1.The Allies; the Central Powers
2.A common Slavic identity
3.France, Russia, and Great Britain
4.Germany
5.Germany and the United Kingdom
6.A series of provocations from the Germans
7.Fully mobilized its troops on Germany's border
8.Taking France out quickly and then focusing on Russia
9.Enormous payments to France and England for World War I
10.Foreign securities like U.S. Treasury notes
11.United Kingdom
12.The health and power of the state to be able to address problems
13.Great Depression
14.Almost nonexistent after a failed play for power
15.The New Economic Policy
16.They threatened Stalin's power in some way.
Answer:1,the Allies; the Central Powers
2, common Slavic identity
3, France, Russia, and Great Britain
4, Germany
5, Germany and the United Kingdom
6, The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand
7, Fully mobilized its troops on Germany's border
8, Taking France out quickly and then focusing on Russia
9. An oversized military not contributing to real output
10. Indentured labor
11. United Kingdom
12. The health and power of the state to be able to address problems.
13. World War I
14. Almost nonexistent after a failed play for power
15. the New Economic Policy
16. They threatened Stalin's power in some way.
Which of the following is most associated with the Reagan Doctrine?
A. Rollback
B. Dollar Diplomacy
C. Realpoltiik
D. Moral Diplomacy
Answer:
The correct answer is A. Rollback
Which of the following describes a cabinet department?
Question 1 options:
a)
major executive office that is directly accountable to the president
b)
agency not subject to the regulatory authority of any specific department
c)
agency assigned to a very specific task
d)
group of White House aides and presidential advisers
Answer:
a)major executive office that is directly accountable to the president
Explanation:
A cabinet department is a significant executive office directly answerable to the president. The principal administrative entities in charge of particular policy areas are known as cabinet departments, and they are led by secretaries who are chosen by the president and ratified by the Senate. They are a member of the executive branch of the federal government in the United States and directly answer to the president.
If the government seizes property under eminent domain and gives the property for personal use, how has the Fifth Amendment been violated?
1. It does not violate the Fifth Amendment according to the “Takings Clause.”
2. It does not violate the Fifth Amendment because it is due process.
3. It violates the Fifth Amendment because the federal government does not have eminent domain power; that is solely the power of the states.
4. It violates the Fifth Amendment because the property, in this case, must be used for a public good or service.
Explanation:
The power of the government through the use of eminent domain, to take private property and convert it into public use, is referred to as a taking. The Fifth Amendment provides that the government may only exercise this power if they provide just compensation to the property owners.
Hopefully this helps! :)
The 12th Amendment:
Question 47 options:
a)
ensures separate votes for the president and vice president.
b)
makes the Speaker of the House president if no one receives a majority of electoral votes.
c)
makes the highest electoral vote getter president and the second place vote-getter vice president
d)
lets the Senate choose the president and the House the vice president if no one receives a majority of electoral votes.
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Please Help Me ASAP! there are 4 images, I need help with all the questions on each of the images. Please help me. I need a real answer, FAST! Offering 50 points and brainliest to someone with an amazing answer! Help me!
A typical Chinese person during Mongol rule in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries would have experienced a period of unrest and upheaval.
What is fourteenth centuries ?The fourteenth century was a period of immense changes in the world. It was a time of exploration and discovery, when the boundaries of knowledge were pushed outward and new ideas and innovations began to emerge. In Europe, the Hundred Years' War between England and France began, and the Black Death ravaged the continent. In China, the Ming dynasty began and the Great Wall of China was constructed. In the Middle East, the Ottoman Empire expanded, and the Mamluk Sultanate was established in Egypt.
To learn more about fourteenth centuries
https://brainly.com/question/29315505
#SPJ1
Was the United States "founded on slavery"? Those who support this framing point to several of the Founding Fathers being slave owners themselves while, as previously mentioned, leaving slavery intact under the early Constitution. From the other side, those critical of this wording state that by no means did every delegate at the Constitutional Convention champion slavery as many were against it and agreed to leave it untouched while optimistically hoping for it to progressively die out in the coming decades as it had in their states. Moreover, this position finds support in the warnings of the slave states in their refusal to agree to the Constitution if slavery were abolished therein. Antislavery proponents saw its inclusion as a necessary evil to create this new government. Had the issue been addressed then and there (in 1787) perhaps the Union would have never been created at all.
Yes I would argue that the United States was founded on slavery based on the way slaves were used to grow the economy
Was the United States "founded on slavery"?This is a complex and controversial topic, and there are differing opinions among historians and scholars. Some argue that the United States was founded on slavery, given that slavery was legal and widely practiced in the country at the time of its founding, and that the Constitution included provisions such as the Three-Fifths Compromise that explicitly recognized and protected the institution of slavery.
Others argue that while slavery was certainly a significant part of American society and economy during the country's early years, it was not the sole or defining factor in the country's founding.
They point out that many of the Founding Fathers, while themselves slave owners, also expressed reservations about the institution and worked towards its eventual abolition. Additionally, they note that the Constitution did not explicitly endorse or promote slavery, but rather sought to strike a balance between the interests of slave-holding and non-slaveholding states.
Ultimately, the debate over whether or not the United States was founded on slavery is complex and nuanced, and requires a careful consideration of historical context and perspective.
Read more on slavery here:https://brainly.com/question/567921
#SPJ1
The French Revolution began less than two decades after the American Revolution. In many ways, the
American experience was an inspiration for the citizens of France. But the people of the two countries had
different situations and had different concerns, which influenced the way each revolution began, progressed,
and ended. In this assignment you will write an essay that compares and contrasts the two revolutions.
In your essay, include information on the economic, political, or social conditions that were present; events
that took place as each revolution progressed; and the final outcome of each. Did the people achieve their
original goals? Did their goals change? Were they satisfied with the outcome or did conditions worsen?
To begin, consider the characteristics of each [ountry, such as the following:
• The status of ordinary citizens before the revolution
• The type of government in place
• The ability of the citizens to participate in their governance
• The people who stepped forward as leaders
• The taxes, laws, or social structure in place at the time
• The outcome of the revolution compared to its original goals
The American and French Revolutions were two landmark events that transformed the political and social landscape of the world. While they shared some similarities, such as their origins in Enlightenment ideas, they were driven by different economic, social, and political factors. In this essay, I will compare and contrast the two revolutions, examining the conditions that were present, the events that took place, and the final outcomes.
One of the key differences between the two revolutions was the economic situation of the two countries. In America, the colonists were generally prosperous and had a degree of economic independence, which allowed them to resist British attempts to tax and regulate them. In contrast, France was deeply in debt and had an oppressive tax system that placed a heavy burden on the poor and middle classes. This economic inequality was a major factor in the French Revolution.
Another key difference was the political structure of the two countries. America was a British colony and had a largely self-governing system based on representative assemblies. However, the colonists felt that they were being denied their rights as British subjects, leading to a demand for greater political autonomy. In contrast, France was an absolute monarchy, with a centralized system of government that gave little power to the people.
As the American Revolution progressed, the colonists formed a Continental Congress and declared their independence from Britain. They fought a long and bloody war, with the help of the French, and eventually succeeded in establishing a democratic republic based on the principles of individual liberty and popular sovereignty. In contrast, the French Revolution began with the storming of the Bastille in 1789, as the people demanded greater political representation and an end to the absolute monarchy. However, the revolution quickly descended into chaos, with the rise of radical factions and the Reign of Terror.
Despite the differences, both revolutions had important outcomes. The American Revolution led to the establishment of a democratic republic, based on the principles of individual liberty, political equality, and popular sovereignty. It also inspired other movements for independence and democracy throughout the world. In contrast, the French Revolution led to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic, but it also unleashed a wave of violence and terror that led to the rise of Napoleon Bonaparte and the restoration of the monarchy.
In conclusion, while the American and French Revolutions shared some similarities, they were driven by different economic, social, and political factors. The American Revolution succeeded in establishing a democratic republic based on individual liberty and popular sovereignty, while the French Revolution led to the overthrow of the monarchy but also unleashed a wave of violence and terror. Despite the different outcomes, both revolutions were important milestones in the history of democracy and inspired other movements for independence and democracy throughout the world.
Match the following scenarios/situations with the corresponding point of the civil rights act of 1964
Title 1 - Barred unequal applicatiοn οf vοter registratiοn requirements.
Title 2 - Nο discriminatiοn based οn race, cοlοr, religiοn οr natiοnal οrigin in public accοmοdatiοns; exempted "private" clubs.
Title 3 - Prοhibited state and municipal gοvernments frοm denying access tο public facilities οn grοunds οf race, cοlοr, religiοn, οr natiοnal οrigin.
Which type of discrimination is prohibited by Civil Rights Act 1964?The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment, public accommodations, education, and federally-assisted programs. It also prohibits retaliation against individuals who oppose discriminatory practices or file complaints under the Act.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was based on the need to address and rectify the widespread discrimination and segregation that existed against racial minorities in the United States, particularly in the Southern states. It aimed to establish equal rights and opportunities for all citizens.
To know more about Civil Rights Act visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4195946
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Match the fοllοwing scenariοs/situatiοns with the cοrrespοnding pοint οf the civil rights act οf 1964.
Title 1Title 2Title 3Nο discriminatiοn based οn race, cοlοr, religiοn οr natiοnal οrigin in public accοmοdatiοns; exempted "private" clubs.Barred unequal applicatiοn οf vοter registratiοn requirements.Prοhibited state and municipal gοvernments frοm denying access tο public facilities οn grοunds οf race, cοlοr, religiοn, οr natiοnal οrigin.Which country in southern Africa has a population that is mostly urban?
A. Zimbabwe
OB. South Africa
O C. Namibia
D. Madagascar
B. South Africa has a population that is mostly urban. According to the World Bank, in 2020, the urban population in South Africa was approximately 66%, making it one of the most urbanized countries in Africa. Zimbabwe, Namibia, and Madagascar have urbanization rates of around 32%, 48%, and 38%, respectively, according to the World Bank.
How are the main points presented
in the book Slaves in the family by Edward Ball
The story of the people, both black and white, who lived and worked on the Balls' South Carolina plantations is brought to light by journalist Ball, who confronts the legacy of his family's ownership of slaves.
Did slaves belong to the Ball family?According to the Ball Family Slaveholder Index, the Ball family "owned more than twenty rice plantations in Lowcountry South Carolina and enslaved nearly 4,000 Africans and African Americans" between 1698 and 1865. Edward Ball did research that went much further than this work. He found many slaves named in records, including some who were in family photos. He has related how his Ball ancestor enslaved an African woman named Priscilla. In 1756, she was taken from the region that is now Sierra Leone and sold to Isaac Ball (or his overseer) in Charleston.
To learn more about Slaves visit :
https://brainly.com/question/16747534
#SPJ1
the Vietnam War was another example of the wars of decolonization in the 20th century.
True
False
Answer:
The Vietnam War was a war of decolonization because it was a fight between the Vietnamese people and foreign colonial powers to gain independence for Vietnam. Vietnam was ruled by France for most of the 20th century. France was a colonial power that took control of the country by force and coercion. Around the middle of the 20th century, Vietnamese nationalist groups began to form. They wanted to get rid of French colonial rule and make Vietnam a free country.
The Vietnamese finally beat the French in 1954, but the country was then split into two separate states: North Vietnam, which was run by a communist government, and South Vietnam, which was run by a non-communist government backed by the United States. The United States helped the government of South Vietnam fight the communist forces of North Vietnam, which led to the Vietnam War.
So, the Vietnam War can be seen as a war of decolonization because it was a fight for independence by the Vietnamese people from France and then the United States, which were colonial powers at the time. The war was part of a larger wave of decolonization movements that happened all over the world in the 20th century. During these movements, many countries in Asia, Africa, and Latin America tried to get rid of European powers' control over them.
Answer:
False.
Explanation:
There is a difference between the Indochina Wars and the Vietnam War. The Vietnam War, which was fought between North Vietnam and South Vietnam, is not a war of decolonization, though North Vietnam may argue that it is so. The war of decolonization has already been fought in the Indochina Wars, in which Vietnam defeated France and her allies (primarily the United States).
Now, you may ask, what the Vietnam War was primarily about? The Vietnam War, on the other hand, primarily was fighting to unite Vietnam under a common government (whether the communist regime of North Vietnam under H-o Chi Minh, or the parliamentary republic of South Vietnam under Ngo Dinh Diem.
Learn more about the Vietnam War, here:
https://brainly.com/question/11375126
What ended before 1990
Answer:
There are many things that ended before 1990. Here are some notable examples:
World War II - The war ended in 1945 with the surrender of Germany and Japan.
Cold War - The political tension between the United States and the Soviet Union ended in 1991 with the collapse of the Soviet Union.
Apartheid - The system of racial segregation and discrimination in South Africa ended in 1990 with the release of Nelson Mandela from prison and the subsequent dismantling of the apartheid system.
Berlin Wall - The physical barrier that divided Berlin, Germany, was torn down in 1989, symbolizing the end of the Cold War.
Space Race - The competition between the United States and the Soviet Union to explore space ended in 1975 with the joint Apollo-Soyuz mission.
Vietnam War - The war ended in 1975 with the fall of Saigon and the unification of North and South Vietnam.
Soviet-Afghan War - The war ended in 1989 with the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan.
These are just a few examples, and there are many other significant events that ended before 1990.
Explanation:
why did America deploy troops to Vietnam
Answer:
The United States deployed troops to Vietnam in the mid-20th century as part of their policy of containing the spread of communism. At the time, there was a strong fear among American policymakers that communism was spreading throughout Southeast Asia, and that if the South Vietnamese government were to fall to communist forces, it would trigger a domino effect in the region, leading to the spread of communism throughout Asia. Additionally, the United States government believed that by aiding the South Vietnamese government in its fight against communist guerrillas known as the Viet Cong, it could prevent the spread of communism and promote democracy and freedom in Vietnam. These beliefs led to the gradual escalation of the conflict, with the United States deploying more and more troops to Vietnam over time.
Based on these maps, which of these nations lost territory in Europe as a result
of World War II?
which of the following was not a reaction to the battle of little big horn?
Answer: The Battle of the Little Bighorn, also called Custer's Last Stand, marked the most decisive Native American victory and the worst U.S. Army defeat in the long Plains Indian War. The demise of Custer and his men outraged many white Americans and confirmed their image of the Indians as wild and bloodthirsty.
In which area did the reforms of the Progressive Era have the most significant positive effect on the lives of Arkansans?
Question options:
health care
government
transportation
public schools
Answer:
Public Schools
Explanation:
The reforms of the Progressive Era had the most significant positive effect on the lives of Arkansans in the area of public schools. During the Progressive Era (1890s-1920s), there was a growing awareness of the need for public education as a means of promoting social and economic mobility. In Arkansas, Progressive Era reforms led to the establishment of a state board of education, the creation of a modern public school system, and the expansion of educational opportunities for both rural and urban students.
One of the key reforms in Arkansas was the passage of the 1905 Peay Education Law, which established a statewide system of public education and provided for the creation of county and district school boards. This law ensured that all Arkansas children, regardless of their social or economic background, had access to a basic education. Additionally, the Progressive Era saw the establishment of teacher training programs and the implementation of standards for teacher certification, which helped to improve the quality of education in Arkansas schools.
Another important reform was the expansion of vocational education programs, which provided training in practical skills and helped to prepare students for the workforce. This was especially important in Arkansas, where agriculture and industry were major drivers of the economy. Progressive Era reforms also led to the establishment of libraries, which provided access to educational resources for both students and adults.
Overall, the reforms of the Progressive Era had a significant positive impact on the lives of Arkansans, particularly in the area of public education. These reforms helped to create a modern public school system, expand educational opportunities, and improve the quality of education in the state.
Explanation:
Arkansas agreed and adopted many of the nation’s progressive reform elements, but they did so still holding on to the racism that existed in the state. There was a great need for change in the state due to the frontier ways of life fading away. People began moving into the cities in large volumes. During this time, Arkansas began to see its first major industries, being that of timber and mining. There were many inventions during the Progressive Era that made the way people lived different. Automobiles, airplanes, electricity, and movies were all inventions created during this time period. There were also major advances in science and medicine. There was a huge urge to adjust institutions to match the modern way of life. The urban middle-class demanded changes. More people had the time and money to devote to civil reforms. The results of the Progressive Reform Movement in Arkansas were very impressive.
List the three branches of government and their role.
Answer:
Legislative Branch: This branch consists of the Congress, which is divided into two houses - the Senate and the House of Representatives. The main responsibility of the legislative branch is to make laws. They also have the power to approve the budget, declare war, and regulate commerce.
Executive Branch: This branch consists of the President, Vice President, and Cabinet members. The main responsibility of the executive branch is to enforce laws. They also have the power to negotiate treaties, appoint judges and other officials, and grant pardons.
Judicial Branch: This branch consists of the Supreme Court and other federal courts. The main responsibility of the judicial branch is to interpret laws. They also have the power to determine the constitutionality of laws and make decisions in legal disputes.
Confederate forces led by General Forrest capture a fort and murder Black
soldiers serving there, rather than accept their surrender, during the:
O A. Fort Pillow Massacre.
B. March to the Sea.
O C. capture of Atlanta.
D. Battle of Mobile Bay.
Answer: A. Fort Pillow Massacre.
Explanation: During the Fort Pillow Massacre, Confederate forces led by General Forrest captured a fort and killed Black soldiers who were serving there, instead of accepting their surrender. This incident took place during the American Civil War on April 12, 1864.
The Fort Pillow Massacre was a controversial and tragic event. After the Confederate forces captured the fort, they brutally killed many of the Union soldiers, including Black soldiers, who were defending the fort. The exact number of casualties is disputed, but it is estimated that around 300 Union soldiers were killed.
The massacre at Fort Pillow highlighted the racial tensions and animosity during the Civil War. It was also one of the incidents that fueled debates and discussions about the treatment of Black soldiers and prisoners of war.
Learn more about the Fort Pillow Massacre here: https://brainly.com/question/15171736.
Which of the following best describes the election of 1972, where Nixon was up for re-election?
A. Overwhelming failure by Nixon
B. Unexpected win for Nixon
C. Surprise loss for Nixon
D. Landslide victory for Nixon
Answer:
It's D!
Explanation:
In the election of 1972, President Nixon won a second term in a landslide victory, defeating his Democratic opponent, George McGovern. Nixon carried every state except Massachusetts and the District of Columbia and won over 60% of the popular vote, making it one of the most decisive victories in US electoral history. Nixon's campaign emphasized his foreign policy accomplishments, including the opening of diplomatic relations with China, as well as his law-and-order platform, which appealed to many voters who were concerned about social unrest and crime. Additionally, Nixon's campaign was well-funded and highly organized, which helped him to effectively mobilize his supporters and reach a broad range of voters. Overall, Nixon's overwhelming victory in the election of 1972 was due to a combination of factors, including his effective campaigning, popular policies, and favorable political and economic conditions.
Why it's not be the other options:
It is not A, B, or C because these descriptions are not accurate in describing the election of 1972, where Nixon was up for re-election.
A. Overwhelming failure by Nixon - This description is not accurate as Nixon won the election with a large margin, receiving over 60% of the popular vote and carrying every state except Massachusetts and the District of Columbia.
B. Unexpected win for Nixon - This description is not accurate as Nixon's victory in the election of 1972 was not unexpected, as he was an incumbent president running for re-election and had significant accomplishments during his first term.
C. Surprise loss for Nixon - This description is not accurate as Nixon did not lose the election, but rather won it with a landslide victory.
Therefore, the only accurate description for the election of 1972 where Nixon was up for re-election is D, "Landslide victory for Nixon."
How did civilians in California support the American war effort?
O They built backyard camps to house enemy prisoners of war.
O They bought a new car every year to boost the American auto industry.
O They planted victory gardens to increase the nation's food supplies.
O They drove more frequently to deprive the enemy of gasoline supplies.
Help..
Answer: They planted victory gardens to increase the nation's food supplies.
Explanation: I took the test.
Warren Harding's victory over Eugene Debs in the 1920 presidential election
indicated that:
A. most Americans weren't interested in socialism and found it too extreme.
B. a large number of Americans desired change and were upset with the status quo.
C. third-party candidates had a good chance of winning an election in the United States.
D. immigrant communities and urban workers were important voting blocs.
Define grain requisition
Answer: ground
Explanation: sciene
Which statement correctly compares and contrasts the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas?
A.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both opponents of Israel, the PLO wants to eliminate Israel, while Hamas members have been elected to the parliament.
B.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both in conflict with Israel, the PLO has recognized Israel's right to exist, while Hamas wants to eliminate Israel.
C.
Although the PLO and Hamas are both considered to be activist groups, the PLO is located in Egypt, and Hamas is located in Syria.
D.
Although Hamas and the PLO both want a peaceful resolution to conflict, Hamas is in favor of West Bank settlements, while the PLO is against them.
ANSWER NEEDED ASAP
The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Hamas are properly contrasted and compared in Whilst both the PLO and Hamas are hostile to Israel, the PLO has acknowledged Israel's right to exist while Hamas seeks Israel's eradication.
What is Palestine Liberation Organization?In order to create Arab unity and statehood over the region of former Mandatory Palestine in opposition to the State of Israel, the Palestine Liberation Organization was founded in 1964. It is a Palestinian nationalist political and militant organization. Although the United States does not recognize the State of Palestine, it does recognize the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) as the legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. After the Oslo Accords, it also recognized the Palestinian National Authority as the legitimate Palestinian government of the Palestinians. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), also known as Muna'amat al-Ta'rr Filasniyyah in Arabic, is an umbrella political organization that claims to speak for all Palestinians around the world, including all Arabs and their descendants who resided in Palestine under British Mandate before the establishment of the State of Israel there in 1948.To learn more about Palestine Liberation Organization, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/10664987
Now that you have learned more about GDP as a measurement, what are the positives and negatives of this economic indicator as a tool for measuring economic health? What does GDP not tell us? Why do economists use it? Use the notes that you took in Part C to explain your answer in 3-5 sentences.
The strengths of GDP are the simplicity with which it is able to measure the economic performance of different locations. The negative effects relate to the consideration of non-monetary factors to measure a country's economy.
What is GDP?It corresponds to an economic indicator used by economists to measure the economic performance of a country in a period, through the sum of all production during a period.
Therefore, the GDP demonstrates the levels of economic growth of a country during a period, but the critics argue that it alone cannot be an instrument of measurement of the economic health of a country, for not considering factors such as employment, income, education and others that demonstrate the quality of life in general.
Find out more about GDP on:
https://brainly.com/question/1383956
#SPJ1
what are shares?
And investors in historical term
Answer:
Explanation:
Shares, also known as stocks, are units of ownership in a company. When you buy a share of a company's stock, you become a part owner of that company, and you have a claim on a portion of its assets and profits.
In historical terms, investors have been around for centuries. In the early days, investors were wealthy individuals who had the means to provide financial backing to new businesses or ventures. This often took the form of lending money to the business, or buying shares in the company in exchange for a portion of the profits.
Over time, as the stock market developed and became more accessible to the general public, anyone with the means to do so could invest in companies by buying shares of stock. Today, investing in the stock market is one of the most common ways for people to build wealth over the long term.
hoped this helped:)
Unlike women in the North, women in the South during the Civil War often
Unlike women in the North, Women in the South during the Civil War often ran plantations.
What was Women role in the South during the Civil War?Because most of the men in the South had gone off to fight the Civil War, women had to take over some of their duties. One such duty that was taken over was that of running the plantations to ensure that production remained steady.
They alos provided uniforms, blankets, sandbags and other supplies for entire regiments. They wrote letters to soldiers and worked as untrained nurses in makeshift hospitals. They even cared for wounded soldiers in their homes.
Read more about Civil War
brainly.com/question/24992590
#SPJ1
How can public opinion encourage Congress to create new laws?
Answer:
Petitions: citizens can create and sign petitions calling for specific laws to be created or changed. If a petition receives a significant number of signatures, it can catch the attention of Congress and motivate them to take action.
Rallies and protests: organized rallies and protests can bring attention to issues and show Congress the intensity and size of public support for a particular cause.
Contacting representatives: citizens can contact their elected representatives through phone calls, emails, or letters to express their support for a particular issue and to urge their representative to support related legislation.
Media coverage: when an issue receives extensive media coverage, it can raise public awareness and bring pressure on Congress to act.
Overall, public opinion can play a significant role in shaping policy and influencing Congress to create new laws.
Explanation:
How did the Aztec need for victims for sacrifice lead to problems controlling the empire? Think about: reactions of the conquered peoples, and changes in army tactics.
The Aztec need for victims for sacrifice created resentment among the conquered peoples and resulted in frequent uprisings, which made it difficult to control the empire. To counter this, the Aztecs had to shift their military tactics towards maintaining a more significant standing army to quell rebellions.
Does some Anglo-Indian people converted to Hinduism.
Answer:
Yes, some Anglo-Indian people have converted to Hinduism, as well as other religions, over time. Conversion is a personal decision and can be influenced by a variety of factors, including cultural and social factors.
Explanation:
Why might a president decide not to sign a bill while Congress is in session?
Answer:
The reason why a president may decide not to sign a bill while Congress is in session because a pocket veto occurs when a bill fails to become law.
Explanation: