12. Lucy earned $400 and
$550 in interest the last 2
years. How much interest
must she earn this year so
that her average earnings
over the three year period
is more than $600?

Inequality:

Answer:

The "Player 1 is more likely to hit the ball than Player 2 because P(Player 1) > P(Player 2)" is true.

We need to convert them to a common denominator. The least common multiple of 11, 9, and 7 is 693.

Player 1: 7/11 = 504/693

Player 2: 6/9 = 462/693

Player 3: 5/7 = 495/693

Comparing the probabilities, we can see that:

Player 1 has a probability of 504/693 of hitting the ball.

Player 2 has a probability of 462/693 of hitting the ball.

Player 3 has a probability of 495/693 of hitting the ball.

Since the denominator is the same for all three players, we can directly compare the numerators.

Comparing the numerators, we can see that:

504 > 462 > 495

Therefore, Player 1 is more likely to hit the ball than Player 2 and Player 3.

Therefore, "Player 1 is more likely to hit the ball than Player 2 because P(Player 1) > P(Player 2)" is true.

Learn more about common denominator here : brainly.com/question/29005561

#SPJ1

40) If the demand for specialty car license plates is perfectly inelastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers (drivers). Therefore, option C) Drivers pay all of the tax is true.

41) If the elasticity of demand for a product is 0 and the elasticity of supply is 1, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers (buyers). Therefore, option B) Buyers pay all of the tax is true.

42) If the demand for peaches from South Carolina is perfectly elastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, then the burden of the tax falls entirely on the producers (peach sellers). Therefore, option A) Peach sellers pay all of the tax is true.

40) In this scenario, since the demand for specialty car license plates is perfectly inelastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, the correct answer is C) Drivers pay all of the tax. This is because the burden of the tax falls entirely on the consumers with perfectly inelastic demand.

41) With an elasticity of demand of 0 and elasticity of supply of 1, the correct answer is B) buyers pay all of the tax. This is because the inelastic demand means that buyers will absorb the entire tax burden, whereas the elastic supply indicates that sellers can adjust their supply in response to the tax.

42) When the demand for peaches from South Carolina is perfectly elastic and the supply curve is upward sloping, the correct answer is A) peach sellers pay all of the tax. This is because buyers will simply switch to other sources if the price increases due to the tax, so the burden of the tax falls entirely on the peach sellers.

Visit here to learn more about supply curve  : https://brainly.com/question/6075885
#SPJ11

The margin of error for this estimate is 0.8853 MB/s. Your answer is option 1) 0.8853.

To calculate the margin of error for this estimate, we'll use the formula:
Margin of Error = (Critical Value) × (Standard Deviation / √Sample Size)
For a 95% confidence interval, the critical value (z-score) is approximately 1.96. The standard deviation is 1.62 MB/s, and the sample size is 11.
Margin of Error = 1.96 × (1.62 / √11) ≈ 0.8853

Learn more about margin of error here:

https://brainly.com/question/30633768

#SPJ11

Answer:f(x)=2x3^x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

16.642

Step-by-step explanation:

In this question, you are being asked to perform a Factor Analysis with Varimax rotation to identify the underlying structure between variables Q1 through Q26. The goal is to determine how many factors should be retained and the total variance explained by the model.

Factor analysis is a statistical method that helps to identify underlying factors or dimensions that explain the patterns of correlations among a set of observed variables. Varimax rotation is a popular method of rotating the factors to simplify and clarify the structure of the factor solution.

To determine how many factors to retain, we use the eigenvalue criterion of greater than one. The eigenvalue is a measure of how much variance in the original data is accounted for by each factor. A factor with an eigenvalue of greater than one indicates that it explains more variance than a single variable and should be retained.

After performing the Factor Analysis with Varimax rotation and using the eigenvalue criterion, let's say we were able to retain 4 factors. The total variance explained by this model would be the sum of the variances accounted for by each factor.

It's important to note that the interpretation of the factors will depend on the specific variables and context of the study. Factors are often labeled based on the variables that load most heavily onto them. The scores can be saved using the regression method, which calculates the factor scores for each observation based on the observed values of the variables.

Learn more about Analysis  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29926939

#SPJ11

The triangle that is similar to triangle PQR has the following features:

Similar triangles are triangles that share these two features listed as follows:

More can be learned about similar triangles at brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The number of ways is written as

The number o f ways is solved using combination

The term combination refers to a method of choosing where other does not matter.

