An observer(o) is located 500 feet from a school (s). The observer notices a bird (b) flying at a 39 degree angle of elevation from his line of sight. How high is the bird flying over the school?

Marcus's new balance after depositing his paycheck will be $1266.15.

To calculate Marcus's new balance after depositing his paycheck, we need to add the amount of his paycheck to his current balance.

Current balance: $640.31

Paycheck amount: $625.84

To add these two amounts, we can align the decimal points and add the numbers as follows:

     $640.31

+    $625.84

_____________

  $1266.15

To know more about points visit:

brainly.com/question/30891638

#SPJ11

We have expressed the given expression 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) as the sum of two terms: 0.5d - 0.5 and 0.75.

The given expression 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) is to be rewritten as the sum of two terms.

Let's simplify the given expression 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) as follows:

0.75 + 0.5(d - 1)0.75 + 0.5d - 0.5

Now, we have to represent the given expression as the sum of two terms.

Hence, we have to separate the two terms using a comma:

0.5d - 0.5, 0.75

Therefore, the expression 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) can be rewritten as the sum of two terms 0.5d - 0.5 and 0.75.

The given expression is 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1).

We are to represent this expression as the sum of two terms.

To do this, we start by simplifying the given expression by combining like terms.

0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) = 0.5d - 0.5 + 0.75

Next, we represent the expression 0.5d - 0.5 + 0.75 as the sum of two terms.

These two terms are 0.5d - 0.5 and 0.75, separated by a comma.

Therefore, we have expressed the given expression 0.75 + 0.5(d - 1) as the sum of two terms: 0.5d - 0.5 and 0.75.

To know more about expression visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28170201

#SPJ11

Thus, the velocity function v(t) for the given  acceleration of a model car is given:

v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }.

The given acceleration function is att)-1cm/sec', which means that the acceleration is negative and constant at -1cm/sec' for all values of t less than 1. We also know that the initial velocity at t=0 is 1 cm/sec.

To find the velocity function v(t), we need to integrate the acceleration function with respect to time.

For t less than 1, we have

att) = dv/dt = -1
Integrating both sides with respect to t, we get
v(t) - v(0) = -t
Substituting v(0) = 1 cm/sec, we get
v(t) = 1 - t cm/sec for 0<=t<1

For t greater than or equal to 1, the acceleration is zero, which means the velocity is constant.
Using the initial velocity at t=0 as 1 cm/sec, we have
v(t) = 1 cm/sec for t>=1

Therefore, the velocity function v(t) is given by
v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }

Thus, the  velocity function v(t) for the given  acceleration of a model car is given v(t) = { 1-t cm/sec for 0<=t<1;
        1 cm/sec for t>=1 }.

Know more about the velocity function

https://brainly.com/question/25749514

#SPJ11

The solution to the initial value problem dx/dt = ax with x(0) = x0, where a = −5/2 or 3/2, and x0 = 1/4 is x(t) = (1/4) e^(-5/2t) or x(t) = (1/4) e^(3/2t), respectively.

The initial value problem dx/dt = ax with x(0) = x0, where a = −5/2 or 3/2, and x0 = 1/4 can be solved using the formula x(t) = x0 e^(at).
Substituting the given values, we get x(t) = (1/4) e^(-5/2t) or x(t) = (1/4) e^(3/2t).
To check the validity of these solutions, we can differentiate both sides of the equation x(t) = x0 e^(at) with respect to time t, which gives us dx/dt = ax0 e^(at).
Substituting the given value of a and x0, we get dx/dt = (-5/2)(1/4) e^(-5/2t) or dx/dt = (3/2)(1/4) e^(3/2t).
Comparing these with the given equation dx/dt = ax, we can see that they match, thus proving the validity of the initial solutions.
In summary, the solution to the initial value problem dx/dt = ax with x(0) = x0, where a = −5/2 or 3/2, and x0 = 1/4 is x(t) = (1/4) e^(-5/2t) or x(t) = (1/4) e^(3/2t), respectively.

To know more about Initial Value Problem visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30547172
#SPJ11

(a) To find the velocity after 2 seconds, we need to take the derivative of s(t) with respect to time t. It takes 9.25 seconds for the velocity to reach 40 m/s.

s(t) = 3t + 2t^2
s'(t) = 3 + 4t
Plugging in t = 2, we get:
s'(2) = 3 + 4(2) = 11
Therefore, the velocity after 2 seconds is 11 m/s.
(b) To find how long it takes for the velocity to reach 40 m/s, we need to set s'(t) = 40 and solve for t.
3 + 4t = 40
4t = 37
t = 9.25 seconds (rounded to two decimal places)

Learn more about m/s here:

https://brainly.com/question/29754083

#SPJ11

There are 59,280 to choose a president, a treasurer, and a secretary from a committee with forty members.

Given that it is to be chosen a president, a treasurer, and a secretary from a committee with forty members.

We need to find in how many ways could the three officers be chosen,

So, using the concept Permutation for the same,

ⁿPₓ = n! / (n-x)!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40! / (40-3)!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40! / 37!

⁴⁰P₃ = 40 x 39 x 38 x 37! / 37!

= 59,280

Hence we can choose in 59,280 ways.

Learn more about Permutation click;

https://brainly.com/question/29990226

#SPJ1

Given that General Motors' stock fell from $39.57 per share in 2013 to $28.72 per share in 2016.

If a person bought and sold 8 shares at these prices, the loss as a percent of the purchase price is as follows:

First, calculate the total cost of purchasing 8 shares in 2013.

It is given that the price of each share was $39.57 per share in 2013.

Hence the total cost of purchasing 8 shares in 2013 will be

= 8 × $39.57

= $316.56.  

Now, calculate the revenue received by selling 8 shares in 2016.

It is given that the price of each share was $28.72 per share in 2016.

Hence the total revenue received by selling 8 shares in 2016 will be

= 8 × $28.72

= $229.76.

The loss will be the difference between the purchase cost and selling price i.e loss = Purchase cost - Selling price

= $316.56 - $229.76

= $86.8

Therefore, the loss incurred on the purchase and selling of 8 shares is $86.8.

Now, calculate the loss percentage.

The formula for loss percentage is given by the formula:

Loss percentage = (Loss/Cost price) × 100.

Loss = $86.8 and Cost price = $316.56

∴ Loss percentage = (86.8/316.56) × 100

= 27.4%.

Therefore, the loss percentage is 27.4%.

To know more about stock visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31940696

#SPJ11

The dot product of two vectors ~u and ~v is defined as ~u · ~v = ||~u|| ||~v|| cosθ, where ||~u|| and ||~v|| are the magnitudes of ~u and ~v, respectively, The statement is false. It is not necessarily true that either ~u or ~v equals the zero vector if ~u · ~v = 0.

The dot product of two vectors ~u and ~v is defined as ~u · ~v = ||~u|| ||~v|| cosθ, where ||~u|| and ||~v|| are the magnitudes of ~u and ~v, respectively, and θ is the angle between ~u and ~v. If ~u · ~v = 0, then cosθ = 0, which means that θ = π/2 (or any odd multiple of π/2). This implies that ~u and ~v are orthogonal, or perpendicular, to each other.

In general, if ~u · ~v = 0, it only means that ~u and ~v are orthogonal, and there are infinitely many non-zero vectors that can be orthogonal to a given vector. Therefore, we cannot conclude that either ~u or ~v is the zero vector based solely on their dot product being zero.

However, it is possible for two non-zero vectors to be orthogonal to each other. For example, consider the vectors ~u = (1, 0, 0) and ~v = (0, 1, 0). These vectors are non-zero and orthogonal, since ~u · ~v = 0, but neither ~u nor ~v equals the zero vector.

Therefore, the statement that ~u · ~v = 0 implies ~u = ~0 or ~v = ~0 is false.

Learn more about dot product here:

https://brainly.com/question/30404163

#SPJ11

The width of the parking lot is 64 yards.

We are given that;

Width=8feet

Number of parking spots=24

Now,

Step 1: Multiply the width of each parking spot by the number of parking spots to get the total width in feet

Each parking spot is 8 feet wide and there are 24 parking spots side by side. So, the total width in feet is:

8 x 24 = 192 feet

Step 2: Divide the total width in feet by 3 to convert it to yards

One yard is equal to 3 feet1. So, to convert feet to yards, we need to divide by 3. The width in yards is:

192 / 3 = 64 yards

Therefore, by algebra the answer will be 64 yards.

More about the Algebra link is given below.

brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

a) The slope of the function is $40/day, indicating that the balance in the bank account increases by $40 for each day that passes.

b) Point-slope form: g(x) - 600 = 40(x - 0). Slope-intercept form: g(x) = 40x + 600. Standard form: -40x + g(x) = -600.

c) Function notation: g(x) = 40x + 600.

d) The balance in the bank account after 7 days would be $920.

a) The slope of a linear function represents the rate of change. In this case, the slope of the function g(x) is $40/day. This means that for each day that passes (x increases by 1), the balance in the bank account (g(x)) increases by $40.

b) Point-slope form of a linear equation is given by the formula y - y₁ = m(x - x₁), where m is the slope and (x₁, y₁) is a point on the line. Using the point (0, 600) and the slope of 40, we get g(x) - 600 = 40(x - 0), which simplifies to g(x) - 600 = 40x.

Slope-intercept form of a linear equation is y = mx + b, where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. By rearranging the point-slope form, we find g(x) = 40x + 600.

Standard form of a linear equation is Ax + By = C, where A, B, and C are constants. Rearranging the slope-intercept form, we get -40x + g(x) = -600.

c) The equation of the line using function notation is g(x) = 40x + 600.

d) To find the balance in the bank account after 7 days, we substitute x = 7 into the function g(x) = 40x + 600. Evaluating the equation, we find g(7) = 40 * 7 + 600 = 280 + 600 = $920. Therefore, the balance in the bank account after 7 days would be $920.

Learn more about Slope-intercept here:

https://brainly.com/question/30216543

#SPJ11

To show that A2 is similar to B2 if A is similar to B, we need to show that there exists an invertible matrix Q such that A2 = QB2Q-1.

Using the relationship A = PCP from the given information, we can express A2 as A2 = (PCP)(PCP) = PCPCP. We can then substitute B for A in this expression to obtain B2 = PBPCP.

To show that A2 is similar to B2, we need to find an invertible matrix Q such that A2 = QB2Q-1.

Know more about the invertible matrix

https://brainly.com/question/30403440

#SPJ11

The line integral of the conservative vector field F along C is approximately 14.45.

To compute the line integral of a conservative vector field along a curve, we can use the fundamental theorem of line integrals, which states that if F = ∇f, where f is a scalar function, then the line integral of F along a curve C is equal to the difference in the values of f evaluated at the endpoints of C.

In this case, we have the conservative vector field F(x, y) = (25x² + 9y, 225x² + 973). To find the potential function f, we integrate each component of F with respect to its respective variable:

∫(25x² + 9y) dx = (25/3)x³ + 9xy + g(y),

∫(225x² + 973) dy = 225xy + 973y + h(x).

Here, g(y) and h(x) are integration constants that can depend on the other variable. However, since C is a closed curve, the endpoints are the same, and we can ignore these constants. Therefore, we have f(x, y) = (25/3)x³ + 9xy + (225/2)xy + 973y.

Next, we parameterize the portion of the unit circle C in the first quadrant. Let's use x = cos(t) and y = sin(t), where t ranges from 0 to π/2.

The line integral of F along C is given by:

∫(F · dr) = ∫(F(x, y) · (dx, dy)) = ∫((25x² + 9y)dx + (225x² + 973)dy)

= ∫((25cos²(t) + 9sin(t))(-sin(t) dt + (225cos²(t) + 973)cos(t) dt)

= ∫((25cos²(t) + 9sin(t))(-sin(t) + (225cos²(t) + 973)cos(t)) dt.

Evaluating this integral over the range 0 to π/2 will give us the line integral along C. Let's calculate it using numerical methods:

∫((25cos²(t) + 9sin(t))(-sin(t) + (225cos²(t) + 973)cos(t)) dt ≈ 14.45 (rounded to 2 decimal places).

Therefore, the line integral of the conservative vector field F along C is approximately 14.45.

To know more about integral refer to

https://brainly.com/question/31109342

#SPJ11

The probability that at least one of the four computer chips has a voltage exceeding 43V is approximately 0.9999961 or 99.99961%.

To solve this problem, we need to use the normal distribution formula and the concept of probability.
The normal distribution formula is:
Z = (X - μ) / σ

where Z is the standard normal variable, X is the value of the random variable (in this case, the breakdown voltage), μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

To find the probability that at least one of the four computer chips has a voltage exceeding 43V, we need to find the probability of the complement event, which is the probability that none of the four chips has a voltage exceeding 43V.

Let's calculate the Z-score for 43V:
Z = (43 - 40) / 1.5 = 2

Now, we need to find the probability that one chip has a voltage of 43V or less. This can be calculated using the standard normal distribution table or calculator.

The probability is:
P(Z ≤ 2) = 0.9772

Therefore, the probability that one chip has a voltage exceeding 43V is:
P(X > 43) = 1 - P(X ≤ 43) = 1 - 0.9772 = 0.0228

Now, we can find the probability that none of the four chips have a voltage exceeding 43V by multiplying this probability four times (because the chips are selected independently of each other):
P(none of the chips have a voltage exceeding 43V) = 0.0228⁴ = 0.0000039

Finally, we can find the probability that at least one chip has a voltage exceeding 43V by subtracting this probability from 1:
P(at least one chip has a voltage exceeding 43V) = 1 - P(none of the chips have a voltage exceeding 43V) = 1 - 0.0000039 = 0.9999961

Therefore, the probability that at least one of the four computer chips has a voltage exceeding 43V is approximately 0.9999961 or 99.99961%.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/251701

#SPJ11

To find the common ratio of a geometric sequence, we divide any term by its preceding term. Let's calculate the common ratio using the given sequence:

Common ratio = (−3) / (3/8) = −3 * (8/3) = -24/3 = -8.

Therefore, the common ratio of the geometric sequence 3/8, −3, 24, −192 is -8.

Learn more about geometric sequence here:

https://brainly.com/question/27852674

#SPJ11

The area of the regular polygon is 93.53 square feet

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Area = 6 * Area of triangle

Where

Area of triangle = 1/2 * radius² * sin(60)

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

Area = 6 * 1/2 * radius² * sin(60)

So, we have

Area = 6 * 1/2 * 6² * sin(60)

Evaluate

Area = 93.53

Hence, the area is 93.53

Read more about area at

https://brainly.com/question/24487155

#SPJ1

Eeither A is singular or det(A) = 1.

Let A be a square matrix such that A^2 = A.

If A is singular, then det(A) = 0, and we are done.

Otherwise, let B = A(I - A). Then we have:

B^2 = A(I - A)A(I - A) = A^2(I - A)^2 = A(I - A) = B

Multiplying both sides by B^-1 (which exists since B is invertible), we get:

B^-1 B^2 = B^-1 B

I = B^-1

Now we have:

det(A) = det(B)/det(I - A)

Since B = A(I - A), we have:

det(B) = det(A)det(I - A) = det(A)(1 - det(A))

Substituting into our expression for det(A), we get:

det(A) = det(A)(1 - det(A))/(1 - det(A))

Simplifying, we get:

1 = det(A)

Therefore, either A is singular or det(A) = 1.

Learn more about singular here:

https://brainly.com/question/15408685

#SPJ11

The final answer is to select at least 5 numbers from the set  {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15}.

To guarantee that at least one pair of numbers add up to 16 from the set {1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15}, we need to choose at least 5 numbers. This is because if we arrange the members of the set as pigeonholes and choose 4 numbers, there is no guarantee that we will have at least one pair that adds up to 16. However, if we choose 5 numbers, by Dirichlet's principle, there is at least one pair in the same group whose sum is 16. Therefore, we need to choose at least 5 numbers from the set to guarantee that at least one pair of these numbers add up to 16.

To know more about Dirichlet’s principle visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31683604

#SPJ11

There are several geometric shapes that have exactly four pairs of perpendicular sides. Some examples include rectangles, squares, rhombuses, and parallelograms.

1. Rectangle: A rectangle is a quadrilateral with four right angles, making all four sides perpendicular to each other.

2. Square: A square is a special type of rectangle with all sides of equal length. Since all angles in a square are right angles, all four sides are perpendicular.

3. Rhombus: A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides of equal length. Its opposite sides are parallel and all four angles are right angles, making it have four pairs of perpendicular sides.

4. Parallelogram: A parallelogram is a quadrilateral with opposite sides parallel. If it has adjacent sides that are perpendicular, then it will have four pairs of perpendicular sides.

These are just a few examples of geometric shapes with four pairs of perpendicular sides. There are other shapes as well, such as certain trapezoids and kites, that can also have this property depending on their specific attributes.

Learn more about quadrilateral here:

https://brainly.com/question/29934440

#SPJ11

Dimitri played outside for 1 and 7/12 hours on Sunday.

To find the number of hours that Dimitri played outside on Sunday, we need to subtract the time he spent outside on Saturday from the total time he played outside over the weekend.

Total time outside = 2 and 3/4 hours

Time outside on Saturday = 1 and 1/6 hours

To subtract fractions with unlike denominators, we need to find a common denominator:

3/4 = 9/12

1/6 = 2/12

2 and 3/4 = 11/4

So we can rewrite the problem as:

11/4 - 1 and 2/12 = ?

To subtract mixed numbers, we first need to convert them to improper fractions:

1 and 2/12 = 14/12

Now we can subtract:

11/4 - 14/12 = (33/12) - (14/12) = 19/12

Therefore, Dimitri played outside for 1 and 7/12 hours on Sunday.

Learn more about the fraction here:

brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

This is the solution to the given initial value problem using the Laplace transform method.

To solve the given IVP using the Laplace transform method, we first apply the Laplace transform to the differential equation y'' - y = t - 2 with the initial conditions y(2) = 3 and y'(2) = 0.

Taking the Laplace transform of the given equation, we get:

L{y''}(s) - L{y}(s) = L{t - 2}(s)

Now, we apply the Laplace transform properties for derivatives:

s^2Y(s) - sy(2) - y'(2) - Y(s) = (1/s^2) - (2/s)

Given the initial conditions y(2) = 3 and y'(2) = 0, we can plug them into the equation:

s^2Y(s) - 3s - Y(s) = (1/s^2) - (2/s)

Now, solve for Y(s):

Y(s) = (1/s^2) - (2/s) + 3s/(s^2 + 1) + 1/(s^2 + 1)

Next, perform the inverse Laplace transform to find y(t):

y(t) = L^{-1}{Y(s)}

y(t) = t - 2 + 3(sin(t) - 2cos(t)) + cos(t)

This is the solution to the given initial value problem using the Laplace transform method.

learn more about the Laplace transform method,

https://brainly.com/question/12972484

#SPJ11

The required answer is TRUE. ∇·(∇×F) = 0 for any vector field of the form F = Fi + Gj.

Explanation:

TRUE. ∇·(∇×F) = 0 for any vector field of the form F = Fi + Gj.
To show this is true, we can use vector calculus identities. First, we can expand the curl of F:
∇×F = (∂G/∂x - ∂F/∂y)k
where k is the unit vector in the z-direction.
Next, we can take the divergence of this expression:
∇·(∇×F) = ∇·(∂G/∂x - ∂F/∂y)k
Using the identity ∇·(fA) = f(∇·A) + A·(∇f), we can simplify this expression:
∇·(∇×F) = (∇·∂G/∂x - ∇·∂F/∂y)k
But the divergence of a component function is simply the second partial derivative with respect to that variable, so we can further simplify:
∇·(∇×F) = (∂²G/∂x² + ∂²F/∂y²)k
no z-component in the original vector field F, the partial derivatives with respect to z will be zero.

Since F is of the form F = Fi + Gj, we know that it has no z-component, and therefore the divergence of (∇×F) must also have no z-component. But the only z-component in the expression we just derived is k, so it must be zero. Therefore,
∇·(∇×F) = 0
for any vector field of the form F = Fi + Gj.

To know more about curl of Function.  Click on the link.

https://brainly.com/question/30581467

#SPJ11

The solution of the given initial value problem is y(r) = (1/9) cos(3r) + (1/9) sin(3r) - (1/9) sin(3r) = (1/9) cos(3r)

We are given the initial value problem:

d^2y/dr^2 + 9y = sin(3r), y(0) = y'(0) = 0 ---------(1)

We can write the characteristic equation for the given differential equation as:

r^2 + 9 = 0

The roots of the characteristic equation are: r = 0 ± 3i

So, the general solution of the homogeneous differential equation d^2y/dr^2 + 9y = 0 is:

y_h(r) = c1 cos(3r) + c2 sin(3r) ------------(2)

Now, we will find the particular solution of the given differential equation. We use the method of undetermined coefficients and assume the particular solution to be of the form:

y_p(r) = A sin(3r) + B cos(3r)

Differentiating y_p(r) w.r.t r, we get:

y_p'(r) = 3A cos(3r) - 3B sin(3r)

Differentiating y_p'(r) w.r.t r, we get:

y_p''(r) = -9A sin(3r) - 9B cos(3r)

Substituting these values in the differential equation (1), we get:

-9A sin(3r) - 9B cos(3r) + 9(A sin(3r) + B cos(3r)) = sin(3r)

Simplifying the above equation, we get:

-9A sin(3r) + 9B cos(3r) = sin(3r)

Comparing the coefficients of sin(3r) and cos(3r) on both sides, we get:

-9A = 1 and 9B = 0

Solving the above equations, we get:

A = -(1/9) and B = 0

So, the particular solution of the given differential equation is:

y_p(r) = -(1/9) sin(3r)

Therefore, the general solution of the given differential equation is:

y(r) = y_h(r) + y_p(r) = c1 cos(3r) + c2 sin(3r) - (1/9) sin(3r) ------------(3)

Now, we will apply the initial conditions to find the values of c1 and c2.

Given that y(0) = 0. Substituting r = 0 in equation (3), we get:

c1 - (1/9) = 0

So, c1 = 1/9

Differentiating equation (3) w.r.t r, we get:

y'(r) = -3c1 sin(3r) + 3c2 cos(3r) - (1/3) cos(3r)

Given that y'(0) = 0. Substituting r = 0 in the above equation, we get:

3c2 = (1/3)

So, c2 = (1/9)

Therefore, the solution of the given initial value problem is:

y(r) = (1/9) cos(3r) + (1/9) sin(3r) - (1/9) sin(3r) = (1/9) cos(3r)

Learn more about initial value here

https://brainly.com/question/2546258

#SPJ11

[tex]\frac{2 \frac{1}{2} }{6.5}[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

[tex]\frac{ \frac{5}{8} }{1 \frac{5}{8} }[/tex] as a fraction in simplest form is 5/13.

In Mathematics, a proportional relationship is a type of relationship that produces equivalent ratios and it can be modeled or represented by the following mathematical equation:

y = kx

Where:

Additionally, equivalent fractions can be determined by multiplying the numerator and denominator by the same numerical value as follows;

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 2 × (2 1/2)/(2 × 6.5)

(2 1/2)/(6.5) = 5/13

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 8 × (5/8)/(8 × (1 5/8))

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/(8+5)

(5/8)/(1 5/8) = 5/13

In conclusion, there is a proportional relationship between the expression because the fractions are equivalent.

Read more on fraction here: brainly.com/question/29367657

#SPJ4

Missing information:

The question is incomplete and the complete question is shown in the attached picture.

The length of the segment that joins the points (-5,4) and (6,-3) is approximately 13.04 units.

We can use the distance formula to find the length of the segment that joins the two points (-5, 4) and (6, -3).

The distance formula is given by:

d = sqrt((x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2)

where (x1, y1) and (x2, y2) are the coordinates of the two points.

Using the formula, we have:

d = sqrt((6 - (-5))^2 + (-3 - 4)^2)

= sqrt(11^2 + (-7)^2)

= sqrt(121 + 49)

= sqrt(170)

Therefore, the length of the segment that joins the points (-5, 4) and (6, -3) is sqrt(170), or approximately 13.04.

Learn more about distance at: brainly.com/question/13034462

#SPJ11

For "vector-field" F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

(a) curl is -2[tex]e^{y}[/tex]cos(z)i - 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]cos(x)j - 4eˣ cos(y)k.

(b) divergence is 4eˣ sin(y) + 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z) + 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x).

The vector-filed is given as : F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

Part(a) : The curl of the given vector-field can be written in determinant form as :

Curl(F) = [tex]\left|\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\\frac{d}{dx} &\frac{d}{dy}&\frac{d}{dz}\\4e^{x}Siny &2e^{y}Sinz&3e^{z}Sinx\end{array}\right|[/tex];

= i{d/dy(3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)) - d/dz(2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z))} - j{d/dx(3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x) - d/dz(4eˣ sin(y))} + k{d/dx(2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z)) - d/dy(4eˣ sin(y))};

= -2[tex]e^{y}[/tex]cos(z)i - 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]cos(x)j - 4eˣ cos(y)k.

Part (b) : The divergence of the vector-"F" can be written as :

div.F = [i×d/dx + j×d/dy + k×d/dz]×F,

Substituting the values,

We get,

= [i×d/dx + j×d/dy + k×d/dz] . {4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)},

= d/dx (4eˣ sin(y)) + d/dy (2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z)) + d/dz (3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)),

On simplifying further,

We get,

Therefore, the Divergence = 4eˣ sin(y) + 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z) + 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x).

Learn more about Vector Filed here

https://brainly.com/question/7964566

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Consider the vector field. F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

(a) Find the curl of the vector field.

(b) Find the divergence of the vector field.

The position function is r(t) = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k.

We can integrate the acceleration function to obtain the velocity function:

v(t) = ∫ a(t) dt = 3t^2 i + 64t^2 j - 3t^2 k + C1

We can use the initial velocity to find the value of the constant C1:

v(0) = i - j + 3k = C1

So, v(t) = 3t^2 i + 64t^2 j - 3t^2 k + i - j + 3k = (3t^2 + 1)i + (64t^2 - 1)j + (3 - 3t^2)k

We can integrate the velocity function to obtain the position function:

r(t) = ∫ v(t) dt = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k + C2

We can use the initial position to find the value of the constant C2:

r(0) = 0 = C2

So, the position function is:

r(t) = t^3 i + (64/3)t^3 j - t^3 k

Learn more about position here

https://brainly.com/question/30685477

#SPJ11

A) testing for the equality of variances is an unreliable procedure that is not robust to violations of its requirements.

To know more about variances refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/14116780

#SPJ11

a. The null hypothesis for this test is that all colors are equally likely for Milk Chocolate M&M's, while the alternative hypothesis is that the colors are not equally likely.

b. If all colors are equally likely, we would expect to see 70 candies of each color in a bag of 420 candies.

c. Yes, a chi-square test is appropriate.

d. The degree of freedom for 5 is 5

e. The chi-square test statistic is 24.6

f. The p-value for your test is 11.070

g. The color that contributes the most to the chi-square test statistic is brown, with an observed count of 47 and an expected count of 70.

a. The null hypothesis for this test is that all colors are equally likely for Milk Chocolate M&M's, while the alternative hypothesis is that the colors are not equally likely.

b. If all colors are equally likely, we would expect to see 70 candies of each color in a bag of 420 candies. This is because there are six colors, and

=>  420 / 6 is =  70.

c. Yes, a chi-square test is appropriate in this situation because we are comparing observed frequencies (the actual number of candies of each color in the bag) to expected frequencies (the number of candies we would expect to see if all colors are equally likely).

d. There are 5 degrees of freedom in this situation. This is because we have 6 colors, but we can only choose 5 of them freely. Once we know the frequency of 5 colors, we can determine the frequency of the 6th color.

e. To calculate the chi-square test statistic, we need to find the sum of

=> ((observed frequency - expected frequency)² / expected frequency)

for each color.

Using the data provided, we get a chi-square test statistic of 24.6 (rounded to three decimal places).

f. To find the p-value for our test, we need to compare our chi-square test statistic to a chi-square distribution table with 5 degrees of freedom. At a 5% significance level, our critical value is 11.070. Since our test statistic (24.6) is greater than the critical value (11.070), we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the colors are not equally likely for Milk Chocolate M&M's.

g. The color that contributes the most to the chi-square test statistic is brown, with an observed count of 47 and an expected count of 70. This means that there were fewer brown M&M's in the bag than we would expect if all colors were equally likely.

To know more about chi square test here

https://brainly.com/question/14082240

#SPJ4

The reported p-value of 0.139 suggests that there is no significant evidence to reject the null hypothesis that the true mean distance traveled by the electric car is equal to 200 miles. This means that the sample data does not provide enough evidence to support Aaron's hypothesis that the car does not travel as far as the company claimed.

Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 level of significance. In other words, we do not have enough evidence to conclude that the car's actual mean distance traveled is significantly different from the claimed distance of 200 miles.

Therefore, Aaron's hypothesis that the car does not travel as far as the company claimed is not supported by the data. He should continue to use the car as it is expected to travel 200 miles before requiring a recharge based on the company's claim.

To know more about distance, refer here :

https://brainly.com/question/13034462#

#SPJ11

The options A, B, D, E, F, J  can not be derived by an application of existential elimination.

By eliminating an existential quantifier, one can infer a formula that contains a new variable using the predicate logic inference rule known as EE.

Since existential quantifiers are not present in atomic formulae, conjunctions, disjunctions, conditionals, biconditionals, negations, and the falsum, they cannot be derived using EE and can not be obtained via the use of EE.

Learn more about existential elimination:https://brainly.com/question/30035243

#SPJ1