(1.1) Let f(x,y)= 1/√x^2 −y (1.1.1) Find and sketch the domain of f. (1.1.2) Find the range of f. (1.2) Sketch the level curves of the function f(x,y)=4x^2 +9y^2 on the xy-plane at f= 1/2 ,1 and 2 .

Measure of D is 43 degrees by using geometry.

In triangle ABC, because sum of angles in a triangle is 180

It is given that AB is parallel to DE, AB is perpendicular to BE and AC is perpendicular to BD. This means that ∠B ∠ACD and ∠ACB = 90

Now,

m∠C = 90

m∠A = 47

m∠ABC = 180 - (90+47) = 43

In triangle BDC, because sum of angles in a triangle is 180

m∠DBE = 90 - ∠ABC = 90 - 43 = 47

∠ BED = 90 (Since AB is parallel to DE)

Therefore∠ BDE = 180 - (90 + 47) = 180 - 137 = 43

The required measure of ∠D = 43 degrees.

To know more about angles,

https://brainly.com/question/22440327

The value of y! y÷(−3/4)=3 1/2 is  -21/8.

Let solve the value of y by multiplying both sides of the equation by (-3/4).

y / (-3/4) = 3 1/2

Multiply each sides by (-3/4):

y = (3 1/2) * (-3/4)

Convert the mixed number 3 1/2 into an improper fraction:

3 1/2 = (2 * 3 + 1) / 2 = 7/2

Substitute

y = (7/2) * (-3/4)

Multiply the numerators and denominators:

y = (7 * -3) / (2 * 4)

y = -21/8

Therefore the value of y is -21/8.

Learn more about value of y here:https://brainly.com/question/25916072

#SPJ4

The remainder of the polynomial division [tex]\frac{x^3 + x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4}[/tex] is -43.

Given the expression in the question:

[tex]\frac{x^3 + x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4}[/tex]

To determine the remainder, we divide the expression:

[tex]\frac{x^3 + x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4}\\\\\frac{x^3 + x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4} = x^2 + \frac{-3x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4}\\\\Divide\\\\\frac{-3x^2 - 3x - 7}{x + 4} = -3x + \frac{9x - 7}{x + 4}\\\\We \ have\ \\ \\x^2-3x + \frac{9x - 7}{x + 4}\\\\Divide\\\\\frac{9x - 7}{x + 4} = 9 + \frac{-43}{x + 4}\\\\We \ have\:\\ \\ x^2 - 3x + 9 + \frac{-43}{x+4}[/tex]

We have a remainder of -43.
Therefore, option A) -43 is the correct answer.

Learn more about synthetic division here: https://brainly.com/question/28824872

#SPJ4

Answer:

I have completed it and attached in the explanation part.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) Since CD is perpendicular to AB,

∠BDC = ∠CDA = 90°

Comparing ΔABC and  ΔACD,

∠BCA = ∠CDA = 90°

∠CAB = ∠DAC (same angle)

since two angle are same in both triangles, the third angles will also be same

∠ABC = ∠ACD

∴ ΔABC and  ΔACD are similar

Comparing ΔABC and  ΔCBD,

∠BCA = ∠BDC = 90°

∠ABC = ∠CBD(same angle)

since two angle are same in both triangles, the third angles will also be same

∠CAB = ∠DCB

∴ ΔABC and  ΔCBD are similar

b) AB = c,  AC = a and BC = b

ΔABC and  ΔACD are similar

[tex]\frac{AB}{AC} =\frac{AC}{AD} =\frac{BC}{CD} \\\\\frac{c}{a} =\frac{a}{AD} =\frac{b}{CD} \\\\\frac{c}{a} =\frac{a}{AD}[/tex]

⇒ a² = c*AD    - eq(1)

ΔABC and  ΔCBD are similar

[tex]\frac{AB}{CB} =\frac{AC}{CD} =\frac{BC}{BD} \\\\\frac{c}{b} =\frac{a}{CD} =\frac{b}{BD} \\\\\frac{c}{b} =\frac{b}{BD}[/tex]

⇒ b² = c*BD    - eq(2)

eq(1) + eq(2):

(a² = c*AD ) + (b² = c*BD)

a² + b² = c*AD + c*BD

a² + b² = c*(AD + BD)

a² + b² = c*(c)

a² + b² = c²

The gross productions for the industries in the closed Leontief model, given the technology matrix A, can be expressed as follows:

Government industry: 0.4H units

Industry: 0.2H units

Households: 0.2H units

In a closed Leontief model, the technology matrix A represents the production coefficients for each industry. The rows of the matrix represent the industries, and the columns represent the sectors (including government and households) involved in the production process.

To find the gross productions for the industries, we can multiply each row of the matrix A by the number of household units produced, denoted as H.

For the government industry, the production coefficient in the first row of matrix A is 0.4. Multiplying this coefficient by H, we get the gross production for the government industry as 0.4H units.

Similarly, for the industry sector, the production coefficient in the second row of matrix A is 0.2. Multiplying this coefficient by H, we get the gross production for the industry as 0.2H units.

Finally, for the households sector, the production coefficient in the third row of matrix A is 0.2. Multiplying this coefficient by H, we get the gross production for households as 0.2H units.

In summary, the gross productions for the industries in terms of H are as follows: government industry - 0.4H units, industry - 0.2H units, and households - 0.2H units.

Learn more about gross productions.
brainly.com/question/14017102

#SPJ11

(a) FALSE

(b) TRUE

(c) TRUE

(d) FALSE

(a) If events E and F are independent, it means that the occurrence of one event does not affect the probability of the other event. However, in general, Pr(E|F) is not equal to Pr(E) unless events E and F are mutually exclusive. Therefore, the statement is false.

(b) The statement is true because the union of two sets, E ∪ F, is commutative. It means that the order in which we consider the events does not affect the outcome. Therefore, E ∪ F is equal to F ∪ E.

(c) The odds of drawing a queen at random from a standard deck of cards are indeed 4 : 52. A standard deck contains four queens (hearts, diamonds, clubs, and spades) out of 52 cards, so the probability of drawing a queen is 4/52, which simplifies to 1/13.

(d) The statement is false. The probability of the union of two events, E and F, is given by Pr(E ∪ F) = Pr(E) + Pr(F) - Pr(E ∩ F), where Pr(E ∩ F) represents the probability of the intersection of events E and F. In general, Pr(E ∪ F) is not equal to Pr(E) + Pr(F) unless events E and F are mutually exclusive.

Learn more about: Probability  

brainly.com/question/31828911

#SPJ11

The conjecture that opposite angles in a polygon are congruent holds true for all polygons. The explanation lies in the properties of parallel lines and the corresponding angles formed by transversals in polygons.

The conjecture that opposite angles in a polygon are congruent can be tested on various polygons, such as triangles, quadrilaterals, pentagons, hexagons, and so on. In each case, we will find that the conjecture holds true.

For example, let's consider a triangle. In a triangle, the sum of interior angles is always 180 degrees. If we label the angles as A, B, and C, we can see that angle A is opposite to side BC, angle B is opposite to side AC, and angle C is opposite to side AB. According to our conjecture, if angle A is congruent to angle B, then angle C should also be congruent to angles A and B. This is true because the sum of all three angles must be 180 degrees.
Similarly, we can apply the same logic to other polygons. In a quadrilateral, the sum of interior angles is 360 degrees. In a pentagon, it is 540 degrees, and so on. In each case, we will find that opposite angles are congruent.
The reason behind this is the properties of parallel lines and transversals. When parallel lines are intersected by a transversal, corresponding angles are congruent. In polygons, the sides act as transversals to the interior angles, and opposite angles are formed by parallel sides. Therefore, the corresponding angles (opposite angles) are congruent.
Hence, the conjecture holds true for all polygons, providing a consistent pattern based on the properties of parallel lines and transversals.

Learn more about polygons here:

https://brainly.com/question/17756657

#SPJ11

c. For the following statement, answer TRUE or FALSE. i. [0,1] is countable: FALSE. ii. The set of real numbers is uncountable: TRUE. iii. The set of irrational numbers is countable: FALSE.

For the first statement, [0, 1] is an uncountable set since we cannot count all of its elements. For the second statement, it is correct that the set of real numbers is uncountable. This result is called Cantor's diagonal argument and is one of the most critical results of mathematical analysis. The proof of this theorem is known as Cantor's diagonalization argument, and it is a significant proof that has made a significant contribution to the field of mathematics.

The set of irrational numbers is uncountable, so the statement is false. Because the irrational numbers are the numbers that are not rational numbers. And the set of irrational numbers is not countable as we cannot list them.

You can learn more about real numbers at: brainly.com/question/31715634

#SPJ11

Step-by-step explanation:

See image

Jeff should pay $3,822.42 into the fund each period of time to repay the loan at the end of 7 years.

Given the loan amount of $25,000 with an annual interest rate of 12%, compounded semiannually at a rate of 6%, and a time period of 7 years, we can calculate the periodic payment amount using the formula:

PMT = [PV * r * (1 + r)^n] / [(1 + r)^n - 1]

Here,

PV = Present value = $25,000

r = Rate per period = 6%

n = Total number of compounding periods = 14

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

PMT = [$25,000 * 0.06 * (1 + 0.06)^14] / [(1 + 0.06)^14 - 1]

Simplifying the equation, we find:

PMT = [$25,000 * 0.06 * 4.03233813454868] / [4.03233813454868 - 1]

PMT = [$25,000 * 0.1528966623083414]

PMT = $3,822.42

Therefore, In order to pay back the debt after seven years, Jeff must contribute $3,822.42 to the fund each period.

Learn more about loan

https://brainly.com/question/11794123

#SPJ11

Answer:

y= 8x

Step-by-step explanation:

y= 48

x= 6

48/6 = 8

y= 8x

x=2

y= 8(2)

y= 16

The distinct equivalence classes of the relation R on set A = {-3, -2, -1, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5} can be listed as:

[-3, 3], [-2, 2], [-1, 1], [0], [4, -4], [5, -5].

The relation R on set A is defined as m R n if and only if 51(m² - 1²). We need to find the distinct equivalence classes of this relation.

An equivalence relation satisfies three properties: reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.

1. Reflexivity: For all elements m in A, m R m. This means that m² - 1² must be divisible by 51. We can see that for each element in the set A, this condition holds.

2. Symmetry: For all elements m and n in A, if m R n, then n R m. This means that if m² - 1² is divisible by 51, then n² - 1² is also divisible by 51. This condition is satisfied as the relation is defined based on the values of m² and n².

3. Transitivity: For all elements m, n, and p in A, if m R n and n R p, then m R p. This means that if m² - 1² and n² - 1² are divisible by 51, then m² - 1² and p² - 1² are also divisible by 51. This condition is satisfied as well.

Based on these properties, we can conclude that R is an equivalence relation on set A.

To find the distinct equivalence classes, we group together elements that are related to each other. In this case, we consider the value of m² - 1². If two elements have the same value for m² - 1², they belong to the same equivalence class.

After examining the values of m² - 1² for each element in A, we can list the distinct equivalence classes as:

[-3, 3]: These elements have the same value for m² - 1², which is 9 - 1 = 8.

[-2, 2]: These elements have the same value for m² - 1², which is 4 - 1 = 3.

[-1, 1]: These elements have the same value for m² - 1², which is 1 - 1 = 0.

[0]: The value of m² - 1² is 0 for this element.

[4, -4]: These elements have the same value for m² - 1², which is 16 - 1 = 15.

[5, -5]: These elements have the same value for m² - 1², which is 25 - 1 = 24.

Learn more about:Equivalence classes

brainly.com/question/30956755

#SPJ11

The 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of voters who plan to vote for Candidate A is approximately 0.4559 to 0.5385.


To find the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion, we can use the formula:

Confidence Interval = Sample Proportion ± (Z * Standard Error)

where


Z is the Z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence,


and the Standard Error is calculated as the square root of (Sample Proportion * (1 - Sample Proportion) / Sample Size).

In this case, we have a sample size of 720 and 358 voters who plan to vote for Candidate A. Therefore, the sample proportion is 358/720 = 0.4972.

Now, we need to find the Z-score corresponding to a 95% confidence level. The Z-score for a 95% confidence level is approximately 1.96.

Substituting the values into the formula, we get:

Confidence Interval = 0.4972 ± (1.96 * √(0.4972 * (1 - 0.4972) / 720))

Calculating the expression inside the square root, we have:

√(0.4972 * (1 - 0.4972) / 720) ≈ 0.0211

Substituting this value into the confidence interval formula, we have:

Confidence Interval = 0.4972 ± (1.96 * 0.0211)

Calculating the values, we get:

Confidence Interval ≈ 0.4972 ± 0.0413

Therefore, the 95% confidence interval for the population proportion of voters who plan to vote for Candidate A is approximately 0.4559 to 0.5385.

Interpreting the confidence interval in context, we can say that we are 95% confident that the true proportion of voters who plan to vote for Candidate A in the population lies between approximately 45.59% and 53.85%


. This means that if we were to conduct multiple samples and construct confidence intervals for each sample, about 95% of those intervals would contain the true population proportion.

To know more about confidence interval refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ11

The boat's coordinates are (10, 0).

A coordinate plane is a grid made up of vertical and horizontal lines that intersect at a point known as the origin. The origin is typically marked as point (0, 0). The horizontal line is known as the x-axis, while the vertical line is known as the y-axis.

The x-axis and y-axis split the plane into four quadrants, numbered I to IV counterclockwise starting at the upper-right quadrant. Points on the plane are described by an ordered pair of numbers, (x, y), where x represents the horizontal distance from the origin, and y represents the vertical distance from the origin, in that order.

The distance between any two points on the coordinate plane can be calculated using the distance formula. When it comes to the given question, we are given that Each unit on the coordinate plane represents 1 NM.

Since the boat is 10 NM east of the y-axis, the x-coordinate of the boat's position is 10. Since the boat is not on the y-axis, its y-coordinate is 0. Therefore, the boat's coordinates are (10, 0).

For more such questions on coordinates, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ8

The collection gadget with the given transfer function and an enter of x(t) = cos(t) has a frequency response given through Y(s) = cos(t) * [tex][8(s+1)/(s+2)(s^2 + 4)][/tex]. The gadget is solid due to the poor real part of the pole at s = -2. The absence of zeros in addition contributes to system stability.

To set up the frequency reaction of the collection system, we want to calculate the output Y(s) inside the Laplace domain given the input X(s) = cos(t) and the transfer function of the device.

The switch function of the series machine, as proven in Figure 1, is given as H(s) = [tex]8(s+1)/(s+2)(s^2 + 4).[/tex]

To locate the output Y(s), we multiply the enter X(s) with the aid of the transfer feature H(s) and take the inverse Laplace remodel:

Y(s) = X(s) * H(s)

Y(s) = cos(t) * [tex][8(s+1)/(s+2)(s^2 + 4)][/tex]

Next, we want to determine the stability of the overall gadget. The stability is determined with the aid of analyzing the poles of the switch characteristic.

The poles of the transfer feature H(s) are the values of s that make the denominator of H(s) equal to 0. By putting the denominator same to zero and solving for s, we are able to find the poles of the machine.

S+2 = 0

s = -2

[tex]s^2 + 4[/tex]= 0

[tex]s^2[/tex] = -4

s = ±2i

The machine has one actual pole at s = -2 and complicated poles at s = 2i and s = -2i. To investigate balance, we observe the actual parts of the poles.

Since the real part of the pole at s = -2 is poor, the system is stable. The complicated poles at s = 2i and s = -2i have 0 real elements, which additionally contribute to stability.

Sketching the poles and zeros at the complex plane, we see that the machine has an unmarried real pole at s = -2 and no 0. The pole at s = -2 indicates balance because it has a bad real component.

In conclusion, the collection gadget with the given transfer function and an enter of x(t) = cos(t) has a frequency response given through Y(s) = cos(t) *[tex][8(s+1)/(s+2)(s^2 + 4)][/tex]. The gadget is solid due to the poor real part of the pole at s = -2. The absence of zeros in addition contributes to system stability.

To know more about the Laplace domain,

https://brainly.com/question/33309903

#SPJ4

The correct question is:

" Establish the frequency response of the series system with transfer function as specified in Figure 1, with an input of x(t) = cos(t). Determine the stability of the connected overall system shown in Figure 1. Also, sketch values of system poles and zeros and explain your answer in terms of the contribution made by the poles and zeros to overall system stability. x(t) 8 5 s+1 s+2 Figure 1 Block diagram of series system s+2 S² +4"

The results in APA format for the given values are as follows: Ot(75) = 1.60, p < .05; t(77) = 2.50, p < .05; t(75) = 1.60, p > .05; and t(76) = 1.60, p > .05.

To report the results in APA format, we need to provide the relevant statistics, degrees of freedom, t-values, and p-values. Let's break down the provided information step by step.

First, we have Ot(75) = 1.60, p < .05. This indicates a one-sample t-test with 75 degrees of freedom. The t-value is 1.60, and the p-value is less than .05, suggesting that there is a significant difference between the sample mean and the population mean.

Next, we have t(77) = 2.50, p < .05. This represents an independent samples t-test with 77 degrees of freedom. The t-value is 2.50, and the p-value is less than .05, indicating a significant difference between the means of two independent groups.

Moving on, we have t(75) = 1.60, p > .05. This denotes a paired samples t-test with 75 degrees of freedom. The t-value is 1.60, but the p-value is greater than .05. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is no significant difference between the paired observations.

Finally, we have t(76) = 1.60, p > .05. This is another paired samples t-test with 76 degrees of freedom. The t-value is 1.60, and the p-value is greater than .05, again indicating no significant difference between the paired observations.

In summary, the provided results in APA format are as follows: Ot(75) = 1.60, p < .05; t(77) = 2.50, p < .05; t(75) = 1.60, p > .05; and t(76) = 1.60, p > .05.

Learn more about degrees of freedom here:

https://brainly.com/question/15689447

#SPJ11

The span of {(1,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,1,1)} is the set of all vectors of the form (x - z, y - z, z), where x, y, and z are arbitrary. The span of {(-1,2),(2,-4)} is the set of all scalar multiples of (-1,2). Vector (1,-2) is in the span, but (1,0) is not.

For the set {(1,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,1,1)}, we can find the span by solving a system of linear equations:

a(1,0,0) + b(0,1,1) + c(1,1,1) = (x,y,z)

This gives us the following system of equations:

a + c = x

b + c = y

c = z

Solving for a, b, and c in terms of x, y, and z, we get:

a = x - z

b = y - z

c = z

Therefore, the span of the set {(1,0,0),(0,1,1),(1,1,1)} is the set of all vectors of the form (x - z, y - z, z), where x, y, and z are arbitrary.

For the set {(-1,2),(2,-4)}, we can see that the two vectors are linearly dependent, since one is a scalar multiple of the other. Specifically, (-1,2) = (-1/2)(2,-4). Therefore, the span of this set is the set of all scalar multiples of (-1,2) (or equivalently, the set of all scalar multiples of (2,-4)).

To determine if a vector is in the span of a set, we need to check if it can be written as a linear combination of the vectors in the set.

For the vector (1,-2), we need to check if there exist constants a and b such that:

a(-1,2) + b(2,-4) = (1,-2)

This gives us the following system of equations:

- a + 2b = 1

2a - 4b = -2

Solving for a and b, we get:

a = 0

b = -1/2

Therefore, (1,-2) can be written as a linear combination of (-1,2) and (2,-4), and is in their span.

For the vector (1,0), we need to check if there exist constants a and b such that:

a(-1,2) + b(2,-4) = (1,0)

This gives us the following system of equations:

- a + 2b = 1

2a - 4b = 0

Solving for a and b, we get:

a = 2b

b = 1/4

However, this implies that a is not an integer, so it is impossible to write (1,0) as a linear combination of (-1,2) and (2,-4). Therefore, (1,0) is not in their span.

To know more about span, visit:
brainly.com/question/32762479
#SPJ11

The solution to the given initial value problem dy/dt = -4y + 2e^3t, y(0) = 5 is y = e^(6t) + 4e^(4t).

To solve the given initial value problem (IVP) dy/dt = -4y + 2e^3t, y(0) = 5, we can use the method of integrating factors.

Write the differential equation in the form dy/dt + P(t)y = Q(t).
  In this case, P(t) = -4 and Q(t) = 2e^3t.

Determine the integrating factor (IF), denoted by μ(t).
  The integrating factor is given by μ(t) = e^(∫P(t)dt).
  Integrating P(t) = -4 with respect to t, we get ∫P(t)dt = -4t.
  Therefore, the integrating factor μ(t) = e^(-4t).

Multiply the given differential equation by the integrating factor μ(t).
  We have e^(-4t) * dy/dt + e^(-4t) * (-4y) = e^(-4t) * 2e^3t.

Simplify the equation and integrate both sides.
  The left-hand side simplifies to d/dt (e^(-4t) * y) = 2e^(-t + 3t).
  Integrating both sides, we get e^(-4t) * y = ∫2e^(-t + 3t)dt.
  Simplifying the right-hand side, we have e^(-4t) * y = 2∫e^(2t)dt.
  Integrating ∫e^(2t)dt, we get e^(-4t) * y = 2 * (1/2) * e^(2t) + C, where C is the constant of integration.

Solve for y by isolating it on one side of the equation.
  e^(-4t) * y = e^(2t) + C.
  Multiplying both sides by e^(4t), we have y = e^(6t) + Ce^(4t).

Apply the initial condition y(0) = 5 to find the value of the constant C.
  Substituting t = 0 and y = 5 into the equation, we get 5 = e^0 + Ce^0.
  Simplifying, we have 5 = 1 + C.
  Therefore, C = 5 - 1 = 4.

Substitute the value of C back into the equation for y.
  So, y = e^(6t) + 4e^(4t).

Therefore, the solution to the given initial value problem is y = e^(6t) + 4e^(4t).

To know more about initial value problem, refer to the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/33247383#

#SPJ11

The value of cos(tan^(-1)(4/3) - sin^(-1)(3/5)) is 24/25.

To evaluate the expression cos(tan^(-1)(4/3) - sin^(-1)(3/5)), we can use the sum and difference formulas for trigonometric functions.

Let's start by applying the tangent inverse (tan^(-1)) and sine inverse (sin^(-1)) functions to their respective arguments:

Let angle A = tan^(-1)(4/3) and angle B = sin^(-1)(3/5).

Using the tangent inverse formula, we have:

tan(A) = 4/3

This means that the opposite side of angle A is 4, and the adjacent side is 3. Therefore, the hypotenuse can be found using the Pythagorean theorem:

hypotenuse = sqrt((opposite side)^2 + (adjacent side)^2) = sqrt(4^2 + 3^2) = sqrt(16 + 9) = sqrt(25) = 5

So, the values of the sides of angle A are: opposite = 4, adjacent = 3, hypotenuse = 5.

Similarly, using the sine inverse formula, we have:

sin(B) = 3/5

This means that the opposite side of angle B is 3, and the hypotenuse is 5. The adjacent side can be found using the Pythagorean theorem:

adjacent side = sqrt((hypotenuse)^2 - (opposite side)^2) = sqrt(5^2 - 3^2) = sqrt(25 - 9) = sqrt(16) = 4

So, the values of the sides of angle B are: opposite = 3, adjacent = 4, hypotenuse = 5.

Now, we can apply the sum and difference formulas for cosine (cos) to the given expression:

cos(A - B) = cos(A) * cos(B) + sin(A) * sin(B)

Plugging in the values we obtained for angles A and B:

cos(tan^(-1)(4/3) - sin^(-1)(3/5)) = cos(A - B) = cos(tan^(-1)(4/3)) * cos(sin^(-1)(3/5)) + sin(tan^(-1)(4/3)) * sin(sin^(-1)(3/5))

Using the values of the sides we found earlier, we can evaluate the cosine and sine of angles A and B:

cos(A) = adjacent / hypotenuse = 3 / 5

sin(A) = opposite / hypotenuse = 4 / 5

cos(B) = adjacent / hypotenuse = 4 / 5

sin(B) = opposite / hypotenuse = 3 / 5

Substituting these values into the formula:

cos(tan^(-1)(4/3) - sin^(-1)(3/5)) = (3 / 5) * (4 / 5) + (4 / 5) * (3 / 5)

Evaluating the expression:

cos(tan^(-1)(4/3) - sin^(-1)(3/5)) = (12 / 25) + (12 / 25) = 24 / 25

for such more question on inverse

https://brainly.com/question/15066392

#SPJ8

The smaller number is 10 and the larger number is 12.

Let's assume the smaller number as "x" and the larger number as "y".

According to the given information, we can form two equations:

1) Seven times the smaller number plus nine times the larger number is 178:

7x + 9y = 178

2) Ten times the larger number plus eleven times the smaller number is 230:

11x + 10y = 230

We now have a system of linear equations. We can solve this system using any suitable method, such as substitution or elimination.

Let's use the elimination method to solve the system:

Multiply equation (1) by 10 and equation (2) by 7 to eliminate the variable "y":

70x + 90y = 1780

77x + 70y = 1610

Now, subtract equation (2) from equation (1) to eliminate "x":

70x + 90y - 77x - 70y = 1780 - 1610

-7x + 20y = 170

Simplify:

-7x + 20y = 170

Now, we can solve this equation for either "x" or "y". Let's solve it for "y":

20y = 7x + 170

y = (7/20)x + 8.5

Now, substitute this value of "y" into equation (1):

7x + 9((7/20)x + 8.5) = 178

Simplify and solve for "x":

7x + (63/20)x + 76.5 = 178

140x + 63x + 1530 = 3560

203x = 2030

x = 10

Now, substitute this value of "x" back into equation (1) to find "y":

7(10) + 9y = 178

70 + 9y = 178

9y = 178 - 70

9y = 108

y = 12

Learn more about smaller number here:-

https://brainly.com/question/26100056

#SPJ11

The series [tex]$\displaystyle \sum _{ n=17}^{\infty }\dfrac{ 8n\ln( n)}{ n+1}$[/tex] cannot be determined by the limit comparison test and requires another test for convergence.

The limit comparison test is inconclusive in this case. The limit comparison test is typically used to determine the convergence or divergence of a series by comparing it to a known series. However, in this case, it is not possible to find a known series that can be used for comparison. The series [tex]$\displaystyle \sum _{ n=17}^{\infty }\dfrac{ 8n\ln( n)}{ n+1}$[/tex] does not have a clear pattern or a simple known series to compare it with. Therefore, the limit comparison test cannot provide a definitive conclusion.

To determine the convergence or divergence of the series [tex]$\displaystyle \sum _{ n=17}^{\infty }\dfrac{ 8n\ln( n)}{ n+1}$[/tex], one must employ another convergence test. There are several convergence tests available, such as the integral test, ratio test, or root test, which can be applied to this series to determine its convergence or divergence. It is necessary to explore alternative methods to establish the convergence or divergence of this series since the limit comparison test does not yield a conclusive result.

To learn more about convergence refer:

https://brainly.com/question/30275628

#SPJ11

For the given relation, Reflexive closure is: {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4)}; Symmetric closure is: {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (2, 1), (4, 1), (3, 2)}; and Transitive closure is {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (1, 3), (3, 2), (4, 3), (1, 2), (4, 1), (3, 1), (2, 1), (4, 2), (1, 4), (2, 4), (3, 4)}.

The reflexive closure of a relation is defined as the union of the relation with its diagonal. The diagonal is a set of ordered pairs where the first and second elements are equal. The symmetric closure of a relation is the union of a relation and its inverse. The transitive closure of a relation is the smallest transitive relation that contains the original relation.

For the given relation {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2)} on the set {1,2,3,4}, we can find its reflexive closure, symmetric closure, and transitive closure as follows:

Reflexive closure: We need to add the diagonal elements (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), and (4, 4) to the relation. Therefore, the reflexive closure of the relation is: {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (1, 1), (2, 2), (3, 3), (4, 4)}.

Symmetric closure: We need to add the inverse of each element of the relation to the relation itself. Therefore, the symmetric closure of the relation is: {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (2, 1), (4, 1), (3, 2)}.

Transitive closure: We can construct a directed graph with the given relation and apply the transitive closure algorithm. In the graph, we have vertices 1, 2, 3, and 4 and directed edges from each pair of ordered pairs. In other words, there are directed edges from vertex i to vertex j for all (i, j) in the relation.

The transitive closure algorithm adds an edge from vertex i to vertex j whenever there is a directed path from vertex i to vertex j in the graph. After applying the algorithm, we obtain the transitive closure of the relation: {(1,2), (1, 4), (2, 3), (3, 1), (4, 2), (1, 3), (3, 2), (4, 3), (1, 2), (4, 1), (3, 1), (2, 1), (4, 2), (1, 4), (2, 4), (3, 4)}.

Learn more about Reflexive closure:

https://brainly.com/question/30105700

#SPJ11

Answer:

(4) r = 0.28

Step-by-step explanation:

The correlation coefficient represents the amount of association between two variables,

so, the higher the coefficient, the stronger the association,

and conversely, the lower the coefficient, the weaker the association

in our case, the least amount of association is given by the smallest number of the bunch,

Hence, since r = 0.28 is the smallest number, it shows the least amount of association between two variables

Approximately 20.05% of 11th-grade students failed a standardized test with a passing grade of 1000, based on a normally distributed score distribution.

To find the percentage of students who failed the test, we need to calculate the proportion of students who scored below the passing grade of 1000. We can use the standard normal distribution to solve this problem.
First, we need to standardize the passing grade using the formula:
Z = (x – μ) / σ
Where:
Z = the standardized score
X = the passing grade (1000)
Μ = the mean (1128)
Σ = the standard deviation (154)
Substituting the values:
Z = (1000 – 1128) / 154
Z = -0.837
Now, we can use the z-score to find the percentage of students who scored below the passing grade. We can consult a standard normal distribution table or use a calculator to find this value. Looking up the z-score of -0.837 in the table, we find that the cumulative probability is approximately 0.2005.
This means that approximately 20.05% of students scored below the passing grade of 1000. Therefore, the percentage of students who failed the test is approximately 20.05%.

Learn more about Normal distribution here: brainly.com/question/30390016
#SPJ11

The real fourth root of 10,000/81 is 10/3.

To find all the real fourth roots of the number 10,000/81, we can use the concept of taking the fourth root. The fourth root of a number x is denoted as √√x.

The number 10,000/81 can be expressed as [tex](10,000/81)^(1/4)[/tex], representing the fourth root of 10,000/81.

To simplify this expression, we can rewrite 10,000 as [tex]100^2[/tex] and 81 as [tex]3^4[/tex].

Now, we have [tex]((100^2)/(3^4))^(1/4)[/tex]. Applying the properties of exponents, we can simplify further by taking the fourth root of both the numerator and denominator.

Taking the fourth root of [tex]100^2[/tex] gives us 10, and the fourth root of [tex]3^4[/tex] gives us 3.

To know more about real roots, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/506802

#SPJ11

The length of the minimum spanning tree is 32 units.

To calculate the length of the minimum spanning tree, we need to sum up the values of the edges in the tree.

Given the edge values:

a = 7

b = 9

c = 13

d = 3

To find the length of the minimum spanning tree, we simply add these values together:

Length = a + b + c + d

= 7 + 9 + 13 + 3

= 32

Which means that the length of the minimum spanning tree is 32.

Learn more about spanning trees at.

https://brainly.com/question/29991588

#SPJ4

The length of the minimum spanning tree, considering the given edges, is 32.

To calculate the length of the minimum spanning tree, we need to sum the values of all the edges in the tree. In this case, the given edges have the following values:

a = 7

b = 9

c = 13

d = 3

To find the minimum spanning tree, we need to select the edges that connect all the vertices with the minimum total weight. Assuming these edges are part of the minimum spanning tree, we can add up their values:

7 + 9 + 13 + 3 = 32

Therefore, the length of the minimum spanning tree, considering the given edges, is 32.

Learn more about minimum spanning tree here:

https://brainly.com/question/13148966

#SPJ11

The given statement "If P(t) = 2e^0.15t gives the population in an environment at time t, then P(3) = 2e^0.045" is False.

The given function P(t) = 2e^0.15t provides the population in an environment at time t.

Here, e is Euler's number, which is approximately equal to 2.71828182846.

Now, we need to find the value of P(3)

Population in an environment at time t=3:

P(3) = 2e^0.15×3

      = 2e^0.45

      = 2×1.56997≈ 3.1399 (approx)

Therefore, P(3) = 3.1399 (approx)

To learn more on Euler's number:

https://brainly.com/question/29899184

#SPJ11

Monica went to the market and bought a bunch of red grapes that weighed 1/4 kilogram, another bunch of seedless grapes that weighed 1/2 kilogram, and 3/4 kilogram of loose grapes from both types. The total amount of grapes she bought is 1.5 kilograms.

Monica bought a total of grapes weighing 1/4 kilogram + 1/2 kilogram + 3/4 kilogram. To find the total amount of grapes, we need to add these fractions together.

First, we can convert the fractions to a common denominator. The common denominator for 4, 2, and 4 is 4. So we have:

1/4 kilogram + 2/4 kilogram + 3/4 kilogram

Now, we can add the fractions:

(1 + 2 + 3) / 4 kilogram

The numerator becomes 6, and the denominator remains 4:

6/4 kilogram

We can simplify this fraction by dividing both the numerator and denominator by their greatest common divisor, which is 2:

6/4 kilogram = (6 ÷ 2) / (4 ÷ 2) kilogram = 3/2 kilogram

Therefore, Monica bought a total of 3/2 kilogram of grapes.

In decimal form, 3/2 is equal to 1.5. So, Monica bought 1.5 kilograms of grapes in total.

For more such information on:  total amount

https://brainly.com/question/29766078

#SPJ8

The question probable may be:

Monica went to the market and bought a bunch of red grapes that weighed 1/4 kilogram, another bunch of seedless grapes that weighed 1/2 kilogram, and 3/4 kilogram of loose grapes from both types. What is the total amount of grapes she bought?

Answer:

ST = 108km

Step-by-step explanation:

In ΔPQR and ΔTSR,

∠PRQ = ∠TRS (vertically opposite)

∠PQR = ∠TSR (alternate interior)

∠QPR = ∠ STR (alternate interior)

Since all the angles are equal,

ΔPQR and ΔTSR are similar

Therefore, their corresponding sides have the same ratio

[tex]\implies \frac{ST}{PQ} = \frac{RT}{PR}\\ \\\implies \frac{ST}{48} = \frac{81}{36}\\\\\implies ST = \frac{81*48}{36}[/tex]

⇒ ST = 108km

To compute the determinants of the matrices A₁, A₂, A₃, A₄, and As, obtained from Ao by the given operations, we will apply the determinant properties: the determinants of the matrices are:

det(A₁) = 6

det(A₂) = 2

det(A₃) = 4

det(A₄) = -2

det(As) = 54

Determinant of A₁: A₁ is obtained from Ao by multiplying the fourth row of Ao by the number 3. This operation scales the determinant by 3, so det(A₁) = 3 * det(Ao) = 3 * 2 = 6.

Determinant of A₂: A₂ is obtained from Ao by replacing the second row by the sum of itself plus 4 times the third row. This operation does not affect the determinant, so det(A₂) = det(Ao) = 2.

Determinant of A₃: A₃ is obtained from Ao by multiplying Ao by itself. This operation squares the determinant, so det(A₃) = (det(Ao))² = 2² = 4.

Determinant of A₄: A₄ is obtained from Ao by swapping the first and last rows of Ao. This operation changes the sign of the determinant, so det(A₄) = -det(Ao) = -2.

Determinant of As:

As is obtained from Ao by scaling Ao by the number 3. This operation scales the determinant by the cube of 3, so det(As) = (3³) * det(Ao) = 27 * 2 = 54.

Therefore, the determinants of the matrices are:

det(A₁) = 6

det(A₂) = 2

det(A₃) = 4

det(A₄) = -2

det(As) = 54

Learn more about matrices here

https://brainly.com/question/2456804

#SPJ11