to as redlining
The Confiscation Act, which would have allowed the federal government to seize property, including slave property, being used to assist the Confederate insurrection, was one of the wartime measures that the Senate debated during its special session from July 4 to August 6, 1861. The final bill was approved by the Senate on August 5, 1861, by a vote of 24 to 11, and President Lincoln signed it into law the following day. Although this bill had symbolic value, it had no bearing on the uprising or the talks during the war. Every American was able to purchase any property up to 160 acres of free federal land thanks to a congress statute from 1862. The process of purchasing a homestead consists mostly of three steps. The federal government was authorized in early 1962.
Learn more about congressional acts from
brainly.com/question/26521801
#SPJ4
What are the two types of crust on the earth’s surface
Answer:
Oceanic and Continental Crust
Explanation:
Clint and Carlina open their business and find a cream cheese supplier, Jackson Dairy, Inc. Their relationship with Jackson Dairy, Inc. is great at first; the cream cheese is of good quality and is delivered according to their contract. However, after a few months, Jackson Dairy, Inc. starts providing deliveries later and later and is eventually unable to deliver any cream cheese at all. Unfortunately, Clint and Carlina have already paid Jackson Dairy, Inc. for the cream cheese that has not been delivered.
Jackson Dairy, Inc. is incorporated as a C corporation with Jack Jackson and his wife as the sole shareholders and the directors and officers of the corporation. Jack and his wife have held two annual meetings over the last eight years and do not keep current minutes for the corporation. Jackson Dairy, Inc.’s bank account rarely has a positive balance, most of the corporation’s expenses are paid from Jack and his wife’s personal bank account, and the corporation owns no assets because all assets are held in Jack and his wife's names.
Clint and Carlina file a lawsuit for breach of contract against Jackson Dairy, Inc., and against Jack Jackson and his wife as individuals. In terms of liability for business owners, do you think Clint and Carlina will be successful holding Jack Jackson and his wife personally liable? Why or why not?
Clint and Carlina will be successful in holding Jack Jackson and his wife personally liable because they backed from the commitment that was made to them.
What is a lawsuit?A lawsuit seems to be a civil procedure brought by one person or organization vs another with a courtroom to decide the outcome. A jury trial or indeed a court of fairness may adjudicate, depending upon the cure requested or the location where the plaintiff brings the action.
Clint and Carlina's relationship with Jackson Dairy, Inc. is of good quality at first. After a few months, Jackson Dairy starts delivering cream cheese later and later. Jack Jackson and his wife do not keep minutes for the corporation. Therefore they will be termed liable for the lawsuit.
Learn more about lawsuit, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28521301
#SPJ1
n addition to pregnant women, fetuses, and neonates, another subpart of the hhs regulations provides additional protections for which of the following v
By another component of the HHS regulations in addition to pregnant women, fetuses, and newborns is Prisoners.
Who is a prisoner in law?In S.1 of the Prisoner Security Act of 1992, the word "prisoner" is defined. The term "prisoner" refers to any person who is currently incarcerated due to a court order or another legal requirement that he be held in protective custody.
Do prisoners possess any rights?Prisoners have extremely few "absolute" rights because of how condensed the Prison Act of 1952 and the Written Rules are. Such fundamental rights include the right to access the legal system and the right to bodily integrity, or the right not to be assaulted. As the legislation changes, other people might be recognized.
To know more about Prisoner visit:
https://brainly.com/question/2663000
#SPJ4
what arguments could be made to support such a law? what arguments could be made against such a law?
for support: national security is of utmost importance. against: restricting free expression would violate the fundamental human rights that Americans are given by the US Constitution.
Dissidents may hinder the fighting effort during a period of conflict. The First Amendment does not shield speech that might offend other Americans. In addition, even unpopular speech should be protected under the first amendment. Other Americans are not put in risk when they speak out against a war. People should have the freedom to disagree with the government in a democracy. Speech that decried the war effort in World War I was prohibited by the Espionage and Sedition Acts of 1917. Americas were put in prison after being charged with and found guilty of opposing the war. Speaking out against war does not in any way endanger Americans; everyone is entitled to their own ideas.
learn more about argument hear:
https://brainly.com/question/12008588
#SPJ4
For centuries, English law dictates that a jury should have _____ people. In the United States, the minimum constitutionally allowed number of jurors currently is ____.
It has been dictated by the English Law that a jury should have twelve members, however, in the United States, the minimum constitutionally allowed number of jurors currently is limited to a number of six.
A jury can be referred to or considered as a panel consisting of judges who vote in favor or against the interest of an appeal being heard in the court of law. Different laws and countries have different regulations related to the scope and panel of jury with respect to the number of jurors to meet the passing of a judgment.
Learn more about a jury here:
https://brainly.com/question/9788151
#SPJ4
the element 213/85 at decays to 209/83 bi. use the laws of conservation of charge and nucleon number to determine the decay particle emitted. explain your reasoning. (2 points)
A neutron must be converted into a proton in some way. Since a proton has a charge of +1 and a neutron is electrically neutral, the decay process must involve the emission of a particle with a charge of -1. Furthermore, a nucleon cannot be it. the element is the most basic particle that satisfies these restrictions.
Since thorium has an atomic value of 85, all of its isotopes have 85 protons. The isotope in question has the element 213 nucleons, which means that 213 - 85 = 128neutrons. Protactinium has 83 protons since it has an atomic number of 83. Nucleon 209 also appears in the product of the Th 209 decay, which is Pa 209. We do, in fact, have nucleon number conservation for this decay. Consequently, how do we go from having 128 neutrons and 85 protons to having 126 neutrons and 83 protons? A neutron must be converted into a proton in some way. Since a proton has a charge of +1 and a neutron is electrically neutral, the decay process must involve the emission of a particle with a charge of -1. Furthermore, a nucleon cannot be it. An electron is the most basic particle that satisfies these restrictions.
Learn more about element from
brainly.com/question/18096867
#SPJ4
which of the following describes booker t. washington's approach to agitation for equal civil rights?
Booker T. Washington is best described as a civil rights pioneer who was born into slavery and later worked to establish racial equality.
Throughout his life, Washington produced a number of compilations of his speeches and essays, but Up from Enslavement (1901), an autobiographical narrative of his transition from slavery to civic leader, is his most well-known work. Washington was a reformer and educator. He was instrumental in the early growth and success of Tuskegee University, which is located in Tuskegee, Alabama. He rose to fame as a writer and was arguably the most important African American leader of his era. Self-help, racial unity, and accommodation were the three main tenets of Booker T. Washington's (1856–1915) worldview, which made him the most influential black leader of his day. In order to advance via hard effort and material wealth, he pushed blacks to temporarily accept discrimination.
Learn more about Booker T. Washington here
https://brainly.com/question/1155673
#SPJ4
primary laws for enforcement of seat belt use allow law enforcement officers specifically to stop motorists who are not wearing seat belts and are more effective than secondary laws.
Primary enforcement seat belt laws allow law enforcement officers to stop vehicles if a driver or passenger is not wearing a seat belt. Secondary enforcement seat belt laws require law enforcement officers to have some other reason for stopping a vehicle before citing a driver or passenger for not using a seat belt. The most comprehensive seat belt policy is a primary enforcement seat belt law that covers all occupants, regardless of where they are sitting in the vehicle.
Primary laws allow law enforcement personnel to stop cars with drivers and passengers not wearing seat belts and to issue tickets.Secondary laws only allow officers to issue tickets for not wearing a seat belt if the driver is first stopped for another offence.Hence, Primary laws are more effective for encouraging seat belt use and for reducing fatalities
Seat belt laws and enhanced enforcement increase seat belt use, thereby reducing crash-related injuries. Seat belt use reduces serious crash-related injuries and deaths by about half, and seat belt laws and enforcement strategies have been proven to increase seat belt use.
To learn more about seat belt laws visit here ; https://brainly.com/question/9460070?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4
prior to the civil rights movement, the strategies of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience, or the refusal to obey an unjust law, had been effective in the campaign led by
Prior to the civil rights movement, the strategies of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience, or the refusal to obey an unjust law, had been effective in the campaign led by Mahatma Gandhi.
What do you mean by civil right movement?The emergence of our own civil rights movement was inspired by Gandhi's satyagraha concept. After his visit to India, Dr. King returned determined to follow Gandhi's nonviolent tactics. But Dr. King was not the only figurehead for civil rights who adhered to Gandhi's outlook.
The concerted effort undertaken on a national level in the 1950s and 1960s by black people and others who supported them to end segregation and achieve equal rights.
From 1954 through 1968, the civil rights movement was an American political movement and struggle to end institutionalized racial segregation, discrimination, and racial disenfranchisement nationwide.
Therefore, prior to the civil rights movement, the strategies of nonviolent resistance and civil disobedience, or the refusal to obey an unjust law, had been effective in the campaign led by Mahatma Gandhi.
To know more about the civil right movement, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/24078961
#SPJ1
is the use of two-way mirrors permitting the observation of restrooms illegal per se under california criminal law?
A crime is committed by anybody who instals or any two-way mirror that allows observation of any lavatory, bathroom, washroom, shower, locker room, fitting room, motel room, or hotel room after April 1, 1970
This section does not apply to state or local public penal, correctional, custodial, or medical facilities that are used by, or for the treatment of, individuals who are committed or voluntarily confined to such facilities, or who voluntarily receive treatment there; or private custodial or medical facilities that are used by, or for the treatment of, individuals who are committed or voluntarily confined to such facilities, or who voluntarily receive treatment there. A building used by a state or local law enforcement agency, a public or private educational institution, or any of the aforementioned locations.
lean more about california here:
https://brainly.com/question/13238995
#SPJ4
Which supreme court case ruled that racial quotas could not be used to reduce inequality in schools.
According to the Supreme Court's Bakke (1978) decision, a university's utilisation racial "quotas" in the admissions process was unlawful, but using "affirmative action" to admit more minority candidates was lawful in some cases.
What good is a courtroom?The courts make decisions on what actually happened and what should be done about it. They decide whether a person committed a sin or the punishment was appropriate. They also give people a peaceful means of resolving interpersonal disputes that they would be unable to settle on their own.
What makes it a court?The Latin term crtem, the accusative tense of cohors, which implies an enclosure yard or the tenants of such a yard, is derived from the French word cour, which signifies an enclosed yard.
To know more about court visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28567848
#SPJ4
in deciding whether a contract was formed, the courts look to the subjective intent of the parties. a. true b. false
The courts consider the subjective intention of the parties when determining whether or not a contract was formed. This statement is False.
whether a contract exists based on a subjective or objective standard?
The objective standard test governs terms and conditions, which asks if a reasonable person observing the interaction would surmise that an acceptance and an offer had occurred.
Which of the four considerations is taken into account by courts in evaluating whether an argument is a term or solely a depiction?
The rule of parol evidence
A court's starting point in deciding whether a written term is a term or a misrepresentation is that it is a term and the only term.
To know more about parol evidence click here brainly.com/question/29679663
#SPJ4
a ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment that pays returns from new capital invested with the fraudsters instead of from a legitimate investment.
A Ponzi scheme is an economic fraud in which money obtained from new investors is used to pay out old investors. Ponzi scheme operators frequently make the claim that they will invest your funds.
What is meaning by legitimate?According to the law, something that is legitimate is the actual deal. Other interpretations of the word "legitimate" exist. Making anything legal involves either enacting legislation or having it acknowledged as being in compliance with the law.
Does legitimate mean legal?Legitimate has a variety of legal connotations. It means legal or proper when used as an adjective. It can also apply to someone who was legally born, that is, not of illegal parents or of illegal issue. In other terms, the person was born into a married couple.
To know more about Legitimate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26622333
#SPJ4
___ is physical evidence or witness testimony other than from the victim that supports the claim that a crime occurred.
Physical proof or witness testimony that backs up the allegation that a crime was committed is referred to as corroborated evidence.
Physical Evidence that supports or verifies prior evidence is referred to as corroborating evidence. It is employed in courts to back up witness testimony. Evidence that tends to confirm a claim that has previously been supported by some prior evidence is referred to as corroborating evidence (or corroboration). For instance, W, a witness, claims she saw X crash his car into a green car. The corroboration rule's fundamental tenet is that an accused person cannot be found guilty of a crime unless the key elements of the crime can be proven through at least two independent sources of evidence.
Learn more about Physical proof from
brainly.com/question/1083531
#SPJ4
when counseling a woman who feels she cannot afford to raise the child she is carrying, a pro-life advocate would most likely
when providing therapy to a pregnant lady who feels she cannot afford to raise the child, She proposes placing the infant for adoption.
The following advantages make using an agency helpful for many women who ask how late they can place their child for adoption after birth: All of everything in one place- When you make a decision, agencies will have waiting families that have already finished their home studies, and they will assist you in formalizing the adoption. Additionally, they'll be able to arrange any upcoming communications between you and the adoptive family. Support and direction Your adoption counsellor can assist you in comprehending your feelings if you are experiencing any uncertainty, confusion, or general overwhelm with the procedure. By doing this, you'll have a better chance of having a successful adoption. Knowledge and experience: Adoption agencies are well-equipped to assist mothers like you who are considering placing their child for adoption before birth and have probably dealt with a great number of circumstances that are quite similar to yours.
Learn about adoption from
brainly.com/question/23680837
#SPJ4
Which case represented the first time the supreme court reviewed and ruled on acts of the other branches of government?.
Marbury v. Madison, arguably the maximum crucial case in Supreme Court history, became the primary U.S. supreme-court case to use the precept of "judicial review" -- the energy of federal courts to void acts of Congress in warfare with the Constitution.
It's Written in 1803 through Chief Justice John Marshall, the selection performed a key function in making the Supreme Court a separate department of presidency on par with Congress and the executive. The information surrounding Marbury have been complicated. In the election of 1800, the newly prepared Democratic-Republican celebration of Thomas Jefferson defeated the Federalist celebration of John Adams.
It's growing an ecosystem of political panic and Adams appointed a huge variety of justices of peace for the District of Columbia whose commissions have been authorized through the Senate, signed through the president, and affixed with the reputable seal of the government. The commissions have been now no longer delivered, however, and while President Jefferson assumed workplace March 5, 1801, he ordered James Madison, his Secretary of State, now no longer to supply them. William Marbury, one of the appointees, then petitioned the Supreme Court for a writ of mandamus, or criminal order, compelling Madison to expose purpose why he need to now no longer get hold of his commission.
Learn more about supreme court visit: brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
What's the case represented when the first time the supreme court reviewed and ruled on acts of the other branches of government?.
comprehensive general liability (cgl) policies are the business equivalent of a homeowner's policy that protects the organization against personal injury claims and loss. A. True B. False
Comprehensive general liability (cgl) policies are the business equivalent of a homeowner's policy - True
If a person's services, business operations, or personnel are at fault for property damage or physical injury or advertising injury, a Comprehensive general liability (CGL) policy will shield the firm from financial loss. Despite not covering all potential dangers, it is regarded as comprehensive company insurance. Businesses can add other businesses or people they do business with as "additional insureds" on their commercial liability insurance policy.
General liability insurance plans may pay for unintentional losses brought on by a firm's operations or the costs of defending a lawsuit. Therefore, comprehensive general liability policies are the firm's version of homeowner's insurance that shields the firm against claims of personal injury and property damage.
Read more about Comprehensive policy on:
https://brainly.com/question/27796742
#SPJ4
in interpreting the harmonized tariff schedule, the courts will look at the common and commercial meaning of the items being imported.
The common and commercial meaning of the imported goods shall be taken into consideration by the courts when interpreting the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The transaction value is the dutiable value after all import-related expenses have been factored into the purchase price for the purpose of determining the amount of duties that must be paid.
HTS codes, which stand for Harmonized Tariff Schedule, make it simple for importers and exporters to locate and determine the tariff or tax that must be paid on their goods. HTS codes are distinctive, 10-digit numbers that are consistently used in international trade, but their tax consequences vary by country. You can look up your HTS code using online resources, certified customs experts, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Importers and exporters need Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes to conduct international trade in goods and correctly determine tariff and product categorization.
Learn more about tariff from
brainly.com/question/19960273
#SPJ4
henry is juror number four in a murder trial. he believes the accused is guilty, but when the jurors vote it becomes clear he is the only one that thinks this way. henry votes not guilty along with the other jurors despite what he sees as evidence clearly indicating guilt. this is an example of the same kind of behavior observed in the studies of conformity.
In a murder trial, Henry is the fourth juror. He thinks the accused is guilty, but it becomes apparent when the jury votes that he is the only one who shares this opinion. Despite what he believes to be conclusive evidence of guilt, Henry joins the other jurors in voting not guilty. The Asch effect is demonstrated here.
The Solomon Asch conformity experiments, commonly referred to as the Asch paradigm, were a set of psychological studies exploring the acceptance or rejection of pressure from the majority and the implications of such impacts on beliefs and ideas. The method was developed in the 1950s and is currently widely used by researchers. Research on the effects of task importance, age, sex, and culture on conformity is one application. The Hawthorne effect may have been observed in these studies, but it was unclear whether subject opinions could actually be changed.
Learn more about Asch effect from
brainly.com/question/15727795
#SPJ4
Under the Articles of Confederation…..
a)Group of answer choices individual states had responsibility and written authority to make military treaties with other countries.
b)all individual state money was to be destroyed effective 1 January 1781 and only silver dollars were to be used.
c) the U.S. national government assumed all the power that the British parliament had to impose taxes.
d) the U.S. national government could only ask states for money.
All individual state money was to be destroyed effective 1 January 1781 and only silver dollars were to be used.
A comprehensive revision of the laws controlling the US Mint was made by the Coinage Act of1781, also referred to as the Mint Act of 1781. By removing the option for owners of silver bullion to continue having their coins produced into standard silver dollars while continuing to permit owners of gold bullion to have their coins transformed into money, the act established a gold standard by default. Three small-denomination coins were also withdrawn, and a Trade dollar with limited legal tender that was largely aimed at export to Asia was introduced. Detractors referred to the occurrence as the "Crime of '73" because it had divisive results. Prior to the California Gold Rush or the American Civil War, the Mint Act of 1781 was established, and it had a significant impact on American history.
Learn more about Act of 1781 from
brainly.com/question/1838614
#SPJ4
to justify recovery based on a quasi-contract, a plaintiff must prove all but which of the following elements? multiple choice the defendant would be enriched by receiving the benefit that was the result of a unilateral mistake on behalf of the plaintiff. the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant. the plaintiff had reasonably expected to be compensated for the benefit conferred on the defendant. the defendant would be unjustly enriched from receiving the benefit without compensating the plaintiff for it.
A plaintiff must establish that everyone else, excluding the plaintiff, gave the defendant a benefit. The plaintiff had legitimately anticipated receiving payment for the benefit given to the defendant in contract law .
The remedies for contract violation are discussed in this fourth and final instalment of a series on practical contract law. Numerous business contracts have explicit provisions for remedies. In a contract for the sale of goods, for instance, the buyer may be able to demand that the seller make good on or replace any defective items. There may be a presumption that the parties included all of the provisions that will govern their contractual relationship in the contract itself, expressly and in writing. They meant to replace any legal rights and remedies that are not mentioned in the contract, such as the buyer's right to terminate the contract for a fundamental breach.
Learn more about contract law from
brainly.com/question/21891824
#SPJ4
First: Choose a song from any music genre that you think captures the essence of one of the criminological theories we have discussed over this semester.
Part 1 – Theory Summary
Choose one of the criminological theories we have covered this semester that you feel is depicted in your chosen song and summarize its: 1) major components, 2) assumptions, and 3) its basic description of the cause of crime. 250-word limit (1 page, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)
Part II – Application
Apply your chosen theory to describe how the song's lyrics embody or capture the theory you have chosen. Describe how the theory’s main propositions are demonstrated through the song's lyrics. 250-word limit (1 page, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, Times New Roman 12-point font)
A song from any music genre that I think captures the essence of one of the criminological theories is Never Change: Song by Jay-Z and the theory talked about is Classical/Rational Choice Theory.
The Theory Summaries are:
Classical/Rational ChoiceSocial ControlDifferential Association/Social LearningAnomieLabelingSubculture of ViolenceLower-Class Focal ConcernsWhat did the song portray?The song portray the fact that crime is a freely made decision in which the costs outweigh the benefits, according to the classical/rational choice theory.
Economics, psychology, and philosophy are just a few of the disciplines where rational choice theory is applicable. According to this view, people make decisions based on their own interests in order to maximize their own benefits. People consider their options before making the decision they believe will best serve them.
Addicts, according to rational choice theorists, aim to get the most out of their delight. In other words, those who are at risk for addiction choose whether or not to consume substances that are addictive.
Therefore, According to the traditional theory of criminology, committing a crime is a free-will decision. The pain-pleasure principle is used to make this decision; it states that people behave in ways that maximize pleasure and minimize pain.
Learn more about criminological theories from
https://brainly.com/question/6790053
#SPJ1
in the senate, the speaker controls legislative debate by selecting who speaks and how long the debate will last. t/f
In the Senate, the speaker does not have a control over the debate, and thus cannot select people who speak and other matters such as the length of the debate. Therefore, the statement given above holds false.
