When a new partner is admitted to a partnership, they become liable for the existing debts and obligations (antecedent debts) of the partnership only to the extent of their capital contribution.
What this means is that the new partner is only responsible for the debts and obligations of the partnership up to the amount that they have contributed as capital. If the partnership owes more than that amount, the other partners are still liable for the remainder of the debt.
Basically, a partner is not responsible for any debts that were incurred before they joined the partnership. However, if they contribute to the partnership's capital, they become liable for any debts that are incurred after they become a partner. This is because they have invested in the partnership and stand to benefit from its success.
To illustrate this concept with an example: let's say that a partnership has three partners, A, B, and C. The partnership owes $100,000 in antecedent debts. The partners have each contributed $50,000 to the partnership as capital. If a new partner, D, is admitted to the partnership and contributes $25,000 as capital, they are only liable for up to $25,000 of the antecedent debts. The existing partners, A, B, and C, are still liable for the remaining $75,000 of antecedent debts.
Learn more about partnership:
https://brainly.com/question/15913927
#SPJ11
Critically evaluate the considerations taken by the courts in determining the application for postponement of possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor.
The courts consider several factors when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor. Here is a step-by-step evaluation of these considerations:
1. Lack of concrete evidence: When the mortgagor fails to provide concrete evidence to support their application for postponement of possession, the courts may consider this as a factor against granting the request. Concrete evidence could include valid reasons for the delay or evidence of financial hardship.
2. Reason for the postponement: The courts will evaluate the reason provided by the mortgagor for seeking a postponement. If the reason is deemed valid, such as unforeseen circumstances or financial difficulties, the courts may be more inclined to grant the application.
3. Merits of the case: The courts will assess the overall merits of the case, including any defenses raised by the mortgagor. If the mortgagor has a strong legal argument or valid defense, the courts may consider this in favor of postponing the possession order.
4. Balance of interests: The courts will weigh the interests of both parties involved, including the mortgagor and the mortgagee. They will consider factors such as the potential harm to the mortgagor if possession is granted, as well as the legitimate rights and interests of the mortgagee.
5. Good faith efforts: The courts will evaluate whether the mortgagor has made good faith efforts to address the issue and resolve any outstanding obligations. This could include attempts to negotiate with the mortgagee, seek financial assistance, or make partial payments.
In conclusion, when determining an application for postponement of a possession order in the absence of concrete evidence from the mortgagor, the courts critically evaluate factors such as the lack of evidence, the reason for the postponement, the merits of the case, the balance of interests, and the mortgagor's good faith efforts. These considerations help the courts make a fair and informed decision.
Learn more about ' Evidence in Courts' https://brainly.com/question/23323608
#SPJ11
_____ law is based on the previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances.
Precedent law is based on previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal consistency and predictability.
Precedent law, also known as case law or common law, is a legal system where judicial decisions from higher courts serve as binding or persuasive authority for future cases with similar circumstances. Under this system, judges are expected to follow the legal principles established in previous cases and apply them to the current case at hand.
Precedent law is essential in providing consistency, predictability, and stability in legal interpretations and outcomes. It allows for the development of legal principles and standards over time as courts build upon and refine previous decisions. Precedents play a crucial role in shaping the legal landscape, as they serve as a guide for judges and lawyers in determining the appropriate legal reasoning and outcome in new cases. Hence, precedent law is based on the previous decisions of higher courts as applied to the same or similar circumstances, providing a foundation for legal interpretations and outcomes.
Learn more about Precedent law here:
https://brainly.com/question/25440253
#SPJ11