Explanation:
Roman law, the law of ancient Rome from the time of the founding of the city in 753 BCE until the fall of the Western Empire in the 5th century CE. It remained in use in the Eastern, or Byzantine, Empire until 1453. As a legal system, Roman law has affected the development of law in most of Western civilization as well as in parts of the East. It forms the basis for the law codes of most countries of continental Europe (see civil law) and derivative systems elsewhere.
Help me to worship you aright, O God. Teach my heart to hallow your holy name. Teach my lips to praise you according to truth. Teach my hands to work for your glory and my feet to go where you send me. Make all my life an act of worship of you, O Lord.
ᴀᴍᴇɴ!!
Answer:
GOD IS EVERYTHING !!
GOD IS THE CREATOR OF US AND THE WHOLE WORLD !!
AND HOPE UR ALL PRAYS WILL BE TRUE !!
SAME PRAY FROM ME TO LORD !!
KEEP IT UP !!
How might the great depression have affected people’s morale to wait in unemployment lines and bread lines to keep their families nourished and alive?
Answer:
well they lost their jobs and that was probably the worst time to be alive
What role did the French play in helping lead to the British defeat at Yorktown?
They had all of the fortifications built before the Continental army arrived to
fight
A
Besides additional soldiers and supplies, the French fleet destroyed part of the
British fleet and drove away the rest of the British ships trapping the British at
Yorktown
They transported the whole Continental army to Yorktown to fight
They surprised the British fleet and then lured them away toward the Caribbean
so they could not help during the battle.
30°F Cloudy
Answer:
Besides additional soldiers and supplies, the French fleet destroyed part of the
British fleet and drove away the rest of the British ships trapping the British at
Yorktown
Explanation:
In the battle of the Chesapeake the french naval fleet and the british naval fleet fought on the water. In the end the french won the battle, driving the fleet away and then trapped the british at Yorktown
Explain why more transportation could make the U.S. into a foreign power?
Answer:
Explanation:
The transportation revolution in the United States began when Americans taking advantage of features of the natural environment to move people and things from place to place began searching for ways to make transport cheaper, faster, and more efficient. Over time a series of technological changes allowed transportation to advance to the point where machines have effectively conquered distance. People can almost effortlessly travel to anywhere in the world and can inexpensively ship raw materials and products across a global market.
But this technology is not ubiquitous, and it is not necessarily democratic. As a famous science fiction writer once said, the future is already here, it’s just not very evenly distributed. Modern transportation infrastructure is controlled to a great extent by large corporations, but the benefits of transport are depended on by everyone. And transportation technology itself requires specific conditions such as abundant, cheap, portable energy in the form of fossil fuels, and public infrastructure created by our own and foreign governments, that even those large corporations depend upon but don’t control.
When we think of transportation, it is natural to think first about going places. Getting on a plane in one hemisphere and getting off on the other side of the world is a life-changing opportunity which was unavailable to most people as little as a generation ago, and unthinkable two generations ago. But more crucial to our daily lives than the freedom offered by world travel is the cargo from the other side of the world that reaches us quickly in the holds of jets and more slowly but in almost unimaginable volume in containers on ships. The global transportation of foods, raw materials, and finished goods goes virtually unnoticed in our daily lives, but makes our contemporary consumer lifestyle possible.
what happened at the battles of fort ticonderoga and bunker hill
Answer:
The colonists fled over Bunker Hill, handing the Peninsula to the British. The fight was a tactical, though somewhat Pyrrhic, success for the British, as it proved to be a sobering experience for them, since they suffered far more losses than the Americans, including several commanders.
Explanation:
hope it helps :)
5 factors that contributed to the decline in the population of the indigenous population
Answer:
If you're asking about the decline in the indigenous population after the arrival of European settlers in the Americas, then five factors are as follows:
1. Diseases brought by Europeans decimated the indigenous population, since they had no natural immunity to viruses such as smallpox.
2. Many indigenous people were killed by the settlers, as they where no match for the guns and horses that the Europeans brought.
3. Many natives where forced into slavery and terrible living conditions, causing further death.
4. In some cases, the European conquers turned the indigenous tribes against each other, inciting further violence.
5. The displacement of Native Americans by settlers as they pushed further and further into the continent also resulted in a decline in the population.
True or False, All democratic countries have a two-party system.
Answer:
I believe this is false, sorry if I am wrong
Explanation:
Some countries may be democratic but not all of them have two parties. There may be more than 2 options for people to pick from, or there may be no parties at all.
