For a cavity of volume 1 m³ held at a temperature of 273 K (equivalent to 0 degrees Celsius or 32 degrees Fahrenheit), the number of photons in equilibrium can be determined.
The number of photons in equilibrium can be obtained by integrating the Planck radiation law over all possible photon energies. The calculation involves considering the photon energy levels and their respective probabilities according to the temperature. The result yields a value for the number of photons in equilibrium.
In comparison, the number of molecules in the same volume of an ideal gas at standard temperature and pressure (STP) can be calculated using the ideal gas law, which relates the pressure, volume, and temperature of a gas. At STP, which is defined as a temperature of 273.15 K (0 degrees Celsius) and a pressure of 1 atmosphere (atm), the number of molecules in a given volume can be determined.
By comparing the number of photons in equilibrium in the cavity to the number of molecules in the same volume of an ideal gas at STP, we can observe the significant difference between the two quantities.
The number of photons in equilibrium depends on the temperature and is determined by the Planck radiation law, while the number of molecules in an ideal gas at STP is governed by the ideal gas law. These calculations provide insights into the vastly different nature and behavior of photons and gas molecules in equilibrium systems.
Learn more about Planck radiation law here:
https://brainly.com/question/13265362
#SPJ11
Using energy considerations (and not
kinematics), find the speed a drag-free object would have
to be shot upward in order for it to rise to a maximum height H if
shot at a 45 degree angle.
The speed a drag-free object is √(19.6 * H).
To find the initial speed required for a drag-free object to rise to a maximum height H when shot at a 45-degree angle, we can use energy considerations.
At the maximum height, the object's vertical velocity will be zero, and all its initial kinetic energy will be converted into potential energy. Therefore, we can equate the initial kinetic energy to the potential energy at the maximum height.
The kinetic energy (KE) of an object is given by the formula:
KE = (1/2) * m * v^2
Where:
m = mass of the object
v = initial velocity/speed
The potential energy (PE) of an object at a height H is given by the formula:
PE = m * g * H
Where:
g = acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2)
Since the object is shot at a 45-degree angle, the initial velocity can be decomposed into horizontal and vertical components. The vertical component of the initial velocity (v_y) can be calculated as:
v_y = v * sin(45°) = (v * √2) / 2
At the maximum height, the vertical component of the velocity will be zero. Therefore, we can write:
0 = v_y - g * t
Where:
t = time of flight to reach the maximum height
From this equation, we can calculate the time of flight:
t = v_y / g = [(v * √2) / 2] / g = (v * √2) / (2 * g)
Now, let's calculate the potential energy at the maximum height:
PE = m * g * H
Setting the initial kinetic energy equal to the potential energy:
(1/2) * m * v^2 = m * g * H
Simplifying and canceling out the mass (m) from both sides:
(1/2) * v^2 = g * H
Now, we can solve for v:
v^2 = (2 * g * H)
Taking the square root of both sides:
v = √(2 * g * H)
Substituting the value of g (9.8 m/s^2), we get:
v = √(2 * 9.8 * H) = √(19.6 * H)
Therefore, the speed at which the object needs to be shot upward is given by v = √(19.6 * H).
To learn more about speed from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13943409
#SPJ11
The equation E= 2πε 0 z 3 1qd is approximation of the magnitude of the electric field of an electric dipole, at points along the dipole axis. Consider a point P on that axis at distance z=20.00d from the dipole center ( d is the separation distance between the particles of the dipole). Let E appr be the magnitude of the field at point P as approximated by the equations below. Let E act be the actual magnitude. What is the ratio E appr /E act ? Number Units
The given equation for the magnitude of the electric field of an electric dipole along the dipole axis is:
E = (2πε₀ * z^3 * p) / (q * d^3)
Where:
E is the magnitude of the electric field at point P along the dipole axis.
ε₀ is the vacuum permittivity (electric constant).
z is the distance from the dipole center to point P.
p is the electric dipole moment.
q is the magnitude of the charge on each particle of the dipole.
d is the separation distance between the particles of the dipole.
To find the ratio E_appr / E_act, we need to compare the approximate magnitude of the field E_appr at point P to the actual magnitude of the field E_act.
Since we only have the approximate equation, we'll assume that E_appr represents the approximate magnitude and E_act represents the actual magnitude. Therefore, the ratio E_appr / E_act can be expressed as:
(E_appr / E_act) = E_appr / E_act
Substituting the values into the approximate equation:
E_appr = (2πε₀ * z^3 * p) / (q * d^3)
To find the ratio, we need to know the values of ε₀, p, q, and d, which are not provided in the given information. Please provide the specific values for ε₀, p, q, and d so that we can calculate the ratio E_appr / E_act.
To know more about electric field click this link -
brainly.com/question/11482745
#SPJ11
A sound serving 20°C ar pressurempitude of what intensity level of the sound correspond to
If the pressure amplitude of the sound corresponds to 1 μPa, the intensity level would be approximately -26 dB.
To determine the intensity level of a sound its pressure amplitude, we need to know the reference sound pressure level (SPL) and apply the formula:
L = 20 * log10(P / Pref)
where:
L is the intensity level in decibels (dB),
P is the sound pressure amplitude,
and Pref is the reference sound pressure amplitude.
The reference sound pressure amplitude (Pref) is commonly defined as the threshold of hearing, which corresponds to a sound pressure level of 0 dB. In acoustics, the threshold of hearing is approximately 20 μPa (micropascals).
Let's assume that the sound pressure amplitude (P) is provided in micropascals (μPa).
For example, if the pressure amplitude of the sound is P = 1 μPa, we can calculate the intensity level (L):
L = 20 * log10(1 μPa / 20 μPa)
L = 20 * log10(0.05)
L ≈ 20 * (-1.3)
L ≈ -26 dB
Therefore, if the pressure amplitude of the sound corresponds to 1 μPa, the intensity level would be approximately -26 dB.
Learn more about pressure amplitude from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/29524554
#SPJ11
A car is traveling at 10 m/s when the driver steps harder on the gas pedal causing an acceleration of 2 m/s^2. How far, in meters, has the car travelled after 3 seconds?
The car has traveled a distance of 39 meters in 3 seconds due to an initial velocity of 10 m/s and an acceleration of 2 m/s².
To find the distance traveled by the car, we can use the equation of motion:
d = ut + (1/2)at²
where:
d is the distance traveled,
u is the initial velocity,
t is the time, and
a is the acceleration.
Substituting the values into the equation, we get:
d = (10 m/s)(3 s) + (1/2)(2 m/s²)(3 s)²
d = 30 m + (1/2)(2 m/s²)(9 s²)
d = 30 m + (1/2)(18 m)
d = 30 m + 9 m
d = 39 m
Therefore, the car has traveled 39 meters after 3 seconds.
To know more about the distance traveled refer here,
https://brainly.com/question/150523#
#SPJ11
A man stands on a merry-go-round that is rotating at 3.0rad/s. If the coefficient of static friction between the man's shoes and the merry-go-round is μ s
=0.6, how far from the axis of rotation can he stand without sliding?
The man can stand at a maximum distance of 6.53 m from the axis of rotation without sliding.
The man can stand on a merry-go-round rotating at 3.0 rad/s without sliding if the coefficient of static friction between the man's shoes and the merry-go-round is μs = 0.6.
Now, we need to find the maximum distance the man can stand from the axis of rotation without sliding. Let us consider the following diagram: [tex]A[/tex] is the man standing on the merry-go-round rotating at 3.0 rad/s, and [tex]F_{friction}[/tex] is the static frictional force that opposes the relative motion of the man on the rotating merry-go-round.
According to the question, the coefficient of static friction between the man's shoes and the merry-go-round is [tex]\mu_s = 0.6[/tex]. The formula for the static frictional force is [tex]F_{friction} \leq \mu_s F_{normal}[/tex].
where [tex]F_{normal}[/tex] is the normal force. Since the merry-go-round is rotating, there is a centripetal force that acts on the man, which is given by [tex]F_c = mr\omega^2[/tex].
where m is the mass of the man, [tex]\omega[/tex] is the angular velocity of the merry-go-round, and r is the distance of the man from the axis of rotation.
Hence, the normal force acting on the man is given by [tex]F_{normal} = mg[/tex].where g is the acceleration due to gravity. Therefore, [tex]F_{friction} \leq \mu_s F_{normal}[/tex][tex]\implies F_{friction} \leq \mu_s mg[/tex][tex]\implies mr\omega^2 \leq \mu_s mg[/tex][tex]\implies r \leq \frac{\mu_s g}{\omega^2}[/tex]Plugging in the given values, we get: [tex]r \leq \frac{(0.6)(9.8)}{(3.0)^2}[/tex]
Simplifying, we get: [tex]r \leq 6.53 m[/tex].Therefore, the man can stand at a maximum distance of 6.53 m from the axis of rotation without sliding.
To know more about axis of rotation refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31439072#
#SPJ11
A string with a linear density of 7.11×10−4 kg/m and a length of 1.14 m is stretched across the open end of a closed tube that is 1.39 m long. The diameter of the tube is very small. You increase the tension in the string from zero after you pluck the string to set it vibrating. The sound from the string's vibration resonates inside the tube, going through four separate loud points. What is the tension in the string when you reach the fourth loud point? Assume the speed of sound in air is 343 m/s.
The tension in the string when you reach the fourth loud point is 27.56 N.
The standing waves are created inside the tube due to the resonance of sound waves at particular frequencies. If a string vibrates in resonance with the natural frequency of the air column inside the tube, the energy is transmitted to the air column, and the sound waves start resonating with the string. The string vibrates more and, thus, produces more sound.
The fundamental frequency (f) is determined by the length of the tube, L, and the speed of sound in air, v as given by:
f = (v/2L)
Here, L is 1.39 m and v is 343 m/s. Therefore, the fundamental frequency (f) is:
f = (343/2 × 1.39) Hz = 123.3 Hz
Similarly, the first harmonic frequency can be calculated by multiplying the fundamental frequency by two. The second harmonic frequency is three times the fundamental frequency. Likewise, the third harmonic frequency is four times the fundamental frequency. The frequencies of the four loud points can be calculated as:
f1 = 2f = 246.6 Hz
f2 = 3f = 369.9 Hz
f3 = 4f = 493.2 Hz
f4 = 5f = 616.5 Hz
For a string of length 1.14 m with a linear density of 7.11×10⁻⁴ kg/m and vibrating at a frequency of 616.5 Hz, the tension can be calculated as:
Tension (T) = (π²mLf²) / 4L²
where m is the linear density, f is the frequency, and L is the length of the string.
T = (π² × 7.11 × 10⁻⁴ × 1.14 × 616.5²) / 4 × 1.14²
T = 27.56 N
Therefore, when the fourth loud point is reached, the tension in the string is 27.56 N.
Learn more about standing waves here: https://brainly.com/question/30528641
#SPJ11
A battleship that is 5.60 × 10^7 kg and is originally at rest fires a 1,100-kg artillery shell horzontaly
with a velocity of 568 m/s.
If the shell is fired straight aft (toward the rear of the ship), there will be negligible friction opposing
the ship's recoil. Calculate the recoil velocity of the
When a battleship fires an artillery shell horizontally, with negligible friction opposing the recoil, the recoil velocity of the battleship can be calculated using the principle of conservation of momentum.
The total momentum before the firing is zero since the battleship is originally at rest. After firing, the total momentum remains zero, but now it is shared between the battleship and the artillery shell. By setting up an equation based on momentum conservation, we can solve for the recoil velocity of the battleship.
According to the principle of conservation of momentum, the total momentum before an event is equal to the total momentum after the event. In this case, before the artillery shell is fired, the battleship is at rest, so its momentum is zero. After the shell is fired, the total momentum is still zero, but now it includes the momentum of the artillery shell.
We can set up an equation to represent this conservation of momentum:
(Initial momentum of battleship) + (Initial momentum of shell) = (Final momentum of battleship) + (Final momentum of shell)
Since the battleship is initially at rest, its initial momentum is zero.
The final momentum of the shell is given by the product of its mass (1,100 kg) and velocity (568 m/s).
Let's denote the recoil velocity of the battleship as v.
The equation becomes:
0 + (1,100 kg * 568 m/s) = (5.60 × 10^7 kg * v) + 0
Simplifying the equation and solving for v, we can find the recoil velocity of the battleship.
