1459 divided by 6 with remainder as fraction

Answer:

20

Step-by-step explanation:

She biked an equal amount each day for 8 days to a total of 32 miles. We can write that as 8x = 32. 32/8 = 4 so x = 4. To find how much shell bike in 5 days, we multiply it by x(4). 5*4 = 20.

Answer:

The slope is 5.

Hope this helps!

Step-by-step explanation:

( x, y )

( 6, 50 ) and ( 12, 80 )

[tex]\frac{80-50}{12 - 6} < = \frac{y_{2} -y_{1} }{x_{2}-x_{1} }[/tex]

[tex]\frac{30}{6} = \frac{5}{1} = 5[/tex]

The slope is 5.

a. The first term of the arithmetic sequence is 12.

b. The value of n for which the nth term is -33 is 16.

c. The common difference of the arithmetic sequence is -3.

a. The first term, u1, can be found by substituting n=1 into the given formula for the nth term:

u1 = 15 - 3(1) = 12

b. To find the value of n for which the nth term is -33, we set the formula for the nth term equal to -33 and solve for n:

un = 15 - 3n = -33

Adding 3n to both sides, we get:

15 = -33 + 3n

Adding 33 to both sides, we get:

48 = 3n

Dividing both sides by 3, we get:

n = 16

c. The common difference, d, is the difference between any two consecutive terms of the sequence. To find d, we can subtract any two consecutive terms, such as u2 and u1:

u2 = 15 - 3(2) = 9

u1 = 15 - 3(1) = 12

d = u2 - u1 = 9 - 12 = -3

for such more question on arithmetic sequence

https://brainly.com/question/30194025

#SPJ11

The coordinates in the solution to the systems of inequalities is (12, 1)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

y > -4x + 6

y > 1/3x - 7

Next, we plot the graph of the system of the inequalities

See attachment for the graph

From the graph, we have solution to the system to be the shaded region

The coordinates in the solution to the systems of inequalities graphically is (12, 1)

Read more about inequalities at

brainly.com/question/30977554

#SPJ1

Answer:

To convert square millimeters to square centimeters, we need to divide the area in square millimeters by 100 (since there are 100 square millimeters in a square centimeter).

So, the area of the top of Katrina's laptop in square centimeters would be:

57,000 mm² ÷ 100 = 570 cm²

Therefore, the area of the top of Katrina's laptop in square centimeters is 570 cm².

Answer:

R500

Step-by-step explanation:

20 books x R25 each = R500.

The graph will look like a circle centered at (2, 1) with radius 3.

To graph the equation [tex]x^2 - 4x + y^2 - 2y - 4 = 0[/tex]  by completing the square, we need to rearrange the terms as follows:

[tex](x^2 - 4x + 4) + (y^2 - 2y + 1) = 9[/tex]

This can be simplified to:

[tex](x - 2)^2 + (y - 1)^2 = 3^2[/tex]

So the equation represents a circle with a center at (2, 1) and a radius 3. To graph the circle, we can plot the center point (2, 1) and then draw a circle with radius 3 around that point.

Learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

1. Event A includes the outcomes of H and T,

2. while event AC includes all the possible outcomes of rolling a number cube, which are 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

1. Event A is defined as tossing a heads on a coin, regardless of the outcome of rolling a number cube. Therefore, the outcomes in event A are H (heads) and T (tails), since either of these outcomes could occur when rolling a number cube and tossing a coin.

2. Event AC is the complement of event A, i.e., it is the set of outcomes that are not in event A. Since event A contains H and T, the outcomes in event AC are the remaining outcomes that are not in event A, which are all the possible outcomes when rolling a number cube: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6.

Learn more about probability here;

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

The three equivalent equations are 2 + x = 5, x + 1 = 4 and -5 + x = -2. So, correct options are A, B and E.

Two equations are considered equivalent if they have the same solution set. In other words, if we solve both equations, we should get the same value for the variable.

To determine which of the given equations are equivalent, we need to solve them for x and see if they have the same solution.

Let's start with the first equation:

2 + x = 5

Subtract 2 from both sides:

x = 3

Now let's move on to the second equation:

x + 1 = 4

Subtract 1 from both sides:

x = 3

Notice that we got the same value of x for both equations, so they are equivalent.

Next, let's look at the third equation:

9 + x = 6

Subtract 9 from both sides:

x = -3

Since this value of x is different from the previous two equations, we can conclude that it is not equivalent to them.

Now, let's move on to the fourth equation:

x + (-4) = 7

Add 4 to both sides:

x = 11

This value of x is also different from the first two equations, so it is not equivalent to them.

Finally, let's look at the fifth equation:

-5 + x = -2

Add 5 to both sides:

x = 3

Notice that we got the same value of x as the first two equations, so this equation is also equivalent to them.

So, correct options are A, B and E.

To learn more about equations click on,

https://brainly.com/question/29266004

#SPJ1

Complete question is:

Which of the following equations are equivalent? Select three options.

2 + x = 5

x + 1 = 4

9 + x = 6

x + (- 4) = 7

- 5 + x = - 2

The value of number of students who failed in both mathematics and English is 40.

Since, Given that;

60% of the 1000 students passed the examination,

Hence, we can calculate the number of students who passed the exam as follows:

60/100 x 1000 = 600

So, 600 students passed the examination.

Now, let's find the number of students who failed the examination.

Since 60% of the students passed, the remaining 40% must have failed. Therefore, the number of students who failed the examination is:

40/100 x 1000 = 400

Of the 400 failing students, we know that 60% failed in mathematics.

So, the number of students who failed in mathematics is:

60/100 x 400 = 240

Similarly, we know that 50% of the failing students failed in English.

So, the number of students who failed in English is:

50/100 x 400 = 200

Now, we need to find the number of students who failed in both subjects.

We can use the formula:

Total = A + B - Both

Where A is the number of students who failed in mathematics, B is the number of students who failed in English, and Both is the number of students who failed in both subjects.

Substituting the values we have, we get:

400 = 240 + 200 - Both

Solving for Both, we get:

Both = 240 + 200 - 400

Both = 40

Therefore, the number of students who failed in both mathematics and English is 40.

Learn more about the subtraction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/17301989

#SPJ1

Answer:

24 cakes.

Step-by-step explanation:

6 cups of oil divided by 1/4 cup oil per cake = 24 cakes

6/(1/4) = 24

or 6/(0.25) = 24

She can make 24 cakes with 6 cups of oil.

The value of Sin A is 5/13.

Option A is the correct answer.

We have,

Sin A = Perpendicular / Hypotenuse

Sin A = BC / AB

And,

BC = 5

AB = 13

Substituting.

Sin A = 5/13

Thus,

The value of Sin A is 5/13.

Learn more about trigonometric identities here:

https://brainly.com/question/14746686

#SPJ1

Using ratios and proportions, the number of 20 mg tabs that should be given in place of 40 mg po qd for 60 days is 120 tabs.

Using ratios and proportions, the number of tabs of 20 mg that should be given in place of 40 mg qd for 60 days is determined as follows:

Order: Zocor 40 mg po qd for 60 days

= 60 tabs since it is once per day (qd)

Total mg = 2,400 mg (40 mg x 60 tabs)

On hand: 20 mg tabs

Proportionately, 20 mg = 120 tabs (2 x 60) since 40 mg is for 60 tabs

Total mg = 2,400 mg (20 mg x 120 tabs)

Learn more about ratios and proportions at https://brainly.com/question/29774220.

#SPJ1

The correct step to prove that [tex]BC^2 = AB^2 + AC^2[/tex] is:

By the cross product property, [tex]AC^2 = BC \cdot AD[/tex].

To prove that [tex]BC^2 = AB^2 + AC^2[/tex], we can use the triangle similarity and the Pythagorean theorem. Here's a step-by-step explanation:

Given triangle ABC with right angle at A and segment AD perpendicular to segment BC.

By triangle similarity, triangle ABD is similar to triangle ABC. This is because angle A is common, and angle BDA is a right angle (as AD is perpendicular to BC).

Using the proportionality of similar triangles, we can write the following ratio:

[tex]$\frac{AB}{BC} = \frac{AD}{AB}$[/tex]

Cross-multiplying, we get:

[tex]$AB^2 = BC \cdot AD$[/tex]

Similarly, using triangle similarity, triangle ACD is also similar to triangle ABC. This gives us:

[tex]$\frac{AC}{BC} = \frac{AD}{AC}$[/tex]

Cross-multiplying, we have:

[tex]$AC^2 = BC \cdot AD$[/tex]

Now, we can substitute the derived expressions into the original equation:

[tex]$BC^2 = AB^2 + AC^2$\\$BC^2 = (BC \cdot AD) + (BC \cdot AD)$\\$BC^2 = 2 \cdot BC \cdot AD$[/tex]

It was made possible by cross-product property.

Therefore, the correct step to prove that [tex]BC^2 = AB^2 + AC^2[/tex] is:

By the cross product property, [tex]AC^2 = BC \cdot AD[/tex].

For more questions on cross-product property:

https://brainly.com/question/14542172

#SPJ8

If the population in the year 2007 is 111.3 million, then the population in the year 2044 will be 148.37 million.

In order to find the population in the year 2044, we use the population growth formula; which is : P = P₀ × (1 + r)ⁿ;

where P = future population, P₀ = initial population, r = annual growth rate, and n = number of years;

Substituting the values,

We get;

⇒ P = (111.3 million) × (1 + 0.0078)²⁰⁴⁴⁻²⁰⁰⁷;

Simplifying this expression,

We get;

⇒ P = (111.3 million) × (1.0078)³⁷;

⇒ P ≈ 148.37 million;

Therefore, the population in the year 2044 is estimated to be approximately 148.37 million.

Learn more about Growth Rate here

https://brainly.com/question/29203229

#SPJ1

The equation of the Damari's investment is B(x) = 30000 * 1.03ˣ

Damari's investment

Given that

Initial value, a = 30000

B(3) = 32306.72

The function is calculated as

B(x) = a * bˣ

Using B(3), we have

30000 * b³ = 32306.72

So, we have

b³ = 1.077

Take the cube root of both sides

b = 1.03

So, we have

B(x) = 30000 * 1.03ˣ

So, the function is B(x) = 30000 * 1.03ˣ

The boat of Sky's family

Here, we have

Initial value = 6000

Rate of depreciation = 6%

So, the function is

f(x) = 6000 * (1 - 6%)ˣ

So, we have

f(x) = 6000 * (0.94)ˣ

In 2024, we have

x = 2024 - 2021

x = 3

So, we have

f(3) = 6000 * (0.94)³

Evaluate

f(3) = 4983.50

This value is less than the offered value of $5000

This means that Sky's family should take the offer

The rule of the function

Here, we have the graph

From the graph, we have

Initial value, a = 8

Rate, b = 4.8/8

So, we have

Rate, b = 0.6

So, the function is

f(x) = 8 * 0.6ˣ

Read more about exponential functions at

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

Answer:

y- intercept = - 6

Step-by-step explanation:

the equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

here slope m = 2 , then

y = 2x + c ← is the partial equation

to find c substitute (5, 4 ) into the partial equation

4 = 2(5) + c = 10 + c ( subtract 10 from both sides )

- 6 = c

that is the y- intercept c = - 6

The critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test is ± 2.0.6

To find the critical values t₀ for a two-sample t-test to test the claim that the population means are equal (i.e., µ₁ = µ₂), we need to use the following formula:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df)

where t_(α/2, df) is the critical t-value with α/2 area in the right tail and df degrees of freedom.

The degrees of freedom are calculated as:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

n₁ = 14, n₂ = 12, X₁ = 6,X₂ = 7, s₁ = 2.5 and s₂ = 2.8

α = 0.05 (two-tailed)

First, we need to calculate the degrees of freedom:

df = (s₁²/n₁ + s₂²/n₂)² / [(s₁²/n₁)²/(n₁-1) + (s₂²/n₂)²/(n₂-1)]

= (2.5²/14 + 2.8²/12)² / [(2.5²/14)²/13 + (2.8²/12)²/11]

= 24.27

Since this is a two-tailed test with α = 0.05, we need to find the t-value with an area of 0.025 in each tail and df = 24.27.

From a t-distribution table, we find:

t_(0.025, 24.27) = 2.0639 (rounded to four decimal places)

Finally, we can calculate the critical values t₀:

t₀ = ± t_(α/2, df) = ± 2.0639

To learn more on Statistics click:

https://brainly.com/question/30218856

#SPJ1

About 88.49% of cellphone plans have charges that are less than $83.60.

To determine the percentage of plans that have charges less than $83.60, we need to find the z-score (z) using the given mean and standard deviation, and then look up the corresponding area under the normal distribution curve.

z = (x – μ) / σ

where x = 83.60, mean, μ =  62 and standard deviation, σ = 18

Thus, the z-score of $83.60 is:

z = (83.60 - 62) / 18 = 1.2

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find that the area to the left of z = 1.20 is 0.8849 or 88.49% (check image attached).

Therefore, about 88.49% of cellphone plans have charges that are less than $83.60.

Learn more about normal distribution on:

https://brainly.com/question/4079902

#SPJ1

The type of model that best fits the situation of a $500 raise in salary each year is a linear model.

In a linear model, the dependent variable changes a constant amount for constant increments of the independent variable.

In the given case, the dependent variable is the salary and the independent variable is the year.

You may build a table to show that for increments of 1 year the increments of the salary is $500:

Year         Salary        Change in year         Change in salary

2010           A                           -                                       -

2011           A + 500     2011 - 2010 = 1          A + 500 - 500 = 500

2012          A + 1,000   2012 - 2011 = 1          A + 1,000 - (A + 500) = 500

So, you can see that every year the salary increases the same amount ($500).

In general, a linear model is represented by the general equation y = mx + b, where x is the change of y per unit change of x, and b is the initial value (y-intercept).              

In this case, m = $500 and b is the starting salary: y = 500x + b.

The exponential function that model this situation is [tex]A(t) = 2500(1 + 0.035)^t.[/tex]

The account will have $5000 in 20 years.

Let A be the amount in the account after t years.

Then, we can model this situation with the function A(t) = 2500(1 + 0.035)^t with the use of compound intererst formula which is [tex]P = A*(1+r)^t[/tex]

To find when the account will have $5000, we can set A(t) = 5000 and solve:

5000 = 2500(1 + 0.035)^t

2 = (1.035)^t

Taking the natural logarithm:

ln(2) = t ln(1.035)

t = ln(2)/ln(1.035)

t = 20.148791684

t = 20 years.

Read more about exponential function

brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

Answer:

1)  21 years

2) 26 years

Step-by-step explanation:

To model the account balance of Vanessa's account at t years, we can use an exponential function in the form:

[tex]\large\boxed{A(t) = A_0(1 + r)^t}[/tex]

where:

Given Vanessa invested $2500 into the account and it will increase in value by 3.5% each year:

Substitute these values into the formula to create an equation for A in terms of t:

[tex]A(t) = 2500(1 + 0.035)^t[/tex]

[tex]A(t) = 2500(1.035)^t[/tex]

To find when the account balance will be $5000, set A(t) equal to $5000 and solve for t:

[tex]A(t)=5000[/tex]

[tex]2500(1.035)^t=5000[/tex]

[tex](1.035)^t=\dfrac{5000}{2500}[/tex]

[tex](1.035)^t=2[/tex]

[tex]\ln (1.035)^t=\ln 2[/tex]

[tex]t \ln 1.035=\ln 2[/tex]

[tex]t=\dfrac{\ln 2}{ \ln 1.035}[/tex]

[tex]t=20.1487916...[/tex]

[tex]t=20.15\; \sf years\;(2\;d.p.)[/tex]

Therefore, it will take approximately 20.15 years for Vanessa's account to reach a value of $5000.

Since the interest rate is an annual rate of 3.5%, it means that the interest is applied once per year, at the end of the year. Therefore, we need to round up the number of years to the next whole number.

So Vanessa's account will have $5,000 after 21 years.

Note: After 20 years, the account balance will be $4,974.47. After 21 years, the account balance will be $5,148.58.

[tex]\hrulefill[/tex]

To model the increase in movie ticket prices over time, we can use an exponential function in the form:

[tex]\large\boxed{P(t) = P_0(1 + r)^t}[/tex]

where:

Given the initial price of the ticket was $4.22 and the price has increased by 3.1% each year:

Substitute these values into the formula to create an equation for P in terms of t:

[tex]P(t) = 4.22(1 + 0.031)^t[/tex]

[tex]P(t) = 4.22(1.031)^t[/tex]

To find how many years until tickets cost $9.33, we can set P(t) equal to $9.33 and solve for t:

[tex]P(t)=9.33[/tex]

[tex]4.22(1.031)^t=9.33[/tex]

[tex](1.031)^t=\dfrac{9.33}{4.22}[/tex]

[tex]\ln (1.031)^t=\ln \left(\dfrac{9.33}{4.22}\right)[/tex]

[tex]t \ln (1.031)=\ln \left(\dfrac{9.33}{4.22}\right)[/tex]

[tex]t =\dfrac{\ln \left(\dfrac{9.33}{4.22}\right)}{\ln (1.031)}[/tex]

[tex]t=25.9882262...[/tex]

Therefore, it will take approximately 26 years for movie ticket prices to reach $9.33, assuming the annual growth rate remains constant at 3.1%.

The total amount in the account when turning 60 years is A = $ 11,13,706.08

Given data ,

A savings account with an interest rate of 6% per year and you aren't adding any additional funds in the future

Now , you make $80,000 within the year you turn 60

So , the number of years = 60 - 16 = 44 years

And , from the compound interest , we get

A = P ( 1 + r/n )ⁿᵇ

On simplifying , we get

Where A is the final amount, P is the initial amount (which is 0 in this case), r is the annual interest rate (6% or 0.06), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (let's assume it is compounded monthly, so n=12), t is the time in years (44 years from age 16 to age 60).

A = 80,000 ( 1 + 0.06/12 )¹²ˣ⁴⁴

A = $ 11,13,706.08

Hence , the amount in account is A = $ 11,13,706.08

To learn more about compound interest click :

https://brainly.com/question/21270833

#SPJ1

The condition that will prove the two triangles similar is

side JL = 8 * side ZX

angle L = angle Z

Similar triangles are  triangles which have the  similar shape however not necessarily the equal size. More officially, two triangles are comparable if their corresponding angles are congruent and their corresponding aspects are in proportion.

This means that if we had been to scale one triangle up or down uniformly, the ensuing triangle could be much like the original triangle.

In the figure, the scale is 8

Learn more about similar triangles

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The outside border of the garden would have walked around approximately  58%.

Without more information about the shape and dimensions of the garden, it's impossible to give an exact answer. However, if we assume that the garden is a rectangle, we can use the formula for the perimeter of a rectangle to estimate the percentage of the garden's border that would be walked around.

Let's say that the length of the garden is L and the width of the garden is W. The perimeter of the rectangle is then:

P = 2L + 2W

If the person walks from point A to point B along the outside of the garden, they are essentially walking along two sides of the rectangle. Let's call these sides S1 and S2. Depending on the location of A and B, S1 and S2 may be two adjacent sides, two opposite sides, or one side and one diagonal.

To estimate the percentage of the garden's border that the person would walk around, we can calculate the length of S1 and S2 and divide by the total perimeter of the rectangle:

Percentage walked = (S1 + S2) / P * 100%

Again, without more information about the shape and dimensions of the garden, we can't give an exact answer. However, if we assume that the person walks along two adjacent sides of the rectangle, the percentage of the garden's border that they would walk around would be:

Percentage walked = (2L + W) / (2L + 2W) * 100%

Simplifying this expression, we get:

Percentage walked = (2L + W) / (2(L + W)) * 100%

Assuming that L and W are measured in the same units (e.g. meters), we can simplify further:

Percentage walked = (2 + W/L) / (2 + 2W/L) * 100%

For example, if the length of the garden is 10 meters and the width of the garden is 5 meters, then the percentage of the garden's border that the person would walk around if they walked along two adjacent sides would be:

Percentage walked = (2 + 5/10) / (2 + 2*5/10) * 100%

= 7/12 * 100%

= 58.3%

So the outside border of the garden would have walked around approximately  58%.

For such more questions on Percentage of Garden Border

https://brainly.com/question/29001444

#SPJ11

The solution set of given inequalities are represented by Part A.

The given inequalities are

⇒ y ≥ x + 1 and y + x > -1

Hence, The related equations of both inequalities are

y = x + 1

Put x=0, to find the y-intercept and put y=0, to find x intercept.

y = 0 + 1

y = 1

And, 0 = x + 1

x = - 1

Therefore, x-intercept of the equation is (-1,0) and y-intercept is (0,1).

Similarly, for the second related equation

y + x = - 1

y + 0 = - 1

y = - 1

0 + x = - 1

x = - 1

Therefore x-intercept of the equation is (-1,0) and y-intercept is (0,-1).

Now, join the x and y-intercepts of both lines to draw the line.

Now check the given inequalities by (0,0).

0 ≥ 0 + 1

0 ≥ 1

It is a false statement, therefore the shaded region is in the opposite side of origin.

0 + 0 ≥ - 1

0 ≥ - 1

It is a true statement, therefore the shaded region is about the origin.

Hence, From the below figure we can say that the solution set of given inequalities are represented by Part A.

Learn more about the inequality visit:

https://brainly.com/question/25944814

#SPJ1

If a top travels 8 centimeters each time it is spun and it is spun 7 times, the total distance it travels is 56 centimeters.

The total distance is determined by multiplication of the distance traveled per spin and the number of spins.

Multiplication involves the multiplicand, the multiplier, and the product.

The traveling distance per spun = 8 centimeters

The number of spinning of the top = 7 times

The total distance = 56 centimeters (8 x 7)

Thus, using multiplication, the total distance the top travels after the 7th spin is 56 centimeters.

Learn more about multiplication at https://brainly.com/question/4721701.

#SPJ1

You can write 27% as a fraction like this: [tex]\frac{27}{100}[/tex] . (27/100).

Or as a decimal 0.27.

The number 1.3 is both a rational and an irrational number.

The number 1.3 is a rational number because it can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, namely 13/10.

The number 1.3 an irrational number because it cannot be expressed as the ratio of two integers, without repeating or terminating decimals, and its decimal representation goes on forever without repeating.

So we can conclude that the number 1.3 is both rational and irrational number.

Learn more about rational numbers here: https://brainly.com/question/19079438

#SPJ1