When the American settlers signed the Texas Declaration of Independence, Texas became:
Why did the Bonus Army come to Washington D.C.?
Answer: Financial Assistance
Explanation:
It relatedto the issues of the Great Depression.
All of the following facts about Africa are true EXCEPT: A. Africa is the second largest continent C. Africa’s deserts are smaller in size compared to those found within Europe. B. Africa’s landscape is 10% rainforests D. Africa, being a plateau, has many waterfalls throughout the continent
Answer:
C Africas deserts are smaller in size compared to those found within Europe
QUESTION 1
Under federalism, power is distributed three ways. One type of power is known as concurrent powers. Which of these powers is not an example of a concurrent power?
Imagine you have just heard about Schenck's arrest. You want to write a letter to your newspaper to protest the Espionage Act. Of course, the post office may not agree to deliver your letter. And if it is printed, you risk being arrested yourself. Questions 1. What would you say in your letter?
The best is for your letter to include evidence to oppose Schenck's arrest, and not to include your name.
Charles Schneck was arrested in 1919 for printing thousands of fliers that encouraged men not to approve the World War I draft and therefore join was as Schneck considered this was against people's rights.
The government considered Schneck's actions a crime because it oppose the Espionage Act of 1917 that states people could not interfere with military recruitment.
Based on this context, if you want to express your disagreement with Shneck's arrest it is important you:
Express you clearly disagree with Schneck's arrest.Provide evidence in your letter that shows why this action is not legitimate.Do not include your name to avoid any attack from those who do not agree.Learn more about World War I in: https://brainly.com/question/925121
The American Revolution was caused by all of the following EXCEPT
A) the cost of the Seven Years' War.
B) the upheaval caused by urban industrial laborers.
C) geographic distance between Britain and North America.
D) Britain’s policy of “salutary neglect” of the colonies.
Answer:
The correct answer is B)
Explanation:
what popular holiday song was written during the cuban missile crisis and was a plea for peace?
Answer:
do you hear what i hear
Explanation:
written in response to tbe dread everyone felt due to the war
Which of the following documents was responsible for limiting the power of King John in 1215?
A.
the Magna Carta
B.
the English Bill of Rights
C.
the Mayflower Compact
D.
the Fundamental Orders of Connecticut
Answer:
A. the magna carta
Explanation:
Can someone plz help me? :(
Answer:
I believe it's B. I took a similar test
Explanation:
who was first prime minister of nepal
Answer:
bisheshwor parsad koirala (first elected PM) in 1959
What does segregation mean?
inclusion
refusing service
mandatory imprisonment
a legal system of separation by race
Answer:
a legal system of separation of race
Explanation:
White and black/brown people had different schools because of there skin colour this is an example. This was LEGAL because of the system made and therefore black/brown people could not say it was illegal or wrong as it stands for what the government said was ok (back then)
I hope this helps
2. How many people inhabited the planet in 1950?
Answer:
In 1950 there were 2.5 billion people on the planet. Now in 2019, there are 7.7 billion. By the end of the century the UN expects a global population of 11.2 billion.
Explanation:
2.5 billion people i believe!
Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. Complete the following paragraph about the Bracero program, the reason it was needed, and what the workers received. During World War II, the United States faced a huge labor shortage, especially in , so it created the Bracero program. Laborers were allowed to migrate to the United States for a short period of time in exchange for the return of illegal immigrants to Mexico. The laborers were promised adequate shelter, food, sanitation, and 30 cents an hour.
Answer:
1. agriculture
2. Mexican
describe California’s agriculture in the 1930s
Answer
California grew fruits, vegetables, and dairy products.
According to the popular interpretation, how well does "The Wonderful
Wizard of Oz" reflect late-nineteenth-century America?
Answer: Literary scholars have long interpreted the Wonderful wizard of oz as a fable of populism, but it is more than that it is a celebration of consumer culture as the very meaning of America, this bright and shining land where men and women are happy to deceive themselves into believing a fairy tale, which, as the Wizard of oz himself admitted, every sensible person ought to know is untrue.
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
David Brainerd was a missionary to Africa. True False
Answer: True
Explanation: Give me the brainiest
Answer:
False
Explanation:
David Brainerd was an American missionary to the Native Americans.
Long term consequences of the Teapot Dome Scandal?
Answer:
In 1927, the Supreme Court ruled that the oil leases had been corruptly obtained. The Court invalidated the Elk Hills lease in February 1927, and the Teapot Dome lease in October. Both reserves were returned to the Navy. In 1929, Fall was found guilty of accepting bribes from Doheny.
Explanation:
Why was the third amendment created?
Use each spelling word to write a "chirp" that you want your friends to read. You may choose to use hashtags (#), but you do not need to do so. Use each spelling word in at least one "chirp". Review rubric prior to turning in your work.
Words: disturbance
reassurance
inheritance
maintenance
resemblance
appearance
performance
attendance
abundance
endurance
Answer:
okokokokokokoo
ExplanationIn philosophy there is a lot of emphasis on what exists. We call this ontology, which means, the study of being. What is less often examined is what does not exist.
It is understandable that we focus on what exists, as its effects are perhaps more visible. However, gaps or non-existence can also quite clearly have an impact on us in a number of ways. After all, death, often dreaded and feared, is merely the lack of existence in this world (unless you believe in ghosts). We are affected also by living people who are not there, objects that are not in our lives, and knowledge we never grasp.
Upon further contemplation, this seems quite odd and raises many questions. How can things that do not exist have such bearing upon our lives? Does nothing have a type of existence all of its own? And how do we start our inquiry into things we can’t interact with directly because they’re not there? When one opens a box, and exclaims “There is nothing inside it!”, is that different from a real emptiness or nothingness? Why is nothingness such a hard concept for philosophy to conceptualize?
Let us delve into our proposed box, and think inside it a little. When someone opens an empty box, they do not literally find it devoid of any sort of being at all, since there is still air, light, and possibly dust present. So the box is not truly empty. Rather, the word ‘empty’ here is used in conjunction with a prior assumption. Boxes were meant to hold things, not to just exist on their own. Inside they might have a present; an old family relic; a pizza; or maybe even another box. Since boxes have this purpose of containing things ascribed to them, there is always an expectation there will be something in a box. Therefore, this situation of nothingness arises from our expectations, or from our being accustomed. The same is true of statements such as “There is no one on this chair.” But if someone said, “There is no one on this blender”, they might get some odd looks. This is because a chair is understood as something that holds people, whereas a blender most likely not.
The same effect of expectation and corresponding absence arises with death. We do not often mourn people we only might have met; but we do mourn those we have known. This pain stems from expecting a presence and having none. Even people who have not experienced the presence of someone themselves can still feel their absence due to an expectation being confounded. Children who lose one or both of their parents early in life often feel that lack of being through the influence of the culturally usual idea of a family. Just as we have cultural notions about the box or chair, there is a standard idea of a nuclear family, containing two parents, and an absence can be noted even by those who have never known their parents.
This first type of nothingness I call ‘perceptive nothingness’. This nothingness is a negation of expectation: expecting something and being denied that expectation by reality. It is constructed by the individual human mind, frequently through comparison with a socially constructed concept.
Pure nothingness, on the other hand, does not contain anything at all: no air, no light, no dust. We cannot experience it with our senses, but we can conceive it with the mind. Possibly, this sort of absolute nothing might have existed before our universe sprang into being. Or can something not arise from nothing? In which case, pure nothing can never have existed.
If we can for a moment talk in terms of a place devoid of all being, this would contain nothing in its pure form. But that raises the question, Can a space contain nothing; or, if there is space, is that not a form of existence in itself?
This question brings to mind what’s so baffling about nothing: it cannot exist. If nothing existed, it would be something. So nothing, by definition, is not able to ‘be’.
Is absolute nothing possible, then? Perhaps not. Perhaps for example we need something to define nothing; and if there is something, then there is not absolutely nothing. What’s more, if there were truly nothing, it would be impossible to define it. The world would not be conscious of this nothingness. Only because there is a world filled with Being can we imagine a dull and empty one. Nothingness arises from Somethingness, then: without being to compare it to, nothingness has no existence. Once again, pure nothingness has shown itself to be negation.
A world where there is nothing is just an empty shell, you might reply; but the shell itself exists, is something. And even if there were no matter, arguably space could still exist, so could time; and these are not nothing.
Think about the differences between groups and regions in Canada between 1850 and 1890. Create an inquiry question that will help you better understand these differences.
Answer:
exadration
Explanation:
that's all there is to it
Prince Henry interested in what when he traveled to the western side of africa
Which of the following best describes Native American societies?
Native Americans lived in large city-states.
Native Americans created societies only in river valleys.
Native Americans were monotheistic.
Native Americans lived in tribes, clans, or bands.
im kinda to lazy to look sooo helping me would be nice lol
Answer:
it's d. they assimilated into American culture.
What is a summary that describes the course of the Revolutionary war?
brits winning america wins