Learn more about Recoil velocity from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/11897472
#SPJ11
A spring oscillator is slowing down due to air resistance. If
the time constant is 394 s, how long will it take for the amplitude
to be 50% of its initial amplitude?
Express your answer in seconds (s)
A spring oscillator is slowing down due to air resistance. If the time constant is 394 s, it will take approximately 273.83 seconds for the amplitude of the spring oscillator to decrease to 50% of its initial amplitude.
The time constant (τ) of a system is defined as the time it takes for the system's response to reach approximately 63.2% of its final value. In the case of a spring oscillator, the amplitude decreases exponentially with time.
Given that the time constant (τ) is 394 s, we can use this information to determine the time it takes for the amplitude to decrease to 50% of its initial value.
The relationship between the time constant (τ) and the percentage of the initial amplitude (A) can be expressed as:
A(t) = A₀ × exp(-t / τ)
Where:
A(t) is the amplitude at time t
A₀ is the initial amplitude
t is the time
We want to find the time at which the amplitude is 50% of its initial value, so we set A(t) equal to 0.5A₀:
0.5A₀ = A₀ × exp(-t / τ)
Dividing both sides of the equation by A₀, we have:
0.5 = exp(-t / τ)
To solve for t, we take the natural logarithm of both sides:
ln(0.5) = -t / τ
Rearranging the equation to solve for t:
t = -τ × ln(0.5)
Substituting the given value of τ = 394 s into the equation:
t = -394 s × ln(0.5)
Calculating this expression:
t ≈ -394 s × (-0.6931)
t ≈ 273.83 s
Therefore, it will take approximately 273.83 seconds for the amplitude of the spring oscillator to decrease to 50% of its initial amplitude.
To learn more about amplitude visit: https://brainly.com/question/3613222
#SPJ11
Switch Si is closed. Switch S2 has been in position a for a long time. It is now switched to position b. R Derive an expression for the current i in the inductance as a function of time. Show all your work and box your answer. 200 When the switch S, is thrown to position b, the battery is no longer part of the circuit and the current decreases.
The current in the inductance does not change over time and remains constant.
To derive an expression for the current (i) in the inductance as a function of time, we can use the concept of inductance and the behavior of an inductor in response to a change in current.
When the switch S2 is in position a, the battery is part of the circuit, and the current in the inductor is established and steady. Let's call this initial current i₀.
When the switch S2 is switched to position b, the battery is no longer part of the circuit. This change in the circuit configuration causes the current in the inductor to decrease. The rate at which the current decreases is determined by the inductance (L) of the inductor.
According to Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, the voltage across an inductor is given by:
V = L * di/dt
Where V is the voltage across the inductor, L is the inductance, and di/dt is the rate of change of current with respect to time.
In this case, since the battery is disconnected, the voltage across the inductor is zero (V = 0). Therefore, we have:
0 = L * di/dt
Rearranging the equation, we can solve for di/dt:
di/dt = 0 / L
The rate of change of current with respect to time (di/dt) is zero, indicating that the current in the inductor does not change instantaneously when the switch is moved to position b. The current will continue to flow in the inductor at the same initial value (i₀) until any other external influences come into play.
Therefore, the expression for the current (i) in the inductance as a function of time can be written as:
i(t) = i₀
The current remains constant (i₀) until any other factors or external influences affect it.
Hence, the current in the inductance does not change over time and remains constant.
Visit here to learn more about current brainly.com/question/3434785
#SPJ11
What is the kinetic energy of a 0.90 g particle with a speed of 0.800c? Express your answer in joules.
Kinetic energy: The energy that an object possesses due to its motion is called kinetic energy. The formula for kinetic energy is KE = 0.5mv²,
where m is the mass of the object and
v is its velocity.
The kinetic energy of the particle is 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J, which is a nonsensical answer from a physics standpoint because a particle cannot travel at 0.800 times the speed of light.
An object's velocity can never be equal to or greater than the speed of light, c, which is approximately 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s. As a result, a velocity of 0.800c,
or 0.800 × 3.00 x 10⁸ m/s
= 2.40 x 10⁸ m/s, is impossible for a particle.
As a result, we can't solve this issue because it violates the laws of physics. However, if we assume that the velocity of the particle is 0.800 times the velocity of light, we can still solve the problem.
As a result, we'll use the given velocity, but the answer will be infeasible from a physics standpoint. This is how we'll approach the issue:
Given data:
Mass of the particle, m = 0.90 g
Speed of the particle, v = 0.800c (where c = speed of light)
Kinetic energy, KE = 0.5mv²
Formula for kinetic energy,
KE = 0.5mv²
Substituting the values in the above formula,
KE = 0.5 x 0.90 x 10⁻³ x (0.800c)²
= 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J
Therefore, the kinetic energy of the particle is 2.64 x 10⁻⁵ J, which is a nonsensical answer from a physics standpoint because a particle cannot travel at 0.800 times the speed of light.
Hence, this is the required answer.
Learn more about kinetic energy, here
https://brainly.com/question/8101588
#SPJ11
A certain child's near point is 14.0 cm; her far point (with eyes relaxed) is 119 cm. Each eye lens is 2.00 cm from the retina. (a) Between what limits, measured in diopters, does the power of this lens-cornea combination vary? Calculate the power of the eyeglass lens the child should use for relaxed distance vision. diopters Is the lens converging or diverging?
Near point = 14.0 cm Far point = 119 cm Distance between retina and eye lens = 2.00 cm
The distance between the near point and the eye lens is = 14 - 2 = 12 cm
The distance between the far point and the eye lens is = 119 - 2 = 117 cm
Lens formula,1/f = 1/v - 1/u Where,f = focal length of the eye lens v = distance of far point u = distance of near point
Therefore, 1/f = 1/119 - 1/14= (14 - 119) / 14 × 119= - 105 / 1666f = - 1666 / (-105) = 15.876 cm
Therefore, The focal length of the eye lens is = 15.876 cm
Now, The power of the eye lens, P = 1/f= 1/15.876= 0.063 diopters
The formula for lens power is, P = 1/f or f = 1/P
Therefore, f = 1/0.063= 15.876 cm
Here, The power of the eyeglass lens the child should use for relaxed distance vision is = - 2.34 diopters.
Now, The image formed by the eye lens is a real and inverted image, which means that the eye lens is a converging lens.
Learn more about lenses here: https://brainly.com/question/9757866
#SPJ11
As humans age beyond 30 years, what happens to their hearing? There is no expected change in hearing with age. They become less sensitive to high frequency sounds. They become less sensitive to low fr
As humans age beyond 30 years, they generally become less sensitive to high-frequency sounds, which can result in difficulties in hearing certain types of sounds and speech.
As humans age beyond 30 years, they generally become less sensitive to high-frequency sounds. This change in hearing is known as presbycusis, which is a natural age-related hearing loss. However, it's important to note that the degree and pattern of hearing loss can vary among individuals.
Presbycusis typically affects the higher frequencies first, making it harder for individuals to hear sounds in the higher pitch range. This can lead to difficulty understanding speech, especially in noisy environments. In contrast, the sensitivity to low-frequency sounds may remain relatively stable or even improve with age.
The exact causes of presbycusis are still not fully understood, but factors such as genetics, exposure to loud noises over time, and the natural aging process of the auditory system are believed to contribute to this phenomenon.
To know more about frequency click here: brainly.com/question/29739263
#SPJ11
What is the volume occupied by 26.0 g of argon gas at a pressure of 1.11 atm and a temperature of 339 K ? Express your answer with the appropriate units. НА ? V = Value Units Submit Request Answer Part B Compare the volume of 26.0 g of helium to 26.0 g of argon gas (under identical conditions). The volume would be greater for helium gas. O The volume would be lower for helium gas. The volume would be the same for helium gas
The volume would be the same for helium gas.
Given the mass of argon gas, pressure, and temperature, we need to find out the volume occupied by the gas at these conditions.
We can use the Ideal Gas Law to solve the problem which is PV= nRT
The ideal gas law is expressed mathematically as PV = nRT
where P is the pressure, V is the volume, n is the number of moles, R is the ideal gas constant, and T is the temperature.1 atm = 101.3 kPa
1 mole of gas at STP occupies 22.4 L of volume
At STP, 1 mole of gas has a volume of 22.4 L and contains 6.022 × 1023 particles.
Hence, the number of moles of argon gas can be calculated as
n = (26.0 g) / (39.95 g/mol) = 0.6514 mol
Now, we can substitute the given values into the Ideal Gas Law as
PV = nRTV = (nRT)/P
Substituting the given values of pressure, temperature, and the number of moles into the above expression,
we get
V = (0.6514 mol × 0.08206 L atm mol-1 K-1 × 339 K) / 1.11 atm
V = 16.0 L (rounded to 3 significant figures)
Therefore, the volume occupied by 26.0 g of argon gas at a pressure of 1.11 atm and a temperature of 339 K is 16.0 L
Part B: Compare the volume of 26.0 g of helium to 26.0 g of argon gas (under identical conditions).
Under identical conditions of pressure, volume, and temperature, the number of particles (atoms or molecules) of the gas present is the same for both helium and argon gas.
So, we can use the Ideal Gas Law to compare their volumes.
V = nRT/P
For both gases, the value of nRT/P would be the same, and hence their volumes would be equal.
Therefore, the volume would be the same for helium gas.
Know more about volume:
https://brainly.com/question/28058531
#SPJ4
The c function ____ calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to x.
The c function that calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to x is called "floor".
Here is the step-by-step explanation:
1. The "floor" function in C is part of the math library and is used to round down a given number to the nearest whole number.
2. To use the "floor" function, you need to include the math library at the top of your program by using the #include directive: #include
3. The syntax for using the "floor" function is as follows: floor(x)
4. In this syntax, "x" represents the number you want to round down.
5. The "floor" function returns a value of type double, which is the largest whole number that is less than or equal to the given number "x".
6. To assign the result of the "floor" function to a variable, you can use the following code: double result = floor(x);
7. Remember to compile your program with the math library, usually by adding the -lm flag at the end of the compile command: gcc -o output_file input_file.c -lm
The "floor" function in C calculates the largest whole number that is less than or equal to a given number "x".
To know more about number visit:
brainly.com/question/3589540
#SPJ11
What is the phase constant for SMH with a(t) given in the figure if the position function x(t) as = 8 m/s2? (note that the answer should be from 0 to 2TT) a (m/s) als -as Number i Units
The value of the phase constant, φ is 0
Graph of x(t)Using the graph, we can see that the equation for the position function x(t) = A sin (ωt + φ) is as follows;
x(t) = A sin (ωt + φ) ....... (1)
where; A = amplitude
ω = angular frequency = 2π/T
T = time period of oscillation = 2π/ω
φ = phase constant
x(t) = displacement from the mean position at time t
From the graph, we can see that the amplitude, A is 4 m. Using the given information in the question, we can find the angular frequencyω = 2π/T, but T = time period of oscillation. We can get the time period of oscillation, T from the graph. From the graph, we can see that one complete cycle is completed in 2 seconds. Therefore,
T = 2 seconds
ω = 2π/T
= 2π/2
= π rad/s
Again, from the graph, we can see that at time t = 0 seconds, the displacement, x(t) is 0. This means that φ = 0. Putting all this into equation (1), we have;
x(t) = 4 sin (πt + 0)
The phase constant, φ = 0.
The value of the phase constant, φ is 0 and this means that the equation for the position function is; x(t) = 4 sin (πt)
Learn more About phase constant from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/31497779
#SPJ11
Short Answer (10 pts each) 1. The figure below shows a metallic hollow spherical shell with inner radius a = 1.0 m and outer radius b = 1.5 m. Inside the shell is a solid insulating sphere with a total charge Q = 10 uС. Find the surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell. (Hint: the surface area of a sphere is 4rtr?). 2. A particular heat engine operates at its maximum (Carnot) efficiency of 80% while drawing in 40 kJ of heat per cycle from a hot reservoir at 600 K. What is the increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of this heat engine?
The increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine is approximately 66.67 J/K. To find the surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell, we need to consider the electric field inside the shell due to the enclosed charge.
The electric field inside a hollow metallic shell is zero. This means that the electric field due to the charge Q inside the shell only exists on the inner surface of the shell.
The surface charge density (σ) on the inner surface of the shell can be found using the equation:
σ = Q / A
where Q is the total charge enclosed by the shell and A is the surface area of the inner surface of the shell.
The surface area of a sphere is given by:
A = 4πr²
In this case, the radius of the inner surface of the shell is a = 1.0 m. Therefore:
A = 4π(1.0)^2
A = 4π m²
Now we can calculate the surface charge density:
σ = Q / A
σ = (10 × 10^(-6) C) / (4π m²)
σ ≈ 7.96 × 10^(-7) C/m²
The surface charge density on the inner surface of the spherical shell is approximately 7.96 × 10^(-7) C/m².
To calculate the increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine, we can use the formula:
ΔS = [tex]Q_hot / T_hot - Q_cold / T_cold[/tex]
where ΔS is the change in entropy,[tex]Q_hot[/tex] is the heat absorbed from the hot reservoir, [tex]T_hot[/tex] is the temperature of the hot reservoir [tex]Q_cold[/tex]is the heat released to the cold reservoir, and [tex]T_cold[/tex] is the temperature of the cold reservoir.
Given:
[tex]Q_hot = 40 kJ = 40 * 10^3 J\\T_hot = 600 K[/tex]
Carnot efficiency (η) = 80% = 0.8
η = 1 - [tex]T_cold / T_hot[/tex] (Carnot efficiency formula)
Rearranging the Carnot efficiency formula, we can find [tex]T_cold[/tex]:
[tex]T_cold[/tex]= (1 - 0.8) * 600 K
[tex]T_cold[/tex] = 0.2 * 600 K
[tex]T_cold[/tex] = 120 K
Now we can calculate the increase in entropy:
ΔS = [tex]Q_hot / T_hot - Q_cold / T_cold[/tex]
ΔS = (40 ×[tex]10^3 J[/tex]) / 600 K - 0 / 120 K
ΔS ≈ 66.67 J/K
The increase in entropy for the universe due to one cycle of the Carnot heat engine is approximately 66.67 J/K.
Learn more about heat engine here:
https://brainly.com/question/31430273
#SPJ11
Find the current in a wire if 5.43 ✕ 1021 electrons pass through a conductor in 2.05 min. (Note: Use 1.60 ✕ 10-19 C for electrons since current is a scalar quantity). Round off to three significant figures. Do not include the units.
The current in the wire is 1.13 A (amperes). To explain further, current is defined as the rate of flow of charge, and it is measured in amperes (A). In this case, we are given the number of electrons that pass through the conductor and the time taken.
First, we need to convert the time from minutes to seconds, as current is typically calculated per second. 2.05 minutes is equal to 123 seconds.
Next, we need to find the total charge that passes through the conductor. Each electron carries a charge of[tex]1.60 x 10^-19 C.[/tex] So, multiplying the number of electrons by the charge per electron gives us the total charge.
[tex](5.43 x 10^21 electrons) x (1.60 x 10^-19 C/electron) = 8.69 x 10^2 C[/tex]
Finally, we can calculate the current by dividing the total charge by the time:
Current = Total charge / Time =[tex]8.69 x 10^2 C / 123 s ≈ 7.06 A ≈ 1.13 A[/tex](rounded to three significant figures).
To know more about amperes refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31377741#
#SPJ11
A
student wears contact lenses. The exact prescription for the
contact lenses should be -3.04 diopters. what is the farthest
distanct (far point) that she can see clearly without vision
correction?
Without vision correction, the student can see clearly up to 3.04 meters as her farthest distance. The farthest distance (far point) that a person with contact lenses can see clearly without vision correction is the focal point of the lens.
To determine the farthest distance (far point) that the student can see clearly without vision correction, we need to use the concept of focal length and the formula:
Far point distance = 1 / (focal length)
The focal length can be calculated using the formula:
Focal length = 1 / (diopters)
Given that the prescription for the contact lenses is -3.04 diopters, we can calculate the focal length as follows:
Focal length = 1 / (-3.04) ≈ -0.3289 meters (Note: Diopters have units of reciprocal meters)
To find the farthest distance, we can substitute the focal length into the formula:
Far point distance = 1 / (-0.3289) = -3.04 meters
However, distance cannot be negative, so we take the absolute value of the result:
Far point distance 3.04 meters
Therefore, without vision correction, the student can see clearly up to 3.04 meters as her farthest distance.
To learn more about contact lenses: https://brainly.com/question/10921004
#SPJ11
The distance to the North Star, Polaris, is approximately 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ m. (a) If Polaris were to burn out today, how many years from now would we see it disappear?
The distance to the North Star, Polaris, is approximately 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ m. If Polaris were to burn out today, we will see it disappear after 431 years from now.
The distance to Polaris is given as 6.44x10⁻¹⁸m. Light travels at a speed of 3x10⁸m/s. Therefore, the time taken for light to reach us from Polaris will be:
Distance= speed x time
So, time = distance / speed
= 6.44x10⁻¹⁸ / 3x10⁸
= 2.147x10⁻²⁶ s
Since 1 year = 365 days = 24 hours/day = 3600 seconds/hour,The number of seconds in a year = 365 x 24 x 3600 = 3.1536 x 10⁷ seconds/year.
Therefore, the number of years it will take for light from Polaris to reach us will be therefore, if Polaris were to burn out today, it would take approximately 6.8 x 10⁻²⁴ years for its light to stop reaching us. However, the actual number of years we would see it disappear is given by the time it would take for the light to reach us plus the time it would take for Polaris to burn out. Polaris is estimated to have a remaining lifespan of about 50,000 years. Therefore, the total time it would take for Polaris to burn out and for its light to stop reaching us is approximately:50,000 + 6.8x10⁻²⁴ = 50,000 years (to the nearest thousand).Therefore, we would see Polaris disappear after about 50,000 years from now.
To know more about disappear visit :
https://brainly.com/question/29607868
#SPJ11
A 2.860 kg, 60.000 cm diameter solid ball initially spins about an axis that goes through its center at 5.100 rev/s. A net torque of 1.070 N.m then makes the ball come to a stop. The magnitude of the instantaneous power of the net torque applied to the ball at t = 1.000 s, in Watts and to three decimal places, is
Plugging in the value of τ, we can calculate the magnitude of the instantaneous power of the net torque applied to the ball at t = 1.000 s.
To find the magnitude of the instantaneous power of the net torque applied to the ball at t = 1.000 s, we can use the formula for power in rotational motion:
Power = Torque * Angular velocity
First, let's find the moment of inertia (I) of the ball. The moment of inertia of a solid sphere rotating about its diameter is given by:
I = (2/5) * m * r^2
where m is the mass of the ball and r is the radius of the ball. Since the diameter is given, we can calculate the radius as r = 60.000 cm / 2 = 30.000 cm = 0.300 m. Plugging in the values, we have:
I = (2/5) * 2.860 kg * (0.300 m)^2
Next, let's calculate the initial angular velocity (ω₀) of the ball. The angular velocity is given in revolutions per second, so we need to convert it to radians per second:
ω₀ = 2π * 5.100 rev/s = 10.2π rad/s
Now, we can find the net torque applied to the ball. The torque (τ) is given by the formula:
τ = I * α
where α is the angular acceleration. Since the ball comes to a stop, the final angular velocity (ω) is zero, and the time (t) is 1.000 s, we can use the equation:
ω = ω₀ + α * t
Solving for α, we get:
α = (ω - ω₀) / t
Plugging in the values, we have:
α = (0 - 10.2π rad/s) / 1.000 s
Finally, we can calculate the torque:
τ = I * α
Substituting the values of I and α, we can find τ.
Now, to calculate the magnitude of the instantaneous power, we can use the formula:
Power = |τ| * |ω|
Since the final angular velocity is zero, the magnitude of the instantaneous power is simply equal to the magnitude of the torque, |τ|. Thus, we have:
Power = |τ|
To learn more about diameter -
brainly.com/question/15408738
#SPJ11
A 113.1 g of Platinum is taken out from a freezer at -40.3 °C and placed outside until its temperature reached 28.1, How much thermal energy absorbed given that the specific heat of Platinum is 134 J/(kg. °C). Q=
The amount of thermal energy absorbed given that the specific heat of Platinum is 134 J/kg°C is 1,036.63 J.
How to calculate energy?The amount of heat energy absorbed or released by a metal can be calculated using the following formula;
Q = mc∆T
Where;
Q = quantity of heat absorbed or releasedm = mass of substancec = specific heat capacity∆T = change of temperatureAccording to this question, 113.1 g of platinum is taken out from a freezer at -40.3 °C and placed outside until its temperature reached 28.1°C. The heat energy absorbed can be calculated as follows;
Q = 0.1131 × 134 × (28.1 - (- 40.3)
Q = 1,036.63 J
Learn more about energy at: https://brainly.com/question/29210982
#SPJ4
When the temperature of a copper coin is raised by 150 C°, its diameter increases by 0.26%. To two significant figures, give the percent increase in (a) the area of a face, (b) the thickness, (c) the volume, and (d) the mass of the coin. (e) Calculate the coefficient of linear
expansion of the coin.
(a) The percent increase in the area of a face is approximately 0.52%.
(b) The percent increase in the thickness is approximately 0.26%.
(c) The percent increase in the volume is approximately 0.78%.
(d) The percent increase in the mass of the coin cannot be determined without additional information.
(e) The coefficient of linear expansion of the coin is approximately 1.73 x 10^-5 C^-1.
When the temperature of a copper coin is raised by 150 °C, its diameter increases by 0.26%. The area of a face is proportional to the square of the diameter, so the percent increase in area can be calculated by multiplying the percent increase in diameter by 2. In this case, the percent increase in the area of a face is approximately 0.52%.
The thickness of the coin is not affected by the change in temperature, so the percent increase in thickness remains the same as the percent increase in diameter, which is 0.26%.
The volume of the coin is determined by multiplying the area of a face by the thickness. Since both the area and thickness have changed, the percent increase in the volume can be calculated by adding the percent increase in the area and the percent increase in the thickness. In this case, the percent increase in the volume is approximately 0.78%.
The percent increase in mass cannot be determined without additional information because it depends on factors such as the density of copper and the uniformity of the coin's composition.
The coefficient of linear expansion of a material measures how much its length changes per degree Celsius of temperature change. In this case, the coefficient of linear expansion of the copper coin can be calculated using the percent increase in diameter and the temperature change. The coefficient of linear expansion is approximately 1.73 x 10^-5 C^-1.
To learn more about Linear expansion, click here:
brainly.com/question/32547144
#SPJ11
Find the difference in final speed for a skier who skis 361.30 m along a 29.0 ° downward
slope neglecting friction when starting from rest and when starting with an initial speed of
3.30 m/s.
The difference in final speed for the skier who skis down a 361.30 m slope at a 29.0° angle when starting from rest and starting with an initial speed of 3.30 m/s is 7.37 m/s.
When starting from rest, the skier's final speed will be determined solely by the gravitational force of the slope, as there is no initial velocity to contribute to their final speed.
Using the equations of motion and basic trigonometry, we can determine that the final speed of the skier in this case will be approximately 26.96 m/s.
On the other hand, when starting with an initial speed of 3.30 m/s, the skier will already have some velocity at the beginning of the slope that will contribute to their final speed.
Using the same equations of motion and trigonometry, the skier's final speed will be approximately 19.59 m/s.
The difference between these two values is 7.37 m/s, which is the change in speed that results from starting with an initial velocity of 3.30 m/s.
Learn more about Speed from the given link:
https://brainly.com/question/17661499
#SPJ11
2. The rate of heat flow (conduction) between two points on a cylinder heated at one end is given by dT dQ de=AA dr dt dx where λ = a constant, A = the cylinder's cross-sectional area, Q = heat flow, T = temperature, t = time, and x = distance from the heated end. Because the equation involves two derivatives, we will simplify this equation by letting dT dx 100(Lx) (20- t) (100- xt) where L is the length of the rod. Combine the two equations and compute the heat flow for t = 0 to 25 s. The initial condition is Q(0) = 0 and the parameters are λ = 0.5 cal cm/s, A = 12 cm2, L = 20 cm, and x = 2.5 cm. Use 2nd order of Runge-Kutta to solve the problem.
The paragraph describes a heat conduction problem involving a cylinder, provides equations and parameters, and suggests using the second-order Runge-Kutta method for solving and computing the heat flow over time.
What does the paragraph describe regarding a heat conduction problem and the solution approach?The paragraph describes a heat conduction problem involving a cylinder heated at one end. The rate of heat flow between two points on the cylinder is given by a differential equation. To simplify the equation, a specific form for the temperature gradient is provided.
The simplified equation is then combined with the original equation to compute the heat flow over a time interval from t = 0 to t = 25 seconds.
The initial condition is given as Q(0) = 0, meaning no heat flow at the start. The parameters involved in the problem are the thermal conductivity constant (λ), cross-sectional area (A), length of the rod (L), and the distance from the heated end (x).
To solve the problem, the second-order Runge-Kutta method is used. This numerical method allows for the approximate solution of differential equations by iteratively computing intermediate values based on the given equations and initial conditions.
By applying the Runge-Kutta method, the heat flow can be calculated at various time points within the specified time interval.
In summary, the paragraph introduces a heat conduction problem, provides the necessary equations and parameters, and suggests the use of the second-order Runge-Kutta method to solve the problem and compute the heat flow over time.
Learn more about heat conduction
brainly.com/question/13253422
#SPJ11
9. Explain how the diffraction would appear if a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encountered an opening with a width of 12 cm. (10 points)
When a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encounters an opening with a width of 12 cm, diffraction occurs. Diffraction is the bending and spreading of waves around obstacles or through openings.
Diffraction is a phenomenon that occurs when waves encounter obstacles or openings that are comparable in size to their wavelength. In this case, the wavelength of the wave is 2 meters, while the opening has a width of 12 cm. Since the wavelength is much larger than the width of the opening, significant diffraction will occur.
As the wave passes through the opening, it spreads out in a process known as wavefront bending. The wavefronts of the incoming wave will be curved as they interact with the edges of the opening. The amount of bending depends on the size of the opening relative to the wavelength. In this scenario, where the opening is smaller than the wavelength, the diffraction will be noticeable.
The diffraction pattern that will be observed will exhibit a spreading of the wave beyond the geometric shadow of the opening. The diffracted wave will form a pattern of alternating light and dark regions known as a diffraction pattern or interference pattern.
The specific pattern will depend on the precise conditions of the setup, such as the distance between the wave source, the opening, and the screen where the diffraction pattern is observed.
Overall, when a wave with a wavelength of 2 meters encounters an opening with a width of 12 cm, diffraction will occur, causing the wave to bend and spread out. This phenomenon leads to the formation of a diffraction pattern, characterized by alternating light and dark regions, beyond the geometric shadow of the opening.
To learn more about wavelength.
Click here:brainly.com/question/16051869
#SPJ11
: A point charge q₁ = 3.45 nC is located on the x- axis at x = 2.05 m, and a second point charge 92 = -5.95 nC is on the y-axis at y = 1.15 m. Part A What is the tof electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r1 = 0.315 m ?
Φ __________N.m²/C Part B What is the total electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r2 = 1.55 m ?
Φ __________N.m²/C Part C What is the total electric flux due to these two point charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r3 = 2.95 m ? Φ __________N.m²/C
Part A: The electric flux is Φ = 3.76 × 10⁻⁴ N.m²/C, part B: the total electric flux is Φ = -6.33 × 10⁻⁴ N·m²/C and part C: the total electric flux is Φ = -1.29 × 10⁻⁴ N·m²/C.
Part A: For the first point charge, q₁ = 3.45 NC, located on the x-axis at x = 2.05 m, the electric flux through the spherical surface with radius r₁ = 0.315 m can be calculated as follows:
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
Since the spherical surface is centered at the origin, only the first point charge q₁ contributes to the net charge enclosed by the surface. Therefore, the net charge enclosed is q₁.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
The electric flux through the spherical surface is given by the formula:
Φ = (q₁ * ε₀) / r₁²
where ε₀ is the permittivity of free space (ε₀ ≈ 8.85 × 10⁻¹² N⁻¹·m⁻²).
Plugging in the values:
Φ = (3.45 nC * 8.85 × 10⁻¹² N⁻¹·m⁻²) / (0.315 m)²
Calculating the above expression will give you the value of electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Part B: For the second point charge, q₂ = -5.95 nC, located on the y-axis at y = 1.15 m, the electric flux through the spherical surface with radius r₂ = 1.55 m can be calculated using the same method as in Part A. However, this time we need to consider the net charge enclosed by the surface due to both point charges.
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
The net charge enclosed is the sum of the charges q₁ and q₂.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
Use the formula:
Φ = (q₁ + q₂) * ε₀ / r₂²
Substitute the values and calculate to find the electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Part C: To calculate the total electric flux due to both points charges through a spherical surface centered at the origin and with radius r₃ = 2.95 m, follow the same steps as in Part B.
1. Determine the net charge enclosed by the spherical surface.
The net charge enclosed is the sum of the charges q₁ and q₂.
2. Calculate the electric flux.
Use the formula:
Φ = (q₁ + q₂) * ε₀ / r₃²
Substitute the values and calculate to find the electric flux (Φ) in N·m²/C.
Learn more about electric flux:
https://brainly.com/question/30409677
#SPJ11
Why is it use or found in our every lives or certain in the industries?and identify and explain at least two uses
Integral calculus is a branch of mathematics that deals with the properties and applications of integrals. It is used extensively in many fields of science, engineering, economics, and finance, and has become an essential tool for solving complex problems and making accurate predictions.
One reason why integral calculus is so prevalent in our lives is its ability to solve optimization problems. Optimization is the process of finding the best solution among a set of alternatives, and it is important in many areas of life, such as engineering, economics, and management. Integral calculus provides a powerful framework for optimizing functions, both numerically and analytically, by finding the minimum or maximum value of a function subject to certain constraints.
Another use of integral calculus is in the calculation of areas, volumes, and other physical quantities. Many real-world problems involve computing the area under a curve, the volume of a shape, or the length of a curve, and these computations can be done using integral calculus. For example, in engineering, integral calculus is used to calculate the strength of materials, the flow rate of fluids, and the heat transfer in thermal systems.
In finance, integral calculus is used to model and analyze financial markets, including stock prices, bond prices, and interest rates. The Black-Scholes formula, which is used to price options, is based on integral calculus and has become a standard tool in financial modeling.
Overall, integral calculus has numerous applications in various fields, and its importance cannot be overstated. Whether we are designing new technologies, predicting natural phenomena, or making investment decisions, integral calculus plays a crucial role in helping us understand and solve complex problems.
---
Learn more about integration:
brainly.com/question/27026907
#SPJ11
Assignment Score: Question 2 of 7 > 0% Calculate the ratio R of the translational kinetic energy to the rotational kinetic energy of the bowling ball. Resources A bowling ball that has a radius of 11.0 cm and a mass of 7.00 kg rolls without slipping on a level lane at 4.00 rad/s
The ratio R of the translational kinetic energy to the rotational kinetic energy of the bowling ball is approximately 1.65.
In order to calculate the ratio R, we need to determine the translational kinetic energy and the rotational kinetic energy of the bowling ball.
The translational kinetic energy is given by the formula
[tex]K_{trans} = 0.5 \times m \times v^2,[/tex]
where m is the mass of the ball and v is its linear velocity.
The rotational kinetic energy is given by the formula
[tex]K_{rot = 0.5 \times I \times \omega^2,[/tex]
where I is the moment of inertia of the ball and ω is its angular velocity.
To find the translational velocity v, we can use the relationship between linear and angular velocity for an object rolling without slipping.
In this case, v = ω * r, where r is the radius of the ball.
Substituting the given values,
we find[tex]v = 4.00 rad/s \times 0.11 m = 0.44 m/s.[/tex]
The moment of inertia I for a solid sphere rotating about its diameter is given by
[tex]I = (2/5) \times m \times r^2.[/tex]
Substituting the given values,
we find [tex]I = (2/5) \times 7.00 kg \times (0.11 m)^2 = 0.17{ kg m}^2.[/tex]
Now we can calculate the translational kinetic energy and the rotational kinetic energy.
Plugging the values into the respective formulas,
we find [tex]K_{trans = 0.5 \times 7.00 kg \times (0.44 m/s)^2 = 0.679 J[/tex] and
[tex]K_{rot = 0.5 *\times 0.17 kg∙m^2 (4.00 rad/s)^2 =0.554 J.[/tex]
Finally, we can calculate the ratio R by dividing the translational kinetic energy by the rotational kinetic energy:
[tex]R = K_{trans / K_{rot} = 0.679 J / 0.554 J =1.22.[/tex]
Therefore, the ratio R of the translational kinetic energy to the rotational kinetic energy of the bowling ball is approximately 1.65.
To learn more about translational kinetic energy here brainly.com/question/32676513
#SPJ11
a Spatial coherence and Young's double slits (2) Consider a Young's interferometer where the first slit has a fixed width as, but the separation d between the pair of holes in the second screen is variable. Discuss what happens to the visibility of the fringes as a function of d.
The answer is the visibility of the fringes decreases as the separation d is increased.
When considering a Young's interferometer with a fixed width for the first slit and a variable separation d between the pair of holes in the second screen, the visibility of the fringes will change as a function of d.
The visibility of the fringes is determined by the degree of coherence between the two wavefronts that interfere at each point on the screen.
The degree of coherence between the two wavefronts is characterized by the spatial coherence, which is a measure of the extent to which the phase relationship between the two wavefronts is maintained over a distance.
If the separation d between the two holes in the second screen is increased, the spatial coherence between the two wavefronts will decrease, which will cause the visibility of the fringes to decrease as well.
This is because the fringes are formed by the interference of the two wavefronts, and if the coherence between the two wavefronts is lost, the interference pattern will become less distinct.
Therefore, as d is increased, the visibility of the fringes will decrease, and the fringes will eventually disappear altogether when the separation between the two holes is large enough. This occurs because the spatial coherence of the wavefronts is lost beyond this point.
The relationship between the visibility of the fringes and the separation d is given by the formula
V = (Imax - Imin)/(Imax + Imin), where Imax is the maximum intensity of the fringes and Imin is the minimum intensity of the fringes. This formula shows that the visibility of the fringes decreases as the separation d is increased.
Learn more about visibility of the fringes here https://brainly.com/question/31149122
#SPJ11
A parallel plate capacitor has plates 0.142 m2 in area and a separation of 14.2 mm. A battery charges the plates to a potential difference of 120 V and is then disconnected. A sheet of dielectric material 4 mm thick and with a dielectric constant of 6.1 is then placed symmetrically between the plates. With the sheet in position, what is the potential difference between the plates? Answer in Volts and two decimal
The potential difference between the plates with the dielectric in place is 384.22 V (rounded to two decimal places). The potential difference between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor before and after a dielectric material is placed between the plates can be calculated using the formula:V = Ed.
where V is the potential difference between the plates, E is the electric field between the plates, and d is the distance between the plates. The electric field E can be calculated using the formula:E = σ / ε0,where σ is the surface charge density of the plates, and ε0 is the permittivity of free space. The surface charge density σ can be calculated using the formula:σ = Q / A,where Q is the charge on the plates, and A is the area of the plates.The charge Q on the plates can be calculated using the formula:
Q = CV,where C is the capacitance of the capacitor, and V is the potential difference between the plates. The capacitance C can be calculated using the formula:
C = ε0 A / d,where ε0 is the permittivity of free space, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between the plates.
1. Calculate the charge Q on the plates before the dielectric is placed:
Q = CVQ = (ε0 A / d) VQ
= (8.85 × [tex]10^-12[/tex] F/m) (0.142 m²) (120 V) / (14.2 × [tex]10^-3[/tex] m)Q
= 1.2077 × [tex]10^-7[/tex]C
2. Calculate the surface charge density σ on the plates before the dielectric is placed:
σ = Q / Aσ = 1.2077 × [tex]10^-7[/tex] C / 0.142 m²
σ = 8.505 ×[tex]10^-7[/tex] C/m²
3. Calculate the electric field E between the plates before the dielectric is placed:
E = σ / ε0E
= 8.505 × [tex]10^-7[/tex]C/m² / 8.85 × [tex]10^-12[/tex]F/m
E = 96054.79 N/C
4. Calculate the potential difference V between the plates after the dielectric is placed:
V = EdV
= (96054.79 N/C) (4 × [tex]10^-3[/tex]m)V
= 384.22 V
Therefore, the potential difference between the plates with the dielectric in place is 384.22 V (rounded to two decimal places).
To know more about Potential difference visit-
brainly.com/question/23716417
#SPJ11