The Senate of the United States, is the most crucial or critical part of the House of Representatives. The US Senate consists of representatives from each individual state, and are responsible for the purpose of managing the duties and exercising the powers available under their jurisdiction. A Senate also consists of a speaker.
Learn more about the Senate here:
https://brainly.com/question/24779287
#SPJ4
Presidents prefer using executive orders to legislation, even when Congress is smoothly processing new legislation. t/f
The exercise of executive orders is not done by the President to pass a legislation, despite the Congress smoothly processing the enforcement of the same. Therefore, the statement given above is completely false.
An executive order can be referred to or considered as an order, which can only be passed by the person in power, i.e., the American President. Such orders are passed by the President when he or she deems fit to pass a legislation with respect to a matter of political and social interest to the society. It is interesting to know that Congress does not have the powers to barge into the matters related to the enforcement of these orders.
Learn more about an executive order here:
https://brainly.com/question/18973126
#SPJ4
governance is a system of rules, policies, and practices that dictate how – a. Company’s Board of directors manage b. oversee the operations c. oversee the operations d. All of the above
The governance of a structure can be regarded as a system of rules, policies, and also certain practical activities that tend to dictate the management and overseeing of operations done by a company's Board of Directors. Therefore, the option D holds true.
The Board of Directors can be referred to or considered as the most important key managerial personnel within an organization. They take the crucial decisions of the organization, which are always in the orientation of the process that ensures achievement of the organizational goals.
Learn more about the Board of Directors here:
https://brainly.com/question/14898210
#SPJ4
civil liberties refer to the extension of government action to secure citizenship rights to all members of society. true / false
By extending government action to guarantee citizenship rights to every member of society, civil liberties are meant. is accurate.
The United Kingdom's constitutional law includes provisions protecting civil liberties, which have a long and influential history. Magna Carta, a key document in the development of British constitutional law, is typically credited with starting this. In the 17th and 18th centuries, common law and statute law, particularly the Bill of Rights of 1689, promoted the development of civil freedoms. Working-class people fought for the right to vote and to join unions during the 19th century. The Reform Act of 1832 was the first piece of new legislation passed by Parliament in response. After the first and second world wars, attitudes regarding voting rights and other freedoms improved. Since that time, the United Kingdom has had a mediated relationship with civil freedoms thanks to its adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights.
Learn more about civil liberties from
brainly.com/question/21572056
#SPJ4
which of the following establishes revised national security adjudicative criteria for determining eligibility for initial or continued access to classified information or eligibility to hold a sensitive position? (select one response)
Critical sensitive establishes revised national security adjudicative criteria for determining eligibility for initial or continued access to classified information or eligibility to hold a sensitive position.
War plan creation or approval, plans for upcoming big or special actions, or crucial and extremely important war things. - the process of granting people security clearances, conducting investigations, or serving on personnel security boards. In the embryo, some organs develop significantly earlier or later than others. When the main developmental changes are about to occur or when an important organ is beginning its initial stage of rapid proliferation or budding, a serious interruption of the developmental progress frequently results in decided injuries to that specific organ, while the embryo as a whole may only experience minor or no negative effects. These specific vulnerable phases of development are what I refer to as Critical sensitive.
Learn more about Critical sensitive from
brainly.com/question/28127485
#SPJ4
bill questions whether there is consideration for her contract with Isaac to exchange her catering services for his payment of a certain amount. To constitute consideration, the value of whatever is exchanged must be
legally sufficient.
Jen queries the existence of compensation for her agreement with Isaac to provide catering services in exchange for his payment of a specific sum. The worth of whatever is transferred must be legally sufficient to qualify as consideration.
Legally sufficient denotes that the document has been examined by a lawyer in the legal department of DHS Headquarters (HQ) or a component and found to be in accordance with all laws, rules, regulations, policies, and procedures that may be in force. Legal sufficiency requires that the consideration be one of the following: a commitment made by a party to take action that is not required by law. a commitment not to do something that a party is legally permitted to do. a commitment made by a party to take action that they otherwise would not be required to take. According to the legal sufficiency model, a case is prosecuted when the essential elements of a crime are present. A prosecutor's office accepts a lot of cases for prosecution under this model, but the majority of cases are resolved through plea agreements.
Learn more about legally sufficient here
https://brainly.com/question/7269067
#SPJ4