$25 with a 300% increase

Answer:

2

Step-by-step explanation:

If you use rise over run, you should get to. From one point to the other, the rise is 2 and the run to the right is 1. So, you do 2 divided by 1, which is 2. So, the slope would be 2.

Answer: Water: The battle between the clean vs the dirty :P

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

12.718 units

Step-by-step explanation:

The coordinates of the vertices of parallelogram WXYZ are given to be W(0,-1), X(4,0), Y(3,-2) and Z(-1,-3).

So, the perimeter of the parallelogram will be 2(WX + XY) {Since opposite sides of parallelogram are same in length}

Now, length of WX =  units,  To find the units click this link :

https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B(-1)%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%204%5E%7B2%7D%20%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B17%7D%20%3D%204.123

And, length of XY =  units, To find the units click this link :

https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%7B(4-3)%5E%7B2%7D%20%2B%20(0-(-2))%5E%7B2%7D%7D%20%3D%20%5Csqrt%7B5%7D%20%3D%202.236

Therefore, the perimeter of the parallelogram WXYZ = 2(4.123 + 2.236) = 12.718 units. (Answer)

Answer:

girls: 16

boys: 40

Step-by-step explanation:

girls : boys

2 : 5

let the total number of people be (2+5)x.

2x + 5x = 56

7x = 56

x = 8

therefore, no. of girls = 2 x 8 = 16

no. of boys = 5 x 8 = 40

This is a question on ratio and proportions + forming and solving equations. If you wish to venture further into it/understand this topic better, you may want to follow my Instagram account (learntionary), where I post some of my own notes on certain topics and also some tips that may be useful to you :)

Answer:

the missing number is 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Left side is (733*5)*2 (please use * for multiplication, or · , but not X or x)

Right side is 733*5.  Rewriting the expression this way makes it obvious that the missing number is 2.

Answer:

x=-6

Step-by-step explanation:

Move all terms that don't contain x to the right and solve using the elimination process.

Answer:

9

Step-by-step explanation:

formula for inverse proportion is y = [tex]\frac{k}{x}[/tex]

k is the constant of probability

to find k,

y is 12, x is 6

12 = [tex]\frac{k}{6}[/tex]

so x = 12 × 6

∴ k is 72

so y = [tex]\frac{72}{8}[/tex]

∴ y is 9

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

250 for place  4 for books each.

If they charge 14 per person, 4 of that goes for the books and 10 will be applied to the rental fee.

250/10= 25 people to break even. Any people beyond that  is a profit of 10.00 since the other 4 will still go to the books.

Answer:

nile blue should be the correct answer

Step-by-step explanation:

It's B!!!           ik cuz i ggogled it lol

Answer:

I think the answer is B. $92

Step-by-step explanation:

$80 time (115 on calculator will give you 9200

Answer:

4 - slope

2 - y - intercept

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation is in slope-intercept form.

[tex]y=mx+b[/tex]

m - slope

b - y-intercept

The '4' is the slope of the equation.

[tex]y=\boxed{m}x+b\\\\y=\boxed{4}x+2[/tex]

The '2' is the y-intercept.

[tex]y=mx+\boxed{b}\\\\y=4x+\boxed{2}[/tex]

Hope this helps.

Answer:

If a coin is tossed 4 times; number of possible outcomes = (2^4) = 16. 3 heads and 1 tail can occur from 4 tosses in (4C3)*(1C1) = 4*1 = 4 ways. So, the probability = (4 / 16) = (1 / 4) = 0.25.  

i didnt really understand the question but hope this helps

According to the information given, we have that:

For each coin, there are only two possible outcomes, either it is heads, or it is tails. The result of the flip of a coin is independent of any other flip, hence, the binomial distribution is used to solve this question.

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]C_{n,x} = \frac{n!}{x!(n-x)!}[/tex]

The parameters are:

Item a:

Hence, a binomial model with [tex]p = 0.5[/tex] and [tex]n = 4[/tex] should be used.

Item b:

P(B) is P(X = 3), hence:

[tex]P(X = x) = C_{n,x}.p^{x}.(1-p)^{n-x}[/tex]

[tex]P(X = 3) = C_{4,3}.(0.5)^{3}.(0.5)^{1} = 0.25[/tex]

Hence, P(B) = 0.25.

To learn more about the binomial distribution, you can take a look at https://brainly.com/question/24863377

Answer:

518

Step-by-step explanation:

P = 2

Q = 8

p3 + 64q

Multiply "p" (which is 2) with 3

Multiply "q" (which is 8) with 8

Add the two numbers you get

And you have you answer

I hope this helps. :)

Step-by-step explanation:

constant=7

coefficient=2

Answer:

I think the answer would be A

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=-7

Step-by-step explanation:

BRAINLIEST PLS

Answer:

There wouldn't be a fraction form because its a whole number which is 9

Answer:

The drift angle is approximately 7.65° towards the East from the plane's heading

Step-by-step explanation:

The speed of the plane = 350 mph

The direction in which the plane flies N 40° E = 50° counterclockwise from the eastern direction

The speed of the wind = 40 mph

The direction of the wind = S 70° E = 20° clockwise from the eastern direction

The component velocities of the plane are;

[tex]R_{Plane}[/tex] = (350 × cos 50)·i + (350 × sin 50)·j

[tex]R_{Wind}[/tex] = (40 + cos 20)·i - (40 × sin 40)·j

The resultant speed of the plane = [tex]R_{Plane}[/tex] + [tex]R_{Wind}[/tex] = 265.915·i +242.404·j

The direction the plane is heading = tan⁻¹(242.404/265.915) ≈ 42.35°

Therefore, the drift angle = Actual Angle - Direction of the plane = 50 - 42.35 ≈ 7.65° towards the East

Answer: A. 5.89

Step-by-step explanation:

edge2020

Answer:

The perimeter of the new TV is approximately  95.32 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The diagonal dimension of the original TV = 32 inches

The perimeter of the original TV = 87.16 inches

The diagonal dimension of the new TV = 70 inches

The perimeter of the new TV = 87.16 inches

For the original TV, we have;

Let w be the width of the original TV and l be the length of the original TV, we have;

2·w + 2·l = 87.16

√(w² + l²) = 32

Therefore, we have;

32² = w² + l²

w = (87.16 - 2·l)/2

w = 43.58 - l

32² = l² + (43.58 - l)²

l² + (43.58 - l)² - 32² = 0

l² + 43.58² - 2 × 43.85 × l + l² - 32² = 0

2·l² - 87.16·l + 875.2164 = 0

By the quadratic formula, we have;

l = (87.16 ± √((-87.16)² - 4×2 × 875.2164))/(2 × 2)

Therefore, l = 27.89 inches or l = 15.69

Therefore, w = (87.16 - 2·l)/2 = (87.16 - 2× 27.89)/2 = 15.69

or w = (87.16 - 2× 15.69)/2 = 27.89

Whereby the ratio of the width to the length of the original TV and the new TV are the same, we have;

15.69/27.89

w₂/l₂ for the new TV = 15.69/27.89

∴ w₂ = l₂ × 15.69/27.89

w₂² + l₂² = 70²

∴ (l₂ × 15.69/27.89)² + l₂² = 70²

l₂² × (15.69/27.89)² + l₂² = 70²

l₂²((15.69/27.89)² + 1) = 70²

l₂² = 70²/((15.69/27.89)² + 1) = 3722.04

l₂ = √(3722.04) ≈ 61.0

w₂ = l₂ × 15.69/27.89 = 61 × 15.69/27.89 ≈ 34.32

Therefore;

The perimeter of the new TV = 34.32 + 61 = 95.32 inches.

In this exercise we have to use the knowledge and information given to calculate the perimeter that will correspond to:

The perimeter of the new TV is approximately  95.32 inches

So the data for this exercise is from:

Let w be the width of the original TV and l be the length of the original TV, we have;

[tex]2*(w) + 2*(l) = 87.16\\\sqrt{(w^2 + l^2)} = 32[/tex]

Therefore, we have:

[tex]32^2 = w^2 + l^2\\w = (87.16 - 2*l)/2\\w = 43.58 - l\\32^2 = l^2 + (43.58 - l)^2\\l^2 + (43.58 - l)^2 - 32^2 = 0\\l^2 + 43.58^2 - (2 * 43.85 * l)+ l^2 - 32^2 = 0\\(2)*(l)^2 - 87.16*l + 875.2164 = 0[/tex]

By the quadratic formula, we have;

[tex]l = (87.16 +/- \sqrt{((-87.16)^2 - 4*2 * 875.2164))/(2 * 2)} )[/tex]

Therefore:

[tex]w = (87.16 - (2)*(l))/2 = (87.16 - 2* 27.89)/2 = 15.69\\w = (87.16 - 2* 15.69)/2 = 27.89[/tex]

Whereby the ratio of the width to the length of the original TV and the new TV are the same, we have;

w₂/l₂ for the new TV = [tex]15.69/27.89[/tex]

[tex]w_2 = (l_2)* (15.69/27.89)\\w_2^2 + l_2^2 = 70^2\\(l_2 *15.69/27.89)^2 + l^2_2 = 70^2\\l^2_2 * (15.69/27.89)^2 + l^2_2 = 70^2\\l^2_2((15.69/27.89)^2 + 1) = 70^2\\l^2_2 = 70^2/((15.69/27.89)^2 + 1) = 3722.04\\l_2 = \sqrt{(3722.04)} = 61.0\\w_2= l_2 * 15.69/27.89 = 61 * 15.69/27.89 = 34.32\\[/tex]  

The perimeter of the new TV :

[tex]P = 34.32 + 61 = 95.32[/tex]

See more about perimeter at brainly.com/question/6465134

Answer:

Please find attached, the required drawing of quadrilateral ABCD and the dilation of quadrilateral ABCD scaled down by a scale factor of 1/3

Step-by-step explanation:

The coordinates of the quadrilateral ABCD are;

A(0, 6), B(6, 6), C(9, 0), D(0, 0)

From the dilation by a scale factor of 1/3, using D as the center of dilation, we have from the attached drawing, the following coordinates of the quadrilateral EFGH as E(0, 2), F(2, 2), G(3, 0) H(0, 0) which is the quadrilateral ABCD scaled down by 1/3

Answer:

It's not similar :)

hope this helps<3

The triangles are not similar because the sides are not proportional.

Similar triangles are those triangles which has the same shape but different size.

The length of sides and angles are proportional in similar triangles.

So we know that length of sides are proportional.

If we find the ratio of corresponding sides of the two triangles, then they must be equal to a common value.

We have only the length of two sides of each triangle.

If those sides are proportional, we must have an angle of each triangle to be equal.

Here, the angles formed by the intersecting lines are vertical angles and are thus equal.

Let's look if the sides are proportional.

20 / 36 = 5/9

24 / 42 = 4/7

Sides are not proportional.

Hence the given triangles are not similar.

Learn more about Similar Triangles here :

https://brainly.com/question/14926756

#SPJ2

Answer:

849.7m2

Step-by-step explanation:

L= length

SA = surface area

volume = L x L x L

1700= L x L x L

find cube root

=11.93m

round off to 1 dp

=11.9m

SA= 6( L x L)

     = 6( 11.9 x 11.9)

       =6(141.61)

       =849.66m2

round off to 1 dp

=849.7m2

Answer:

i wanna say its 136 but im not completely sure

Answer:

wait what grade are you in ?

Answer:

D.

Step-by-step explanation:

to prove congruency of two triangles, you need two congruent sides and one congruent angle

in this case we are given exactly that, 2 sides and one angle that is congruent

we would also need to make sure that the given sides and angles are actually congruent, and not mismatched

we can do this by looking at the positions of the letters in each congruency statement

for example, the letters LO and MA are the first two letters in each triangle's name, this means that they are congruent and properly matched

if you do this with every statement that you are give, you can see that the triangles can be proven by SAS

Answer:

0.295

Step-by-step explanation:

you needed to subtract 2.175-1.88=0.295