Answer: yes. I do believe that a blood splatter can lead to the discovery of who the murderer was. When DNA is taken, you can see who had touched the blood. Whoever had touched the blood is either the murderer or involved. It’s a crime to mess with evidence, so whoever did touch the blood would be held in court otherwise
Explanation:
Blood Spatter is not the way to know who is the criminal, or to charge someone being a criminal. Blood Spatter is the only reliable source to learn from where the blood has come into existence. Hence, the above statement is appropriate.
What is Blood Spatter?Blood Spatter is one of the foremost and most important things which helps in the understanding of matters whether related to a particular crime or such an incident. Blood Spatter has been used readily in Forensics also.
Blood Spatter is the mark of blood on either the wall or other places which have been done by the force of some external agents other than the presence of gravity. Over time, it helps the Forensics team to understand the individual way in which the crime has been committed.
Blood Spatters can be of six types. The process of the bullet entering the body readily creates the process of the blood being spattered on the walls or around the victims.
Learn more about blood spatter here:
https://brainly.com/question/19407943
#SPJ5
A is introduced by placing it in the______. Next, it is discussed in_______
It then continues to the_______
If passed there it goes to the_______
The final step is for it to go to the_______
Answer:
Explanation:
A bill is introduced by placing it in a wooden box called the hooper
Next it is discussed in the Committee
It then continues to where the Congress debates and voting takes place
If passed there it goes to the US senate
The final step is for it to go to the President
Select the correct answer.
Which theory suggests that individuals’ criminal tendencies are related to their biological and psychological attributes?
A.
social disorganization theory
B.
broken windows theory
C.
positivist theory
D.
general strain theory
Put yourself in the place of one of the lawmakers in 1787. You are present to represent your state. At the end, you realize that you have experienced “the art of compromise.” How will you describe to your neighbor what this compromise means?
Answer:
the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.
the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.
Explanation:
Answer:
The art of compromise can be described as a solution or agreement to an argument or a disagreement between two (or more) parties where neither of the two parties gets what they initial wanted in full. However the two parties do end up having a beneficial outcome from the final decision as the solution of what they initially wanted. For instance say you bought a box of cookies for you to bring to your friend's house to enjoy at a party. Later after some time at the party there was one cookie left, and you want to eat that cookie. However your friend also wants to eat that cookie, so instead of fighting for the cookie and only one of you end up happy. You cut the cookie in half making it into two cookies so that both you and your friend get what was wanted; just not in full.
PLEASE HELP QUICK DO SOON! THANK YOU! :)
What do some criminalologisys feel might be a drawback to privitzation of prisons?
-The prison system would start releasing inmates before the court allowed.
-The state or county would have nothing to do with their budgets.
-The prison system would become less productive
-The prison system might begin to cut corners on care to save money.
Answer:
The prison system might begin to cut corners on care to save money.
Explanation:
Some criminalologists feel that the privatization of prisons might lead to the prison system cutting corners on care to save money. Therefore, the correct answer is D.
What is prison privatization?Prison privatization is the practice of contracting out the management and operation of prisons to private companies. These companies are responsible for everything from staffing to programming to healthcare for inmates. Proponents of prison privatization argue that it can save the government money and increase efficiency.
Opponents of prison privatization argue that it can lead to a number of potential drawbacks. One of the main concerns is that private companies may prioritize profits over the well-being of inmates. This could lead to cost-cutting measures that compromise the quality of care and rehabilitation services provided to prisoners.
Learn more about prison privatization, here:
https://brainly.com/question/16901807
#SPJ2
Why is gerrymandering a problem for the House of Representatives but not the Senate? A. Members of the House are more influenced by changes in public opinion. B. Senators are elected in statewide elections rather than in specific districts. C. Senators serve longer terms than members of the House. D. Members of the House are greatly influenced by their political parties.
Answer:
I think it's B. Senators are elected in statewide elections rather than in specific districts.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
b
Explanation:
1. what is public opinion ?
a, views of the media about government policies.
b, views of the people on issues of public interest.
c, views of parents on their child's performance.
A Public opinion would be
The distribution of the population's beliefs about politics and policy issues So A
Private prisons are more economically efficient than government-run facilities.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation: government-run facilities doesn't have as many cells i think don't trust my answer wait till someone else says something
what play an important role in forming and expressing public opinion?
a, school.
b, media.
c, elections.
what is the best way to get an accurate idea of public opinion?
A. through letters to the editor in the newspaper
B. through scientific opinion polls
C. by watching tv newscasts
D. by following election results
Answer for this question ↑↓
B. through scientific opinion polls
in this case it's B ↑
Answer for ur Questions it is C- Elections (Opinion Poll) are the same
Rebekah believed that her business partner misused company funds for a vacation trip around the world. She is suing her for $20,000. Which court would hear this case?
1. US Supreme Court
2. US Court of Appeals
3. US District Court
4. State District Court
The court that would hear this case is the States District Court.
Jurisdiction refers to the authority of a formally constituted legal body such as Supreme court, Federal court, District court etc
The Federal jurisdiction cover case causing controversies between States, government and foreign governments.The States jurisdiction usually cover type of case such as Robberies, Traffic offences and other case relating to the state.
Therefore the Option D is correct because the court that would hear this case is the States District Court.
Read more about this here
brainly.com/question/15122297
Why is amendment 26 important?
Answer: Forty years ago, the 26th Amendment to the United States Constitution took effect, lowering the universal voting age in America from 21 years to 18 years. Millions of young Americans were extended the right to vote, empowering more young people than ever before to help shape our country.
Explanation:
Which Progressive Era Amendment mandated the direct election of senators?h
Answer:
The Seventeenth Amendment (Amendment XVII) to the United States Constitution established the direct election of United States senators in each state.
Explanation: Hope this helps and I get the brainliest
Which of the following is NOT a requirement for dealing with hazardous materials?
A. Using good ventilation
B. Preventing toxic materials from being released
C. Wearing appropriate protective equipment
D. Determining wether it can be thrown away or not
Dealing with dangerous materials DOES NOT require determining whether something can be thrown away or not. As a result, Option (D) is the adequate answer.
What is meant by hazardous materials?Any object or agent that has the potential to harm people, animals, or the environment qualifies as a hazardous material, regardless of its biological, chemical, radiological, or physical nature. The material itself or its interactions with other materials may be to blame for this.
The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission are largely responsible for defining and enforcing laws and regulations in this country regarding hazardous materials (NRC). A "hazardous material" is defined differently in each country.
Therefore, option (D) is the accurate answer.
Learn more about hazardous materials, from:
brainly.com/question/14309081
#SPJ2
1. What are the various inchoate crimes? Define all the elements of each Crimes?
2. Give examples (scenarios) of each crime?
3. Find famous Supreme Court cases for each Inchoate Crimes?
Please help!!!!!
Answer:
More Points Sorry
Explanation:
Sorry
(blank) officers are most likely to suffer injuries in a vehicle accident during high-speed car chases when trying to nab a criminal.
please help
Answer:
Vehicular officers are most likely to suffer injuries in a vehicle accident during high-speed car chases when trying to nab a criminal.
Answer:
Maybe police officer
Explanation:
Police officers are usually the ones who do high-speed car chases. It also fits the sentence
Explain the difference between separation of powers and checks and
balances. Use examples about the legislative branch and executive branch
to support your answer.
Answer: What is the difference between separation of powers and checks and balances? Separation of powers divides the national government into three branches. Checks and balances refers to the power that each branch exerts over the others and keeps them from becoming more powerful than one another.
Explanation: Separation of powers is the separation of branches under the constitution by the legislative, judicial, and executive branches of government. The check and balances play the roles of the three branches of government. This system was made so that no one branch will over power the other.
Representation in the House is based on_____
whereas in the Senate representation is_____
Citizens would like a new form of public transportation in their city. Who would they address regarding this request?
Answer:
State representative
Answer:
C
Explanation:
"In the United States, a governor serves as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief in each of the fifty states and in the five permanently inhabited territories, functioning as both head of state and head of government therein. As such, governors are responsible for implementing state laws and overseeing the operation of the state executive branch. As state leaders, governors advance and pursue new and revised policies and programs using a variety of tools, among them executive orders, executive budgets, and legislative proposals and vetoes."
why it is considered inhumane or inappropriate to execute certain groups of
people.
Answer:
discrimination, some people think some groups of people are too good to die, sometimes it's anti-discrimination, this is when a person of color isn't executed because people are to proud to handle the weight of people hating them, also because murder is dark and disgusting
Answer:#1. It’s inhumane
The international human rights treaty – The Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment – is intended to prevent actions considered inhumane. While the Convention doesn’t take a clear stance on the death penalty, many believe executions fall under the type of punishment described in the document. In the United States, research shows that 3% of executions between 1890-2010 were “botched.” What does it mean to “botch” an execution? It causes severe suffering to the prisoner. Lethal injection has the highest rate of error despite being the most “humane” – and most common – option. When injections go wrong, it can take a long time for a prisoner to die. Exams after death show serious chemical burns and other injuries. Opponents of the death penalty say this demonstrates cruel and inhumane punishment.
#2. The death penalty disproportionately affects certain groups
The death penalty is not a good example of blind justice. Studies show that the mentally ill, people of color, and the poor make up the majority of death row inmates. In the United States, between 5-10% of prisoners on death row have a severe mental illness, according to Mental Health America. As for racial groups, despite making up only 13% of the US population, black people make up over 40% of the prisoners with a death sentence. When researchers take a deeper dive, they discover patterns of discrimination based on race. According to the United Nations, the poor are also disproportionately affected by the death penalty on a global scale. They are less likely to get good representation and the system is biased against them. Even though these groups are not committing the most crimes, they are the ones receiving the most severe punishment.
#3. The death penalty can be used as a tool for control, not justice
In theory, the death penalty is only intended for use as punishment for the most serious crimes, like murder. However, in places around the world, governments use executions for non-lethal crimes. This includes drug-related offenses, burglary, adultery, blasphemy, and political crimes. It becomes clear that many governments are not interested in justice, but rather suppression and control. By using the death penalty so arbitrarily, authorities set their own definitions for what’s “unacceptable” in society and what’s an appropriate punishment. It makes citizens fearful and violates their human rights. Allowing the death penalty to exist allows corrupt governments to use executions for their own purposes.
#4. It can’t be undone if new evidence is revealed
What makes the death penalty distinct from life in prison is that the judgement can’t be reversed. It’s a final punishment. However, what if new evidence is discovered and it turns out the prisoner was innocent? In the US, the rate of error is extremely high. Since 1973, 159 people have been released from death row. New technologies like DNA testing have played a big role. If timing and circumstances had been different, prisoners would have died for a crime they didn’t commit. How many other death row inmates are at risk for unjust execution? Even if they aren’t all innocent, a deeper dive into their cases could reveal discrimination, inadequate representation, and other issues that would prove they didn’t receive a fair trial. In a society where the legal system can’t be relied on for justice, the death penalty is too serious a punishment.
#5. It doesn’t deter crime
The fact that it doesn’t prevent crime may be the most significant reason why the death penalty is wrong. Many people might believe that while the death penalty isn’t ideal, it’s worth it if it dissuades potential criminals. However, polls show people don’t think capital punishment does that. The facts support that view. The American South has the highest murder rate in the country and oversees 81% of the nation’s executions. In states without the death penalty, the murder rate is much lower. There are other factors at play, but the fact remains that no studies show that capital punishment is a deterrent. If the death penalty is not only inhumane, discriminatory, and arbitrary, but it often claims innocent lives and doesn’t even prevent crime, then why should it still exist? It’s disappearing from legal systems around the world, so it’s time for all nations (like the United States) to end it.
Explanation: