1)a man bought 20 litres of petrol. he used 12 3/4 litres of petrol in his car and 3 2/5 litres in his motorbike. how much petrol was left with him? 2) on a particular day, a labourer earned rs 580 1/2 . out of this money, he spent rs 280 3/4on food and rs 130 1/5 on other needs. how much money is left with him? 3) ranjeet plays cricket for 1 3/4hours and then swims for half an hour. how much time does he spend on playing cricket and swimming ?

The student should subtract the correct value, -2, instead of -3  is the answer.

The student made an error while performing synthetic division. To correctly divide x³-x²-2x by x+1 using synthetic division, we start by writing the coefficients of the polynomial in descending order, which in this case are 1, -1, and -2. Next, we write the opposite of the divisor, which is -1, on the left side.

We then bring down the first coefficient, 1, and multiply it by -1, which gives us -1. Adding this result to the second coefficient, -1, we get -2. We then multiply -2 by -1, which gives us 2, and add it to the last coefficient, -2. The result is 0.

The correct division would be x²-2. So, the student's error was in the second step of synthetic division, where they incorrectly added -1 and -2 to get -3 instead of the correct result, which is -2. To correct the error, the student should subtract the correct value, -2, instead of -3.

know more about  synthetic division.

https://brainly.com/question/29809954

#SPJ11

In summary, the redesigned equation of the path from entrance a affects the coordinates of the fountain by changing the coefficients of x and y in the equation. This change in coefficients results in a different slope for the path.

The redesigned equation of the path from entrance a affects the coordinates of the fountain by changing the values of x and y in the equation of the path.


The original equation of the path from entrance a is 3x + y = 5. To redesign the equation, we need to analyze the changes mentioned in the question: "path a ---- = path b - 2x + 5y8 wao entrance bc".

From this information, we can deduce that the new equation of the path from entrance a is given by: 3x + y = -2x + 5y + 8.

To understand how this redesigned equation affects the coordinates of the fountain, we can compare it to the original equation.

By rearranging the terms in both equations, we can see that the coefficients of x and y have changed. In the original equation, the coefficient of x is 3 and the coefficient of y is 1. However, in the redesigned equation, the coefficient of x is now -2 and the coefficient of y is 5.

These changes in the coefficients affect the slope of the path. The slope of the original equation is -3 (the coefficient of x divided by the coefficient of y), while the slope of the redesigned equation is -2/5.

Learn more about the coordinates: https://brainly.com/question/32836021

#SPJ11

The simplest type of group design that could be used to assess the effectiveness of the 3R approach to studying is a pretest-posttest control group design.

This design involves randomly assigning participants to two groups: an experimental group that receives the 3R approach and a control group that does not. Both groups are assessed with a pretest to measure their initial level of studying skills. The experimental group then receives the 3R approach, while the control group continues with their usual studying methods.

After a designated period of time, both groups are assessed again with a posttest to measure any changes in their studying skills. The effectiveness of the 3R approach can be evaluated by comparing the post-test scores of the experimental and control groups.

However, group designs have certain limitations. First, there may be issues with generalizability, as the results obtained from a specific group may not be applicable to other populations. Second, there can be threats to internal validity, such as selection biases or participant attrition, which may affect the accuracy of the findings. Third, group designs may not allow for individual differences to be adequately addressed, as the focus is on group-level outcomes rather than individual variations. These limitations highlight the need for caution in interpreting and applying the findings from group designs.

Learn more about group design here:

https://brainly.com/question/31762927

#SPJ11

The probability that a randomly chosen young adult has at least a high school education can be found using the rule of probability called the "complement rule".

To find the answer, we need to subtract the probability that a randomly chosen young adult does not have at least a high school education from 1. In other words:

Probability of having at least a high school education = 1 - Probability of not having at least a high school education.

By using this rule, we can calculate the probability.

To know more about probability refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation: The negative sign needs to be enclosed in parentheses if you want the result to be 9

If you write (-3)^2 the result is 9

and -3^2 = -9 is right

Without additional information such as the significance level or p-value, it is not possible to make a definitive decision regarding the null hypothesis based solely on the t-score of -0.20.

Based on the given information, the counselor obtained a t-score of -0.20. To make a decision regarding the null hypothesis, we need to compare this t-score to a critical value or determine the p-value associated with it.

If the counselor has a predetermined significance level (α), she can compare the t-score to the critical value from the t-distribution table. If the t-score falls within the critical region (beyond the critical value), she would reject the null hypothesis. However, without knowing the significance level or degrees of freedom, we cannot make a definitive decision based solely on the t-score.

Alternatively, if the counselor has access to the p-value associated with the t-score, she can compare it to the significance level. If the p-value is less than the significance level (typically α = 0.05), she would reject the null hypothesis.

Without more information about the significance level or p-value, it is not possible to determine the decision regarding the null hypothesis based solely on the t-score of -0.20.

To learn more about null hypothesis visit : https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ11

The required answer is the volume of the sphere is approximately 65 cubic inches.

To find the volume of the sphere inscribed in a cube with a volume of 125 cubic inches,  the formula for the volume of a sphere.

The volume of a sphere is given by the formula V = (4/3) * π * r^3, where r is the radius of the sphere.

In this case, since the sphere is inscribed in the cube, the diameter of the sphere is equal to the side length of the cube. the side length of the cube as s.

Since the volume of the cube is 125 cubic inches, we have s^3 = 125.

Taking the cube root of both sides gives us s = 5.

Therefore, the diameter of the sphere is 5 inches, and the radius is half of the diameter, which is 2.5 inches.

Plugging the value of the radius into the volume formula, we get V = (4/3) * π * (2.5)^3.

Evaluating this expression gives us V ≈ 65.4 cubic inches.

Rounding this answer to the nearest whole number, the volume of the sphere is approximately 65 cubic inches.

To know about sphere . To click the link .

https://brainly.com/question/14703025.

#SPJ11

To construct an equilateral triangle inscribed in a circle, Zahid would need to draw three specific segments.

First, Zahid would need to draw the radius of the circle, which is a line segment connecting the center of the circle to any point on its circumference. This segment serves as the base of the equilateral triangle.

Next, Zahid would draw two more line segments from the endpoints of the base (radius) to another point on the circumference of the circle. These segments should be of equal length and form angles of 60 degrees with the base. These segments complete the equilateral triangle by connecting the remaining two vertices. Zahid needs to draw the radius of the circle (base of the equilateral triangle) and two additional line segments connecting the endpoints of the radius to other points on the circle's circumference. These line segments should be equal in length and form angles of 60 degrees with the base.

It is important to note that an equilateral triangle is a special case where all sides are equal in length and all angles are 60 degrees. In the context of a circle, an equilateral triangle is inscribed when all three vertices lie on the circumference of the circle.

Learn more about triangle here: brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ11

By finding the appropriate scalars c1 and c2, we can express vector b as a linear combination of vectors v and w.

In the given example, the scalars c1 = 8/5 and c2 = 19/5 allow us to represent vector b = (7, 1) as a linear combination of v = (2, 3) and w = (1, -1).

To find c1 and c2, we set up a system of equations by equating the components of both sides of the equation:
c1v1 + c2w1 = b1
c1v2 + c2w2 = b2

Solving this system of equations will give us the values of c1 and c2.

For example, let's say v = (2, 3), w = (1, -1), and b = (7, 1).

We have:
c1(2) + c2(1) = 7
c1(3) + c2(-1) = 1

Simplifying the equations:
2c1 + c2 = 7   (equation 1)
3c1 - c2 = 1    (equation 2)

We can solve this system of equations using various methods such as substitution or elimination.

Let's use the elimination method to solve this system. By adding equation 1 and equation 2, we eliminate c2:
(2c1 + c2) + (3c1 - c2) = 7 + 1
5c1 = 8
c1 = 8/5

Substituting the value of c1 back into equation 1, we can find c2:
2(8/5) + c2 = 7
16/5 + c2 = 7
c2 = 7 - 16/5
c2 = 35/5 - 16/5
c2 = 19/5

So, the scalars c1 and c2 that express b as a linear combination of v and w are c1 = 8/5 and c2 = 19/5.

To know more about scalars visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29030722

#SPJ11

By finding the appropriate values for c1 and c2, we can express any vector b as a linear combination of vectors v and w in R2.

To express vector b as a linear combination of vectors v and w, we need to find scalars c1 and c2 such that b = c1v + c2w. Since v and w are vectors in R2, we can express them as v = [v1, v2] and w = [w1, w2].

