The British takeover of Florida from the Spanish during the French and Indian War was a concern for African Americans because Florida had been a key escape location for slaves seeking freedom.
The British acquisition of Florida during the French and Indian War had significant implications for African Americans, particularly those who were enslaved. Florida had served as a crucial escape location for slaves seeking freedom from the oppressive conditions of slavery. Its proximity to British-controlled territories, such as Georgia, provided enslaved individuals with a potential route to liberation. By taking over Florida, the British disrupted this escape route and posed a threat to the freedom-seeking efforts of African Americans.
The significance of Florida as an escape location can be traced back to its unique geographical position and the presence of maroon communities and Native American tribes that provided sanctuary to fugitive slaves. African Americans recognized Florida as a territory where they could potentially establish their own communities and live independently. The British takeover of Florida meant that this refuge was now under British control, which raised concerns among African Americans about the potential loss of their escape route and the freedom they sought.
Learn more about implications here:
https://brainly.com/question/30470225
#SPJ11
Amy and Mike need to borrow $83,000 to buy a house. They want to borrow the money for 15 years at a simple yearly interest rate of 8. 25%. How much interest will they pay?
Amy and Mike will pay $103,875 in interest over the 15-year loan term. This can be calculated by multiplying the loan amount ($83,000) by the interest rate (8.25%) and the loan duration (15 years).
To calculate the total interest paid, we can use the formula: Interest = Principal × Interest Rate × Time.
The principal (loan amount) is $83,000, the interest rate is 8.25% (expressed as a decimal, 0.0825), and the time is 15 years.
Plugging these values into the formula: Interest = $83,000 × 0.0825 × 15 = $103,875.
Therefore, Amy and Mike will pay a total of $103,875 in interest over the 15-year loan term. It's important to note that this calculation assumes simple interest, which means that the interest is calculated only on the initial loan amount and does not compound over time.
The interest payment is a significant factor in the total cost of borrowing and should be taken into account when budgeting for homeownership. Amy and Mike should carefully assess their financial situation and consider whether the total cost, including interest, aligns with their long-term financial goals and ability to make monthly mortgage payments.
Learn more about homeownership here:
https://brainly.com/question/29557280
#SPJ11
Imperialism and Colonialism with active and passive voice
The effects of colonialism and imperialism were different, with colonialism referring to the process of establishing and maintaining colonies, while imperialism involved the extension of power and influence over other nations or territories. The long-term consequences of both for colonized regions were significant, including political, economic, and social effects.
Colonialism typically involved the establishment of settlements in colonized regions, with the colonizers imposing their own political, economic, and cultural systems on the native populations. In contrast, imperialism often involved the imposition of political and economic dominance without the establishment of settlements. Imperialism could be achieved through a variety of means, including military force, economic pressure, or political influence.
The long-term consequences of both colonialism and imperialism were significant for colonized regions. Politically, many colonized regions experienced a loss of sovereignty and self-determination, as well as the imposition of foreign political systems that were not well-suited to local conditions.
---------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
'How did the effects of colonialism differ from those of imperialism, and what were some of the long-term consequences of both for colonized regions?'------------
To know more about colonialism, click here
https://brainly.com/question/1225474
#SPJ1
What event, fueled by intense hatred, led to the deaths of over 11 million people
How has farming in the United States changed in the last 50–100 years?
Responses
a Farms have gotten bigger, and the number of farms has declined.
b American farms now produce mostly grain products.
c The number of people becoming farmers has increased steadily.
d Most farms now grow food using organic methods.
first person gets brainiest
Answer:
Now THAT'S ALOTTA POINTS
Explanation:
The correct response is:
a. Farms have gotten bigger, and the number of farms has declined.
In the last 50-100 years, farming in the United States has experienced significant changes. One major trend is the consolidation of farms, leading to larger farm sizes. This has been driven by advancements in technology, machinery, and agricultural practices, allowing for increased efficiency and productivity. As a result, the number of farms has declined as smaller farms have been absorbed or replaced by larger operations.
Answer:
a Farms have gotten bigger, and the number of farms has declined.
Explanation:
Since 1950 an average farm size has doubled, but the number of laborers decreased substantially and the number of small local farmers has been cut in half. Farmers have been forced to become more efficient and there 's been a reliance on greater chemicals and technology, which has become very extensive and expensive.
Evaluate the Scramble for Africa in light of the concepts of justice, power, and citizenship.
It refers to the European powers' competition for African colonies during the "Scramble for Africa." It took place at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th.
The European nations' competition for control of the most prosperous and influential African colonies is referred to as "Scramble for Africa." European superpowers decided to control how the African continent was divided after the Berlin Conference in 1844–1845.
By 1900, seven major European powers had colonized a significant portion of Africa. For the Africans, government had various adverse consequences, including the deficiency of their regular assets, work abuse, and oppressive tax assessment.
Find out more about the fight for Africa here:
https://brainly.com/question/7738545
#SPJ1
how many years ago was the cypress tree cut to make king tut’s sarcophagi?
King Tutankhamun's sarcophagus, discovered in 1922, was actually made of gold and not from a cypress tree. However, the burial chamber did include a gilded wooden shrine that contained the sarcophagus, which may be what you are referring to.
The cypress wood used for this shrine was most likely cut around the time of King Tut's burial, which occurred in 1323 BCE. It is important to note that cypress trees were not native to Egypt and were imported from the Eastern Mediterranean region.
To calculate the years that have passed since the wood was cut, we can simply subtract the year of King Tut's burial (1323 BCE) from the current year (2022 CE). Keep in mind that there is no year "0" in the calendar, so we must add one year to the difference.
Therefore, the cypress wood used in King Tut's burial chamber was cut approximately 3,345 years ago (1323 + 2022 + 1 = 3,345).
For more questions on: sarcophagus
https://brainly.com/question/13734360
#SPJ11
The correct answer is The cypress tree used to make King Tut's sarcophagi was estimated to have been cut down around 3,300 years ago.
King Tutankhamun was an Egyptian pharaoh who ruled from approximately 1332 BCE to 1323 BCE. His tomb was discovered by archaeologist Howard Carter in 1922 in the Valley of the Kings in Egypt. Among the many treasures found in the tomb were three nested sarcophagi made of wood, the outermost of which was covered in gold and weighed nearly 2,000 pounds. X-ray analysis of the sarcophagi conducted in the 1960s revealed that the wood used to make them was cypress, a type of tree that grows in the Mediterranean region. The tree used was estimated to have been 100 to 120 years old at the time it was cut down, putting its age at around 3,300 years.
To learn more about cypress click the link below:
brainly.com/question/31868530
#SPJ11
The collapse of the soviet union resulted in independent republics that moved to institute democratic reforms and introduce _______market economies.
a) command
b) complex
c) free
The collapse of the Soviet Union resulted in independent republics that moved to institute democratic reforms and introduce free market economies. The answer is (c) free.
The transition from a command economy to a free market economy was a significant development that occurred in many of the former Soviet republics after the collapse of the Soviet Union. The command economy, which was characteristic of the Soviet system, involved central planning and state control over economic activities. However, the collapse of the Soviet Union led to a shift towards democratic reforms and the adoption of market-oriented economic systems. These reforms aimed to promote private ownership, competition, and the free flow of goods and services. By embracing free market economies, these newly independent republics sought to encourage entrepreneurship, attract foreign investment, and stimulate economic growth.
Learn more about free market economies here:
https://brainly.com/question/30281184
#SPJ11
The most serious blow to Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam policy was the ___ ___ of 1968.
The most serious blow to Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam policy was the Tet Offensive of 1968.
This was a major military operation launched by the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong forces against South Vietnam and the United States. The offensive was unexpected and caught the US and South Vietnamese forces off guard. The offensive lasted for several months and resulted in heavy casualties on both sides.
The Tet Offensive was a turning point in the Vietnam War and had a significant impact on US public opinion and political support for the war. Prior to the offensive, the US government had portrayed the war as being under control and progress was being made towards victory.
However, the Tet Offensive exposed the reality of the war, that it was far from being won. The media coverage of the offensive showed the public the brutal reality of the war, and the high cost of American lives.
The Tet Offensive also shattered the US government's credibility and trust with the American people. The offensive had revealed that the US government had been misleading the public about the progress of the war and the military situation on the ground.
This revelation led to a loss of faith in the Johnson administration and the government's ability to manage the war.
In conclusion, the Tet Offensive of 1968 was the most serious blow to Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam policy. It exposed the reality of the war to the American people, shattered their trust in the government, and led to a significant decline in political support for the war effort.
For more question on policy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/20444496
#SPJ11
Describe both a PUSH and a PULL factor about the Irish Potato Famine in Ireland from 1845-1849. Answer in your own words
PUSH factor: The Irish Potato Famine in Ireland from 1845-1849 was characterized by a devastating push factor, which was the widespread failure of the potato crop. PULL factor: A significant pull factor during the Irish Potato Famine was the promise of hope and relief that emigration presented to the Irish population.
PUSH factor: The Irish Potato Famine in Ireland from 1845-1849 was characterized by a devastating push factor, which was the widespread failure of the potato crop. The potato, being the staple food for a significant portion of the Irish population, suffered from a potato blight that destroyed the crops year after year. This catastrophic event pushed the Irish people into a state of extreme poverty and famine, as their main source of sustenance and livelihood was decimated.
PULL factor: A significant pull factor during the Irish Potato Famine was the promise of hope and relief that emigration presented to the Irish population. Faced with dire circumstances and the inability to sustain themselves, many Irish individuals and families were drawn towards the idea of leaving their homeland in search of better opportunities and a chance for survival. Countries such as the United States and Canada offered the prospect of employment, land, and a fresh start, providing a pull factor for the Irish to leave their country in the hopes of a better future. This pull factor fueled a significant wave of Irish emigration during and after the potato famine.
Learn more about Irish Potato Famine
https://brainly.com/question/30204054
#SPJ11
Identify three of the professions mentioned in The Satire of the Trades, and why does
the author belittle these professions?
Three professions mentioned in "The Satire of the Trades" are lawyers, physicians, and priests. The author belittles these professions due to their perceived greed, incompetence, and hypocrisy.
In "The Satire of the Trades," the author mocks lawyers, physicians, and priests, highlighting the negative aspects of their professions. The author belittles lawyers primarily for their greed and deceitful practices. Lawyers are portrayed as individuals who exploit legal loopholes, charging exorbitant fees and prolonging cases for personal gain. The author criticizes their lack of integrity and their tendency to prioritize monetary gains over justice.
Physicians, on the other hand, are ridiculed for their incompetence and ineffectiveness. The author satirizes their inability to cure diseases or provide proper medical care. Physicians are depicted as individuals who are more interested in making money than in genuinely helping their patients. The author suggests that they often rely on ineffective remedies or experimental treatments, demonstrating their lack of skill and knowledge in the medical field.
Priests are also targets of the author's satire, mainly due to their perceived hypocrisy. The author criticizes priests for their moral failings and insincerity in practicing their faith. They are portrayed as individuals who preach piety and righteousness but engage in immoral behavior behind closed doors. The author highlights the discrepancy between their public image and their private actions, emphasizing the hypocrisy within the priesthood.
Learn more about hypocrisy here:
https://brainly.com/question/29886703
#SPJ11
What was the “Iron Curtain” that Winston Churchill referred to?
A wall of Soviet missiles positioned along its border
A way to push the Soviet Union out of Eastern Europe
An imaginary line that separated communist countries from free countries in Europe
is An imaginary line that separated communist countries from free countries in Europe
Answer:
nn
Explanation:
1. ANALYZE CAUSE AND EFFECT What factors caused tension during the election of 1800?
Political differences, personal animosity between candidates, campaign strategies, and contentious issues such as federal power and foreign policy.
The election of 1800 was marked by several factors that caused tension. One major factor was the deep ideological divide between the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans.
The Federalists, led by John Adams, favored a strong central government and were suspicious of excessive democracy, while the Democratic-Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, championed states' rights and agrarianism.
This ideological clash led to fierce political debates and personal attacks during the campaign.
Another factor was the intense rivalry between Adams and Jefferson themselves.
Both men had been close allies during the American Revolution but later became bitter adversaries.
Their personal animosity fueled the tension and added a personal dimension to the political contest.
Furthermore, the contentious issues of the time, such as the Alien and Sedition Acts and the role of the federal government, also contributed to the tension.
These policies sparked debates about civil liberties and the scope of federal power, further dividing the electorate.
Overall, the combination of ideological differences, personal rivalry, and contentious issues created a highly charged and tense atmosphere during the election of 1800.
For more such questions on Federal power:
https://brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ11
Examine the reasons why so many artists were seeking a different world. Help please
Many artists during different time periods sought a different world for various reasons.
Artists often seek a different world as a form of artistic expression and as a response to the social, political, and cultural climate of their time. They may challenge existing norms, question authority, and propose alternative visions through their work. Artists seek to provoke thought, inspire change, and create a more idealistic or utopian society through their art. Their motivations can range from personal experiences and observations to broader societal concerns such as injustice, inequality, war, or environmental issues. By envisioning a different world, artists aim to stimulate dialogue, raise awareness, and encourage viewers to consider alternative possibilities for a better future.
Learn more about seeking a different world here:
https://brainly.com/question/31951288
#SPJ11
You own a small Roman farm in the 100s b. C write a letter to a friend describing the changes you have witnessed in agriculture and and the Roman government.
The Roman government refers to the system of governance and political institutions that operated in ancient Rome, characterized by a combination of republican and imperial elements.
Dear [Friend's Name],
I hope this letter finds you well. I wanted to share with you the changes I have witnessed in agriculture and the Roman government during these times in the 100s BC. In terms of agriculture, there have been significant advancements and improvements. Our small Roman farm has embraced new techniques and tools that have enhanced productivity. We have adopted more efficient plows, better irrigation systems, and advanced crop rotation methods. These innovations have allowed us to cultivate the land more effectively, resulting in better yields and a more sustainable farming practice. In regards to the Roman government, there have been notable transformations.
Learn more about Roman government here:
https://brainly.com/question/14489465
#SPJ11
What nations were divided in half due to the Cold War
What proved that the brown decision had not ended racial discrimination?
Continued racial discrimination and segregation in various aspects of society, such as housing, public facilities, and education, demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not effectively ended racial discrimination.
While the Brown v. Board of Education decision in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, it did not bring an immediate end to racial discrimination. Numerous factors and subsequent events revealed that racial discrimination persisted in various forms, indicating that the impact of the Brown decision was limited.
One significant indicator was the persistence of racial segregation in schools. Despite the Court's ruling, many schools and districts resisted desegregation efforts, implementing tactics such as "token" integration, "separate but equal" policies, or outright defiance. The slow pace of desegregation efforts and the persistent existence of racially segregated schools illustrated that the Brown decision alone did not effectively eliminate racial discrimination in education.
Moreover, racial discrimination persisted in other areas beyond education. Housing discrimination, for example, prevented African Americans from accessing certain neighborhoods, perpetuating residential segregation and unequal opportunities. Discrimination in public facilities, such as restaurants, hotels, and transportation, also continued to limit equal access and treatment for people of color.
Additionally, discriminatory practices and attitudes persisted in employment, voting rights, and criminal justice , among other spheres. Racial disparities in income, employment opportunities, and criminal justice outcomes highlighted the ongoing presence of racial discrimination.
In summary, the existence of continued racial discrimination and segregation in housing, public facilities, education, employment, and other areas clearly demonstrated that the Brown v. Board of Education decision had not successfully ended racial discrimination. The decision marked an important milestone, but the struggle for racial equality and the dismantling of systemic discrimination required further efforts and legal developments beyond the initial ruling.
Learn more about justice here:
https://brainly.com/question/14830074
#SPJ11
All of the following were guitarists for the Yardbirds EXCEPT:
jimmy page,
jeff beck,
john maclaughlin,
eric clapton.
c). John McLaughlin was not a guitarist for the Yardbirds
The other three options, Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Eric Clapton, were all guitarists for the Yardbirds at different times. Jimmy Page played with the Yardbirds from 1966 to 1968,
Jeff Beck was with the band from 1965 to 1966 and Eric Clapton played with the Yardbirds from 1963 to 1965. The Yardbirds were an influential British rock band of the 1960s that helped launch the careers of several famous guitarists.
They were known for their experimentation with different musical styles and their innovative use of guitar effects. Some of their most famous songs include "For Your Love," "Heart Full of Soul," and "Shapes of Things."
Therefore the correct option is c). John McLaughlin
To know more about guitarist refer to
https://brainly.com/question/31042588
#SPJ11
John Maclaughlin was not a guitarist for the Yardbirds. The guitarists for this band were Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Eric Clapton.
Explanation:The Yardbirds were a famous rock band known for having some of the most talented guitarists of their time. However, John Maclaughlin was not one of them. The guitarists who played for the Yardbirds were Jimmy Page, Jeff Beck, and Eric Clapton.
Learn more about Yardbirds guitarists here:https://brainly.com/question/30226298
TRUE/FALSE. Abraham Lincoln's plan at the start of the Civil War was to immediately end slavery and to fight a long, defensive war against the Southern states.
Answer:
false
Explanation:
while he did want to abolish slavery he did not want to fight a war, but he was willing to fight a war to abolish slavery
Answer:
false
Explanation:
Why did Floridians ask to enter
the Union as a slave state? Who led the government and
politics of the region at the time?
Florida became a U.S. territory in 1821 and was admitted to the Union as a slave state in 1845. The primary reason for Florida's request to enter the Union as a slave state was due to the economic importance of slavery in the region's agricultural industry, particularly in the cultivation of cotton and sugar.
Slavery had become a significant source of wealth for many plantation owners in Florida, and they sought to protect their economic interests by maintaining the institution of slavery.
Florida's territorial government at the time was led by Governor William Duval, who served from 1822 to 1834. During his tenure, he oversaw the development of Florida's economy and the expansion of its agricultural industry, which was heavily dependent on slave labor.
In 1835, a Seminole Indian uprising erupted in Florida, leading to a conflict that lasted for several years. This conflict further highlighted the importance of maintaining slavery in the region as a means of controlling the local population and protecting the economic interests of plantation owners.
Florida's statehood was granted under the presidency of John Tyler, and its first governor was William Dunn Moseley, a Democrat who served from 1845 to 1849. Moseley was a strong advocate for states' rights and supported the institution of slavery, which was an integral part of Florida's economy and society at the time.
Despite the political tensions and conflicts that arose from the issue of slavery, Florida continued to be a slave state until the end of the Civil War in 1865, when slavery was abolished throughout the United States.
for similar questions on Florida
https://brainly.com/question/20446172
#SPJ11
Why did the tsarista, alexandra, have complete faith in rasputin as a holy man?
This miraculous healing created a strong bond between Rasputin and the royal family, leading Alexandra to believe in his divine abilities.
Additionally, Rasputin presented himself as a mystic and spiritual advisor, offering guidance on matters of faith and personal matters. He cultivated a close relationship with Alexandra, who saw him as a confidant and trusted advisor. Rasputin's influence over the Tsarina extended beyond spiritual matters, as he also provided counsel on political decisions, further solidifying her trust in him. It is important to note that historical perspectives on Rasputin's influence and his relationship with the Tsarina vary, and opinions differ regarding the extent of his control over the royal family and its impact on Russian history.
Learn more about Rasputin and the royal family here:
https://brainly.com/question/30806456
#SPJ11
T/F: olaudah equiano and john wesley both offer arguments against the growing trans-atlantic slave trade
True. Both Olaudah Equiano and John Wesley were strong opponents of the trans-Atlantic slave trade and offered compelling arguments against it.
Equiano, who was a former slave himself, wrote about his experiences in his autobiography, "The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano", which became a popular and influential text in the abolitionist movement. In it, he highlighted the cruelty and inhumanity of the slave trade and argued for its abolition. Wesley, a prominent Christian theologian and founder of the Methodist movement, also spoke out against slavery, calling it a sin and a violation of human rights. He published several sermons and pamphlets condemning the slave trade and worked with other abolitionists to bring an end to it. Both Equiano and Wesley's contributions were important in raising awareness about the horrors of the trans-Atlantic slave trade and helping to bring about its eventual abolition.
To know more about Slave visit :
https://brainly.com/question/16747534
#SPJ11
Explain two factors that could make the public resort to volent ways of protesing
Two factors that could make the public resort to violent ways of protesting are perceived injustice and a lack of peaceful avenues for expressing grievances.
Perceived injustice is a powerful motivator that can drive individuals or groups to take extreme measures. When people feel that their fundamental rights, freedoms, or interests are being violated or ignored, they may become frustrated, angry, and disillusioned with peaceful methods of protest. They may believe that peaceful avenues, such as dialogue or negotiation, have failed to bring about meaningful change, leading them to resort to violence as a means to be heard and to disrupt the status quo.
A lack of peaceful avenues for expressing grievances can also contribute to the adoption of violent protest tactics. When individuals or groups feel marginalized or excluded from the political process, they may perceive nonviolent methods as ineffective or futile. If peaceful channels for expressing concerns, such as peaceful protests, public debates, or access to fair legal mechanisms, are suppressed or inaccessible, individuals may feel compelled to resort to violence as a way to amplify their message and compel a response from those in power.
While violence in protests is a complex issue, understanding these underlying factors can help address root causes and promote peaceful means of expressing dissent and effecting change.
Learn more about violent ways of protesting
https://brainly.com/question/31008177
#SPJ11
Explain how an interest group could use the holding in Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization to further its agenda.
Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization (CIO) was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1939.
The case dealt with the issue of free speech rights and the ability of interest groups to hold public meetings in public spaces.
In Hague v. CIO, the Court held that the denial of permits by the Mayor of Jersey City, New Jersey, to the CIO to hold public meetings in public parks violated the First Amendment rights of the organization and its members. The Court emphasized that public spaces, such as parks, are considered traditional public forums where individuals and groups have a right to express their views.
An interest group, seeking to further its agenda, could utilize the holding in Hague v. CIO in several ways:
1. Right to Assembly: The case affirms the right of individuals and interest groups to assemble and hold meetings in public spaces. An interest group could leverage this ruling to secure permits and organize public gatherings or rallies to raise awareness about its agenda or advocate for policy changes.
2. Freedom of Speech: The Court's decision in Hague v. CIO highlights the protection of free speech rights. An interest group could utilize this precedent to argue against any attempts by authorities to limit or suppress their freedom of speech, such as restrictions on protest activities or attempts to silence dissenting voices.
3. Public Awareness and Mobilization: The case underscores the importance of public spaces as venues for public expression and engagement. An interest group could utilize the ruling to mobilize its supporters and rally public opinion by organizing events or demonstrations in public spaces, thereby gaining visibility and drawing attention to its cause.
4. Legal Precedent: The holding in Hague v. CIO established a legal precedent that can be cited in future court cases involving restrictions on the right to assemble or freedom of speech in public spaces. An interest group could invoke this precedent to challenge similar denials of permits or limitations on their activities, asserting their constitutional rights.
It is worth noting that the specific ways in which an interest group may leverage the holding in Hague v. CIO will depend on the nature of their agenda, the legal framework in place, and the particular circumstances of their advocacy efforts.
Learn more about freedom here:
https://brainly.com/question/7723076
#SPJ11
Who overturned a treaty signed by the Creek Nation in 1825 that ceded
its remaining land to the state of Georgia?
The treaty signed by the Creek Nation in 1825 that ceded its remaining land to the state of Georgia was overturned by the US Supreme Court in the case Worcester v. Georgia in 1832.
In the landmark case of Worcester v. Georgia in 1832, Chief Justice John Marshall ruled that the treaty was invalid because only the federal government, not individual states, had the authority to negotiate treaties with Native American nations. The case was brought by Samuel Worcester, a missionary who was arrested by Georgia authorities for living and working on Creek lands without a state license. Worcester and his attorneys argued that the state of Georgia had no jurisdiction over the Creek Nation, as it was a sovereign nation with whom the United States had signed treaties. In his opinion, Chief Justice Marshall affirmed the sovereignty of the Creek Nation and other Native American nations, stating that they were "distinct, independent political communities, retaining their original natural rights." He declared that the United States had made a commitment to protect these nations in treaties, and that the federal government had the ultimate authority to regulate relations with them. The ruling in Worcester v. Georgia was a significant victory for Native American rights, and it established the principle of tribal sovereignty that continues to be recognized by the U.S. government today.
for more such questions on treaty
https://brainly.com/question/14254077
#SPJ11
Why was Europe’s "New Imperialism" abroad essentially a movement to maintain the existing
state of social and political affairs at home by the late nineteenth century?
Answer:
In the late 1800's, economic, political, and religious motives prompted these nations to expand their influence over other regions, each with a goal to increase their power across the globe.
Explanation:
compare communism between china and the soviet union
The Marxist ideology of Chinese communism distinguished it from Soviet communism. Their perception of the peasantry as having played a significant role in the communist revolution was a significant difference.
The Soviet people, on the other hand, trusted a "revolutionary elite" of intellectuals and urban workers rather than the poor in the countryside. The leaders of Chinese communism saw themselves as guides for urban workers, whereas those of Soviet communism saw themselves as serving peasants in the countryside directly.
Chinese communism changed its philosophy to support a peasant revolution, whereas Russian communism favored a workers' revolution.As a result, the Soviet leaders viewed themselves as guides for urban workers, whereas the Chinese communist leaders worked directly to serve rural peasants.
Read more about Communism
https://brainly.com/question/3269798
#SPJ1
Why did the Rich live in the European city centers
The rich lived in European city centers due to proximity to commercial activities, cultural institutions, and social gatherings, reflecting their social status and access to amenities and opportunities.
The rich lived in European city centers for several reasons. Firstly, city centers were hubs of economic activity, with thriving markets, trade, and commerce. Living in close proximity to these centers allowed the wealthy to monitor and engage in business activities more conveniently.
Secondly, city centers were home to cultural institutions, such as theaters, opera houses, and museums, offering entertainment, intellectual stimulation, and social prestige. The rich valued the proximity to these cultural amenities, which were often concentrated in urban areas.
Furthermore, city centers provided a social environment that catered to the elite. Exclusive clubs, high-end restaurants, and luxurious residences were common in these areas, enabling the rich to socialize and network with their peers.
Lastly, city centers provided convenient access to transportation networks, allowing the wealthy to travel easily within the city and beyond. This was particularly important for individuals involved in international trade or diplomatic affairs.
Overall, living in European city centers offered the rich a combination of economic opportunities, cultural amenities, social connections, and convenient transportation, reflecting their status and desire for a comfortable lifestyle.
For more such question on commercial activities
https://brainly.com/question/17632205
#SPJ11
Speech
C: Santorum
Close reading According to this speech,
what were reasons to support or oppose
the resolution?
To defuse the theant Sad-9/11
clam Hussein poses to his
people.
Need this resolution will
help get Support
C: Santorum
Historical context. According to this speech
what historical events influenced the senator's
decision about whether to support the
resolution?
•pleading for sanity
to prevent further
•New Yorkers got burned ond
Killed.
Communist aggression
repel armed attacks.
9/11 changed everything
In this speech by Senator Santorum, the reasons to support the resolution are to defuse the threat posed by Saddam Hussein to his people and to garner support for the resolution.
The senator believes that the resolution is necessary to protect the safety and well-being of the Iraqi people and to address the potential danger posed by Saddam Hussein. By supporting the resolution, Santorum argues that it will help in preventing further acts of violence and terrorism.In terms of historical context, the senator's decision to support the resolution is influenced by the events of 9/11. The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001, had a profound impact on the senator's perspective and understanding of the need to confront and repel acts of aggression. The attack on the World Trade Center in New York City resulted in the loss of lives and highlighted the threat of terrorism. As a result, the senator believes that the events of 9/11 fundamentally changed the geopolitical landscape and necessitated a strong response to ensure national security.Overall, Senator Santorum supports the resolution based on the perceived threat posed by Saddam Hussein and the belief that it is essential to confront and prevent acts of aggression in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks. The historical context of the speech underscores the senator's determination to prioritize national security and the safety of the American people. The complete question should be What were the reasons given in the speech for supporting or opposing the resolution, and what historical events influenced the senator's decision?For more questions on Saddam Hussein
https://brainly.com/question/1017250
#SPJ8
During the 12th century, inspired by ______ culture, Islamic civilization developed new iwan forms mosques.
Answer: During the 12th century, inspired by Persian culture, Islamic civilization developed new iwan forms mosques.
How did the supreme court strengthen the rights of people accused of a crime
The Supreme Court strengthened the rights of people accused of a crime through various landmark decisions that upheld constitutional protections and ensured fair treatment throughout the criminal justice process.
One of the significant ways the Supreme Court strengthened these rights was through the recognition and enforcement of the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments of the United States Constitution. These amendments guarantee the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, protection against self-incrimination, the right to a fair trial, and protection against cruel and unusual punishment.
The Supreme Court's rulings, such as Miranda v. Arizona (1966) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), established crucial principles to safeguard the rights of the accused. Miranda v. Arizona introduced the requirement of reading suspects their rights (Miranda rights) before custodial interrogations, ensuring that individuals are aware of their rights against self-incrimination. Gideon v. Wainwright established the right to counsel, ensuring that defendants who cannot afford an attorney are provided with legal representation.
These landmark decisions and others like them have played a vital role in enhancing the legal protections and procedural safeguards for individuals accused of crimes, ensuring a fair and just criminal justice system.
Learn more about rights of people accused
https://brainly.com/question/1057825
#SPJ11