A random sample of 111 people was taken. 80 of the people in the sample favored candidate a. we are interested in determining whether or not the proportion of the population in favor of candidate a is significantly more than 70%. the test statistic is:__________

Answer: 51

Step-by-step explanation:

By adding the color frequency of each color, you can find that the spinner was originally spun a total of 70 times. Now you can use this to create an equality equation to find how many times you may land on purple. It would look something like this:

[tex]\frac{12}{70}=\frac{x}{300}[/tex]

Now, with this, you can calculate what the answer would be by solving the inequality. You can cross multiply the equality and turn it into this:

[tex]12\cdot300=70\cdot x[/tex]

Now you can divide out the 12 from both sides, and you are given this:

[tex]\frac{\left(12\cdot300\right)}{12}=\frac{\left(70\cdot x\right)}{12}[/tex]

Which gives you this when simplified:

[tex]300=\left(\frac{70}{12}\right)\cdot x[/tex]

You can simplify 70/12 to be 35/6

and you are given this:

[tex]300=\left(\frac{35}{6}\right)\cdot x[/tex]

Now you can remove the parenthesis

[tex]300=\frac{35}{6}\cdot x[/tex]

Multiply both sides by 6:

[tex]300\cdot6=\frac{35}{6}\cdot6\cdot x[/tex]

Simplify to this:

[tex]1800=35\cdot x[/tex]

Now, the final step is to divide both sides by 35:

[tex]\frac{1800}{35}=\frac{\left(x\cdot35\right)}{35}[/tex]

And the final answer is

[tex]51.4285714286=x[/tex]

and since you are rounding to the nearest whole number, you can turn it into this: 51=x

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

irrational.

[tex]\sqrt{x} 361 = 19\\and 19 is irrational[/tex]

Answer: The answer is irrational. In order to find this out if you have a calculator you can put this number into it and it will tell you if it's rational or irrational. Calculator type TI-30Xa.

Step-by-step explanation: Please give Brainlist.

Hope this helps!!!!

I can answer more questions if you wish.

Area = 50.27 cm²

Circumference = 25.13 cm

The relationship between the diameter and other values of a circle can help us solve for unknown values.

Area

In order to solve for the area, we need to find the radius. The radius is always half of the diameter.

This means that the radius is 4 cm. Then, we can solve for area using the formula, A = πr², where r is the radius. So, plug 4 in and solve. For this calculation, I will not be rounding pi.

Rounded to 2 decimal places, the area of the circle is 50.27cm². If you round pi to 3.14 before doing the calculation, the answer will be 50.24cm².

Circumference

Now, we can solve for circumference. The formula for circumference is C = 2πr, where r is the radius.

Rounding to 2 decimal places, the circumference of the circle is 25.13 cm. Note that I did not preround pi. If you do preround and use 3.14 for pi, the answer will be 25.12cm.

The inverse of the given function; f(x) = 3x + 6 as required to be determined is; f-¹(x) = (x - 6) / 3.

It follows from the task content that the inverse of the given function; f (x) = 3x + 6 is to be determined.

First, let y represent f(x) and then make x the subject of the formula;

Therefore, we have;

y = 3x + 6

y - 6 = 3x

x = (y - 6) / 3.

Ultimately, interchange the variables x and y and finally replace y with f-¹(x) so that we have;

y = (x - 6) / 3

f-¹(x) = (x - 6) / 3

Therefore, the inverse function as required is; f-¹(x) = (x - 6) / 3.

Read more on Inverse function;

https://brainly.com/question/3831584

#SPJ1

The meaning of "directly proportional" refers to a relationship between two variables, where when one variable increases, the other variable also increases by a constant factor, and vice versa.

When two variables are directly proportional, it means that as one variable increases or decreases, the other variable will also increase or decrease in the same proportion. In other words, there is a constant ratio between the two variables. For example, if the speed of a car is directly proportional to the distance it travels, then as the car's speed increases, the distance it travels will also increase at the same rate.

The meaning of "directly proportional" refers to a relationship between two variables, where when one variable increases, the other variable also increases by a constant factor, and vice versa. In other words, as one variable goes up, the other does too, and their ratio remains constant. This relationship can be represented mathematically as y = kx, where y and x are the two variables and k is the constant of proportionality.

Learn more about proportional here:

https://brainly.com/question/31266854

#SPJ11

If a rectangular retaining wall has an area of 48 square feet and the height of the wall is two feet less than its length, then the height and the length of the wall are 6 feet and 8 feet respectively.

A rectangle is a 2-Dimensional shape with 4 sides and parallel sides that are equal to one another. It has 4 angles and is of the magnitude of 90° each.

The area of a rectangle wall is given as

A = l * b

where l is the length

b is the breadth

Let the height of the wall be x

According to the question,

The length of the wall is x + 2

Area = 48

x (x + 2) = 48

[tex]x^{2} +2x[/tex] = 48

[tex]x^2+2x-48=0[/tex]

[tex]x^2+8x-6x-48=0[/tex]

x (x + 8) - 6 (x +8) = 0

(x + 8)(x - 6) = 0

x = -8 or 6

Since height can not be negative, thus the height is 6 feet

The length of the rectangle is 6 + 2 is 8 feet.

Learn more about the Area:

https://brainly.com/question/25092270

#SPJ4

For the series, the ratio test is inconclusive.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies divergence.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence.

For each of the given series, we need to apply the ratio test to determine its convergence or divergence.

The ratio test states that if the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms in the series is less than 1, then the series converges. If the limit is greater than 1, then the series diverges. If the limit is equal to 1, then the test is inconclusive, and we need to try other methods.

Let's apply this test to each series:

1. For the series, the ratio test is inconclusive because the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is 1.

2. For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence because the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is less than 1.

3. For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies divergence because the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is greater than 1.

4. For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence because the limit of the absolute value of the ratio of consecutive terms is less than 1.

Therefore, the answers are:

For the series, the ratio test is inconclusive.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies divergence.
For the series, the ratio test is conclusive and implies convergence.

Visit here to learn more about convergence:
brainly.com/question/15415793

#SPJ11

Public opinion researchers analyze polls conducted on small samples from those populations to estimate the opinions of large populations. The correct answer is b.

They use various sampling techniques to ensure the sample is representative of the population, and then analyze the results to make inferences about the opinions of the larger group. Survey sampling, as used in statistics, is the process of choosing a sample of constituents from a target population to perform a survey. The word "survey" can be used to describe a wide range of observational methods or procedures.

Most frequently, a questionnaire meant to assess people's traits and/or opinions is employed in survey sampling. The topic of survey data collecting is various methods of contacting sample participants after they have been chosen. Sampling is done to cut down on the expense and/or labor required to survey the complete target population. Therefore option b. is the correct answer.

More on public researchers: https://brainly.com/question/29708464

#SPJ11

The sentence into an inequality is written as;

⇒ 3 + 9y > - 20

We have to given that;

The expression is,

Three increased by the product of a number and 9 is greater than -20.

Now, Let the unknown number is,

⇒ y

Hence, We can formulate the inequality as;

⇒ 3 + (9 × y) > - 20

⇒ 3 + 9y > - 20

Thus, The sentence into an inequality is written as;

⇒ 3 + 9y > - 20

Learn more about the inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25944814

#SPJ1

The  determinant of the matrix cannot be uniquely determined from the information given.

The characteristic polynomial of a 2x2 matrix A is given by:

p(λ) = det(A - λI) = λ^2 - tr(A)λ + det(A)

where tr(A) is the trace of A and det(A) is the determinant of A.

In this case, the characteristic polynomial of the matrix is given by:

p(λ) = λ^2 - 5λ + 6

Comparing this to the general form of the characteristic polynomial, we can see that:

- tr(A) = 5
- det(A) = 6

Since the determinant of a 2x2 matrix A is given by:

det(A) = a11*a22 - a12*a21

where aij denotes the entry in the ith row and jth column of A, we can use the fact that det(A) = 6 to solve for the determinant of the matrix. Specifically, we have:

det(A) = a11*a22 - a12*a21 = 6

We don't have enough information to determine the specific values of a11, a12, a21, and a22. However, we do know that their product is 6. For example, we could have:

a11 = 2, a12 = 3, a21 = 1, a22 = 4

which gives det(A) = 2*4 - 3*1 = 5.

Alternatively, we could have:

a11 = 6, a12 = 0, a21 = -1, a22 = -1

which also gives det(A) = 6.

Therefore, the determinant of the matrix cannot be uniquely determined from the information given.

Visit to know more about Matrix:-

brainly.com/question/2456804

#SPJ11

Total amount Ming pays the cab driver is $25.96. Ming took a cab across town and his fare was $22. He also leaves an 18% tip.

To calculate the total amount Ming pays the cab driver, we need to find the tip amount and add it to the fare.

Tip amount = Fare * Tip percentage
Tip amount = $22 * 18%

First, convert 18% to decimal by dividing by 100:
18% ÷ 100 = 0.18

Now, calculate the tip amount:
Tip amount = $22 * 0.18
Tip amount = $3.96

Finally, add the tip amount to the fare:
Total amount = Fare + Tip amount
Total amount = $22 + $3.96
Total amount = $25.96

So, the total amount Ming pays the cab driver is $25.96.

Learn more about amount here:

https://brainly.com/question/13024617

#SPJ11

Answer:

58°

Step-by-step explanation:

The internal angles of a triangle add up to 180°. We know that one of the angles is 90° and the other is 32°, so add up 90° and 32° and subract from 180°

90°+32°=122°

180°-122°= 58°

Answer:

Correct statements:

Since it is a ratio of two integers, 8/12 is rational.

Since 64 is a perfect square, √64 is rational.

The resultant of the vector is 25 units.

The resultant of the vector is calculated as follows;

The given vector, v = 24i - 7j

The resultant of the vector is calculated by applying the following formula as shown below;

v = √ (vx² + vy² )

where;

The resultant of the vector is calculated as;

v = √ (24² + (-7)² )

v = 25 units

Learn more about resultant of vector here: https://brainly.com/question/28047791

#SPJ1

The exact value of sin (A-B) in simplest form for positive acute angle A and B is found to be 221/1445.

We can use the trigonometric identity sin(A - B) = sinAcosB - cosAsinB to find the exact value of sin(A - B) for positive acute angles.

From the given information, we know that cosA = 4/5 and sinB = 8/17. Using identities, sin²A + cos²A = 1 and sin²B + cos²B = 1:

sinA = √(1 - cos²A)

= √(1 - (4/5)²)

= 3/5

cosB = √(1 - sin²B)

= √(1 - (8/17)²)

= 15/17

Now, we can substitute these values into the identity:

sin(A - B) = sinAcosB - cosAsinB

sin(A - B) = (3/5)(15/17) - (4/5)(8/17)

sin(A - B) = 9/17 - 32/85

sin(A - B) = (765 - 544)/1445

sin(A - B) = 221/1445

Therefore, the exact value of sin(A - B) in simplest form is 221/1445.

To know more about trigonometric identities, visit,

https://brainly.com/question/24496175

#SPJ4

The requried sine function with an amplitude of 4, a midline of y = 2, and a period of 2π/3 is y = 4 sin (3x) + 2.

The general form of a sine function is:

y = A sin (Bx - C) + D

Given that the amplitude is 4 and the midline is at y = 2, we have A = 4 and D = 2.

The period is 2π/3, which means that the coefficient of x (B) is given by:

B = 2π / (2π/3) = 3

To find the horizontal shift C, we need to know the starting point of the sine wave. Let's assume that the starting point is at the origin (0, 0), which means that C = 0.

Putting all of this together, we get:

y = 4 sin (3x)

Therefore, the requried sine function with an amplitude of 4, a midline of y = 2, and a period of 2π/3 is y = 4 sin (3x) + 2.

Learn more about the sine function here:

https://brainly.com/question/12015707

#SPJ1

Answer:

(x - 5)(x + 1)

Step-by-step explanation:

Use the sum product pattern:

x^2 - 4x - 5

x^2 + x - 5x - 5

Common factor from the two pairs:

(x^2 + x) + (5x - 5)

x(x + 1) - 5(x + 1)

Rewrite in factored form:

x(x + 1) - 5(x + 1)

(x - 5)(x + 1)

The fraction that represents the part of the whole cake each child receives is 4/25

from the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Five children divide 4/5 of a cake equally

The fraction that represents the part of the whole cake each child receives is calculated as

Fraction = 4/5 divided by 5

Mathematically, this can be represented as

Fraction = (4/5)/5

When the fraction is then evaluated, we have the solution to be

Fraction = 4/25

Hence, the solution is 4/25

Read more about fraction at

https://brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ1

Answer:

the maximum value is 6.96

Step-by-step explanation:

the minimum value is -6.96

A biased coin is one where the probability of getting heads or tails is not equal. In this case, the coin is biased such that heads are three times more likely than tails. To determine the expected total number of heads when the coin is flipped five times, we can use the concept of probability and expected value.

First, let's find the probability of getting heads (P(H)) and tails (P(T)). Since heads are three times more likely than tails, we can represent this as a ratio: 3:1. The total number of outcomes is 3 + 1 = 4. Thus, the probability of getting heads is P(H) = 3/4, and the probability of getting tails is P(T) = 1/4.

Now, let's find the expected value. The expected value (EV) is the sum of the probabilities of each outcome multiplied by the value of that outcome. In this case, the value is the number of heads obtained. Since we are flipping the coin five times, the possible number of heads is between 0 and 5. For simplicity, we will only calculate the expected number of heads after one flip, and then multiply it by the total number of flips (5).

Expected number of heads after one flip (EV) = P(H) * 1 + P(T) * 0 = (3/4) * 1 + (1/4) * 0 = 3/4

Now, multiply the expected number of heads after one flip by the total number of flips (5) to find the expected total number of heads:

Expected total number of heads = EV * 5 = (3/4) * 5 = 15/4 = 3.75

So, the expected total number of heads when flipping the biased coin five times is 3.75.

Learn more about biased  here:

https://brainly.com/question/16912939

#SPJ11

The answer is that The critical point (0, 0) is asymptotically stable (C) and is a proper node (C).

To find the linearization of the given system, we need to calculate the Jacobian matrix and evaluate it at the critical point (0, 0). The given system is:

x' = -6x - y - x^2
y' = 16x - 6y - 2xy^3

The Jacobian matrix J(x, y) is:

J(x, y) = | -6 - 1 - 2x, -1          |
         | 16 - 6y^2 - 2x, -6 - 6x^2 |

Evaluating J(x, y) at the critical point (0, 0):

J(0, 0) = | -6, -1 |
         | 16, -6 |

Now we need to find the eigenvalues of this matrix to determine the stability of the critical point (0, 0). The eigenvalues of J(0, 0) are λ1 = -2 and λ2 = -10. Both eigenvalues are real and negative.

The critical point (0, 0) is asymptotically stable (C) and is a proper node (C).

Now, to find the solution to the linearization with initial conditions x(0) = -0.3 and y(0) = 1, we need to solve the linearized system:

x' = -6x - y
y' = 16x - 6y

Since the initial conditions are x(0) = -0.3 and y(0) = 1, we can't provide a closed-form solution without more information. However, the linearized system can be solved numerically or analytically using various methods such as matrix exponentials or numerical integration.

Your answer:
The critical point (0, 0) is asymptotically stable (C) and is a proper node (C).

Visit here to learn more about matrix  : https://brainly.com/question/28180105
#SPJ11

The rate of the river current is 5 mph.
Let x represent the rate of the river current. When Kellen travels upstream, she goes against the current, so her effective speed will be (15 - x) mph. When she travels downstream, she goes with the current, so her effective speed will be (15 + x) mph.

We're given that the time it takes to travel 2 miles upstream is the same as the time it takes to travel 4 miles downstream. We can express time as distance divided by speed.

So, we have the equation:

(2 mi) / (15 - x) = (4 mi) / (15 + x)

Now, we need to solve for x:

Cross-multiply:

2(15 + x) = 4(15 - x)

Distribute:

30 + 2x = 60 - 4x

Add 4x to both sides:

6x = 30

Divide by 6:

x = 5

Learn more about Boat speeds here: brainly.com/question/24229194
#SPJ11

From the equation: y= B0+B1x1+B2x2+u. It should be noted that B1 impliea b. measure the partial effect of x1 on y.

The regression equation presented showcases B1 as the coefficient of x1 that signifies the partial effect of x1 on y when considering x2 to remain constant.

By increasing only x1 by one unit, whilst keeping all other variables in the equation unchanging, the projected change in terms of result is logically denoted by the value of B1. Thus this indicates that B1 embodies the subsidiary impact of x1 on y and nothing else.

Learn more about regression on

https://brainly.com/question/25987747

#SPJ1

The critical point of the two-dimensional system x' = Ax is asymptotically stable if all eigenvalues of matrix A have negative real parts, stable if all eigenvalues have non-positive real parts, and unstable if there exists at least one eigenvalue with a positive real part.

In a two-dimensional system described by x' = Ax, the stability of the critical point is determined by the eigenvalues of the matrix A. If all eigenvalues have negative real parts, the critical point is asymptotically stable, meaning the system will converge to the critical point as time goes to infinity.

If all eigenvalues have non-positive real parts (including zero), the critical point is stable, indicating that the system trajectories will remain bounded but may not necessarily converge to the critical point. Finally, if there exists at least one eigenvalue with a positive real part, the critical point is unstable, and the system trajectories will diverge away from the critical point over time.

Learn more about asymptotic stability: https://brainly.com/question/31669573

#SPJ11

If you have 367 people there are at least 2 that were born on the same day of the year.There must be at least 2 that were born on the same day of the year.

To prove by contradiction that if you have 367 people, there are at least 2 that were born on the same day of the year, follow these steps:

1. Assume the opposite of what we want to prove, i.e., all 367 people were born on different days of the year.

2. We know that there are only 365 possible days in a year (ignoring leap years). So, if 367 people were all born on different days, that would mean there are at least 367 unique days in a year.

3. This assumption contradicts the fact that there are only 365 days in a year, which is a contradiction.

4. Since we've reached a contradiction, our original assumption must be incorrect.

Thus, if you have 367 people, there must be at least 2 that were born on the same day of the year.

To know more about Probability:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The opposite of the assumption (i.e., what you want to prove) must be true.

Assume that there are 367 people and none of them were born on the same day of the year.

There are 365 days in a year, so if no two people were born on the same day, then the first person could have been born on any day, the second person could have been born on any of the remaining 364 days, the third person could have been born on any of the remaining 363 days, and so on.

Therefore, the number of possible ways for 367 people to be born on different days of the year is: 365 x 364 x 363 x ... x 2 x 1 / (367 x 366 / 2)

Simplifying this expression gives: 365 x 364 x 363 x ... x 2 x 1 / 183,055

This is a very large number, approximately equal to 2.8 x 10^782.

However, this is greater than the total number of people who have ever lived on Earth, which is estimated to be around 108 billion.

Therefore, it is impossible for 367 people to be born on different days of the year, and our initial assumption must be false.

Thus, we can conclude that if you have 367 people, there are at least 2 that were born on the same day of the year.

Step 1: Assume the opposite of what you want to prove.

Step 2: Use logical reasoning to derive a consequence of the assumption.

Step 3: Show that the consequence is inconsistent with what is known to be true.

Step 4: Conclude that the assumption must be false, and therefore, the opposite of the assumption (i.e., what you want to prove) must be true.

To learn more about consequence visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23037584

#SPJ11

A linear function can be used to model this relationship is: Option A:

y = -13.5x + 97.8

From the given data and graph, we see that:

When x = 0, y = 100

When x = 1, y = 86

When x = 2, y = 65

When x = 3, y = 59

When x = 4, y = 41

When x = 5, y = 34

The general form of the equation of a line in slope intercept form is:

y = mx + c

where:

m is slope

c is y-intercept

Looking at the given options, the closest y-intercept to 100 is 97.8 given by option A and as such it is the best estimate of the line of best fit.

Read more about Equation of Line of best fit at: https://brainly.com/question/1564293

#SPJ1

The given function is f(x) = 2(3x) = 6x.

The domain of the function is all real numbers since there are no restrictions on the input x. Therefore, the correct answer is:

Domain: (-∞, ∞)

To find the range, we can consider the fact that the function is a linear function with a positive slope of 6. This means that the output values increase as the input values increase.

The lowest possible output value occurs when x = 0, which gives f(0) = 0. As x increases, the output values increase without bound. Therefore, the range of the function is:

Range: (0, ∞)

So, the correct answer is:

Domain: (-∞, ∞)

Range: (0, ∞)

It will take approximately 23.3 years for Caleb's account to grow to $12,700 with 3% simple interest, assuming he makes no withdrawals or deposits during that time.

To solve this problem, we need to use the formula for simple interest:

I = P * r * t

where I is the interest earned, P is the principal (the initial amount invested), r is the interest rate, and t is the time period.

We know that Caleb invests $10,000 and earns 3% simple interest. So,

I = 10,000 * 0.03 * t

Simplifying this expression, we get:

I = 300t

Now, we need to find out how long it will take for the account to grow to $12,700. That means the total amount in the account will be the principal plus the interest:

P + I = 12,700

Substituting the expression for I that we found above, we get:

10,000 + 300t = 12,700

Solving for t, we get:

t = 23.3

To learn more about investment click on,

https://brainly.com/question/30277745

#SPJ1

The value of k for the function f(x+3) = f((x-3) + 3) is 2 by simplifying the function and substituting the values.

Let's substitute x-3 for x in the given function: f(x+3) = f((x-3) + 3) = f(x).

Then, we can rewrite the given function as f(x) = (x-3)² + k(x-3) - 21.

To find the value of k, we can set x=0 and solve for k: f(0) = (0-3)^2 + k(0-3) - 21 = -12 + 3k - 21 = 3k - 33.

We know that f(0) = f(3-3) = f(-3), so we can also calculate f(-3) using the given function:

f(-3+3) = f(0) = 0² + k(0) - 21 = -21.

Setting f(-3) = -21, we get:

-21 = (-3)² + k(-3) - 21, which simplifies to k = 2.

Therefore, the value of k is 2.

Learn more about the function at

https://brainly.com/question/23154320

#SPJ4