To find c1 and c2, we can set up a system of equations by equating the corresponding components of b, v, and w:

b1 = c1v1 + c2w1
b2 = c1v2 + c2w2

We can solve this system of equations using various methods such as substitution or elimination. Let's assume that the solution is c1 = 2 and c2 = 3.

Substituting these values back into the equation, we have:

b = 2v + 3w

For example, if v = [1, 2] and w = [3, 4], we can calculate b as:

b = 2[1, 2] + 3[3, 4] = [2, 4] + [9, 12] = [11, 16]

So, b can be expressed as a linear combination of v and w with c1 = 2 and c2 = 3.

In conclusion, by finding the appropriate values for c1 and c2, we can express any vector b as a linear combination of vectors v and w in R2.

Learn more about vector from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/15650260

#SPJ11

a) The square root of 196 is 14.

b) The square root of 441 is 21.

To find the square root of a number using the prime factorization method, we need to express the number as a product of its prime factors and then take the square root of each prime factor.

a) Let's find the square root of 196:

First, we find the prime factorization of 196:

196 = 2 * 2 * 7 * 7

Now, we group the prime factors into pairs:

196 = (2 * 2) * (7 * 7)

Taking the square root of each pair:

√(2 * 2) * √(7 * 7) = 2 * 7

Therefore, the square root of 196 is 14.

b) Let's find the square root of 441:

First, we find the prime factorization of 441:

441 = 3 * 3 * 7 * 7

Now, we group the prime factors into pairs:

441 = (3 * 3) * (7 * 7)

Taking the square root of each pair:

√(3 * 3) * √(7 * 7) = 3 * 7

Therefore, the square root of 441 is 21.

Learn more about prime factorization on:

https://brainly.com/question/17108205

#SPJ11

The maximum volume of the CD holder is 14/27 cubic feet.To find the maximum volume of the CD holder, we need to determine the value of x that maximizes the volume function V(x) = -x³ - x² + 6x.

To do this, we can take the derivative of V(x) with respect to x and set it equal to zero. The critical points we find will give us the potential values of x that maximize the volume.

First, let's find the derivative of V(x):
V'(x) = -3x² - 2x + 6

Setting V'(x) equal to zero:
-3x² - 2x + 6 = 0

Next, we can solve this quadratic equation by factoring or using the quadratic formula. However, since we are only interested in finding the maximum value, we can use the vertex formula to find the x-coordinate of the vertex.

The x-coordinate of the vertex is given by the formula: x = -b / (2a), where a, b, and c are the coefficients of the quadratic equation.

For our equation -3x² - 2x + 6 = 0, a = -3 and b = -2.

x = -(-2) / (2 * (-3))
x = 2 / 6
x = 1/3

So, the critical point that gives the potential maximum volume is x = 1/3.

To confirm if this is indeed a maximum, we can check the second derivative of V(x).

Taking the derivative of V'(x), we get:
V''(x) = -6x - 2

Substituting x = 1/3 into V''(x), we get:
V''(1/3) = -6(1/3) - 2
V''(1/3) = -2 - 2
V''(1/3) = -4

Since the second derivative is negative (-4), this confirms that x = 1/3 is a maximum point.

Now, we can find the maximum volume by substituting x = 1/3 into the volume function V(x):
V(1/3) = -(1/3)³ - (1/3)² + 6(1/3)
V(1/3) = -1/27 - 1/9 + 6/3
V(1/3) = -1/27 - 3/27 + 18/27
V(1/3) = 14/27

Therefore, the maximum volume of the CD holder is 14/27 cubic feet.

To know more about maximum volume of the CD holder visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12453809

#SPJ11

The statement “When an outcome falls outside the sample space, it is a failure” is ALWAYS TRUE. A sample space is defined as the set of all possible outcomes of an experiment. Therefore, any outcome that is not within the sample space cannot be an actual outcome of the experiment and is considered a failure.

In probability theory, the sample space is the set of all possible outcomes of a random experiment. Every outcome within the sample space has a non-zero probability of occurrence. If the outcome falls outside the sample space, it has a zero probability of occurring and is therefore considered a failure.For instance, consider an experiment of flipping a coin, where the sample space is {Heads, Tails}. If the outcome is “Side”, then it is not part of the sample space and is considered a failure. Similarly, if we throw a dice, then the sample space is {1,2,3,4,5,6}. Any outcome other than these six values, like 0 or 7, would be a failure because it falls outside of the sample space.Therefore, the statement “When an outcome falls outside the sample space, it is a failure” is always true.

For more question sample space

https://brainly.com/question/29719992

#SPJ8

The expression for Cam's amount would be: bbbb dollars - 7777 dollars.

To find the number of dollars Cam has, we need to subtract 7777 from Ben's amount.

Let's represent Ben's amount as "bbbb dollars."
The expression for Cam's amount would be: bbbb dollars - 7777 dollars.

Know more about expression  here:

https://brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ11

The seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To calculate the seasonal total prior to the recent storm, we need to subtract the rainfall from the recent storm (50 inches) from the updated seasonal total (26.42 inches).

Let's assume that the seasonal total prior to the recent storm is represented by "x" inches.

So, we can set up the equation:

x - 50 = 26.42

To solve for x, we can add 50 to both sides of the equation:

x - 50 + 50 = 26.42 + 50

This simplifies to:

x = 76.42

Therefore, the seasonal total prior to the recent storm was 76.42 inches.

To know more about equation click-
http://brainly.com/question/2972832
#SPJ11

The value of the missing angle x is approximately 26.015 degrees.

Real functions called trigonometric functions link the angle of a right-angled triangle to the ratios of its two side lengths. The sine, cosine, tangent, cotangent, secant, and cosecant are the six trigonometric functions. These formulas reflect the right triangle side ratios.

To determine the value of the missing angle, we can use the fact that the sine function and cosine function are related in a right triangle.

Given that sin(26) = 0.4384, we can find the value of the missing angle by using the inverse sine function (also known as arcsine). Let's denote the missing angle as x.

sin(x) = 0.4384

Taking the inverse sine of both sides:

x = arcsin(0.4384)

Using a calculator, we can find the approximate value of arcsin(0.4384) to be approximately 26.015 degrees.

Therefore, the angle x that is lacking has a value of about 26.015 degrees.

Learn more about trigonometric function on:

https://brainly.com/question/25618616

#SPJ11

The directional derivative of f(x, y) = ln(6 + x² + y²) at the point P(-2, 1) in the direction of the vector (3, 2) is -8 / (9 √(13)).

To compute the directional derivative of the function f(x, y) = ln(6 + x² + y²) at the point P(-2, 1) in the direction of the given vector (3, 2), we need to calculate the dot product of the gradient of f at P and the unit vector in the direction of (3, 2).

First, let's find the gradient of f(x, y):

∇f(x, y) = (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y)

Taking partial derivatives:

∂f/∂x = 2x / (6 + x² + y²)

∂f/∂y = 2y / (6 + x² + y²)

Now, let's evaluate the gradient at the point P(-2, 1):

∇f(-2, 1) = (2(-2) / (6 + (-2)² + 1²), 2(1) / (6 + (-2)² + 1²))

          = (-4 / 9, 2 / 9)

Next, we need to calculate the unit vector in the direction of (3, 2):

Magnitude of (3, 2) = sqrt(3² + 2²) = √(13)

Unit vector = (3 / √(13), 2 / √(13))

Finally, we take the dot product of the gradient and the unit vector to find the directional derivative:

Directional derivative = ∇f(-2, 1) · (3 / sqrt(13), 2 / sqrt(13))

                     = (-4 / 9)(3 / √(13)) + (2 / 9)(2 / √(13))

                     = (-12 / (9 √(13))) + (4 / (9 √(13)))

                     = -8 / (9 √(13))

Therefore, the directional derivative of f(x, y) = ln(6 + x² + y²) at the point P(-2, 1) in the direction of the vector (3, 2) is -8 / (9 √(13)).

Learn more about Vector here:

https://brainly.com/question/33399947

#SPJ4

1. Calculate the gradient of the function at point p. The gradient is a vector that points in the direction of the steepest increase of the function at that point.

2. Normalize the given direction vector to obtain a unit vector. To normalize a vector, divide each of its components by its magnitude.

3. Compute the dot product between the normalized direction vector and the gradient vector. The dot product measures the projection of one vector onto another. This gives us the magnitude of the directional derivative.

4. To find the actual directional derivative, multiply the magnitude obtained in step 3 by the magnitude of the gradient vector. This accounts for the rate of change of the function in the direction of the given vector.

5. The directional derivative represents the rate of change of the function at point p in the direction of the given vector. It indicates how fast the function is changing in that particular direction.

Learn more about Function from the link:

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

Given quadratic function:

[tex]y=3x^2 - 9, \qquad x \leq 0[/tex]

The domain of the given function is restricted to values of x less than or equal to zero. Therefore:

As 3x² ≥ 0, then range of the given function is restricted to values of y greater than or equal to -9.

[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]

To find the inverse of the given function, first interchange the x and y variables:

[tex]x = 3y^2 - 9[/tex]

Now, solve the equation for y:

[tex]\begin{aligned}x& = 3y^2 - 9\\\\x+9&=3y^2\\\\\dfrac{x+9}{3}&=y^2\\y&=\pm \sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}\end{aligned}[/tex]

The range of the inverse function is the domain of the original function.

As the domain of the original function is restricted to x ≤ 0, then the range of the inverse function is restricted to y ≤ 0.

Therefore, the inverse function is the negative square root:

[tex]f^{-1}(x)=-\sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}[/tex]

The  domain of the inverse function is the range of the original function.

As the range of the original function is restricted to y ≥ -9, then the domain of the inverse function is restricted to x ≥ -9.

[tex]\boxed{f^{-1}(x)=-\sqrt{\dfrac{x+9}{3}}\qquad x \geq -9}[/tex]

So the correct statement is:

The equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent to the curve y=x^4+x-1 at the point (1,1) is y = -1x + 2.

To find the equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent, we first need to find the slope of the tangent line. The slope of the tangent line is equal to the derivative of the curve at the given point. Taking the derivative of y=x^4+x-1, we get y'=4x^3+1. Substituting x=1 into the derivative, we get y'=4(1)^3+1=5.

The slope of the tangent line is 5. To find the slope of the perpendicular line, we use the fact that the product of the slopes of perpendicular lines is -1. Therefore, the slope of the perpendicular line is -1/5.

Next, we use the point-slope form of a line to find the equation. Using the point (1,1) and the slope -1/5, we have y-1=(-1/5)(x-1). Simplifying this equation gives us y = -1x + 2. Thus, the equation of the line perpendicular to the tangent to the curve y=x^4+x-1 at the point (1,1) is y = -1x + 2.

Know more about tangent here:

https://brainly.com/question/10053881

#SPJ11

When a 45-foot long cable with a weight-density of 7 pounds per foot is wound up 34 feet, the work done when winding up the cable is 10,710 foot-pounds.

The work done is equal to the force applied multiplied by the distance over which the force is exerted. In this case, the force applied is the weight of the cable, which is determined by multiplying the weight-density by the length of the cable.

The distance over which the force is exerted is the distance the cable is wound up, which is 34 feet. By multiplying these values together, we can determine the work done in foot-pounds.

The weight of the cable is given by the weight-density (7 pounds per foot) multiplied by the length of the cable (45 feet), resulting in a weight of 7 pounds/foot × 45 feet = 315 pounds. This weight represents the force applied to wind up the cable. The distance over which the force is exerted is 34 feet, as mentioned in the problem.

Therefore, the work done is calculated by multiplying the force (315 pounds) by the distance (34 feet), resulting in a total work of 315 pounds × 34 feet = 10,710 foot-pounds. Thus, the work done when winding up the cable is 10,710 foot-pounds.

To learn more about density click here:

brainly.com/question/1354972

#SPJ11

The mean e(t) is 48.393 and the standard deviation sd(t) is approximately 2.850.

To determine the mean e(t) and standard deviation Sd(t) of the relay team's total time in the medley event, we need to calculate the weighted average and standard deviation of each swimmer's time.

The mean e(t) is calculated by adding up the product of each swimmer's time and the corresponding weight (number of strokes) and dividing it by the total weight.

[tex]e(t) = (49.39 * 2 + 55.67 * 1 + 48.76 * 3 + 45.8 * 4) / (2 + 1 + 3 + 4)[/tex]

Calculating this expression, we get:

[tex]e(t) = (98.78 + 55.67 + 146.28 + 183.2) / 10[/tex]

[tex]e(t) = 483.93 / 10[/tex]
[tex]e(t) = 48.393[/tex]

So, the mean e(t) is 48.393.

To calculate the standard deviation sd(t), we need to find the weighted variance and then take its square root.

First, we calculate the weighted variance by summing up the products of each swimmer's squared time difference from the mean and the corresponding weight, and dividing it by the total weight.

variance(t) = [tex][(2 * (49.39 - 48.393)^2) + (1 * (55.67 - 48.393)^2) + (3 * (48.76 - 48.393)^2) + (4 * (45.8 - 48.393)^2)] / (2 + 1 + 3 + 4)[/tex]

Calculating this expression, we get:

variance(t) =[tex][2 * (0.997)^2 + 1 * (7.277)^2 + 3 * (0.367)^2 + 4 * (-2.593)^2] / 10[/tex]
variance(t) =[tex][2 * 0.994 + 1 * 52.94 + 3 * 0.135 + 4 * 6.713] / 10[/tex]
variance(t) =[tex](1.988 + 52.94 + 0.405 + 26.852) / 10[/tex]

variance(t) =[tex]81.185 / 10[/tex]

variance(t) = [tex]8.119[/tex]

Finally, taking the square root of the variance gives us the standard deviation sd(t):

[tex]sd(t) = √8.119[/tex]

[tex]sd(t) ≈ 2.850[/tex]

So, the standard deviation sd(t) is approximately 2.850.

To know more about deviation visit:

https://brainly.com/question/23907081

#SPJ11

The expression is [tex]∑(i=1 to n) (a * x_i + b * y_i + c) = a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n[/tex]

To show that the given expression is true, we will use the properties of summation notation. Let's break it down step-by-step:

1. Start by expanding the left side of the equation using the properties of summation:
[tex]a * x_1 + b * y_1 + c + a * x_2 + b * y_2 + c + ... + a * x_n + b * y_n + c[/tex]

2. Now, group the terms together based on their constants (a, b, and c):
[tex](a * x_1 + a * x_2 + ... + a * x_n) + (b * y_1 + b * y_2 + ... + b * y_n) + (c + c + ... + c)[/tex]

3. Observe that each sum within the parentheses represents the summation of the sequences x_i, y_i, and a sequence of c's respectively:
[tex]a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n[/tex]

4. This matches the right side of the equation, which proves that the given expression is true.

Therefore, we have shown that:
[tex]∑(i=1 to n) (a * x_i + b * y_i + c) = a * ∑(i=1 to n) x_i + b * ∑(i=1 to n) y_i + c * n.[/tex]

To know more about the expression, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32967003

#SPJ11

The correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

Based on the given information, the reasoning used is an example of deductive reasoning.

Deductive reasoning is when a conclusion is drawn based on a set of premises or known facts. In this case, the formula p = 4s is a well-known and accepted formula to calculate the perimeter of a square.

By substituting the side length of 7 inches into the formula, the conclusion is reached that the perimeter is 28 inches. However, the stated perimeter of 4728 inches is incorrect.

To find the correct perimeter, we would use the formula p = 4s, where s represents the side length of the square.

Plugging in 7 inches for s, we get p = 4 * 7, which simplifies to p = 28 inches.

Therefore, the correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

To know more about perimeter visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13957726

#SPJ11

The reasoning used in this example is deductive because it starts with a general formula and applies it to a specific example to draw a conclusion. The conclusion, however, is incorrect, and the correct perimeter is 28 inches, not 4728 inches.

The reasoning provided is an example of deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning is a logical process where specific conclusions are drawn from general principles or premises.

In this case, the reasoning starts with the general principle or formula for finding the perimeter of a square, which is p = 4s, where p represents the perimeter and s represents the length of one side of the square. The formula is based on the geometric properties of a square.

Next, the specific example of a square with a side length of 7 inches is given. By substituting the value of s into the formula, we can calculate the perimeter: p = 4 * 7 = 28 inches.

The conclusion that the perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 4728 inches is incorrect. It seems like there might have been a typo or calculation error in the provided answer.

To find the correct perimeter, we need to use the formula p = 4s again, substituting the correct value of s (7 inches). This gives us: p = 4 * 7 = 28 inches. Therefore, the correct perimeter of a square with a side length of 7 inches is 28 inches.

In summary, the reasoning used in this example is deductive because it starts with a general formula and applies it to a specific example to draw a conclusion. The conclusion, however, is incorrect, and the correct perimeter is 28 inches, not 4728 inches.

Learn more about Deductive reasoning  from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/7284582

#SPJ11

John's study aims to determine if exercise frequency has an effect on pulse rate. Statistical analysis can be used to verify the alternate hypothesis.

John wants to determine whether the frequency of exercise affects pulse rate. To investigate this, he randomly selects individuals at a local gym who agree to participate in his research. John divides the 55 individuals who agree into three exercise frequency categories: high, moderate, and low.

Following their exercise, he calculates their pulse rates. Is there a difference in pulse rates among those who exercise frequently, moderately, and infrequently?The null hypothesis for this research question would be that there is no relationship between the frequency of exercise and pulse rate. The alternate hypothesis would be that there is a correlation between frequency of exercise and pulse rate. Statistical tools like ANOVA or T-test can be used to test the hypothesis.

In conclusion, John's study aims to determine if exercise frequency has an effect on pulse rate. Statistical analysis can be used to verify the alternate hypothesis.

To know more about alternate hypothesis.visit:

brainly.com/question/33149605

#SPJ11

To calculate z-scores, use the formula z1 = (x1 - mean) / standard deviation and z2 = (x2 - mean) / standard deviation. Use a standard normal table or calculator to find the proportion of measurements between z1 and z2.Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find the proportion of measurements between -0.769 and 0.769.

To find the proportion of measurements in a given interval, we can use the properties of the normal distribution. Since the distribution is mound-shaped, we can assume that it follows the normal distribution.

First, we need to determine the z-scores for the lower and upper bounds of the given interval. The z-score formula is given by: z = (x - mean) / standard deviation.

Let's say the lower bound of the interval is x1 and the upper bound is x2. To find the proportion of measurements between x1 and x2, we need to find the area under the normal curve between the corresponding z-scores.

To calculate the z-scores, we use the formula:
z1 = (x1 - mean) / standard deviation
z2 = (x2 - mean) / standard deviation

Once we have the z-scores, we can use a standard normal table or a calculator to find the proportion of measurements between z1 and z2.

For example, if x1 = 50 and x2 = 70, the z-scores would be:
z1 = (50 - 60) / 13 = -0.769
z2 = (70 - 60) / 13 = 0.769

Using a standard normal table or a calculator, we can find the proportion of measurements between -0.769 and 0.769.

Note: Since the question does not specify the specific interval, I have provided a general approach to finding the proportion of measurements in a given interval based on the mean and standard deviation. Please provide the specific interval for a more accurate answer.

To know more about standard deviation Visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29115611

#SPJ11

Approximately 0.12% of high school athletes will go on to play professional sports. What we are given is that about 9% of high school athletes proceed to play sports in college. And of these college athletes, only 1.3% will play professional sports. Now we have to calculate the probability of a high school athlete going on to play professional sports.

It is important to remember that only college athletes can go pro, so the probability we are looking for is the probability that a high school athlete will go on to play in college and then become a professional athlete. We can solve this by multiplying the two probabilities:

Probability of a high school athlete playing in college = 9% = 0.09Probability of a college athlete playing professionally = 1.3% = 0.013Probability of a high school athlete playing college and then professionally = (0.09) (0.013) = 0.00117 or 0.12% (rounded off to two decimal places)Therefore, the probability that a high school athlete will go on to play professional sports is approximately 0.12%.

To know more about probability visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

A line chart is a special type of scatter plot in which the data points in the scatter plot are connected with a line. A line chart is a graphical representation of data that is used to display information that changes over time. The line chart is also known as a line graph or a time-series graph. The data points are plotted on a grid where the x-axis represents time and the y-axis represents the value of the data.

The data points in the scatter plot are connected with a line to show the trend or pattern in the data. Line charts are commonly used to visualize data in business, economics, science, and engineering.Line charts are useful for displaying information that changes over time. They are particularly useful for tracking trends and changes in data. Line charts are often used to visualize stock prices,

sales figures, weather patterns, and other types of data that change over time. Line charts are also used to compare two or more sets of data. By plotting multiple lines on the same graph, you can easily compare the trends and patterns in the data.Overall, line charts are a useful tool for visualizing data and communicating information to others. They are easy to read, understand, and interpret, and can be used to display a wide range of data sets.

To know more about graphical visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14191900

#SPJ11

The ordered pair that can be added to the given set and still have the set represent the same linear function is (3, 1).

To determine which ordered pair can be added to the given set and still have the set represent the same linear function, we need to identify the pattern or rule governing the set. We can do this by examining the x and y values of the ordered pairs.

Looking at the x-values, we can see that they increase by 1 from -2 to 2. This suggests that the x-values follow a constant increment pattern.

Next, let's examine the y-values. We can see that they also increase by 2 from -9 to -1. This indicates that the y-values follow a constant increment pattern as well.

Based on these observations, we can conclude that the linear function rule is y = 2x - 5.

Now, let's check if the ordered pair (3, 1) follows this rule. Plugging in x = 3 into the linear function equation, we get y = 2(3) - 5 = 1. Since the y-value matches, we can add (3, 1) to the given set and still have the set represent the same linear function.

Know more about linear function here:

https://brainly.com/question/29205018

#SPJ11

The percent of increase in the price of the basketball is approximately 10.4%.

When a sporting goods store raises the price of a basketball from $16.75 to $18.50,

the percent of increase in the price can be calculated using the percent increase formula which is given as:\[\% \text{ increase} = \frac{\text{new value} - \text{old value}}{\text{old value}} \times 100\]

Substituting the given values in the above formula,

we get:\[\% \text{ increase} = \frac{18.50 - 16.75}{16.75} \times 100\]\[\% \text{ increase} = \frac{1.75}{16.75} \times 100\]\[\% \text{ increase} = 10.4478...\]

To round this answer to the nearest tenth, we look at the second decimal place which is 4.

Since 4 is less than 5, we round down the first decimal place which gives us:\[\% \text{ increase} \approx 10.4\]

Therefore, the percent of increase in the price of the basketball is approximately 10.4%.

To know more about sporting visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30833575

#SPJ11

You can substitute the value of x into the formula to calculate the probability for any specific number of no-change audits.

To determine the probability that the sample has a specific number of no-change audits, we can use the binomial probability formula.

The binomial probability formula is given by:

[tex]P(X = k) = C(n, k) * p^k * (1 - p)^{(n - k)}[/tex]

Where:

P(X = k) is the probability of having exactly k successes (in this case, no-change audits),

n is the sample size,

k is the number of successes,

p is the probability of success in a single trial (in this case, the probability of a no-change audit), and

C(n, k) is the binomial coefficient, also known as "n choose k," which represents the number of ways to choose k successes from n trials.

In this scenario, n = 200 (sample size) and p = 0.9 (probability of no-change audit). We want to calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits. Let's say we want to find the probability of having x no-change audits.

[tex]P(X = x) = C(200, x) * 0.9^x * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - x)}[/tex]

Now, let's calculate the probability of having a specific number of no-change audits for different values of x. For example, if we want to find the probability of having exactly 180 no-change audits:

[tex]P(X = 180) = C(200, 180) * 0.9^{180} * (1 - 0.9)^{(200 - 180)}[/tex]

To know more about probability visit:

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

To find the expected number of people that win at least once in k mutually independent lottery drawings, we can use the principle of linearity of expectation.

Since each person is equally likely to win the lottery in each drawing, the probability that a person does not win in a single drawing is (n-1)/n. Therefore, the probability that a person wins at least once in a single drawing is 1 - (n-1)/n = 1/n. Now, let's consider the k independent drawings. The probability that a person wins at least once in a single drawing is 1/n. Since the drawings are independent, the probability that a person does not win at least once in any of the k drawings is (1 - 1/n)^k.

Using the principle of linearity of expectation, the expected number of people that win at least once in k drawings can be calculated by multiplying the number of people (n) by the probability that a person wins at least once in a single drawing, which is 1 - (1 - 1/n)^k.Therefore, the expected number of people that win at least once in k mutually independent lottery drawings is n * (1 - (1 - 1/n)^k).

To know more about number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33311228

#SPJ11