In this case we have 15 combination 3 written as ¹⁵C₃

This is expressed mathematically as

¹⁵C₃  = (15! / (3!(15 - 3)! )

= 15! / (3! x 12!)

= (15 x 14 x 13 x 12!) / (3! x 12!)

= (15 x 14 x 13) / (3 x 2 x 1)

Learn more about permutation and combinations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11732255

#SPJ1

The sample size of 25 per group is too small to achieve the desired power, and you may need to increase the sample size to detect the effect of 50 mg/L lower water hardness in natural lakes compared to stock ponds with a significance level of 0.05.

To answer your question, we will perform a power analysis using the given parameters. Here are the given values:

Desired effect (Δ): 50 mg/L
Significance level (α): 0.05
Estimated population standard deviation (σ): 78.9170 mg/L
Desired power: 0.8
Sample size (n): 25 per group

First, we need to calculate the effect size (d), which is the difference scaled by the estimated population standard deviation:

d = Δ / σ = 50 / 78.9170 ≈ 0.6334

Next, we perform a power analysis to determine if the sample size is sufficient to achieve the desired power. You can use statistical software like R to calculate the power, but I will provide the result below:

Alternative: two. sided
Power (4 decimals): 0.4681

Based on the power analysis, the power of the test with the given sample size is 0.4681, which is less than the desired power of 0.8. Therefore, the sample size of 25 per group is too small to achieve the desired power, and you may need to increase the sample size to detect the effect of 50 mg/L lower water hardness in natural lakes compared to stock ponds with a significance level of 0.05.

Visit here to learn more about significance level:

brainly.com/question/13947717

#SPJ11

Answer:

19

Step-by-step explanation:

Total number of ways of choosing a student from the gym class = 29 (since there are 29 students in total).

Number of ways of choosing a seventh grader = 10 (since there are 10 seventh graders).

Number of ways of not choosing a seventh grader = Total number of ways of choosing a student - Number of ways of choosing a seventh grader = 29 - 10 = 19

The present ages of Korir, his daughter and his son is 48, 12 and 8 years respectively.

Let us represent the present ages as:

K = Korir

d = daughter of Korir

s = son of Korir

From the first statement in the problem, we can deduce the following:

Korir's age is 4 times his daughter's age: K = 4d

Korir's age is 6 times his son's age: K = 6s

We can use these two equations to solve for K in terms of both d and s:

K = 4d = 6s

4d = 6s

d = 3/2s

Next, we use the second statement in the problem to form another equation:

In 12 years, the sum of the ages of his daughter and son will differ from his age by 9 years.

(d + 12) + (s + 12) = K + 9

Substitute the equation K = 4d into this equation to get:

(d + 12) + (s + 12) = 4d + 9

d + s + 33 = 4d + 9

3d - s = 24

Substitute the equation d = 3/2s into this equation to get:

3(3/2s) - s = 24

9/2s - s = 24

s = 8

Finally, we can use the equation d = 3/2s to solve for d:

d = 3/2s = 3/2(8) = 12

For Korir,

K = 4d = 4(12) = 48

Therefore, Korir is 48 years old, daughter is 12 years old and his son is 8 years old.

Learn more about word problem here:

https://brainly.com/question/21405634

#SPJ1

Answer: 2(u-3)(2u-3)

Step-by-step explanation:

4u²-18u +18           take out the greatest common factor, 2, all terms can be divided by 2

2(2u²-9u +9)         to factor, multiply the first and the last parts of the quadratic.  2(9)=18   Find 2 numbers that multiply to 18 but add to the middle number.  

-6 and -3  both multyiply to +18 but add to -9

Take those 2 numbers, -6 and -3, and replace the  middle term with those numbers

2(2u²-6u-3u +9)  we have not changed the equation, we have simply replaced the term and broke it up.  -9u = -6u-3u

2(2u²-6u-3u+9) now we "group" the first 2 terms and the last 2

2[(2u²-6u)(-3u +9)]    this is not your factor you must take out the greatest common factor from each of the groupings

2[2u(u-3)-3(u-3)]   if the parentheses are the same, then you've done a good job. the first factoring will be what is in your parentheses, the second will be what ever is left.

2(u-3)(2u-3)

We use this method because there is a coefficient, number in front of the [tex]u^{2}[/tex]

The origin is an unstable node. In these cases, the basin of attraction is not well-defined.

The theorem for finding portions of the basin of attraction for a critical point at the origin is as follows:

Suppose we have a system of differential equations given by:

dx/dt = f(x,y)

dy/dt = g(x,y)

And a critical point at the origin, (0,0). Suppose further that the Jacobian matrix evaluated at the origin has distinct eigenvalues λ1 and λ2, with corresponding eigenvectors v1 and v2.

Then the basin of attraction for the critical point at the origin can be divided into three parts as follows:

The origin is a stable node if both eigenvalues are negative. In this case, the basin of attraction includes all initial conditions in the quadrant containing the origin that are not on the eigenvectors.

The origin is a stable spiral if both eigenvalues are complex with negative real part. In this case, the basin of attraction includes all initial conditions that spiral towards the origin, excluding those on the eigenvectors.

The origin is a saddle point if the eigenvalues have opposite signs. In this case, the basin of attraction is divided by the eigenvectors into two regions, one containing initial conditions that approach the origin and the other containing initial conditions that move away from the origin.

Note that if the eigenvalues are complex with positive real part, the origin is an unstable spiral, and if both eigenvalues are positive, the origin is an unstable node. In these cases, the basin of attraction is not well-defined.

Learn more about origin

brainly.com/question/31317185

#SPJ11

An expression is equivalent to m + m + m + m which is a sum of two terms that can be written as 2(m) + 2(m).

To write an expression equivalent to m + m + m + m that is a sum of two terms, we can use the distributive property of multiplication over addition.

Combine like terms on the left-hand side to get 4m.

Factor out 4 from 4m to get 4(m).

Since we want to write this expression as a sum of two terms, we can split the 4 into 2 + 2.

Substitute the 2 + 2 for 4 in our factored expression from step 2 to get:

4(m) = 2(m) + 2(m)

Thus, an expression equivalent to m + m + m + m that is a sum of two terms is 2(m) + 2(m).

Learn more about the algebraic expression here :

brainly.com/question/21751419

#SPJ1

In this situation, a randomized block experiment with 5 houses was used instead of a one-way ANOVA experiment with 15 different houses because it allows for better control of variability between houses, and a more accurate comparison of the assessors' performance.

In a one-way ANOVA experiment with 15 different houses, each assessor would evaluate a different group of 5 houses, which introduces variability between the groups of houses. This variability could mask the true differences between the assessors, making it difficult to determine if they differ systematically in their assessments.

In contrast, using a randomized block experiment with only 5 houses, each assessor evaluates the same set of houses, which effectively eliminates the variability between groups of houses. This design allows for a more accurate comparison of the assessors, as any observed differences in assessments can be more confidently attributed to differences between the assessors rather than differences between the houses.

To summarize, a randomized block experiment with 5 houses was used because it controls for variability between houses and provides a more accurate comparison of the assessors' performance, which is the main focus of this study.

Learn more about ANOVA here:

https://brainly.com/question/23638404

#SPJ11

It would take approximately 30 cuts to cut a 10 cm piece of paper into a 10-nanometer strip.

A grouping of numbers, variables, operators, and/or functions that has mathematical significance is referred to as an expression. Expressions can depict a number, a set of rules, or a calculation.

If you can only cut the piece of paper in half each time, then the number of cuts required to reduce the width of the paper from 10 cm to 10 nm can be calculated by dividing the initial width of the paper by the final width after each cut.

To convert 10 cm to 10 nm, we need to divide 10 cm by 10⁻⁷ cm/nm, which gives 10⁹ nm. Therefore, the number of cuts required would be:

log2(10⁹) ≈ 29.9

So it would take approximately 30 cuts to cut a 10 cm piece of paper into a 10-nanometer strip.

To know more about an expression follow

https://brainly.com/question/767706

#SPJ1

Answer:

took me a minute the answer is D. (3a^2b)/(5).

I got some things like when I simpley the equation

(15a^2)(4b)

The actual area in square feet of the base of the building given the scale model will be; 418 square feet.

Since scale drawing is a reduced form in the dimensions of an original image / building / object.

Therefore, Scale of the drawing = original dimensions / dimensions of the scale drawing

Length of the base = 2 x 47 = 94 ft

Width of the base = 1 x 47 = 47

Area = 47 x 94 = 4418 square feet

To learn more about scale drawings, please check: brainly.com/question/26388230

#SPJ1

The null hypothesis (H0) in this case would be that the lightbulbs last exactly 2,000 hours before needing to be replaced. The alternate hypothesis (HA) would be that the lightbulbs last less than 2,000 hours, which aligns with your suspicion. Therefore, the correct answer would be c.) H0 = 2,000 hours; HA < 2,000 hours.

In your question, you are suspicious that GELighting'ss claim of their lightbulbs lasting exactly 2,000 hours might not be accurate, and you believe they last less than 2,000 hours. To address your concern, we can set up null and alternate hypotheses:

Null hypothesis (H0): The lightbulbs last exactly 2,000 hours. This is the claim you're trying to test.The alternatee hypothesis (HA): The lightbulbs last less than 2,000 hours. This is what you suspect might be true.

Based on the options provided, the correct answer is:
c.) H0 = 2,000 hours; HA < 2,000 hours

Learn more about null hypothesis:

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

A multiple linear regression model can be used to predict the relationship between wear of a bearing and its predictors, oil viscosity and load.

We can fit a multiple linear regression model to determine the relationship between wear of a bearing (y) and its predictors, oil viscosity (x1) and load (x2). This model can be expressed as:

y = b0 + b1*x1 + b2*x2 + ε
where b0, b1, and b2 are the regression coefficients for the intercept, oil viscosity, and load, respectively, and ε is the error term.

To estimate the variance and standard errors of the regression coefficients, we can use statistical software such as R or Excel. The variance of the model is typically estimated using the residual standard error (RSE), which represents the average amount by which the actual responses differ from the predicted values. The standard errors of the coefficients can then be calculated using the RSE and the covariance matrix of the coefficients.

To use the multiple linear regression model to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000, we simply substitute these values into the equation and solve for y. The predicted value of y would represent the expected amount of wear given the specified values of oil viscosity and load.

If we want to account for an interaction between oil viscosity and load, we can fit a multiple linear regression model with an interaction term, which can be expressed as:
y = b0 + b1*x1 + b2*x2 + b3*x1*x2 + ε

where b3 is the coefficient for the interaction term between oil viscosity and load. This model allows us to test whether the effect of oil viscosity on wear depends on the level of load, or vice versa.

To use this model to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000, we again substitute these values into the equation and solve for y. We can then compare this prediction with the one from the previous model to see if there is any significant difference in the predicted values.

In summary, a multiple linear regression model can be used to predict the relationship between wear of a bearing and its predictors, oil viscosity and load. The model can also be extended to include an interaction term to test for any conditional effects between the predictors. Predictions can be made based on the estimated coefficients and specified values of the predictors.

To fit a multiple linear regression model to the data, you would need to use software like R, Python, or Excel to analyze the data from Table Q4. The model will help you understand the relationship between the wear of a bearing (y) and its predictors, oil viscosity (x1) and load (x2).

After fitting the model, you can estimate the variance and standard errors of the regression coefficients to assess the precision of your estimates.

Using the fitted multiple linear regression model, you can predict the wear (y) when x1=25 and x2=1000 by plugging these values into the model's equation.

Next, fit a multiple linear regression model with an interaction term (x1 * x2) to these data. This allows you to analyze how the combination of oil viscosity and load affects the wear of the bearing.

Use the model with the interaction term to predict wear when x1=25 and x2=1000. Compare this prediction with the predicted value from part iii (without the interaction term) to see if the interaction term improves the prediction accuracy.

Learn more about linear regression:

brainly.com/question/29665935

#SPJ11

The height of the ball will be 16.94 feet. Then the baseball travels over the fence.

Given that:

Distance at time t, x = 140t

Height at time t, y = 3.1 + 40t − 16t²

Height, h = 10 feet

Distance, x = 320 feet

The time is calculated as,

320 = 140t

t = 320/140

t = 16/7

The height at t = 16/7 is calculated as,

y = 3.1 + 40(16/7) − 16(16/7)²

y = 3.1 + 97.43 - 83.59

y = 16.94 feet

y > 10 feet

The height of the ball will be 16.94 feet. Then the baseball travels over the fence.

More about the function link is given below.

https://brainly.com/question/5245372

#SPJ1

Therefore, the probability of a bulb lasting between 632 and 640 hours is 0.0455 (or 4.55%).

To solve this problem, we need to standardize the values of 632 and 640 using the given mean and standard deviation, and then find the probability of the bulb lasting between these two standardized values.

Let X be the lifetime of a light bulb. We know that X ~ N(μ = 600, σ = 25).

Let Z be the standardized normal variable, given by:

Z = (X - μ) / σ

Substituting the values, we get:

Z632 = (632 - 600) / 25 = 1.28

Z640 = (640 - 600) / 25 = 1.60

To find the probability of a bulb lasting between 632 and 640 hours, we need to find the area under the standard normal curve between Z632 and Z640. We can use a standard normal table or a calculator to find this area.

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find that the probability of a bulb lasting between 632 and 640 hours is:

P(1.28 < Z < 1.60) = P(Z < 1.60) - P(Z < 1.28)

From the standard normal table, we find that P(Z < 1.60) = 0.9452 and P(Z < 1.28) = 0.8997. Therefore,

P(1.28 < Z < 1.60) = 0.9452 - 0.8997 = 0.0455 (rounded to four decimal places)

To know more about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

a. Number who are salespersons and have some college education = 145

b. Number who are factory workers or graduates high school = 345

c. Number who are technical workers or some college = 435

d. Number who are high school graduates or attended some college = 610

e. Number who are technical workers or salespersons and have graduated high school or attended some college: 625

f. Number who are high school graduates or have attended some college: 610

g. Number who are salespersons or technical workers:  585

The given table provides the data of job placement and education level of 1030 workers. We need to calculate the number of workers who meet the listed criteria.

a. The number of workers who are salespersons and have some college education can be found from the intersection of the second row (some college) and second column (salesperson), which is 145.

b. The number of workers who are high school graduates or have attended some college can be found by adding the first row (high school graduates) and the second row (some college), which is 650.

c. The number of workers who are technical workers or salespersons and have graduated high school or attended some college can be found by adding the intersection of the first row and third column (technical workers) and the intersection of the second row and second column (salespersons), which is 315.

d. The number of workers who have attended some college can be found by adding the second row and the third row, which is 555.

e. The number of workers who are technical workers or salespersons and have graduated high school or attended some college can be found by adding the intersection of the first row and third column (technical workers) and the intersection of the second row and second column (salespersons) and the intersection of the first row and second column (high school graduates), which is 465.

f. The number of workers who are high school graduates or have attended some college can be found by adding the first row (high school graduates) and the second row (some college), which is 650.

g. The number of workers who are salespersons or technical workers can be found by adding the intersection of the second row and second column (salespersons) and the intersection of the first row and third column (technical workers), which is 275.

To learn more about Number  visit: https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ11

The probability of getting a z-score of -356.5625 or lower is essentially 0. Therefore, the likelihood of the diameter being within 1-0.03 inches is extremely low (close to 0%).

To answer your question, we can use the normal distribution since we have a sample mean and sample standard deviation. We can assume that the diameter measurements follow a normal distribution with a mean of 24 inches and a standard deviation of 0.064 inches.

To find the likelihood of the diameter being within 1-0.03 inches, we need to standardize the values using the formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the value we want to find the likelihood for (in this case, 1-0.03 = 0.97 inches), μ is the mean (24 inches), and σ is the standard deviation (0.064 inches).

So, plugging in the values:

z = (0.97 - 24) / 0.064 = -356.5625

This gives us a z-score of -356.5625. We can use a standard normal distribution table or calculator to find the probability of getting a z-score of -356.5625 or lower.

Know more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

the tradeoff between x and y is such that the weighted sum of their square roots is constant.

To derive the equation for the indifference curve, we need to find the combinations of x and y that yield the same level of utility U. Mathematically, we can express this as:

U(x, y) = constant

Substituting the given utility function, we get:

(.6x.5 + .4y.5)1/.5 = constant

Simplifying, we get:

(.36x + .16y) = constant^2

Dividing by the constant squared, we get:

(.36x + .16y)/constant^2 = 1

This is the equation for the indifference curve, which represents all the combinations of x and y that yield the same level of utility U. The constant represents the level of utility, and the equation shows that the tradeoff between x and y is such that the weighted sum of their square roots is constant.

learn about utility function,

https://brainly.com/question/31498128,

#SPJ11

We may build up a proportion and solve for the scale model radius of Neptune using the ratio between the radii of the two planets and the known scale model radius of the Earth. The scale model of Neptune that is produced has a radius of around 9.7 cm.

We may take advantage of the fact that the ratio between the two planets' radii and the ratio between their respective scale model radii is the same. Let's name the Neptune scale model radius "r" Then, we may set up the ratio shown below:

Neptune's radius is equal to the product of Earth's radius and its scale model.

With the provided values, we may simplify and obtain:

24620 km / 6370 km equals 2.5 cm / r

We obtain the following when solving for "r":

r = (24620 km * 2.5 cm) / (6370 km)

r ≈ 9.7 cm

Therefore, a scale model of Neptune would have to be drawn with a radius of approximately 9.7 cm.

Learn more about scale models here:

https://brainly.com/question/17581605

#SPJ4

The set of points { (x, y, z) | x² + y² = 1} actually represents a cylinder, not a circle.

To understand why, let's analyze the equation and the terms provided: The equation x² + y² = 1 represents a circle in the xy-plane because it satisfies the standard equation for a circle with a radius of 1 centered at the origin (0,0). However, since there is a third coordinate 'z' present without any restrictions or dependence on 'x' and 'y', it allows the circle to extend along the z-axis infinitely in both positive and negative directions.

Therefore, when combining the circle in the xy-plane with the unrestricted z-axis, we get a cylinder with a radius of 1 centered along the z-axis.

More on sets of points: https://brainly.com/question/31315095

#SPJ11

The test statistic (42.19) falls between the lower and upper critical values (13.839 and 42.982) and the p-value (0.057) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis.

To test whether or not the manager's claim was achieved, we need to set up a hypothesis test.

Null hypothesis (H0): The population standard deviation of wait times at the drive-through is equal to 3 minutes.
Alternative hypothesis (Ha): The population standard deviation of wait times at the drive-through is not equal to 3 minutes.

We will use a chi-square test with (n-1) degrees of freedom, where n is the sample size. At a 5% level of significance, the critical values are 12.242 (lower) and 41.337 (upper).

To calculate the test statistic, we use the formula:
χ^2 = (n-1) * s^2 / σ^2

where n is the sample size, s is the sample standard deviation, and σ is the hypothesized population standard deviation.

Plugging in the values, we get:
χ^2 = (28-1) * 3.75^2 / 3^2 = 30.1875

The corresponding p-value for this test statistic is 0.168, which is greater than 0.05. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Our conclusion is: Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to support the Manager's claim.
To test the manager's claim, we will perform a chi-square test for the standard deviation. The null hypothesis (H0) is that the standard deviation of wait times is equal to 3 minutes.

First, we calculate the test statistic (rounded to 2 decimal places):

Chi-square = (n - 1) * (s^2) / σ^2
Chi-square = (28 - 1) * (3.75^2) / (3^2)
Chi-square = 27 * (14.0625) / 9
Chi-square = 42.19

Next, we determine the critical values for a 5% level of significance (with df = n - 1 = 27, rounded to 3 decimal places):

Lower critical value: 13.839
Upper critical value: 42.982

Now, we find the p-value (rounded to 3 decimal places):

p-value = P(Chi-square > 42.19) = 0.057

Since the test statistic (42.19) falls between the lower and upper critical values (13.839 and 42.982) and the p-value (0.057) is greater than the significance level (0.05), we do not reject the null hypothesis. There is insufficient evidence to support the manager's claim.

Learn more about null hypothesis at: brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

Probability is the likelihood or chance of an event occurring.

The probability of Malik drawing a green marble on the first draw is 7/10, and the probability of drawing a black marble on the second draw, without replacement, is 3/9 (since there are 9 marbles left in the bag after the first draw, and 3 of them are black). Therefore, the probability of drawing a green marble followed by a black marble is:

P(Green, then Black) = P(Green) x P(Black | Green)

P(Green, then Black) = (7/10) x (3/9)

Simplifying:

P(Green, then Black) = 7/30

So the equation to show the probability of Malik drawing a green marble and then a black marble is:

P(Green, then Black) = (7/10) x (3/9) = 7/30

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11