3350 5654 10.. can anyone guess the last two numbers?

Answer:

C. The mean absolute deviation is 2.

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to find the mean absolute deviation, follow the following steps:

Let's work it out.

STEP: 1

|9 - 14| = 5

|13 - 14| = 1

|14 - 14| = 0

|15 - 14| = 1

|15 - 14| = 1

|18 - 14| = 4

STEP: 2

5 + 1 + 0 + 1 + 1 + 4 = 12

STEP: 3

Mean Absolute deviation [tex] =\frac{12}{6}= 2[/tex]

Answer:

B or (0,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

(0,8)

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

The numbers are 160, 192, 240​.

To find:

The LCM of 160, 192, 240.

Solution:

The given numbers are  160, 192, 240​. Write the factor forms of these numbers.

[tex]160=2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 5[/tex]

[tex]160=2^5\times 5[/tex]

[tex]192=2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 3[/tex]

[tex]192=2^6\times 3[/tex]

[tex]240=2\times 2\times 2\times 2\times 3\times 5[/tex]

[tex]240=2^4\times 3\times 5[/tex]

Now, the LCM of given numbers is the product of all prime factors with highest degrees.

[tex]LCM=2^6\times 3\times 5[/tex]

[tex]LCM=64\times 15[/tex]

[tex]LCM=960[/tex]

Therefore, the LCM of given numbers is 960.

Answer:

1. 28.26 2. 94.985 3. 113.04 4. 50.24 5. 153.86

Step-by-step explanation:

For the circles that have a long line that is the size of the circle is the diameter so the number for the diameter for example is 6 so divide it by 2 which is 3. Multiply 3 by 3 which is 9 and multiply by 3.14 and its 28.26

For the circles that have a line that goes halfway of the circle its more quick so 5.5 x 5.5 equals 30.25 and multiply by 3.14 and you get 94.985

Answer:

Make x the same in both so

12x+ 4y=72

12x+6y=30

Now the 12x cancel eachother out so

Difference between 6y and 4y is 2y

Difference between 30 and 72 is -42

2y must equal -42

Y = -21

Substitute -21 into the equation

X = 13

Mark brainliest pls

Answer:

a)

The null hypothesis is [tex]H_0: p = 0.91[/tex].

The alternate hypothesis is [tex]H_1: p < 0.91[/tex].

The decision rule is: accept the null hypothesis for [tex]z > -1.645[/tex], reject the null hypothesis for [tex]z < -1.645[/tex].

Since [tex]z = -1.79 < -1.645[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis that that percentage of athletes who graduate is less than for the student population at large.

b)

The p-value for this test is 0.0367. Since this p-value is less than the significance level of [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis that that percentage of athletes who graduate is less than for the student population at large.

Step-by-step explanation:

Question a:

Perform the appropriate hypothesis test to determine whether this is significant evidence that the percentage of athletes who graduate is less than for the student population at large:

At the null hypothesis, we test if the proportion is the same as the student population, of 91%. Thus:

[tex]H_0: p = 0.91[/tex]

At the alternate hypothesis, we test that the proportion for athletes is less than 91%, that is:

[tex]H_1: p < 0.91[/tex]

The test statistic is:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

In which X is the sample mean, [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis, [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation and n is the size of the sample.

Test if the proportion is less at the 0.05 level:

The critical value is z with a p-value of 0.05, that is, z = -1.645. Thus, the decision rule is: accept the null hypothesis for [tex]z > -1.645[/tex], reject the null hypothesis for [tex]z < -1.645[/tex].

0.91 is tested at the null hypothesis:

This means that [tex]\mu = 0.91, \sigma = \sqrt{0.91*0.09}[/tex]

A sports reporter contacted 152 athletes randomly sampled from that same university and time period and found that 132 of them had graduated within 6 years.

This means that [tex]n = 152, X = \frac{132}{152} = 0.8684[/tex]

Value of the test statistic:

[tex]z = \frac{X - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = \frac{0.8684 - 0.91}{\frac{\sqrt{0.91*0.09}}{\sqrt{152}}}[/tex]

[tex]z = -1.79[/tex]

Since [tex]z = -1.79 < -1.645[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis that that percentage of athletes who graduate is less than for the student population at large.

(b) (3 points) Calculate the P-value for this test. Explain how this P-value can be use to test the hypotheses in part (a).

The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample proportion of 0.8684 or below. This is the p-value of z = -1.79.

Looking a the z-table, z = -1.79 has a p-value of 0.0367.

The p-value for this test is 0.0367. Since this p-value is less than the significance level of [tex]\alpha = 0.05[/tex], we reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternate hypothesis that that percentage of athletes who graduate is less than for the student population at large.

Answer:

of what

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

and the question is...

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) 32 , 40000 b) to a rising in age correspond a rising in salary ,  c) because you can draw a curve(or a brach of hyperbola) that goes up. i guess(?)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\frac{95}{56}[/tex] or [tex]1\frac{39}{56}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

hope this helps have a good day :)

Answer:

Decimal Answer: 1.7

Fraction Answer: 1 39/56

Answer:

(-4,5)

x-midpoint -4

y-midpoint 5

Step-by-step explanation:

M=x1+x2/2 ,y1+y2/2

M=-8+0/2 , 9+1/2

M=-8/2,10/2

M=-4,5

x-midpoint -4

y-midpoint 5

Answer:

╭━━━╮

┃╭━╮┃

╰╯╭╯┃

╭╮╰╮┃

┃╰━╯┃

╰━━━╯

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The FICA tax for an employee who earns 60,000 a year is $ 3,390.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that you pay 5.65% on the first 110,000 of income and 1.45% in excess of $ 110,000, to calculate the FICA tax for an employee who earns 60,000 a year the following calculation must be performed:

60,000 <110,000

60,000 x 0.0565 = X

3,390 = X

Therefore, the FICA tax for an employee who earns 60,000 a year is $ 3,390.

Answer:

Explanation:

x2+14x+40

We can Split the Middle Term of this expression to factorise it.

In this technique, if we have to factorise an expression like ax2+bx+c, we need to think of 2 numbers such that:

N1⋅N2=a⋅c=1⋅40=40

and,

N1+N2=b=14

After trying out a few numbers we get N1=10 and N2=4

10⋅4=40, and 10+4=14

x2+14x+40=x2+10x+4x+40

=x(x+10)+4(x+10)

Here (x+10) is common to both terms.

So the factorised form is=(x+4)(x+10)

Answer:

the answer is 33

Step-by-step explanation: Trust me don't worry :)

Answer:

add 5/10+3/4+1/2 you add number i will give you hint

Answer:

circus ticket pricing influences ticket sales shows that there is an average increase of 4 people for every $3 decrease on the price

of the ticket. A circus owner sells an average of 340 tickets when the price of a ticket is $75. If x represents the number of times the price

decreases by $3, which function describes the revenue earned by the circus owner terms

Answer:

Additive opposite = - 659

Multiplicative opposite = [tex]\frac{1}{659}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

18x+21y

-

22x-3y

__________

= - 4x+24y

18x-(22x)=-4x

21y-(-3y)=24y // - * - = +

Answer:

it should be 40 in.

Step-by-step explanation:

because you have to use pythagorean theorem which is A square plus B square equals C square

Hope it helps.

Answer:

YOU need to add a photo

Answer:

the first question is c

Step-by-step explanation:

2 x pi x the radius

2 x 3.14 x 8

Answer: 84

Step-by-step explanation:

The horizontal line is the line tangential to a circle. The measure of the missing angle "x" is 84 degrees

From the figure given, the horizontal line is the line tangential to a circle.

Given the following parameter

measure of minor arc = 168 degrees

Required

angle at the vertex "x"

Using the theore " angle the vertex is half of the measure of its intercepted arc. Mathematically;

x =1/2 minor arc

x= 1/2 (168)

x = 84 degrees

Hence the measure of the missing angle "x" is 84 degrees

Learn more on circle geometry here: https://brainly.com/question/24375372

#SPJ2

Answer:

19 days

Step-by-step explanation:

2 weeks = 14 days + additional 5 days = 19 days

Answer:

346

Step-by-step explanation: