Answer:
Let me know if this helps:
Should the discoverer of sunken treasure have the right to keep it?
The discovery of sunken treasure is a fascinating event that has captured the imagination of people for centuries. However, there is a great deal of debate about who should have the right to keep the treasure once it is found. Some people believe that the discoverer should be allowed to keep the treasure, while others believe that the treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found.
There are several arguments in favor of allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the discoverer often takes great risks and invests a lot of time and money in finding the treasure. It is only fair that they should be rewarded for their efforts. Second, the discoverer may be the only person who knows where the treasure is located. If they are not allowed to keep the treasure, it may never be found. Third, the discoverer may be able to use the treasure to fund further exploration and research. This could lead to the discovery of even more treasure.
However, there are also several arguments against allowing the discoverer to keep the treasure. First, the treasure may have been lost for centuries. It is possible that the original owners of the treasure are long since dead. In this case, it is not clear who the treasure actually belongs to. Second, the treasure may be of great historical or cultural significance. If it is sold to a private collector, it may be lost to the public forever. Third, the treasure may be located in a sensitive or environmentally sensitive area. If it is excavated, it could damage the environment.
In my opinion, the discoverer of sunken treasure should not have the right to keep it. The treasure should be returned to the country or state in which it was found. This is the fairest and most equitable solution. It ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public. It also ensures that the treasure is not used to fund further exploration and research that could damage the environment.
In conclusion, there are strong arguments on both sides of the debate about who should have the right to keep sunken treasure. However, I believe that the most fair and equitable solution is to return the treasure to the country or state in which it was found. This ensures that the treasure is preserved for future generations and that it is not lost to the public.
Explanation:
An adage is an old, familiar saying that conveys a basic truth.
Highlight the sentence in the paragraph that contains an adage
Answer:
two wrongs don't make a right.
Answer:
two wrongs don't make a right.
Explanation:
hope its help
who dies in the outsiders :(
Answer:
Johnny Cade dies after being severely burned in a church fire, and Dally, a member of the Greasers, is shot by police.
Explanation:
20 POINTS HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSS
What is the purpose of stage productions written by playwrights?
Responses
to have an audience listen to a performance
to have an audience watch actors perform within the same room
to have an audience engage in a drama through text
to have an audience watch a filmed version of a performance
Playwriting is about storytelling—creating a world and characters from scratch and capturing listeners with their story—but it's also about live performance; in fact, it's this critical element that separates playwrights from novelists or screenwriters.
Answer: I don't know, i'm just hear for the points.
Explanation:
i need help ASAP..!...
The saying "cross that bridge when you come to it" implies one should only deal with a problem when and if it arises.
Hope this helps! Have a good day. :)Your friend offers you an opportunity to make a great deal of money very quickly. He has arranged to set up an off-shore account for your profits. He will not tell you exactly how he is making this money, but you get the impression it is not exactly legal. He only wants an investment of $500 and promises you will have enough from your minimal investment that you will never need to work again. What do you do?
300 words max
Answer: Demand to know the details before getting involved
explanation: Offshore accounts are not illegal - at least by most countries' laws. However, you have to be careful with what you invest your money in. Investments with high returns are usually too good to be true because these are usually Ponzi schemes or some other scam. It never hurts to ask a few questions before giving your money.
Explanation:
From the impression of your friend, we can easily acknowledge that it is not something legal, which means your friend's actions basically is illegal. However, first off, if you agree to invest 500 dollars for him, you should not accept; instead, decline. Why? It is so obvious! You don't even know what he's actually going to do! We must remember consequences will always come back to us. Since it's illegal, you may be punished in the future. So to conclude, we should decline his offer.
20 POINTS HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS PLS PLS PLS
Answer:
The first one
Explanation:
PLSSSSSS HELP PLS PLS PLS PLS 30 POINTS
Which sentence states a theme of “The Red-Headed League” and belongs in a summary of the story?
Drag the correct answer into the box.
Answer: when Mr Wilson loses this job with the red headed league, it shows that failure is always a possibility.
Explanation:
Who said this,
" When one door closes, another opens; but we often look so long and so regretfully upon the closed door that we do not see the one which has opened for us. "
The following claim is made in an argumentative essay:
Teens should be educated on proper social media behavior.
Which of the following would be considered ineffective evidence to support this claim?
Facts from a documentary about how social media began
Examples of teens who have been victims of oversharing on social media
Statistics showing the number of teens who use social media
Data showing the number of incoming freshmen that were denied entry to a college or university because of past social media posts
Answer:
The answer is facts from a documentary about how social media began.
Explanation:
The other options are all effective evidence to support the claim that teens should be educated on proper social media behavior. Examples of teens who have been victims of oversharing on social media, statistics showing the number of teens who use social media, and data showing the number of incoming freshmen that were denied entry to a college or university because of past social media posts all provide concrete evidence of the potential negative consequences of social media use. Facts from a documentary about how social media began, on the other hand, do not provide any specific evidence of the negative consequences of social media use. They simply provide information about the history of social media.
