Distance from P = 2.5 miles
To minimize the total construction costs, the distance from P to Q should be 2.5 miles south of P.
To understand why the distance from P to Q should be 2.5 miles south of P, let's analyze the cost implications. The cost of laying pipe underwater is 1.8 times the cost of laying pipe on land. Considering that it costs one dollar per mile to lay pipe on land, it would cost 1.8 dollars per mile to lay pipe underwater.
If Q is located north of P, the pipeline would have to be laid more on land, resulting in lower costs. However, if Q is located south of P, the pipeline would have to be laid more underwater, resulting in higher costs.
Let's consider the extreme case where Q is located at the water source, 10 miles south of P. In this scenario, the entire pipeline would be underwater, resulting in the highest possible cost.
On the other hand, if Q is located at P, the entire pipeline would be on land, resulting in the lowest possible cost.
To find the optimal point, we need to determine the balance between the cost of laying pipe on land and underwater. Since the cost ratio is 1:1.8, we can conclude that Q should be located approximately (1.8/2.8) = 0.64 times the distance from P to the water source.
Therefore, the distance from P to Q should be (0.64 * 10) = 6.4 miles south of P, which can be rounded to 2.5 miles.
Learn more about construction costs
brainly.com/question/32995037
#SPJ11