Answer: True, all chemicals should be treated as if you don’t know what they are.
Explanation:
All chemicals should be treated as if you do not know what they are. In this way you can protect yourself and others from potential hazards, as chemicals can be mixed up or confused.
The statement "All chemicals in the lab (including foodstuffs and store-bought chemicals) should be treated as if they could be hazardous" is definitely true.
What are Chemicals?Chemicals may be characterized as any sort of basic substance that is significantly utilized in or manufactured during a reaction that involves remarkable alterations to atoms or molecules.
The methodology of treating chemicals demonstrates their physical as well as chemical properties, appearances, and reactiveness. In this way, one must become much more confidential with all the basic characteristics, potential hazards, and efficiency of any chemical.
This procedure also delivers proficiency to you in the future with respect to chemicals or their efficiency. It also decreases your potential fear of chemicals.
Therefore, the statement "All chemicals in the lab (including foodstuffs and store-bought chemicals) should be treated as if they could be hazardous" is definitely true.
To learn more about Chemicals, refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/16416932
#SPJ2
How does a number line describe the location of an object?
Many systems and technologies have been designed to communicate over long distances. They all send information that has been encoded into a signal. What must a receiver be able to do to understand a signal that is being sent to them?
Define position and reference point in your own words.
Answer:
Position is placement of somewhere and reference is giving someone pointers of something
Explanation:
It’s up front
and this one too please thank you for your help
a. Atomic #= 3 b. Mass #=7 c. # of Protons = d. # of Neutrons = e. # of Electrons = E in Ist energy level = E in 2nd energy level = E in 3rd energy level = 0 # of Valence E = Li
SpongeBob noticed that his favorite pants were not as clean as they used to be. His friend, Sandy, told him that he should try using Clean-O detergent, a new brand of laundry soap she found at Sail-Mart. SpongeBob made sure to wash one pair of pants in plain water and another pair in water with the Clean-O detergent. After washing both pairs of pants three times each, the pants washed in the Clean-O detergent did not appear to be any cleaner than the pants washed in plain water. 1) What was the problem SpongeBob wanted to investigate? 2) What was the problem SpongeBob wanted to investigate? 3) What is the dependent variable? 4) What should be SpongeBob’s conclusion?
Answer:
1) SpongeBob investigated whether Clean-O detergent is a good laundry soap. 3) the dependent variable is the color of the pants/how clean the pants were. 4) SpongeBob's conclusion should be that Clean-O detergent is not a good detergent.
Explanation:
You didn't have #2 - it was the same question as #1
Answer:
Hi there!
Explanation:
Questions;
1) He wanted to investigate if clean-o detergent will clean his pants....
2) The independent variable is what the pants were washed in (clean-o detergent)....
3) The dependent variable is, how clean the pants were after washing them...
4) The conclusion should be, the detergent that his friend sandy had told him.. Didn’t work & Clean-o detergent didn’t work any better than plain water.
Hope this helps!
~Have a great day!~
If you have any questions, feel free to ask!