Answer:
32 copiesStep-by-step explanation:
First convert 3 minutes and 15 seconds into minutes by converting 15 sec to min and add it to 3min
60 sec = 1min
15 sec = 15 / 60 × 1 min
= 0.25min
Add it to 3min
3min + 0.25min = 3.25 min
We use ratio and proportion
3.25min = 104 copies
1 min = 104× 1/ 3.25
= 104 / 3.25
= 32
The final answer is 32 copies
Hope this helps you.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3 min 15 sec = 3*60 + 15 = 180 + 15 = 195 seconds
In 195 seconds 104 copies are made
In one second, the number of copies made = [tex]\frac{104}{195}\\[/tex]
In 60 seconds, the number of copies made = [tex]\frac{104}{195}*60[/tex]
= 32 copies
if a varies inversely as the cube root of b and a=1 when b=64, find b
Answer:
b = 64/a³
Step-by-step explanation:
Using the given information, we can only find a relation between a and b. We cannot find any specific value for b.
Since a varies inversely as the cube root of b, we have ...
a = k/∛b
Multiplying by ∛b lets us find the value of k:
k = a·∛b = 1·∛64 = 4
Taking the cube of this equation gives ...
64 = a³b
b = 64/a³ . . . . . divide by a³
The value of b is ...
b = 64/a³
The mean monthly car payment for 123 residents of the local apartment complex is $624. What is the best point estimate for the mean monthly car payment for all residents of the local apartment complex?
Answer:
The best point estimate for the mean monthly car payment for all residents of the local apartment complex is $624.
Step-by-step explanation:
The Central Limit Theorem estabilishes that, for a normally distributed random variable X, with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]\sigma[/tex], the sampling distribution of the sample means with size n can be approximated to a normal distribution with mean [tex]\mu[/tex] and standard deviation [tex]s = \frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex].
In this question:
We apply the inverse Central Limit Theorem.
The mean monthy car payment for 123 residents of the local apartment complex is $624.
So, for all residents of the local apartment complex, the best point estimate for the mean monthly car payment is $624.
whats 1/2 + 2/4 - 5/8?
Answer:
3/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Find common denominators
1/2 = 4/8
2/4 = 4/8
Step 2: Evaluate
4/8 + 4/8 - 5/8
8/8 - 5/8
3/8
Alternatively, you can just plug this into a calc to evaluate and get your answer.
Answer:
3/8
Step-by-step explanation:
Look at the denominator:
2, 4, 8. The LCM (Lowest Common Multiple) is 8.
So this equation becomes
4/8+4/8-5/8=3/8
By what percent will the fraction increase if its numerator is increased by 60% and denominator is decreased by 20% ?
Answer:
100%
Step-by-step explanation:
Start with x.
x = x/1
Increase the numerator by 60% to 1.6x.
Decrease the numerator by 20% to 0.8.
The new fraction is
1.6x/0.8
Do the division.
1.6x/0.8 = 2x
The fraction increased from x to 2x. It became double of what it was. From x to 2x, the increase is x. Since x was the original number x is 100%.
The increase is 100%.
Answer:
33%
Step-by-step explanation:
let fraction be x/y
numerator increased by 60%
=x+60%ofx
=8x
denominator increased by 20%
=y+20%of y
so the increased fraction is 4x/3y
let the fraction is increased by a%
then
x/y +a%of (x/y)=4x/3y
or, a%of(x/y)=x/3y
[tex]a\% = \frac{x}{3y} \times \frac{y}{x} [/tex]
therefore a=33
anda%=33%
find the value of k if x minus 2 is a factor of P of X that is X square + X + k
Answer:
k = -6
Step-by-step explanation:
hello
saying that (x-2) is a factor of [tex]x^2+x+k[/tex]
means that 2 is a zero of
[tex]x^2+x+k=0 \ so\\2^2+2+k=0\\<=> 4+2+k=0\\<=> 6+k =0\\<=> k = -6[/tex]
and we can verify as
[tex](x^2+x-6)=(x-2)(x+3)[/tex]
so it is all good
hope this helps
HELP ASAP! The number of entertainment websites in 1995 wass 54. By 2004 there were 793 entertainment website..
