a biomedical research company produces of its insulin at a plant in kansas city, and the remainder is produced at a plant in jefferson city. quality control has shown that of the insulin produced at the plant in kansas city is defective, while of the insulin produced at the plant in jefferson city is defective. what is the probability that a randomly chosen unit of insulin came from the plant in jefferson city given that it is defective?

Answer: Weather Forecasting

Step-by-step explanation:

The correct option is b, the statement is false because the leading coefficient is -2, which is negative.

Here we have the quadratic function:

f(x) = -2x² - 4x + 7

Remember that if the leading coefficient is positive, then the parabola opens up, while if the leading coefficient is negative, the parabola opens down.

Here the leading coefficient is -2, is negative, then the parabola opens down.

Then the correct option is the second one, the statement is false because the leading coefficient is negative.

Learn more about quadratic functions at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

For the a factor of f(x) expression, the zeros of f(x) are x = 1, x = 4, and x = 6.

To find all the zeros of the function f(x) algebraically, determine the values of x that make f(x) equal to zero.

Here are the steps on how to find the zeros of f(x) algebraically.

Since x-4 is a factor of f(x), factor it out to get:

f(x) = (x - 4)(x² - 7x + 6)

Factor the quadratic expression in the parenthesis to get:

f(x) = (x-4)(x-1)(x-6)

This means that the zeros of f(x) are 4, 1, and 6.

Therefore, the answer is:

4, 1, 6

Find out more on algebraically here: https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

the number is really "x", which oddly enough is the 100%, but we also know that 15% of that is 107.6.

[tex]\begin{array}{ccll} Amount&\%\\ \cline{1-2} x & 100\\ 107.6& 75 \end{array} \implies \cfrac{x}{107.6}~~=~~\cfrac{100}{75} \implies\cfrac{x}{107.6} ~~=~~ \cfrac{4}{3} \\\\\\ 3x=430.4\implies x=\cfrac{430.4}{3}\implies x=\cfrac{2152}{15}\implies x=143\frac{7}{15}\implies x=143.4\overline{66}[/tex]

Answer:

x=72

y=92

Sum of Opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral is 180°

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

1/5*12x/1=

12x/5

1/5*-10=

-2

D=12x/5-2

One cylinder with a 2-inch diameter is sufficient to lift the school bus using the given hydraulic lift system.

To determine how many cylinders are required to lift the school bus using a hydraulic lift system, we need to use the formula:

force = pressure x area

where force is the weight of the bus (10,000 lbs), pressure is the operating pressure of the system (2000 lb/in²), and area is the cross-sectional area of the cylinder (pi x radius²).

First, we need to calculate the area of each cylinder:

radius = diameter/2 = 1 inch

area = pi x (1 inch)² = pi square inches

Next, we can calculate the force required to lift the bus:

force = 10,000 lbs

Finally, we can calculate the number of cylinders needed:

force = pressure x area x number of cylinders

number of cylinders = force / (pressure x area)

Substituting the values we calculated, we get:

number of cylinders = 10,000 lbs / (2000 lb/in² x pi square inches x (2 inches)²)

number of cylinders = 10,000 / (2000 x 4 x pi)

number of cylinders = 0.397

Since we cannot have a fractional number of cylinders, we round up to the nearest integer:

number of cylinders = 1

To learn more about hydraulic lift system click on,

https://brainly.com/question/3832488

#SPJ4

A 15 ¾ in. board is cut in a single cut from a 38 ¼ in board. The saw cut takes 3/8 in.  21 ¾ inches of the 38 ¼ inch board is left.

To find out how much of the 38 ¼ inch board is left after cutting, follow these steps:
1. Determine the total length of the cut: The cut takes 3/8 inch and removes a 15 ¾ inch board, so the total length of the cut is 15 ¾ inches + 3/8 inch.
2. Convert mixed numbers to improper fractions: 15 ¾ = (15 × 4 + 3)/4 = 63/4; 38 ¼ = (38 × 4 + 1)/4 = 153/4
3. Add the improper fractions: (63/4) + (3/8) = (63/4) + (3/8 × 2/2) = (63/4) + (6/8) = (126/8) + (6/8) = 132/8 = 16 ½ inches
4. Subtract the cut length from the original board length: (153/4) - (132/8) = (153/4) - (16 ½ × 4/4) = (153/4) - (66/4) = 87/4 = 21 ¾ inches
After cutting, 21 ¾ inches of the 38 ¼ inch board is left.

To learn more about total length, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/23952968

#SPJ11

The value of the integral ∫ 6 tan^2(x) dx is 6tan(x) - 6x + c.

We can start by using the identity tan^2(x) = sec^2(x) - 1 to rewrite the integral as:

6 tan^2(x) dx = 6(sec^2(x) - 1) dx

Now we can integrate each term separately:

∫ 6(sec^2(x) - 1) dx = 6∫sec^2(x) dx - 6∫dx

The antiderivative of sec^2(x) is tan(x), so:

6∫sec^2(x) dx - 6∫dx = 6tan(x) - 6x + c

where c is the constant of integration.

Therefore, the value of the integral ∫ 6 tan^2(x) dx is 6tan(x) - 6x + c.

Learn more about integral here

https://brainly.com/question/30094386

#SPJ11

By using Pythagoras' theorem, the length of XY is equal to 14.4 centimeters.

In Mathematics and Geometry, Pythagorean's theorem is modeled or represented by the following mathematical equation (formula):

x² + y² = z²

Where:

x, y, and z represents the length of sides or side lengths of any right-angled triangle.

Based on the information provided about the side lengths of this right-angled triangle, we have the following equation:

XZ² = ZY² + XY²

16² = 7² + XY²

256 = 49 + XY²

XY² = 256 - 49

XY² = 207

XY = √207

XY = 14.4 centimeters.

Read more on Pythagorean theorem here: brainly.com/question/15430861

#SPJ1

= 0 - Var(y) = 0  Thus, we have shown that x - y and xy are uncorrelated.

To show that x - y and xy are uncorrelated, we need to show that their covariance is zero.

Covariance is defined as Cov(x,y) = E[(x - E[x])(y - E[y])].

We can expand the covariance of x-y and xy as follows:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - y - E[x - y])(xy - E[xy])]

= E[((x - E[x]) - (y - E[y]))(xy - E[x]E[y])]

= E[(x - E[x])xy - (x - E[x])E[y] - (y - E[y])E[x] + (y - E[y])E[x]E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - E[(x - E[x])E[y]] - E[(y - E[y])E[x]] + E[(y - E[y])E[x]E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - E[x - E[x]]E[y - E[y]] - E[y - E[y]]E[x - E[x]] + E[x - E[x]]E[y - E[y]]

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - (Var(x) - 0)

= E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(x)

Since x and y have the same variance, Var(x) = Var(y). Therefore:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(x) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(y)

To show that this is equal to zero, we can use the fact that E[xy] = E[x]E[y] since x and y are independent.

Therefore:

Cov(x - y, xy) = E[(x - E[x])xy] - Var(y)

= E[(x - E[x])y]E[x] - E[(x - E[x])E[y]] - Var(y)

= E[(x - E[x])](E[xy] - E[x]E[y]) - Var(y)

= 0 - Var(y) = 0

Thus, we have shown that x - y and xy are uncorrelated.

To learn more about variance click here

brainly.com/question/30052284

#SPJ11

T-statistics are more variable than z-scores because the standard error of the mean is more uncertain in small sample sizes. In a smaller sample size, there is less data to draw from which makes the estimate of the population mean less accurate. Therefore, the t-distribution takes into account the additional variability caused by the uncertainty of the sample size. In contrast, the z-score assumes that the population standard deviation is known, which is only true in large sample sizes. As a result, the t-distribution has fatter tails than the z-distribution, indicating a greater likelihood of extreme values.

The variability of t-statistics and z-scores is due to the differences in the distributions they come from. Z-scores are calculated from a standard normal distribution, which assumes that the sample size is infinite and the population standard deviation is known. However, in real-life situations, it is rare to have access to an infinite sample size or knowledge of the population standard deviation. In contrast, t-statistics are calculated from a t-distribution, which assumes that the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown.

In summary, t-statistics are more variable than z-scores due to the additional uncertainty of the standard error of the mean in smaller sample sizes. The t-distribution is used to account for this additional variability, while the z-score assumes a known population standard deviation and an infinite sample size. Understanding the differences between these two distributions is essential for accurate statistical analysis in real-world situations.

To know more about t-statistics and z-score visit:

https://brainly.com/question/15735672

#SPJ11

T statistics are more variable than z-scores because they are based on smaller sample sizes and have larger degrees of freedom.

T statistics are used when the sample size is small and the population standard deviation is unknown. In such cases, the standard error of the mean is estimated using the sample standard deviation and the degrees of freedom, which are calculated as n-1. As the sample size decreases, the degrees of freedom increase, which leads to greater variability in the t distribution.

On the other hand, z-scores are used when the sample size is large and the population standard deviation is known. In this case, the standard error of the mean is estimated using the population standard deviation, which leads to a smaller variability in the z distribution. Therefore, t statistics are more variable than z-scores due to their dependence on smaller sample sizes and larger degrees of freedom.

To know more about variable visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1511425

#SPJ11

The angle that the ramp makes with the ground is approximately 19 degrees.

the   angle    that the ramp makes with the ground can be found using trigonometry. the tangent of the angle is equal to the height of the ramp divided by the horizontal distance it covers:

tan(θ) = height / distance

where θ is the angle, height is 3.5 ft, and distance is 10 ft.

tan(θ) = 3.5 / 10θ = arctan(3.5 / 10)

θ = 19.1 degrees (rounded to the nearest degree)

Learn more about angle here:

https://brainly.com/question/31818999

#SPJ11

Therefore, the equation of the line passing through (-3, -5) and parallel to the line 2x + 3y = 15, in slope-intercept form, is y = (-2/3)x - 7.

To find the equation of a line parallel to the line 2x + 3y = 15 and passing through the point (-3, -5), we need to determine the slope of the given line and use it to construct the equation in slope-intercept form (y = mx + b).

The given line is in the form Ax + By = C, where A = 2, B = 3, and C = 15. To find the slope of this line, we can rearrange the equation to isolate y:

2x + 3y = 15

3y = -2x + 15

y = (-2/3)x + 5

The slope of the given line is -2/3.

Since the line we want to find is parallel to this line, it will have the same slope. Therefore, the slope of the line passing through (-3, -5) will also be -2/3.

Now, we can use the point-slope form of a linear equation to write the equation of the line:

y - y1 = m(x - x1)

Substituting the values of (-3, -5) and -2/3 for (x1, y1) and m, respectively:

y - (-5) = (-2/3)(x - (-3))

y + 5 = (-2/3)(x + 3)

To convert this equation into slope-intercept form, we can simplify and rearrange:

y + 5 = (-2/3)x - 2

y = (-2/3)x - 2 - 5

y = (-2/3)x - 7

Learn more about Equation of Parallel Lines on:

https://brainly.com/question/11345748

#SPJ1

The odds that a student who got an A on the exam got help from the professor during office hours is about 41.77%.

To solve this problem, we can use Bayes' theorem, which is a way to calculate conditional probabilities. Let A be the event that a student got an A on the exam, and B be the event that a student got help from the professor during office hours.

We want to find P(B|A), the probability that a student got help from the professor during office hours given that they got an A on the exam.

Bayes' theorem states that:

P(B|A) = P(A|B) * P(B) / P(A)

We are given that students who get help from the professor during office hours are 18 times more likely to get an A on the exam than students who do not get help, so:

P(A|B) = 18 * P(A|B')

where B' is the complement of B (i.e., not getting help from the professor during office hours).

We are also given that about 11.7% of students get help from the professor during office hours, so:

P(B) = 0.117

We can calculate P(A) by using the law of total probability:

P(A) = P(A|B) * P(B) + P(A|B') * P(B')

Since P(B') = 1 - P(B), we have:

P(A) = 18 * P(A|B') * 0.883 + P(A|B) * 0.117

Now we can plug in the values we have and solve for P(B|A):

P(B|A) = (18 * P(A|B') * P(B)) / (18 * P(A|B') * 0.883 + P(A|B) * 0.117)

Using a calculator, we can find that P(B|A) is approximately 41.77%.

In other words, if we randomly select a student who got an A on the exam, there is a 41.77% chance that they got help from the professor during office hours.

To learn more about probability click on,

https://brainly.com/question/31682849

#SPJ4

Answer: The answer is D. 1/4

To find the values of f(-0.5), f(0.3), and f(0.5), we need to evaluate the function f(x) at those specific points.

f(-0.5) = -1, f(0.3) = 0, and f(0.5) = 1.

Explanation:

The function f is defined on the interval (-2.5, 1.5) with different values for different sub-intervals. We can evaluate the function at a specific point by finding the sub-interval that contains that point and using the corresponding value of f.

For f(-0.5), the point -0.5 lies in the sub-interval (-0.5, 0.5), where f(x) = 0. Therefore, f(-0.5) = 0.

For f(0.3), the point 0.3 also lies in the sub-interval (-0.5, 0.5), where f(x) = 0. Therefore, f(0.3) = 0.

For f(0.5), the point 0.5 lies in the sub-interval (0.5, 1.5), where f(x) = 1. Therefore, f(0.5) = 1.

Thus, we have f(-0.5) = -1, f(0.3) = 0, and f(0.5) = 1, which are the values of the function at those specific points.

To learn more about sub-intervals click here, brainly.com/question/17131235

#SPJ11

Sally's conclusion that high school GPA is an excellent and useful predictor of performance ratings at work is not entirely supported by the correlation coefficient of 0.09 with a significance level of p<.01.

Although a significant correlation suggests a positive association between high school GPA and performance ratings, the strength of the relationship is weak. The practical significance of such a weak correlation may be limited in real-world scenarios where multiple factors can influence job performance.

It is also important to note that correlation does not imply causation.

Therefore, even if high school GPA is significantly correlated with performance ratings at work, it does not necessarily mean that high school GPA is a causative factor in better job performance. Other variables such as work experience, motivation, and personality may also contribute to predicting job performance, and their effects should also be taken into account when assessing the usefulness of high school GPA as a predictor.

Learn more about correlation coefficient here:

brainly.com/question/31978443

#SPJ11

The set of ordered pairs {(–5,2), (–4,1), (–3,0), (–3,–1)} is a relation but not a function.

The set of ordered pairs are {(–5,2), (–4,1), (–3,0), (–3,–1)}

We have to check whether the set is a relation or a function.

We know that a relation is a set of ordered pairs that relate inputs (x-values) to outputs (y-values).

So the set of ordered pairs is a relation.

We know that in a function, each input (x-value) is associated with exactly one output (y-value).

In this set of ordered pairs, the input –3 is associated with two different outputs: 0 and –1.

Therefore, it does not satisfy the criteria for a function, it is not a function.

To learn more on Functions click:

https://brainly.com/question/30721594

#SPJ1

Bill must trim trees for at least 6 hours to earn at least 33 dollars.

The inequality solved for t is t ≥ 6.

We have,

Bill's earnings for t hours of trimming trees is 7t dollars, and his expenses are 9 dollars.

Now,

Profit = 7t - 9

To earn at least 33 dollars, the profit must be greater than or equal to 33:

7t - 9 ≥ 33

Adding 9 to both sides, we get:

7t ≥ 42

Dividing both sides by 7, we get:

t ≥ 6

Therefore,

Bill must trim trees for at least 6 hours to earn at least 33 dollars.

The inequality solved for t is t ≥ 6.

Learn more about inequalities here:

https://brainly.com/question/20383699

#SPJ1

The value of the PQ is 5.452  when the PR value is 7 and the ∠PRQ value is 50°. Option B is the correct answer.

We need to find the value of the PQ. To determine the value of PQ we need to use the trigonometry functions which are,

Sinθ = opposite side / hypotenuse

Cosθ = Adjacent side / hypotenuse

Tanθ =  opposite side / Adjacent side

Given data:

PR = 7

∠PRQ = 50°

We can determine the PQ by using the formula,

Sin θ = opposite side / hypotenuse

Sin θ = P Q / PR

0.766044 = P Q / 7

P Q =  0.766044 × 7

P Q = 5.452

Therefore, The value of the PQ is 5.45.

To learn more about trigonometry functions:

https://brainly.com/question/29615325

#SPJ1

The question is,

use one of the triangles to approximate PQ in the following triangle Answers

The 99% confidence interval for the proportion of coaching among students who retake the SAT is 0.130 to 0.176. The margin of error is 0.023. This means we are 99% confident that the true proportion of students who paid for coaching falls within this range.

A 99% confidence level means that if we were to repeat this study multiple times, 99% of the intervals we construct would contain the true proportion of students who paid for coaching. This level of confidence is commonly used in academic research to ensure that the results are reliable.

To guarantee a maximum margin of error of 1% at a 99% confidence level, the sample size needed would be approximately 15,823. This calculation can be done using the formula: n = (z^2 * p * q) / E^2, where z is the z-score for the desired confidence level, p is the estimated proportion of students who paid for coaching (0.135 in this case), q is 1-p, and E is the maximum margin of error (0.01 in this case).

Learn more about proportion here: brainly.com/question/31548894

#SPJ11

Main Answer: The second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

Supporting Question and Answer:

How can we compare different bank offers to determine which one provides a better deal?

To compare different bank offers, we can consider the interest rates and compounding frequencies offered by each bank. By calculating the future value of an investment using the provided interest rate and compounding frequency, we can determine which bank will yield a higher return over a given time period. Additionally, considering other factors such as fees, terms and conditions, and the reputation of the banks can help in making an informed decision about which offer is a better deal.

Body of the Solution:To determine if Jim will have enough money to buy a car that costs $12,160 after 2 years with an interest rate of 9.8% compounded annually, we can calculate the future value of his initial investment of $10,000.

The formula to calculate the future value (FV) of an investment with compound interest is:

FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt);Where, P = Principal amount (initial investment) ,r = Annual interest rate (as a decimal) ,n = Number of times interest is

compounded per year and  t = Number of years

Using the given information, we have:

P = $10,000

r = 9.8% = 0.098 (as a decimal)

n = 1 (compounded annually)

t = 2 years

Plugging in these values into the formula:

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.098/1)^(1×2)

FV = 10,000(1.098)^2

FV = 10,000(1.206)

FV = 12,060

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years would be approximately $12,060. Therefore, he would not have enough money to buy the car that costs $12,160.

Now, let's consider the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually. To determine if this is a better deal, we need to calculate the future value using the same formula, but with the new interest rate.

r = 10% = 0.10 (as a decimal)

n = 2 (compounded semiannually, meaning twice a year)

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.10/2)^(2×2)

FV = 10,000(1.05)^4

FV = 10,000(1.2155)

FV = 12,155

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years with the second bank would be approximately $12,155. Therefore, the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually would be a slightly better deal as Jim would have more money by the end of the 2-year period compared to the first bank's offer.

Final Answer:Therefore, the second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

Question:Jim places ​$10,000 in a bank account that pays 9.8​% compounded. After 2 ​years, will he have enough money to buy a car that costs ​$12,160​? If another bank will pay Jim 10​% compounded semiannually​, is this a better​ deal?

To learn more about different bank offers to determine which one provides a better deal from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/13791574

#SPJ4

The second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

To compare different bank offers, we can consider the interest rates and compounding frequencies offered by each bank. By calculating the future value of an investment using the provided interest rate and compounding frequency, we can determine which bank will yield a higher return over a given time period. Additionally, considering other factors such as fees, terms and conditions, and the reputation of the banks can help in making an informed decision about which offer is a better deal.

To determine if Jim will have enough money to buy a car that costs $12,160 after 2 years with an interest rate of 9.8% compounded annually, we can calculate the future value of his initial investment of $10,000.

The formula to calculate the future value (FV) of an investment with compound interest is:

FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt);Where, P = Principal amount (initial investment) ,r = Annual interest rate (as a decimal) ,n = Number of times interest is

compounded per year and  t = Number of years

Using the given information, we have:

P = $10,000

r = 9.8% = 0.098 (as a decimal)

n = 1 (compounded annually)

t = 2 years

Plugging in these values into the formula:

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.098/1)[tex]^(1×2)[/tex]

FV = 10,000(1.098[tex])^2[/tex]

FV = 10,000(1.206)

FV = 12,060

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years would be approximately $12,060. Therefore, he would not have enough money to buy the car that costs $12,160.

Now, let's consider the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually. To determine if this is a better deal, we need to calculate the future value using the same formula, but with the new interest rate.

r = 10% = 0.10 (as a decimal)

n = 2 (compounded semiannually, meaning twice a year)

FV = 10,000(1 + 0.10/2)^(2×2)

FV = 10,000(1.05)^4

FV = 10,000(1.2155)

FV = 12,155

The future value of Jim's investment after 2 years with the second bank would be approximately $12,155. Therefore, the second bank offering an interest rate of 10% compounded semiannually would be a slightly better deal as Jim would have more money by the end of the 2-year period compared to the first bank's offer.

Therefore, the second bank's offer is a slightly better deal compared to the first bank's offer.

To learn more about investment

https://brainly.com/question/15105766

#SPJ4

Among the following pairs of triangles, the triangle in option D can be proven through SSS similarity.

Similar triangles are the pair of triangles with corresponding angles of the same magnitude and the corresponding sides are proportional. The following are the criteria for proving similarities:

In the given question,

In option A,

Given:

DF / JK = FG / KL

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by SAS criterion

In option B,

Given:

∠G = ∠L

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by AA criterion

In option C,

Given:

∠G = ∠L

∠F = ∠K

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by AA criterion

In option A,

Given:

DF / JK = FG / KL = GD / LJ

Therefore, ΔDFG ≈ ΔJKL by SSS criterion

Learn more about similar triangles:

https://brainly.com/question/29782809

#SPJ1

Answer: YOU have to put the answer

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1740 people

Step-by-step explanation:

A 16% increase is 0.16 as a decimal.

1500 * 0.16 = 240 more people expected next year

Add that 240 to the 1500 for the total number expected next year:

1500+240 = 1740 people

Answer: Approximately 1,740 people are expected to attend the homecoming football game this year, which is a 16% increase from last year's attendance of 1,500 people. This value is already rounded to the nearest person.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sure, let's calculate the expected attendance for this year's homecoming football game.

Step 1: Understand the problem

The problem states that there was an attendance of 1,500 people last year and this year there is expected to be a 16% increase in attendance. We need to find out the expected attendance for this year.

Step 2: Set up the equation

We can calculate the increase in attendance by multiplying last year's attendance by the percentage increase. The equation for this is:

New Attendance = Old Attendance + (Old Attendance * Percentage Increase)

Step 3: Substitute the given values into the equation

In this case, the Old Attendance is 1,500 and the Percentage Increase is 16% or 0.16 in decimal form. Substituting these values into the equation gives:

New Attendance = 1,500 + (1,500 * 0.16)

Step 4: Solve the equation

Let's calculate the result.

The calculation gives us:

New Attendance = 1,740

So, approximately 1,740 people are expected to attend the homecoming football game this year, which is a 16% increase from last year's attendance of 1,500 people. This value is already rounded to the nearest person.

Therefore, The grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence since two numerical ranges, [70, 73) and [67, 70), have the same grade assigned to them.

Explanation:
A one-to-one correspondence means that each input has a unique output and vice versa. In this case, the grading function assigns a grade to a numerical range.
To determine if it is a one-to-one correspondence, we need to check if any two numerical ranges have the same grade assigned to them.
Looking at the given ranges, we can see that there is an overlap between [70, 73) and [67, 70) since they share the grade. Therefore, this grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence.

Therefore, The grading function is not a one-to-one correspondence since two numerical ranges, [70, 73) and [67, 70), have the same grade assigned to them.

To learn more about the linear function visit:

brainly.com/question/29612131

#SPJ11

Answer:

chat me up I will help you understand this

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of food available divided by ..

The p-value (0.025) is less than the level of significance (0.05). Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis.

This means that there is a low probability of obtaining the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. As a result, we can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Therefore, the correct decision regarding the null hypothesis test is to reject the null hypothesis.

In a hypothesis test, the p-value was calculated as 0.025, and the level of significance is α = 0.05. To make a decision regarding the null hypothesis test, compare the p-value to the level of significance. If the p-value is less than or equal to α, reject the null hypothesis. If the p-value is greater than α, do not reject the null hypothesis.

In this case, the p-value (0.025) is less than the level of significance (0.05). Therefore, the decision is to reject the null hypothesis (option d).

To know more about hypothesis visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/13286354

#SPJ11