1. Classify the type of linear correlation you might expect with each pair of variables. 3K
a) hours of lacrosse practice, goals scored in a lacrosse game
b) students' average marks, the numbers of siblings in their families
c) distances from students' homes to their schools, the time they spend on the school bus each day

Answer:52.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Multiply

The company should use the adjusted R² approach to select variables for their recommendation system, as it will better account for the influence of multiple variables and help create a more accurate model for predicting subscriber's movie ratings.

To build a successful movie recommendation system for the online media streaming company, it's important to consider the appropriate statistical approach for selecting variables.

In this case, the company should use the adjusted R² approach instead of the p-value approach.

The adjusted R² approach is more suitable for this scenario because it measures the proportion of variance in the dependent variable (subscriber's ratings) that is predictable from the independent variables (movie and subscriber data).

Adjusted R² takes into account the number of variables and adjusts for overfitting, which is important when dealing with a large dataset, like the one the streaming company has.

It helps in identifying the most influential factors and creating a model that better predicts movie ratings.
On the other hand, the p-value approach focuses on the statistical significance of individual variables, which might lead to including variables that are significant but not necessarily the best predictors for movie ratings.

This could result in a less accurate recommendation system.

For similar question on proportion.

https://brainly.com/question/11941144

#SPJ11

When a researcher uses the Pearson product-moment correlation, two highly correlated variables will appear on a scatter diagram as a tightly clustered group of points that form a linear pattern.

The scatter diagram is a visual representation of the correlation between two variables, where one variable is plotted on the x-axis, and the other variable is plotted on the y-axis. If the two variables have a high positive correlation, then the points on the scatter diagram will form a cluster that slopes upwards to the right.

On the other hand, if the two variables have a high negative correlation, then the points will form a cluster that slopes downwards to the right. The tighter the cluster of points, the higher the correlation between the variables.

Learn more about scatter diagram

https://brainly.com/question/30243607

#SPJ4

The product of two terms gives the walkway's area around the garden: 15x+13.5.

A rectangle is a four-sided polygon with two pairs of parallel and congruent sides, and four right angles. The opposite sides of a rectangle are equal in length and parallel to each other, while the adjacent sides are perpendicular to each other.

Area of garden = 4(4.5x + 3.5) = 18x+14

The combined area of the garden and the walkway = 5.5​(6x+5​) =33x+27.5

The area of the walkway (Aw) around the garden is the result of subtracting the total area minus the inner area:

Aw=combined area -Area of garden

=33x+27.5-18x-14

=15x+13.5

Thus, we can say that the area of the walkway around the garden is the sum of two terms: 15x+13.5.

To know more about perpendicular, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29268451

#SPJ1

The reasonableness of the estimate depends on the quality and reliability of the data sources and methodology used to arrive at the estimate.

In order to determine whether 12% is a reasonable estimate of the proportion of all Americans who eat chocolate

frequently, we would need to define what is meant by "frequently."

If we define "frequently" as "at least once a week," then 12% may or may not be a reasonable estimate, depending on

the data source and methodology used to arrive at that estimate.

For example, if the estimate is based on a small sample size or a non-representative sample of the population, then it

may not be a reliable estimate of the true proportion of Americans who eat chocolate frequently. Additionally, if the

estimate is several years old, it may not accurately reflect current trends and habits.

On the other hand, if the estimate is based on a large, nationally representative sample of the population, and is

relatively recent, then 12% could be a reasonable estimate of the proportion of Americans who eat chocolate

frequently.

for such more question on frequently

https://brainly.com/question/29985480

#SPJ11

Answer:

The y-intercept is at (0, 8).

Answer: (0,8)

Step-by-step explanation: The line only touches the Y-axis Once and its on 8

The two column proof is written as follows

Statement                                                           Reason

MA = XR                                           given (opposite sides of rectangle)

MK = AR                                           given (opposite sides of rectangle)

arc MA = arc RK                               Equal chords have equal arcs

arc MK = arc AK                               Equal chords have equal arcs

An arc is a portion of the circumference of a circle, and a chord is a line segment that connects two points on the circumference.

If two chords in a circle are equal in length, then they will cut off equal arcs on the circumference. This is because the arcs that the chords cut off are subtended by the same central angle.

Learn more on circle theorem at:

https://brainly.com/question/6240879

#SPJ1

Answer: 3 pieces

Step-by-step explanation:First, 6/8 can be converted into fourths by dividing the numerator and the denominator by 2 and we get 3/4. if we want 1/4 slices we divide 3/4 by 1/4 and get 3.

Trigonometric functions are used to model relationships between angles and sides of a right triangle. They are particularly useful in solving problems that involve angles, distances, heights, and lengths that are difficult to measure directly.

For example, consider a problem that involves finding the height of a building. By measuring the length of the shadow cast by the building at a particular time of day, the angle of the sun's rays can be calculated using trigonometry. Once the angle is known, the height of the building can be determined using the tangent function.

In contrast, a non-trigonometric function may not be able to model the relationship between the given quantities in such problems, and may not provide an accurate solution. Therefore, when a problem involves angles or distances that are not directly measurable, trigonometric functions are typically the best tool for setting up and solving the problem.

To know more about trigonometric functions

https://brainly.com/question/6904750

#SPJ4

Since cosine is negative and a is in quadrant III, we know that sine is positive. We can use the Pythagorean identity to solve for sine:

sin^2(a) + cos^2(a) = 1

sin^2(a) + (-5/9)^2 = 1

sin^2(a) = 1 - (-5/9)^2

sin^2(a) = 1 - 25/81

sin^2(a) = 56/81

Taking the square root of both sides:

sin(a) = ±sqrt(56/81)

Since a is in quadrant III, sin(a) is positive. Therefore:

sin(a) = sqrt(56/81) = (2/3)sqrt(14)

The answers are:

a) 2 cakes cost £5

b) 1 cake costs £2.5.

What is an algebraic expression?

An algebraic expression is a mathematical phrase that contains variables, constants, and mathematical operations. It may also include exponents and/or roots. Algebraic expressions are used to represent quantities and relationships between quantities in mathematical situations, often in the context of problem-solving.

To find the cost of 1 cupcake, we need to subtract the cost of the tea from the total cost of 3 cupcakes:

3 cupcakes + 1 tea = £9

3 cupcakes = £9 - 1 tea = £9 - £1.5 (assuming the cost of 1 tea is the same in both cases) = £7.5

1 cupcake = £7.5 ÷ 3 = £2.5

So 2 cupcakes would cost:

2 cupcakes = 2 × £2.5 = £5

Therefore, the answers are:

a) 2 cakes cost £5

b) 1 cake costs £2.5.

To learn more about algebraic expression from given link:

https://brainly.com/question/19245500

#SPJ1

Answer: To find the average rate of change of the function f(x) over the interval [9, 65], we can use the formula:

average rate of change = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a)

where a = 9, b = 65, f(a) = f(9) = 3√8 + 2, and f(b) = f(65) = 3√64 + 2.

Plugging in these values, we get:

average rate of change = (f(65) - f(9)) / (65 - 9)

average rate of change = (3√64 + 2 - 3√8 - 2) / 56

average rate of change = (3(4) + 2 - 3(2) - 2) / 56

average rate of change = (12 - 4) / 56

average rate of change = 8 / 56

average rate of change = 1 / 7

Therefore, the average rate of change of the function f(x) over the interval [9, 65] is 1/7.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: To find the average rate of change of the function f(x) over the interval [9, 65], we can use the formula:

average rate of change = (f(b) - f(a)) / (b - a)

where a = 9, b = 65, f(a) = f(9) = 3√8 + 2, and f(b) = f(65) = 3√64 + 2.

Plugging in these values, we get:

average rate of change = (f(65) - f(9)) / (65 - 9)

average rate of change = (3√64 + 2 - 3√8 - 2) / 56

average rate of change = (3(4) + 2 - 3(2) - 2) / 56

average rate of change = (12 - 4) / 56

average rate of change = 8 / 56

average rate of change = 1 / 7

Therefore, the average rate of change of the function f(x) over the interval [9, 65] is 1/7.

The correct statement about scale factor is the radius of the larger can will be 8 inches. (option c).

Let's first consider the dimensions of the small can of tomato paste. We are given that it has a radius of 2 inches and a height of 4 inches. Therefore, its volume can be calculated using the formula for the volume of a cylinder, which is V = πr²h, where V is the volume, r is the radius, and h is the height. Substituting the given values, we get:

V_small = π(2²)(4) = 16π cubic inches

Using these dimensions, we can calculate the volume of the larger can using the same formula:

V_large = π(6²)(12) = 432π cubic inches

Now, let's compare the volumes of the small and large cans. We have:

V_large = 432π cubic inches > 16π cubic inches = V_small

Therefore, we can conclude that the volume of the larger can is greater than the volume of the smaller can. But is it three times greater? Let's compare:

V_large = 432π cubic inches 3

V_small = 3(16π) cubic inches = 48π cubic inches

We see that 432π cubic inches is not equal to 48π cubic inches, so option b) is not correct.

Finally, let's consider the radius of the larger can. We found earlier that it is 6 inches, which is greater than the radius of the smaller can, but it is not 8 inches. Therefore, option c) is correct.

To know more about scale factor here

https://brainly.com/question/30215119

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

A small can of tomato paste has a radius of 2 inches and a height of 4 inches. Suppose the larger, commercial-size can has dimensions that are related by a scale factor of 3. Which of these true?

a) The radius of the larger can will be 5 inches.

b) The volume of the larger can will be 3 times the volume of the smaller can

c) The radius of the larger can will be 8 inches.

d) The volume of the larger can is 3 times the volume of smaller can

Becca made a mistake while constructing triangle DEF by using the angles 50°, 65°, and 65°. The mistake she made was violating the triangle inequality theorem.

According to the theorem, the sum of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the third side. In other words, if we add the lengths of two sides of a triangle, it must be greater than the length of the third side.

Since Becca only used angles to construct the triangle, she did not consider the side lengths of the triangle. Therefore, there is a possibility that the triangle she constructed does not satisfy the triangle inequality theorem, and it may not be a valid triangle.

In order to ensure the triangle is valid, Becca needs to consider the side lengths while constructing the triangle. She could use trigonometric ratios or a ruler and protractor to measure the side lengths and angles accurately.

To know more about triangle inequality theorem here

https://brainly.com/question/1163433

#SPJ4

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary method comes out to be during the 4-second period, the tram's elevation changed by 3 metres every second.

To complete the assignment, use the iii . -and-true basic technique, the real variables, and any pertinent details gathered from basic and specialised questions. In response, customers might be given another opportunity to sample expression the products. If these changes don't take place, we will miss out on important gains in our knowledge of programmes.

Here,

By dividing the overall elevation change (12 metres) by the total time required (4 seconds),

it is possible to determine the change in the tram's elevation every second. We would then have the average rate of elevation change per second.

=> Elevation change equals 12 metres

=> Total duration: 4 seconds

=>  12 meters / 4 seconds

=> 3 meters/second

As a result, during the 4-second period, the tram's elevation changed by 3 metres every second.

To know more about unitary method  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1  

Answer:

The comparison that is not correct is:

C. -8 > -6

This is not correct because -8 is actually less than -6. Therefore, the correct comparison would be -8 < -6.

The other comparisons are correct:

A. 1 > -9 (true, because 1 is greater than -9)

B. 3 < 6 (true, because 3 is less than 6)

D. -3 < 4 (true, because -3 is less than 4)

(1) m∠1=45°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

(2) m∠1=180°-129°=51°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(3) m∠1= 152°-115°=37°

(4) m∠1=88°m∠2=42° m∠3=113°

An angle is a geometric figure formed by two rays that share a common endpoint, called the vertex. The measure of an angle is typically expressed in degrees or radians, and it describes the amount of rotation needed to bring one of the rays into coincidence with the other.

A triangle is a closed two-dimensional shape with three straight sides and three angles.

(1) m∠1=45°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

(2) m∠1=180°-129°=51°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(3) m∠1= 152°-115°=37°(sum of two interior angles on the same side is equal to the exterior angle)

(4) m∠1=88°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°),m∠2=42°(vertically opposite angle theorem), m∠3=113°(sum of 3 angles of a triangle is always 180°)

Learn more about angles here:

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ1

The value of x for the intersecting chords is derived to be 1.9 and the segment FS is equal to 18

The property of intersecting chords states that in a circle, if two chords intersect, the product of the lengths of the segments of one chord is equal to the product of the lengths of the segments of the other chord.

UF × FS = VF × FT

8(10x - 1) = 9 × 16

80x - 8 = 144

80x = 144 + 8 {collect like terms}

80x = 152

x = 152/80 {divide through by 80}

x = 1.9

FS = 10(1.9) - 1 = 18

Therefore, the value of x for the intersecting chords is derived to be 1.9 and the segment FS is equal to 18

Read more about intersecting chords here:https://brainly.com/question/13950364

#SPJ1

Translate the solid circle 2 units to the left and 2 units down and dilate the solid circle by a scale factor of 2. and the circles are similar

(a) To move the solid circle exactly onto the dashed circle, we need to perform the following transformations:

Therefore, the blank spaces should be filled as follows:

Translate the solid circle 2 units to the left and 2 units down.

Dilate the solid circle by a scale factor of 2.

(b) Yes, the original solid circle and the dashed circle are not similar, because they have different radii.

This is because all circles are similar

Read more about transformation at

https://brainly.com/question/27224272

#SPJ1

The action that would reduce the amount the person paid in taxes to 1,000 is option (D) Receiving a $49,000 tax credit

In this scenario, the person has $50,000 in taxable income and pays a 10% income tax rate, which amounts to $5,000 in taxes. To reduce the tax liability to $1,000, the person needs to receive a tax credit of $49,000. Tax credits directly reduce the amount of tax owed, whereas tax deductions reduce taxable income.

A tax deduction of $4,000 would lower the taxable income to $46,000, resulting in a lower tax liability of $4,600, which is not low enough to reach $1,000. Therefore, a tax credit of $49,000 is needed to reduce the tax liability to $1,000.

Therefore, the correct option is (D) Receiving a $49,000 tax credit

Learn more about tax credit here

brainly.com/question/30565676

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:

A person has $50,000 in taxable income for a year and pays a 10 percent income tax rate, equal to $5,000. Which action would reduce the amount the person paid in taxes to $1,000?

A.Receiving a $4,000 tax deduction

B.Receiving a $4,000 tax credit

C. Receiving a $49,000 tax deduction

D. Receiving a $49,000 tax credit

Para entender mejor esta función, podemos expandirla y simplificarla:

f(x) = (x+2)(-x+6)

f(x) = [tex]-x^2 + 4x + 12[/tex]

Esta es una función cuadrática, lo que significa que tiene la forma de una parábola. El término cuadrático ([tex]-x^2[/tex]) hace que la parábola tenga una concavidad hacia abajo, lo que significa que el valor máximo de la función se encuentra en el vértice de la parábola.

Podemos encontrar el valor del precio de venta que maximiza la ganancia utilizando la fórmula x = -b/(2a), donde "a" es el coeficiente del término cuadrático y "b" es el coeficiente del término lineal.

En este caso, a = -1 y b = 4, por lo que:

x = -4/(2-1)

x = -4/-2

x = 2

Por lo tanto, el precio de venta que maximiza la ganancia es de 2 por unidad. Si se venden las unidades a este precio, la ganancia total sería de:

f(2) = [tex]-2^2 + 4(2) + 12[/tex]

f(2) = -4 + 8 + 12

f(2) = 16 dólares

Es importante tener en cuenta que la función f(x) también puede ser utilizada para calcular la ganancia total para cualquier precio de venta "x". Por ejemplo, si se venden las unidades a 3 por unidad, la ganancia sería:

f(3) = [tex]-3^2 + 4(3) + 12[/tex]

f(3) = -9 + 12 + 12

f(3) = 15 dólares

for such more question on mejor esta

https://brainly.com/question/1030576

#SPJ11

The current in the circuit when the resistance is 12 ohms is 40 amps.

What is fraction?

A fraction is a mathematical term that represents a part of a whole or a ratio between two quantities.

We can use the inverse proportionality formula to solve this problem, which states that:

current (in amps) x resistance (in ohms) = constant

Let's call this constant "k". We can use the information given in the problem to find k:

24 amps x 20 ohms = k

k = 480

Now we can use this constant to find the current when the resistance is 12 ohms:

current x 12 ohms = 480

current = 480 / 12

current = 40 amps

Therefore, the current in the circuit when the resistance is 12 ohms is 40 amps.

To learn more about fraction from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/10354322

#SPJ1

Answer:

The Correct answer is sinA/3.2=sin110°/4.6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

If the solutions are x = -3 and x = -1, then (x - 3) (x - 1) will give us our answer. Using the FOIL method,

(x - 3) (x - 1)

x^2 - x - 3x + 3

x^3 - 4x + 3 = 0

Your answer is 3

Even though the first student scored 150, the expected average IQ score for the remaining four students is still 100.

Explain average

The average is a statistical measure that represents the central tendency of a set of values. It is calculated by adding up all the values and dividing them by the total number of values. The average provides a single value that represents the typical value in the set and is often used to compare different sets of data or to summarize large amounts of data.

According to the given information

Let X be the random variable representing the IQ score of an individual student. Then, the sample mean of the five students, denoted by Y, can be expressed as:

Y = (X1 + X2 + X3 + X4 + X5) / 5

Given that the first student scored 150, the expected value of the sample mean of the remaining four students, denoted by E(Y|X1=150), can be calculated as follows:

E(Y|X1=150) = E((X2 + X3 + X4 + X5) / 4 | X1 = 150)

Since X1 = 150 is an observed value, we can treat it as a constant and apply the linearity of expectation:

E((X2 + X3 + X4 + X5) / 4 | X1 = 150) = (E(X2 | X1 = 150) + E(X3 | X1 = 150) + E(X4 | X1 = 150) + E(X5 | X1 = 150)) / 4

Now, since the sample is random, the remaining four IQ scores are also independent and identically distributed as X, with the same mean of 100. Therefore, we have:

E(X2 | X1 = 150) = E(X3 | X1 = 150) = E(X4 | X1 = 150) = E(X5 | X1 = 150) = E(X)

Thus, we can simplify the expression as:

E(Y|X1=150) = (4E(X) / 4) = E(X) = 100

To know more about average visit

brainly.com/question/27193544

#SPJ1

Answer:

1

Step-by-step explanation:

First of all we use the "law of sines"

to get the measure/length we need the opposing angle of it of the side, now in this case the missing side is x

and its opposing angle is missing so using common sense, the sum of angles in the triangle is 180°

180°=70°+51°+ x

x = 180°-121°

=59°

Using law of sines:

(sides are represented by small letters/capital letters are the angles)

a/sinA= b/sinB= c/sinC

We have one given side which is "9"

so,

9/sin70= x/sin59

doing the criss-cross method,

9×sin59=sin70×x

9×sin59/sin70=x

x=8.2 (answer 1)

I hope this was helpful <3

Answer:

The formula for the area of a trapezoid is:

Area = (b1 + b2) / 2 x h

where b1 and b2 are the lengths of the two parallel bases, and h is the height.

We are given that the area of the trapezoid is 96 ft, the height is 8 ft, and one of the bases (b1) is 11 ft. We can use this information to find the length of the other base (b2).

Substituting the given values into the formula for the area of a trapezoid, we get:

96 = (11 + b2) / 2 x 8

Multiplying both sides by 2 and dividing by 8, we get:

24 = 11 + b2

Subtracting 11 from both sides, we get:

b2 = 13

Therefore, the length of the other base is 13 ft.

The total amount of money received by each child after splitting $9 among 15 children is equal to $0.60.

Total number of children is equal to 15

Total amount of money distributed among 15 children = $9

To find out how much each child receives,

We can divide the total amount of money by the number of children.

In this case, there are 15 children and $9 to split.

So, the amount of money each child receives is equal to,

(Total amount of money )/ ( total number of children )

= $9 ÷ 15

= $0.60

Therefore, amount of money received by each child in the group of 15 children is equal to $0.60.

Learn more about children here

brainly.com/question/159555

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

its a rectanlge