Approximately, what was the rate of change for the number of the websites for this time period??
=============================================================
How I got that answer:
We have gone from 54 websites to 793 websites. This is a change of 793-54 = 739 new websites. This is over a timespan of 2004-1995 = 9 years.
Since we have 739 new websites over the course of 9 years, this means the rate of change is 739/9 = 82.1111... where the '1's go on forever. Rounding to the nearest whole number gets us roughly 82 websites a year.
----------
You could use the slope formula to get the job done. This is because the slope represents the rise over run
slope = rise/run
The rise is how much the number of websites have gone up or down. The run is the amount of time that has passed by. So slope = rise/run = 739/9 = 82.111...
In a more written out way, the steps would be
slope = rise/run
slope = (y2-y1)/(x2-x1)
slope = (793 - 54)/(2004 - 1995)
slope = 739/9
slope = 82.111....
the ellipse is centered at the origin, has axes of lengths 8 and 4, its major axis is horizontal. how do you write an equation for this ellipse?
Answer:
The equation for this ellipse is [tex]\frac{x^{2}}{64} + \frac{y^{2}}{16} = 1[/tex].
Step-by-step explanation:
The standard equation of the ellipse is described by the following expression:
[tex]\frac{x^{2}}{a^{2}}+\frac{y^{2}}{b^{2}} = 1[/tex]
Where [tex]a[/tex] and [tex]b[/tex] are the horizontal and vertical semi-axes, respectively. Given that major semi-axis is horizontal, [tex]a > b[/tex]. Then, the equation for this ellipse is written in this way: (a = 8, b = 4)
[tex]\frac{x^{2}}{64} + \frac{y^{2}}{16} = 1[/tex]
The equation for this ellipse is [tex]\frac{x^{2}}{64} + \frac{y^{2}}{16} = 1[/tex].
For the triangle show, what are the values of x and y (urgent help needed)
we just have to use the Pythagoras theorem and then calculate the value of x and y.
I got the answer but I really don’t know if it’s correct or not, please help this is due today
Suppose a random variable X is best described by a uniform probability distribution with range 1 to 5. Find the value of that makes the following probability statements true.
a) P(X <-a)= 0.95
b) P(X
c) P(X
d) P(X ->a)= 0.89
e) P(X >a)= 0.31
Answer:
a) 4.8
b) 2.96
c) 4.4
d) 1.44
e) 3.76
Step-by-step explanation:
What we will do is solve point by point, knowing the following:
Fx (x) = P (X <= x) = (x - 1) / 4
a) P (X <-a) = 0.95
Fx (a) = 0.95
(a -1) / 4 = 0.95
a = 1 + 0.95 * 4
a = 4.8
b) P (X <a) = 0.49
Fx (a) = 0.49
(a -1) / 4 = 0.49
a = 1 + 0.49 * 4
a = 2.96
c) P (X <a) = 0.85
Fx (a) = 0.85
(a -1) / 4 = 0.55
a = 1 + 0.85 * 4
a = 4.4
d) P (X> a) = 0.89
P (X <a) = 1 - 0.89 = 0.11
Fx (a) = 0.11
(a -1) / 4 = 0.11
a = 1 + 0.11 * 4
a = 1.44
e) P (X> a) = 0.31
P (X <a) = 1 - 0.31 = 0.69
Fx (a) = 0.69
(a -1) / 4 = 0.69
a = 1 + 0.69 * 4
a = 3.76
Find the indicated conditional probability
using the following two-way table:
P( Drive to school | Sophomore ) = [?]
Round to the nearest hundredth.
Answer:
0.07
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of sophmores is 2+25+3 = 30.
Of these sophmores, 2 drive to school.
So the probability that a student drives to school, given that they are a sophmore, is 2/30, or approximately 0.07.
Answer:
[tex]\large \boxed{0.07}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
The usual question is, "What is the probability of A, given B?"
They are asking, "What is the probability that you are driving to school if you are a sophomore (rather than taking the bus or walking)?"
We must first complete your frequency table by calculating the totals for each row and column.
The table shows that there are 30 students, two of whom drive to school.
[tex]P = \dfrac{2}{30}= \mathbf{0.07}\\\\\text{The conditional probability is $\large \boxed{\mathbf{0.07}}$}[/tex]
Which proportion would convert 18 ounces into pounds?
Answer:
16 ounces = 1 pound
Step-by-step explanation:
You would just do 18/16 = 1.125 pounds. There are always 16 ounces in a pound, so it always works like this
Find the length and width of a rectangle that has the given perimeter and a maximum area. Perimeter: 116 meters
Answer:
Length = 29 m
Width = 29 m
Step-by-step explanation:
Let x and y be the length and width of the rectangle, respectively.
The area and perimeter are given by:
[tex]A=xy\\p=116=2x+2y\\y=58-x[/tex]
Rewriting the area as a function of x:
[tex]A(x) = x(58-x)\\A(x) = 58x-x^2[/tex]
The value of x for which the derivate of the area function is zero, is the length that maximizes the area:
[tex]A(x) = 58x-x^2\\\frac{dA}{dx}=0=58-2x\\ x=29\ m[/tex]
The value of y is:
[tex]y = 58-29\\y=29\ m[/tex]
Length = 29 m
Width = 29 m
co
Which graph represents the inequality?
-2
1-1
-12
1
1 2
NE
1
Y>-
2
2
А
++
1 -1
-12
ou
-2
od
1
NIE
1
B
1 2
2
2
---
Oto
-2
-1
1 2
-12
-
NIE
NI
12
D
-2
1 - 1
1
0
1
1 2
NIS
2
NI
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the equality y > -½, it means the values of y is greater than -½.
The values of y would range from 0 upwards. I.e. 0, ½, 1, 1½, 2. . .
Thus, when graphed on a number line, the circle that appears like "o" would start from -½, and the "o" would not be full or shaded to indicate that -½ is not included in the values of y, which are greater than -½. Since the values of y are greater than -½ the direction of the arrow that indicates values of y would point towards our far right, to indicate the values included as y.
Therefore, the graph that indicates the inequality y > ½ is A
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Growth of Functions (11 points) (1) (4 points) Determine whether each of these functions is O(x 2 ). Proof is not required but it may be good to try to justify it (a) 100x + 1000 (b) 100x 2 + 1000
Answer:
See explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine whether each of these functions is [tex]O(x^2)[/tex], we apply these theorems:
A polynomial is always O(the term containing the highest power of n)Any O(x) function is always [tex]O(x^2)[/tex].(a)Given the function: f(x)=100x+1000
The highest power of n is 1.
Therefore f(x) is O(x).
Since any O(x) function is always [tex]O(x^2)[/tex], 100x+1000 is [tex]O(x^2)[/tex].
[tex](b) f(x)=100x^ 2 + 1000[/tex]
The highest power of n is 2.
Therefore the function is [tex]O(x^2)[/tex].
Answer:
i think its 2000
Step-by-step explanation:
At 95% confidence, how large a sample should be taken to obtain a margin of error of 0.05 for the estimation of a population proportion
Answer:
A sample of 385 is needed.
Step-by-step explanation:
In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of [tex]\pi[/tex], and a confidence level of [tex]1-\alpha[/tex], we have the following confidence interval of proportions.
[tex]\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]
In which
z is the zscore that has a pvalue of [tex]1 - \frac{\alpha}{2}[/tex].
The margin of error is:
[tex]M = z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]
95% confidence level
So [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex], z is the value of Z that has a pvalue of [tex]1 - \frac{0.05}{2} = 0.975[/tex], so [tex]Z = 1.96[/tex].
How large a sample:
We need a sample of n.
n is found when M = 0.05.
We dont know the true proportion, so we work with the worst case scenario, which is [tex]\pi = 0.5[/tex]
[tex]M = z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]
[tex]0.05 = 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.5*0.5}{n}}[/tex]
[tex]0.05\sqrt{n} = 1.96*0.5[/tex]
[tex]\sqrt{n} = \frac{1.96*0.5}{0.05}[/tex]
[tex](\sqrt{n})^{2} = (\frac{1.96*0.5}{0.05})^{2}[/tex]
[tex]n = 384.16[/tex]
Rounding up
A sample of 385 is needed.
Christopher collected data from a random sample of 800 voters in his state asking whether or not they would vote to reelect the current governor. Based on the results, he reports that 54% of the voters in his city would vote to reelect the current governor. Why is this statistic misleading?
Answer:
The statistic is misleading because Christopher collects his sample from a population (voters in his state) and make inferences about another population (voters in his city).
Step-by-step explanation:
The statistic is misleading because Christopher collects his sample from a population (voters in his state) and make inferences about another population (voters in his city).
He should make inferences about the population that is well represented by his sample (voters in his state), or take a sample only from voters from his city to make inferences about them.
The length of a rectangle is 5M more than twice the width and the area of the rectangle is 63M to find the dimension of the rectangle
Answer:
width = 4.5 m
length = 14 m
Step-by-step explanation:
okay so first you right down that L = 5 + 2w
then as you know that Area = length * width so you replace the length with 5 + 2w
so it's A = (5 +2w) * w = 63
then 2 w^2 + 5w - 63 =0
so we solve for w which equals 4.5 after that you solve for length : 5+ 2*4.5 = 14
Suppose 150 students are randomly sampled from a population of college students. Among sampled students, the average IQ score is 115 with a standard deviation of 10. What is the 99% confidence interval for the average IQ of college students? Possible Answers: 1) A) E =1.21 B) E = 1.25 C) E =2.52 D) E = 2.11 2) A) 112.48 < μ < 117.52 B) 113.79 < μ < 116.21 C) 112.9 < μ < 117.10 D) 113.75 < μ < 116.3
Answer:
99% confidence interval for the mean of college students
A) 112.48 < μ < 117.52
Step-by-step explanation:
step(i):-
Given sample size 'n' =150
mean of the sample = 115
Standard deviation of the sample = 10
99% confidence interval for the mean of college students are determined by
[tex](x^{-} -t_{0.01} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } , x^{-} + t_{0.01} \frac{S}{\sqrt{n} } )[/tex]
Step(ii):-
Degrees of freedom
ν = n-1 = 150-1 =149
t₁₄₉,₀.₀₁ = 2.8494
99% confidence interval for the mean of college students are determined by
[tex](115 -2.8494 \frac{10}{\sqrt{150} } , 115 + 2.8494\frac{10}{\sqrt{150} } )[/tex]
on calculation , we get
(115 - 2.326 , 115 +2.326 )
(112.67 , 117.326)
Jeremy makes $57,852 per year at his accounting firm. How much is Jeremy’s monthly salary? (There are 12 months in a year.) How much is Jeremy’s weekly salary? (There are 52 weeks in a year.)
Answer:
Monthly: $4,821
Weekly: $1112.54
Step-by-step explanation:
Monthly
A monthly salary can be found by dividing the yearly salary by the number of months.
salary / months
His salary is $57,852 and there are 12 months in a year.
$57,852/ 12 months
Divide
$4,821 / month
Jeremy makes $4,821 per month.
Weekly
To find the weekly salary, divide the yearly salary by the number of weeks.
salary / weeks
He makes $57,852 each year and there are 52 weeks in one year.
$57,852 / 52 weeks
Divide
$1112.53846 / week
Round to the nearest cent. The 8 in the thousandth place tells use to round the 3 up to a 4 in the hundredth place.
$1112.54 / week
Jeremy makes $1112.54 per week
show that 7 1/2 - 4 2/3 = 2 5/6
Equation is [tex]7\frac{1}{2} -4\frac{2}{3}=2\frac{5}{6}[/tex] is true.
What is Equation?Two or more expressions with an Equal sign is called as Equation.
The given equation is [tex]7\frac{1}{2} -4\frac{2}{3}=2\frac{5}{6}[/tex]
We need to check whether the left hand side is equal to right hand side.
These are in the form pf mixed fraction we can convert them to the improper fraction.
[tex]7\frac{1}{2}=15/2[/tex]
[tex]4\frac{2}{3}=\frac{14}{3}[/tex]
So Let us subtract 24/3 from 15/2
15/2-14/3
LCM of 2 and 3 is 6
45-28/6
17/6
This can be written as mixed fraction [tex]2\frac{5}{6}[/tex]
Hence, equation is [tex]7\frac{1}{2} -4\frac{2}{3}=2\frac{5}{6}[/tex] is true.
To learn more on Equation:
https://brainly.com/question/10413253
#SPJ2
A fair die is rolled repeatedly. Calculate to at least two decimal places:__________
a) the chance that the first 6 appears before the tenth roll
b) the chance that the third 6 appears on the tenth roll
c) the chance of seeing three 6's among the first ten rolls given that there were six 6's among the first twenty roles.
d) the expected number of rolls until six 6's appear
e) the expected number of rolls until all six faces appear
Answer:
a. 0.34885
b. 0.04651
c. 0.02404
d. 36
e. 14.7, say 15 trials
Step-by-step explanation:
Q17070205
Note:
1. In order to be applicable to established probability distributions, each roll is considered a Bernouilli trial, i.e. has only two outcomes, success or failure, and are all independent of each other.
2. use R to find the probability values from the respective distributions.
a) the chance that the first 6 appears before the tenth roll
This means that a six appears exactly once between the first and the nineth roll.
Using binomial distribution, p=1/6, n=9, x=1
dbinom(1,9,1/6) = 0.34885
b) the chance that the third 6 appears on the tenth roll
This means exactly two six's appear between the first and 9th rolls, and the tenth roll is a six.
Again, we have a binomial distribution of p=1/6, n=9, x=2
p1 = dbinom(2,9,1/6) = 0.27908
The probability of the tenth roll being a 6 is, evidently, p2 = 1/6.
Thus the probability of both happening, by the multiplication rule, assuming independence
P(third on the tenth roll) = p1*p2 = 0.04651
c) the chance of seeing three 6's among the first ten rolls given that there were six 6's among the first twenty roles.
Again, using binomial distribution, probability of 3-6's in the first 10 rolls,
p1 = dbinom(3,10,1/6) = 0.15504
Probability of 3-6's in the NEXT 10 rolls
p1 = dbinom(3,10,1/6) = 0.15504
Probability of both happening (multiplication rule, assuming both events are independent)
= p1 * p1 = 0.02404
d) the expected number of rolls until six 6's appear
Using the negative binomial distribution, the expected number of failures before n=6 successes, with probability p = 1/6
= n(1-p)/p
Total number of rolls by adding n
= n(1-p)/p + n = n(1-p+p)/p = n/p = 6/(1/6) = 36
e) the expected number of rolls until all six faces appear
P1 = 6/6 because the firs trial (roll) can be any face with probability 1
P2 = 6/5 because the second trial for a different face has probability 5/6, so requires 6/5 trials
P3 = 6/4 ...
P4 = 6/3
P5 = 6/2
P6 = 6/1
So the total mean (expected) number of trials is 6/6+6/5+6/4+6/3+6/2+6/1 = 14.7, say 15 trials
2{ 3[9 + 4(7 -5) - 4]}
Answer:
2{3[9+4(7-5)-4]}
2{3[9+4(2)-4]}
2{3[13(2)-4]}
2{3[26-4]}
2{3[22]}
2{66}
132
Step-by-step explanation:
Evaluate the expression.........
Answer:
9
Step-by-step explanation:
p^2 -4p +4
Let p = -1
(-1)^1 -4(-1) +4
1 +4+4
9
Prepare the journal entries on December 31, 2019, for the 40 extended contracts (the first year of the revised 3-year contract).
This is not the complete question, the complete question is:
P18-1 (LO2,3) (Allocate Transaction Price, Upfront Fees)
Tablet Tailors sells tablet PCs combined with Internet service, which permits the tablet to connect to the Internet anywhere and set up a Wi-Fi hot spot. It offers two bundles with the following terms.
1. Tablet Bundle A sells a tablet with 3 years of Internet service. The price for the tablet and a 3-year Internet connection service contract is $500. The standalone selling price of the tablet is $250 (the cost to Tablet Tailors is $175). Tablet Tailors sells the Internet access service independently for an upfront payment of $300. On January 2, 2017, Tablet Tailors signed 100 contracts, receiving a total of $50,000 in cash.
2. After 2 years of the 3-year contract, Tablet Tailors offers a modified contract and extension incentive. The extended contract services are similar to those provided in the first 2 years of the contract. Signing the extension and paying $90 (which equals the standalone selling of the revised Internet service package) extends access for 2 more years of Internet connection. Forty Tablet Bundle A customers sign up for this offer.
INSTRUCTION
a) Prepare the journal entries when the contract is signed on January 2, 2019, for the 40 extended contracts. Assume the modification does not result in a separate performance obligation.
b) Prepare the journal entries on December 31, 2019, for the 40 extended contracts (the first year of the revised 3-year contract).
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
(A)
Date Particulars Debit Credit
2-Jan-19 Cash 3600
Unearned Service Revenue 3600
40 * 90 = 3600
services in the extended period are the same as the services that were provided in the original contract period. As they are not distinct hence the modifications will be considered as part of the original contract.
(B)
Date Particulars Debit Credit
31-Dec-19 Unearned Service Revenue 2413
Service revenue 2413
internet = 300, price = 550, connection service = 500
(300/550) * 500 = 273
so
Original internet service contract = 40 * 273 = 10,920
Revenue recognized in 1st two years = 10,920 * 2/3 = 7280
Remaining service at original rates = 10920 - 7280 = 3640
Extended service = 3600
3640 + 3600 = $7240
7240 / 3 = $2413
In a survey, 205 people indicated they prefer cats, 160 indicated they prefer dots, and 40 indicated they don’t enjoy either pet. Find the probability that if a person is chosen at random, they prefer cats
Answer: probability = 0.506
Step-by-step explanation:
The data we have is:
Total people: 205 + 160 + 40 = 405
prefer cats: 205
prefer dogs: 160
neither: 40
The probability that a person chosen at random prefers cats is equal to the number of people that prefer cats divided the total number of people:
p = 205/405 = 0.506
in percent form, this is 50.6%
Would this be correct even though I didn’t use the chain rule to solve?
Answer:
Dy/Dx=1/√ (2x+3)
Yeah it's correct
Step-by-step explanation:
Applying differential by chain differentiation method.
The differential of y = √(2x+3) with respect to x
y = √(2x+3)
Let y = √u
Y = u^½
U = 2x +3
The formula for chain differentiation is
Dy/Dx = Dy/Du *Du/Dx
So
Dy/Dx = Dy/Du *Du/Dx
Dy/Du= 1/2u^-½
Du/Dx = 2
Dy/Dx =( 1/2u^-½)2
Dy/Dx= u^-½
Dy/Dx=1/√ u
But u = 2x+3
Dy/Dx=1/√ (2x+3)
Show all work to solve 3x^2 – 5x – 2 = 0.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
3x2−5x−2=0
For this equation: a=3, b=-5, c=-2
3x2+−5x+−2=0
Step 1: Use quadratic formula with a=3, b=-5, c=-2.
x= (−b±√b2−4ac )2a
x= (−(−5)±√(−5)2−4(3)(−2) )/2(3)
x= (5±√49 )/6
x=2 or x= −1 /3
Answer:
x=2 or x= −1/ 3
The solutions to the equation are x = -1/3 and x = 2.
Here are the steps on how to solve [tex]3x^{2}[/tex] – 5x – 2 = 0:
First, we need to factor the polynomial. The factors of 3 are 1, 3, and the factors of -2 are -1, 2. The coefficient on the x term is -5, so we need to find two numbers that add up to -5 and multiply to -2. The two numbers -1 and 2 satisfy both conditions, so the factored polynomial is (3x + 1)(x - 2).
Next, we set each factor equal to 0 and solve for x.
(3x + 1)(x - 2) = 0
3x + 1 = 0
3x = -1
x = -1/3
x - 2 = 0
x = 2
Therefore, the solutions to the equation [tex]3x^{2}[/tex] – 5x – 2 = 0 are x = -1/3 and x = 2.
Here is the explanation for each of the steps:
Step 1: In order to factor the polynomial, we need to find two numbers that add up to -5 and multiply to -2. The two numbers -1 and 2 satisfy both conditions, so the factored polynomial is (3x + 1)(x - 2).
Step 2: We set each factor equal to 0 and solve for x. When we set 3x + 1 equal to 0, we get x = -1/3. When we set x - 2 equal to 0, we get x = 2. Therefore, the solutions to the equation are x = -1/3 and x = 2.
Learn more about equation here: brainly.com/question/29657983
#SPJ2
The problem is: On a Map, 3 inches represents 40 miles, How many inches represents 480 miles?
The width of a casing for a door is normally distributed with a mean of 24 inches and a standard deviation of 1/8 inch. The width of a door is normally distributed with a mean of 23 7/8 inches and a standard deviation of 1/16 inch. Assume independence. a. Determine the mean and standard deviation of the difference between the width of the casing and the width of the door. b. What is the probability that the width of the casing minus the width of the door exceeds 1/4 inch? c. What is the probability that the door does not fit in the casing?
Answer:
a) Mean = 0.125 inch
Standard deviation = 0.13975 inch
b) Probability that the width of the casing minus the width of the door exceeds 1/4 inch = P(X > 0.25) = 0.18673
c) Probability that the door does not fit in the casing = P(X < 0) = 0.18673
Step-by-step explanation:
Let the distribution of the width of the casing be X₁ (μ₁, σ₁²)
Let the distribution of the width of the door be X₂ (μ₂, σ₂²)
The distribution of the difference between the width of the casing and the width of the door = X = X₁ - X₂
when two independent normal distributions are combined in any manner, the resulting distribution is also a normal distribution with
Mean = Σλᵢμᵢ
λᵢ = coefficient of each disteibution in the manner that they are combined
μᵢ = Mean of each distribution
Combined variance = σ² = Σλᵢ²σᵢ²
λ₁ = 1, λ₂ = -1
μ₁ = 24 inches
μ₂ = 23 7/8 inches = 23.875 inches
σ₁² = (1/8)² = (1/64) = 0.015625
σ₂ ² = (1/16)² = (1/256) = 0.00390625
Combined mean = μ = 24 - 23.875 = 0.125 inch
Combined variance = σ² = (1² × 0.015625) + [(-1)² × 0.00390625] = 0.01953125
Standard deviation = √(Variance) = √(0.01953125) = 0.1397542486 = 0.13975 inch
b) Probability that the width of the casing minus the width of the door exceeds 1/4 inch = P(X > 0.25)
This is a normal distribution problem
Mean = μ = 0.125 inch
Standard deviation = σ = 0.13975 inch
We first normalize/standardize 0.25 inch
The standardized score of any value is that value minus the mean divided by the standard deviation.
z = (x - μ)/σ = (0.25 - 0.125)/0.13975 = 0.89
P(X > 0.25) = P(z > 0.89)
Checking the tables
P(x > 0.25) = P(z > 0.89) = 1 - P(z ≤ 0.89) = 1 - 0.81327 = 0.18673
c) Probability that the door does not fit in the casing
If X₂ > X₁, X < 0
P(X < 0)
We first normalize/standardize 0 inch
z = (x - μ)/σ = (0 - 0.125)/0.13975 = -0.89
P(X < 0) = P(z < -0.89)
Checking the tables
P(X < 0) = P(z < -0.89) = 0.18673
Hope this Helps!!!