A claim about a cause-and-effect relationship should be supported with examples that show what?

similar causes having the same effect

comparison and contrast of characters’ behavior

different types of causes having the same effect

ways that the narrator makes certain things happen

Answer:

D. fruit

Explanation:

hope this helps

Answer: fruit  

Explanation: I thinks its fruit because a orange is a fruit, and lizard is reptile. They both got similarities

or balls since the orange is shaped as a circle

Answer:

1) He didn't think he could sing. In the text, it says, "'I didn't think I could sing,' says Bridges. 'I knew I could do stuff here and there, but didn't think I was good enough to fit.'"

2)His parents got separated when he was 7, his family was poor. In the text, it says, " After his parents separated when he was 7, he split time between suburban Fort Worth and inner-city Dallas, where his father worked at a community center.His family was poor, and shortly after Hurricane Katrina, 10 relatives from New Orleans temporarily came to live with him, his mother, and his half-sister."

3) Bridges said that his mom's friends gave him their old childhood clothes. In the text, it says, "He met Austin Jenkins, guitarist from Austin psych-rock band White Denim, at a Fort Worth bar. He noticed Bridges' singular '50s fashion style—crisp slacks, starched collars, high-waist jeans, exquisite vintage suits. suits. ('It all started when one of my mom's older friends gave me his childhood clothes when I was a teenager," says Bridges of his look. "It's funny when people think it's just a marketing scheme.')"

Answer:

since the morning I has been reading

Explanation:

Shooting an Elephant” first appeared in 1936. The British public already knew Orwell as the socially conscious author of Down and Out in London and Paris (1933), a nonfiction study of poverty, homelessness, unemployment, and subsistence living on poorly-paying menial jobs, and Burmese Days (1934), a novel of British colonialism. “Shooting an Elephant” functions as an addendum to Burmese Days. The story and novel share the same setting, and draw on Orwell’s experience as a colonial official in India and Burma, two regions of the British Empire, in the middle of the century between the two world wars. The story (which some critics consider an essay) concerns a colonial officer’s obligation to shoot a rogue elephant. The narrator does not want to shoot the elephant, but feels compelled to by a crowd of indigenous residents, before whom he does not wish to appear indecisive or cowardly. The situation and events that Orwell describes underscores the hostility between the administrators of the British Empire and their “native” subjects. Both sides feel hatred, distrust, and resentment. The situation is universally degrading. The shooting itself involves enormous pathos conveyed economically in a few words.

e think its B

pls correct me if im wrong