Here is a more detailed explanation of why each option is effective or ineffective evidence:
Examples of teens who have been victims of oversharing on social media are effective evidence because they provide specific examples of the negative consequences of social media use. These examples can help to illustrate the risks of oversharing on social media and can encourage teens to be more careful about what they share online.
Statistics showing the number of teens who use social media are effective evidence because they provide quantitative data on the prevalence of social media use among teens. This data can help to raise awareness of the issue and can encourage parents and educators to take steps to educate teens about proper social media behavior.
Data showing the number of incoming freshmen that were denied entry to a college or university because of past social media posts are effective evidence because they provide concrete evidence of the potential negative consequences of social media use. This data can help to illustrate the risks of posting inappropriate content online and can encourage teens to be more careful about what they post.
Facts from a documentary about how social media began are ineffective evidence because they do not provide any specific evidence of the negative consequences of social media use. They simply provide information about the history of social media. This information is interesting, but it does not provide any concrete evidence to support the claim that teens should be educated on proper social media behavior.
HELPPPPPPP PLSSSSSSSS
I'm SOOOO sorry if this is incorrect (I do not have the materials), but I would guess the last one (based on summaries)
What is a counter claim to video games improve critical thinking
They help them become better for the real world by using strategies, working together in teams, and communicating which are essential skills used nowadays in today's world, by applying for a job in the 21st century.
Critical thinking, Communication, Problem-solving, Leadership, Creativity, Etc.
Write an announcement for a new fitness club at your school (Please help ASAP)
Write about: where you meet, when you meet, what you do, how to get more information.
Answer:
Sure, here is an announcement for a new fitness club at your school:
Attention students!
Are you looking for a fun and supportive way to get fit? If so, then you're in luck! The new fitness club is now open!
We meet every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 3:00-4:00 PM in the school gym. We offer a variety of activities, including:
Zumba
Yoga
Pilates
Weight training
Cardio
We also have a personal trainer who can help you create a fitness plan that's right for you.
Membership is free for all students. To get more information, please come to our first meeting or contact us at [email protected]
We hope to see you there!
Explanation:
What is a counterclaim to video games improve coordination?
Answer:
Although it may help in certain areas of the mind and body it is also harming the vision of the person. Being in front of a screen for long periods of time can easily damage your eye-sight. As stated in East West Eye Institution, "...excessive video game use can cause eye discomfort, focusing problems, blurry vision and headaches." Which in the long run will not be very favorable. Although it is nice to take a break from the real world many people today have a "addiction" to video games. This may lead to poor social skills, unrealistic expectations, poor sleep schedule, and aggression to name a few. The list just goes on... yes video games improve coordination but is it really worth all the risks?
Explanation:
(I got u <3)
Answer:
A counterclaim to the claim that video games improve coordination is that video games can actually worsen coordination. This is because video games can be very sedentary, and they can lead to people becoming less active in general. Additionally, some video games require players to use very repetitive movements, which can actually make it more difficult for them to perform more complex tasks that require a variety of movements.
Here are some specific examples of how video games can worsen coordination:
Sedentary lifestyle: Video games can be very sedentary, and they can lead to people becoming less active in general. This is because video games require people to sit or stand in one place for long periods of time. This lack of physical activity can lead to a decrease in muscle mass and strength, which can make it more difficult for people to perform coordinated movements.
Repetitive movements: Some video games require players to use very repetitive movements. This can actually make it more difficult for them to perform more complex tasks that require a variety of movements. For example, a video game that requires players to constantly click the mouse can make it more difficult for them to perform tasks that require them to use their hands in a variety of ways, such as playing a musical instrument or writing.
It is important to note that not all video games are created equal. Some video games, such as those that involve sports or physical activity, can actually improve coordination. However, it is important to choose video games that are appropriate for your age and fitness level, and to make sure that you are not spending too much time playing video games.
Explanation:
Which of the following formats would benefit from the use of multiple narrators?
A novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school
A poem that discusses the beauty of nature
An article about the discovery of a new species of turtle
An autobiography of a famous inventor
Answer:
The format that would benefit most from the use of multiple narrators is a novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school.
Explanation:
This is because the novel would be able to explore the experiences of each friend from their own unique perspective. This would allow the reader to get a more well-rounded view of the story and to better understand the characters.
The other formats would not benefit as much from the use of multiple narrators. A poem about the beauty of nature would be better served by a single narrator who can use their own personal voice to express their love of nature. An article about the discovery of a new species of turtle would be better served by a single narrator who can provide a clear and concise overview of the discovery. An autobiography of a famous inventor would be better served by a single narrator who can share their own personal story of how they came to be an inventor.
Here are some specific examples of how multiple narrators could be used in a novel about three friends' experiences at boarding school:
One narrator could be the oldest friend, who is trying to navigate the challenges of being a new student at boarding school.
Another narrator could be the middle friend, who is trying to find her place in the school and make new friends.
The third narrator could be the youngest friend, who is trying to adjust to being away from home for the first time.
By using multiple narrators, the novel would be able to explore the experiences of each friend from their own unique perspective. This would allow the reader to get a more well-rounded view of the story and to better understand the characters.
25 POINTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Answer: It is either the second or third one. I am more towards the third one in my opinion, but I am not so sure about it.
Explanation: